OT: Report: Sarkisian to USC

Submitted by MGoVoldemort on

Steve Sarkisian has reportedly accepted the USC job.

 

Hearing from a good source Steve Sarkisian will be named the next head coach at #USC.

 
 
3:02 PM - 2 Dec 13 · Details
 
 
Confirmed: (Edit)
 

Steve Sarkisian has accepted the USC head coaching position

cp4three2

December 2nd, 2013 at 2:23 PM ^

I think Sark is a good coach, but a really meh hire for USC. If Washington can snag Mora from UCLA, they come out the big winner. Wouldn't be surprised if they promote Wilcox, though. 

Rabbit21

December 2nd, 2013 at 4:12 PM ^

He's basically a god at UCLA right now, there's a better local recruiting base to go off of and I would say the football tradition of the two schools is comparable as being good, but not great programs.  Mora has UCLA on the upswing right now with better things to come, I would be shocked if he left.

WolvinLA2

December 2nd, 2013 at 4:42 PM ^

I think Washington is the better job.  UCLA has a long way to go before they're anything but second fiddle in Southern California.  Sure, Mora is a god at UCLA, but he would be the same at Washington, probably even more so since he's their guy.  

Now, the difference isn't huge, but his personal allegiance is the big difference.  Mora would leave UCLA for the pros, he might not do that at Washington.  

Shorty the Bea…

December 2nd, 2013 at 8:14 PM ^

UCLA plays in the Rose Bowl off campus and doesn't sell out.  They don't have luxury suites for boosters and their practice facilities aren't brand spankin' new/state of the art.  They are in SoCal and Mora does have them on the uptick.  However, UW can offer a great deal of great significance that UCLA cannot.  They have a brand new stadium in the most picture-eque setting in the land, a greater ability to generate revenues now, brand new practice facilities, and the Seattle scene is what many do prefer to the LA smog and limelight.  The quality between the jobs is far closer than you think.

M-Wolverine

December 2nd, 2013 at 2:23 PM ^

But the whole "REAL big time programs only go out and hire sure fire winners and big names" thing doesn't really seem to be working or happening for USC. I mean, that 34-29 career record...he's only getting the job because he has USC ties! /s

natesezgoblue

December 2nd, 2013 at 2:24 PM ^

Is this really a big hire? I live in Seattle and numerous people were calling for Sarks head just a few days ago. Don't know who they go after. Jim Mora Jr did say it was his dream job a few years ago.

LSAClassOf2000

December 2nd, 2013 at 2:24 PM ^

As others said, there was a rather brief, largely unheralded statement this morning that Chris Petersen had withdrawn his name from consideration for the job, and indeed, only an hour or so ago, the only reports were still about Sarkisian interviewing for the position. There was also a report from ESPN that James Franklin was in the running, but that proved to be untrue per Bruce Feldman.

This is something I thought USC might do - get someone with ties to the program. As I recall, Steve Sarkisian was an assistant, QB coach and even OC under Pete Carroll for two separate stints.

funkywolve

December 2nd, 2013 at 7:49 PM ^

When was the last time USC had a 'home run' hire?  in hindsight Carrol, but at the time he wasn't a home run hire.

It's generally kind of rare for a school to steal a big name coach.  Generally, coaches move up the ladder. 

Alabama, OSU and South Carolina are three schools that had home run hires, but none of those 3 coaches were coaching at the college level when those schools hired them.

GoBlueInJersey

December 2nd, 2013 at 2:40 PM ^

I am surprised to read a lot of positive reactions to this hire on this board.  I personally think USC could have had a homerun hire, and they missed a royal opportunity.  Sarkisian is 34-29 (1-6 vs. Stanford/Oregon/UCLA) over 5 years.  Does that make him a bad coach? No.  But it doesn't inspire confidence that he can win championships at USC.     

In the end, I think his experience at Washington shows he's a good coach, just not great.  I really thought Pat Haden would look outside of the Pete Carroll circle and make a run for someone like James Franklin or Chris Petersen.  This is similar to our own coaching search 3 years ago.  Sark had enough allies in and around the AD, and that is largely the reason he got this job IMO.

PurpleStuff

December 2nd, 2013 at 3:30 PM ^

Sark was 4-5 in the conference in year one, and has gone 5-4 each of the last four years.  There wasn't some long rebuilding period and they haven't gotten any better.  Only difference this year was an easier non-conference schedule (they beat a fairly mediocre BSU team). 

Harbaugh inherited a situation as bad or worse and was in a BCS bowl in year 4.  Sark is basically Kiffin with less douche.

WolvinLA2

December 2nd, 2013 at 4:52 PM ^

Agree completely.  Sark has basically spent his whole career at Washington losing to all the good teams and beating all the bad teams, with just a handful of exceptions on either side.  He has never been able to build an impressive recruiting class either.  

My exact comment to my SC fan brother-in-law earlier was "This seems like Kiffin all over again, without the douchebaggery."  What it comes down to - if it weren't for his history with SC, they never would have looked at him for the job.  No other big program was looking to snag him. 

WolvinLA2

December 2nd, 2013 at 5:00 PM ^

I agree there are Hoke and Sark comparisons, but Hoke had been a HC at a couple spots and was able to make drastic (and quick) turnarounds ar both programs.  He brought double-digit win totals to teams used to double-digit loss totals.  IMO, that's more impressive than what Sark did at Washington.  

810steveo

December 2nd, 2013 at 2:39 PM ^

kinda saw it coming but thought Haden would of went bold but went safe solid pick up with Sark as for UW job the name could pop up is Doug Nussmeyer former Wash OC and current Bama OC. But everybody put the main canidates as Peterson and Mora and some wild theories about Gruden to UW. but Nussmeyer seems to be the fit for them as head coach.

goblue16

December 2nd, 2013 at 2:48 PM ^

Am i the only one who thinks this is Kiffin all over again?? Hes done an average job at a top teir program and thier hiring him on name alone. I dont see this as the sexy hire everyone was talking about. And im really suprised Sumlin turned them down i thought for sure hed get out of there when he had the chance. The SEC west is a death trap for coaches because competing with Bama LSU Auburn is impossible IMO. Still cant believe Beileima took the Arkansas job

Shorty the Bea…

December 2nd, 2013 at 8:22 PM ^

Those guys are ace recruiters and stellar D-coaches.  Wilcox is an underrated D-Coordinator in the national conference of high speed spread offense.  Lupoi is one of the best recruiters in the nation.  These guys don't get their due because of the west coast bias.  However, they will KILL at USC.  They're a better get than Sark for USC, IMO.  I wanted them to stay at UW.