OT- Max Scherzer rejects Tigers' extension

Submitted by WMUgoblue on

Max Scherzer is taking a gamble on himself to reproduce or upstage his 2013 Cy Young season by rejecting a long term offer from the Tigers. It would appear Dombrowski's offer was more than fair considering Max would have paid among the top 6 pitchers in baseball. 

Thoughts on this? Honestly it's a bit surprising that Dombrowski offered that much, and it's even more surprising the Scherzer rejected said offer. I suppose this could be Boras being Boras, but honestly that seems like a huge gamble for Max or he doesn't enjoy Detroit nearly as much as he puts out there.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/03/tigers-scherzer-done-talking-extension-for-season-.html


 
 EDIT: updated to show the figures. 

Source: Tigers’ offer to Max Scherzer was six years, $144 million. That was what Cole Hamels signed for in 2012. @FOXSportsLive

— Jon Morosi (@jonmorosi) March 23, 2014

Mr Miggle

March 23rd, 2014 at 1:18 PM ^

It's a gamble he's taking because he has confidence in himself. You don't get to that level without it. And just what is he gambling? It's not his financial security. It's money that would take several lifetimes to spend. 

Mr Miggle

March 23rd, 2014 at 1:41 PM ^

He doesn't have to duplicate last season or bust. If he has a good season, he'll get very good offers. If he duplicates last season, he'll make a lot more. If he regresses, he'll get less, but it will still be more money than he can spend. In each case he gets a lot of choice of where to live. We don't know everything that's important to Scherzer. Apparently locking up some extra guaranteed money isn't at the top of his list.  

Simps

March 23rd, 2014 at 12:33 PM ^

He doesn't deserve Verlander money. I would let him walk. This is why we should've kept Fister. A guy that clearly wanted to stay with the club.

phork

March 23rd, 2014 at 12:35 PM ^

That Fister trade is still a head scratcher.  I am willing to give Dombrowski a benefit of the doubt since some of the clowns hes shipped out have tanked.  But man you always need pitching.  Especially now that Rondon is out.

Cold War

March 23rd, 2014 at 12:44 PM ^

The rational for the Fister trade was having enough money to resign Scherzer. That should have been done *before* we traded Fister.

As much as I'd hate to see it, this team is going to decline this year. They'll probably  still be good enough to win the division but that's not a given. Not drinking the "speed and defense" Koolaid. Our pitching and hitting are both weaker.

Jobu

March 23rd, 2014 at 1:08 PM ^

Illlitch is a boob. Not only does he build a shitty stadium but he makes bad decisions. The majority of his ownership the Tigers were dreadful. The only manager that brought them close was just pushed out of town on favor of Brad Ausmus who has zero experience at this level managing.

Out of the 20 MLB stadiums I have been to, Comerica Park is in the bottom half.

I should say that Dumbrowski is half to blame as well

WMUgoblue

March 23rd, 2014 at 1:21 PM ^

There are so many things wrong with this it's ridiculous.

  • In no way shape or form was Jim Leyland pushed aside for Brad Ausmus, this is in fact a terrible summation of what transpired.
     
  • I will certainly grant you that Illitch wasn't the greatest owner prior to 2005, but he's been arguably the best owner since that year with his ability to overpay to get the talent here to lay the foundation for a contender.
     
  • Comerica is a bottom tier ballpark? This is news to me and probably most baseball fans as it's located in a nice area downtown with plenty to do outside and inside the park. For furthur proof http://espn.go.com/page2/s/ballparks/comerica.html, honestly I enjoy most of the 12 of so parks i've visited but Comerica isn't a "shitty stadium" and your bias against it and the Tigers are very real.
     
  • "Dumbrowski" how cute of you to criticize the man that revitalized a dying baseball franchise, and fututre commissioner of the MLB.
     

In summation GTFO troll.

JHendo

March 23rd, 2014 at 2:50 PM ^

Illitch is routinely considered one of the best owners in pro sports. CoPa is routinely considered in the top half of major league parks. Methinks you just have an irrational disdain of the Tigers. You can hate the Tigers all you want but don't give asinine statements of opinion and present them as facts or as general consensous.

LSAClassOf2000

March 23rd, 2014 at 12:59 PM ^

Chris Iott's article delves into the history of the negotiations a little bit - HERE

I found this somewhat interesting:

Dombrowski said the Tigers told Boras during the winter meetings that they were interested in making an offer to Scherzer and approached the subject again during the pre-arbitration process. But Dombrowski said Scherzer and Boras at that time wanted to focus on getting the one-year deal completed.

It sort of makes me curious to know precisely what the terms of Dombrowski's offer were, if they are indeed made available. As he says in this article, it was a personal record for him in terms of the largest contract he's had anyone turn down. It also notes that they put their top offer on the table only about a week before the March 20th deadline set for these negotiations. 

Jack Daniels

March 23rd, 2014 at 1:08 PM ^

Never pay a player based on the greatest season they will ever have in their career. Pay them based on the norm. We'll see what kind of offers he gets after he regresses this year

NJGoBlue7

March 23rd, 2014 at 1:25 PM ^

Some guys just want to experience the free agent market once in their career.  Who wouldnt want to be able to shop themselves to a few different employers at once and get multiple 7 figure offers?? He may end up back in Detroit after all is said and done, but he is gambling on himself for one year to make more money.

Waters Demos

March 23rd, 2014 at 1:47 PM ^

I've always thought in this scenario that if you take less money than you could possibly get, you endear yourself to fans, take pressure off yourself to otherwise live up to a huge salary, and that these things would be more than worth the money you would be giving up.  

bluewave720

March 23rd, 2014 at 7:18 PM ^

I've often fantasized about how I'd handle my recruitment if I were a 5-star bluechip. It always ends with me saying something like "I'll commit to you, Michigan, but don't waste anymore time on me. Recruit other guys, I'll be there in the fall."
The pro equivalent is "I really can't spend all that money anyway, how about you save some of that and build a team around me instead." I don't begrudge a guy who holds out for more money. But if I found myself in that situation, I THINK I'd be cool taking a higher-than-reasonable salary to begin with. But, also to be fair, I'm not a total badass at anything. So I don't know how badasses think.

kb

March 23rd, 2014 at 2:05 PM ^

Everyone who has one or two good years all of a sudden wants to be the highest paid at their position. MLB (and most other sports for that matter) contracts have gotten way out of hand. For some perspective, I remember when Orel Hershiser was the first player to be given a one million dollar contract.

SF Wolverine

March 23rd, 2014 at 5:54 PM ^

That is a hell of a lot of money guaranteed.  Hard to see how he gets a LOT more than this even if he repeats last year.  Which seems unlikely.  Lots more stuff could happen this year that cost him a big chunk of that. 

ca_prophet

March 23rd, 2014 at 7:23 PM ^

I want Scherzer to stay with the Tigers but don't want to give him the long-term deal it would take. I am very leery of any pitcher extension over three years. As to whether this is a good choice for Scherzer, I suspect that unless he gets hurt or tanks, he'll get comparable offers on the open market, perhaps even with a team more likely to win a title. (Although, NYY doesn't seem likely, BOS and TBA won't pay out those deals, SLN has lots of pitching already ... Maybe LAN?)