Sac Fly

October 2nd, 2013 at 7:15 PM ^

Even if he wasn't going to ever take a snap at QB again, you could always use a guy who played four years at the position in the film room and the quarterback meetings to mentor the freshman who is supposed to be the program's future.

grsbmd

October 2nd, 2013 at 7:24 PM ^

Let's consult the heuristics:

  • Position switch starter = Bad
  • Position switch starter who already starts at his other position = Really Bad
  • Position switch starter who already starts at this other position and his only backups are two freshman = Really Really Bad
  • Moving your starting senior quarterback to safety when his only backups are two freshman = 

Zone Left

October 2nd, 2013 at 7:29 PM ^

Move your team's leading passer to safety halfway through his senior season. That's, um, something. I'm not sure a sarcastic "bold" quite covers this one.

LSAClassOf2000

October 2nd, 2013 at 7:42 PM ^

"That's what we're going to find out in the next couple of days," Hazell said when asked about how much Henry can contribute in the secondary. "If not, we know there are some things he can do offensively."

I think Hazell might be opening the door here for a move from safety to guard because obviously, from the appearance of things. 

B-Nut-GoBlue

October 2nd, 2013 at 7:51 PM ^

Purdue is now officially a Junior High team; a Junior High team we don't even get to play for Big Ten Conference win credit.  I bet they'll still find a way to make the Ohio game close, though.

Erik_in_Dayton

October 2nd, 2013 at 8:06 PM ^

He may see this season as doomed (though I remember talk of the Rose Bowl) and therefore see it as worth putting the freshman in at QB so he can gain experience. Moving Henry to safety is presumably about getting your best 22 guys on the field. If Etling goes down, you can have Henry ready in a week, and Purdue isn't going to miss out on winning the division by just one game...I'd want Henry at QB to help Etling, but this isn't necessarily crazy.

Zone Left

October 2nd, 2013 at 7:56 PM ^

Well, Purdue faces maybe the two best units in the conference in Nebraska's offense and MSU's defense in the next two games. This will probably go well.

SFBlue

October 2nd, 2013 at 9:12 PM ^

Can't believe nobody has referenced Michigan's similar move, against Purdue in 2008, in starting TE Carson Butler at Defense End.  Purdue appears headed towards (at best) a similar year.

ChopBlock

October 2nd, 2013 at 10:15 PM ^

Alternate theory: they're doing it for the sake of his health. Perhaps they're caught in the delusion that moving to safety will save poor Rob from Perry the ACL-ephant.