PBS Tackles CTE

Submitted by Balrog_of_Morgoth on

PBS published an article yesterday that summarizes the findings of a recent CTE study. Add this to the growing pile of evidence:

A total of 87 out of 91 former NFL players have tested positive for the brain disease at the center of the debate over concussions in football, according to new figures from the nation’s largest brain bank focused on the study of traumatic head injury.

Researchers with the Department of Veterans Affairs and Boston University have now identified the degenerative disease known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, in 96 percent of NFL players that they’ve examined and in 79 percent of all football players. The disease is widely believed to stem from repetitive trauma to the head, and can lead to conditions such as memory loss, depression and dementia.

In total, the lab has found CTE in the brain tissue in 131 out of 165 individuals who, before their deaths, played football either professionally, semi-professionally, in college or in high school.

Here is a link to the full article:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sports/concussion-watch/new-87-deceased-nfl-players-test-positive-for-brain-disease/.

PeterKlima

September 19th, 2015 at 8:22 AM ^

I never accused the researchers of having an agenda. Some do, but I don't know about any for this study. The agenda I was referring to was by PBS touting this study. The media's agenda is to be interesting/newsworthy/sensational. Focusing on the potential problems with a major sport (without a fuller picture) does that. PBS is better than most media, but there are still agendas that come out.

There are PLENTY of researchers who say we just don't know enough about CTEs in the general population to draw any conclusions. This study is not groundbreaking because most studies link it to repetitive head collisions as one potential cause. I think, however, that even the scientists who did this study would advise against drawing a conclusions that it means football is uniquely dangerous compared to bicycling, soccer, wrestling, skiing, etc.

I have no problem with this study, only the idea that it gets dragged out as newsworthy when most in the scientific community would likely say "woah ..., hold on there." (Of course some scientists like publicity too though.)



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Ronnie Kaye

September 19th, 2015 at 8:32 AM ^

PBS is non-profit. Painting them with the same brush as sensationlist corporate media is wrong. Sorry, but CTE being found in 87 of 91 deceased brains is quite newsworthy.

You are more than welcome to prove to me that "most" of the scientific community has pause about saying that CTE is far more common in football players than the general population.

 

 

caliblue

September 19th, 2015 at 7:10 PM ^

Do tell. However it does have a history of covering stories in detail, especially those that the mainstream media will not or do not cover. Plus they do their due diigence and fact finding prior to releasing a story like this. The mainstream media will release a story without full fact finding if they think their competition will beat them to it.

taistreetsmyhero

September 19th, 2015 at 8:31 AM ^

is that you can negligently exaggerate the knowledge-base that science has on an issue in the exact same way that you can negligently ignore the knowledge-base that science has on an issue. In this case, there is wayyyyy too little known about the mechanism, extent, and scope of the problem to make any sort of informed decisions on changes to rules, equipment, etc. You can make "educated guesses," but those are based off of common sense, not some scientific foundation.

coldnjl

September 19th, 2015 at 10:16 AM ^

True, but not knowing the means doesn't eliminate findings that illuminate the ends. Scientific discovery works in both ways. As of know, the scientific community can say that the evidence points to a heavy correlation between football (via repetitive OR single violent head trauma) and tau build-up/brain wasting. The numbers do point to a degree of causation, but that link isn't known and more research needs to be done.

It is important to remember that CTE can only be diagnosed post-humously. These post-mortem studies point only to tau build-up/brain wasting and not a connection to cognitive defunction (which is assumed). This work needs to be done in living brains, which is challenging by the lack of safe techniquest to illuminate tau deposition and brain wasting.

jmdblue

September 19th, 2015 at 8:35 AM ^

Side here, but if we left "trite" and "moron" out of it the discussion may have worked better.  As for "wrong side of history"?   I know in the 80's it was nothing to throw around the term "faggot".  I was wrong.  Rather than bitch about PCness, people should actually consider their positions.

Sac Fly

September 19th, 2015 at 9:05 AM ^

This discussion has taken place in every CTE thread on this board.

Peter Klima thinks that brain trauma in sports is only caused by concussions; he ignores anything that has to do with sub-concussive hits and goes on about how other sports are just as dangerous because of concussions, ad he'll be back in the next thread saying the same thing. Don't waste your breath trying to argue.

Ronnie Kaye

September 19th, 2015 at 11:15 AM ^

I hear you. But the problem is that because this is a forum of football fans, there are a lot of people who want to believe what he believes because it makes them feel better (nine upvotes for his post that i easily fisked is evidence of this foolishness). Spewing ignorance in that context often works if it goes unchecked.

TESOE

September 19th, 2015 at 9:15 PM ^

it's part and parcel of the scientific method.  Almost every paper ever written suggests the need for further research.

When a scientist actually suggests the need for social policy change... that is when the pitch forks come out - not to mention research dollars drying up.

This dance we are doing around the data wrt CTE is complex as hell.  Science isn't really  helping at the moment given what is known to be true... in my ignorant opinion.

Swayze Howell Sheen

September 19th, 2015 at 9:48 AM ^

This is a fine question to ask, but I suspect a study of a few thousand tennis players won't reveal similar results. Your hypothesis will likely be shown to be quite wrong. Football is going to need to change, whether we like it or not.

 

massblue

September 19th, 2015 at 7:38 AM ^

What percentage of the general population show some form of CTE in their brain before they die? A very large percentage of people over 80 (about 25%) display symptoms of dementia no matter what they did earlier in life. Clearly, this PBS study shows very strong results but it may be exaggerating the association between football and CTE.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

2timeloozer

September 19th, 2015 at 7:30 AM ^

This is not the right data to form an opinion on. That said, I didn't let my kid play past freshman in HS. Repeated blows to head can't be a good thing. Hopefully the risk is relatively manageable, but we need the right facts, not this out of context crap without controls to find out.

coldnjl

September 19th, 2015 at 10:22 AM ^

I agree but this isn't crap. The limitation is you need dead subject brains. Do you want to guess how easy it is to get dead brains? It would be great and ideal if we just took 1000 high school football players and 1000 non-football players and killed them so we can study their brains. Then we would know....but something called ethics and technological limitations prevent these ideal studies from being pursued.

Cope

September 19th, 2015 at 7:51 AM ^

What was the method of gathering these players for the study? That's crucial to reliability. If they asked for football players who thought they had CTE to join that's going to have a drastically different outcome from a random sampling. And of course opt-in might* cause more CTE-concerned/prone players to agree to the study over those who doubt they have any symptoms. How did they come up with the 79% of all football players, contrasting the 96% in this study? While I think CTE is a serious issue, I'm skeptical of this particular study until I know their methods.

taistreetsmyhero

September 19th, 2015 at 8:03 AM ^

players who donated their brains because they were concerned that they had CTE complications from playing football. Basically all this study shows is that 96% of former football players were able to accurately self-diagnose themselves with symptoms caused by CTE.

Wolverdog

September 19th, 2015 at 7:58 AM ^

Two things. One, look into the equipment that was used and how the players were taught to play when they played. These are huge issues. Coaches used to teach lead with the helmet. Then you have the helmets that were used. Suspension, hard rubber padding, foam, etc.
Two, correlation vs cause and effect are still in debate. Yes, individuals who have suffered head trauma are at risk for cte, but have they found the direct medical link? Our society continues to be emasculated as gender and toughness are constantly under attack. Football, as explained by presidents, generals, business leaders, develop different kind of Men. Men who stand for something, who lead their families and nations, men that make a difference. I will always encourage future "Men" to play football.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

xtramelanin

September 19th, 2015 at 8:05 AM ^

comparing across all NFL players of any era and also curious what the prevalance of CTE type tissue would be among the general population.  a couple of factors could be strongly influencing what they report and controlling for them would be very important.

1. would it be safe to assume the specimens they did gather were all donated by families of players with the problem so there's no wonder the number is so high.  in other words, it may be true that the vast majority of players don't/haven't ever developed the issue but that also means their families never had those brains tested.

2.  outside of football, many/most (?) ball players live a very hard life, and yes i do mean boozing, drugs, pills, partying to the Nth degree.  i would imagine those factors would impact the results significantly and be very difficult to control or account for.

non-couch potato disclaimer:  i played football until i was 41, am now in my 50's. i really do feel fine mentally so far [insert old guy joke here] but of course that could change.

 

jabberwock

September 19th, 2015 at 9:24 AM ^

Not disputing your football party lifestyle claim per se
But athletes (younger generations at least) are also in fantastic physical shape, great cardio, nutrition, etc.
They are typically the healthiest top % of the population, so other negative health aspects aren't usually part of the equation.
Older "steak & potatoes" players if agree 100%.

LSAClassOf2000

September 19th, 2015 at 8:13 AM ^

Forty percent of those who tested positive were the offensive and defensive linemen who come into contact with one another on every play of a game, according to numbers shared by the brain bank with FRONTLINE.

I know they did an episode in 2013 about the NFL's handling of concussions and the lawsuit, but it would be interesting to see them devote a show specifically to this study so they can break out and expand on it a bit. I have a suspicion that something more than a summary article would help us here. 

That being said, that 40% of the players in the tested group were lineman of some variety would not shock me in the least. Like someone mentioned above though, a much broader study, perhaps one done at each level of play, would probably be most appropriate here if only to see the progression of problems and even to see which positions are indeed most at risk. 

Frontline has devoted a lot of time to this subject actually - more articles here if anyone is interested, as well as a link to their NFL episode (approx. 2 hours)

taistreetsmyhero

September 19th, 2015 at 8:14 AM ^

is just not solid enough at this point to serve as a basis for policy decisions. This study is propaganda at its worst. Just by stating the 96% stat they are serving up a delectable sound-byte for untrained journalists to negligently run with. This study really does nothing to answer the much more relevant questions that have already been posed higher up.

ThirdVanGundy

September 19th, 2015 at 8:28 AM ^

They know what they are getting themselves into but that doesn't mean the NFL can't do more to aid them in their retirement.

BlueDMD

September 19th, 2015 at 8:59 AM ^

We took our daughter out of high school soccer because we suspect she'd had a few concussions. The neurologist told us that the chances for concussion were higher in girls soccer than any other sport. The information I read later said third behind boys football and boys hockey.

beevo

September 19th, 2015 at 9:13 AM ^

Can we set up a quick poll to determine the following: How many years did you play football? What was the highest level played? Were you diagnosed with a concussion? If so, how many?

vertiGoBlue

September 19th, 2015 at 9:19 AM ^

A recently published (April 2015) article in Proc Nat Acad of Sci details a study in which PET brain imaging was used to characterize CTE *in vivo*. The in vivo aspect of this is key. Based on what I saw in the Frontline documentary League of Denial, the NFL's positions was/is that - despite the high % of ex-NFL players' brains discovered with CTE in autopsy - there is not (yet) a way to determine how widespread of an issue this is for NFL players overall vs. what has been discovered in the autopsy-based research. And, thus, there's no way to definitively/quantitatively link CTE risk to football.

If these in vivo PET studies can be developed into a standard, clinical test for CTE, that would address the issue of large population. A standard protocol could be put in place for getting baseline PET scans on all (or a large segment of) NFL players (and/or for youth, HS, college level players as well) and continuing to monitor this population with such PET scans during and after their football careers.

turtleboy

September 19th, 2015 at 9:16 AM ^

I do think this is something that's already changing for the better, mostly through education, but also through rule changes, and better equipment. Before the big push for CTE awareness happened kids would wear cowboy collars and repeatedly bash their helmets together for fun in practice, and NFL players tried to knock each other unconscious, and if you got one, tough it out, go back in and get another! I watched a highlight reel of John Lynch the Stanford hitman, recently, and just about every "tackle" would be an illegal hit with intent to injure in today's game. Fortunately that's all mostly done. Helmets with some give to them, and shock mounts on the face mask could likely prevent the remainder of occurrences that awareness and common sense rules don't.

turtleboy

September 19th, 2015 at 9:22 AM ^

Hmm double post. The alarmists saying: Football is over! The end times are here! are just talking out of their hats. Football is the #1 and #2 most popular sports in America, and 3rd place is in no danger of overtaking it.