OT: Clowney sits. Spurrier calls him out.

Submitted by HelloHeisman91 on

Clowney told his coaches last minute that he was too sore to play.  Spurrier's response - If Clowney "wants to play, we will welcome him to come play for the team if he wants," Spurrier said. "But he if doesn't want to play, he doesn't have to play. Simple as that."

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/9778041/jadeveon-clowney-misses-no-13-south-carolina-gamecocks-game-vs-kentucky-wildcats

 

 

JHendo

October 6th, 2013 at 3:04 AM ^

I call it you blowing things well out of proportion and crossing a line that should never be crossed. I think Jadeveon, other football players, and other people who can trace their roots back to slaves (like me) would say you are very confused as to what constitutes slavery. Does the current system use players for their gain without giving each player an equal cut? Sure. So do many things. Do you make an equal cut at you job of what the company makes? Is there a higher position you are qualified for, but you have to wait your turn until the oppurtunity comes up to get it? Yeah, well that's life. These young men are getting an education from some of the best institutions in the country. They are getting to travel the country. They get free meals and room and board and the oppurtinity to one day make millions if they prove themselves. This is very far from slavery, and you are a very irrational confused man. Work on more appropriate analogies.

AtkinsDiet

October 6th, 2013 at 3:12 AM ^

Does the current system use players for their gain with giving each player an equal cut? Sure. So do many things.

And there it is. The fairness-by-commonality fallacy.

Also, when waiting for promotion in my job, I am not performing acts that often end in damanged knees, concussions, ruptured achilles, etc. nor is there a window that will close in between the ages of 35-40 to realistically do it. And you criticize my analogies? Yours is incredibly daft. 

But hey, defend the policy. Set by the same league recently found to go on an oil-industry like crusade to discredit science on concussions because it was better for their bottom line, human lives be damned.

 

Carcajous

October 6th, 2013 at 7:50 AM ^

There are other places he could play professionally if he wanted to forgo college. You are making the false assumption that the NFL is the only gig. If you are saying that he has a right to get a job immediately at the very top of his profession out of high school despite the qualifications set down by that particular employer, that is a silly argument.

The NFL has determined that a certain amount of time post-high school is a qualification for employment in their organization. So? Employers make these determinations all the time, and they have the right to do that.

He can go play in Canada or elsewhere if he wants employment. He doesn't
To have the right to the specific job with the specific employer he chooses. None of us do.

JHendo

October 6th, 2013 at 3:22 AM ^

The fact you are complacent to ignore my main concern with your initial statement and thus stand by the fact you openly and unrepentingly compared college football to slavery shows what a loose grip you have on reality. Under the false guise of a concerned critical thinker, what a joke of a shallow minded man you seem to be. I do hope there is truly something a lot more respectable on the other side of that keyboard than the MGoPersona you've created.

AtkinsDiet

October 6th, 2013 at 3:43 AM ^

Are you so dopey that you think I have an obligation to refute any difference you can name between actual slavery of 150+ years ago because I pointed out that a menality in plantation owning is similar? You are that literally challenged?

There is blatant exploitation of physical activity with a cartel-like approach to market manipulation. Is it EXACTLY like slavery? Of course not. This should not have to be spelled out for anyone. Is it similar enough that it's fair to protest and expect a lot more from the establishment in the year 2013? Yes. A million times, yes.

JHendo

October 6th, 2013 at 3:58 AM ^

Very, very little of slavery relates to college football, but enough so that in your little mind, you feel you can defend your decision to bring it up. Again, you continue to enlighten me about yourself with each ignorant word you type. Your inability to use an appropriate, non-extreme example to prove your point shows that you are much more aroused by the thought of stirring the pot than you are interested in truly convincing others to understand how you feel about this topic. I have nothing more to say to you. If you wish to write something else on this mini thread and pretend as if I still care and you are getting in the final word, by all means... P.S. - To your other post, I worship taking care of my little 1 month old baby girl, the same reason I'm awake right now. Fuck football, because I couldn't care less about anything but her anymore. I take it you worship the sound of your voice?

DoubleLegTakedown

October 6th, 2013 at 8:34 AM ^

Plenty of people make minimum wage working for companies worth billions, buuuuut its their choice. Just like its football players choices to attend and play in college. Perhaps a better analogy is in order. American society exploits waaaaY more people through way worse means.

cbs650

October 6th, 2013 at 9:21 AM ^

I agree that this is not slavery but some of the points you make were similar to those made by people who defend slavery. slave owners would tell slaves that you are getting a place to live for your work in the fields and the home. Some even got educated by the slave masters children. And there were slaves who loved he system. The difference was in the physical treatment of slaves. Football players are not treated in like that and if they were the culprits would be in jail.

maizenbluenc

October 6th, 2013 at 10:29 AM ^

but thank you for making this statement. You said it very clearly from a position of moral authority.

College football has gotten way off the edcuational mission, and bloated department budgets, coaches and AD salaries, and gilded facilties. The simple fact is, a D1 scholarship to play football cannot be akin to slavery. Why would there be thousands of high school atheletes competing to get those scholarships otherwise.

 

vablue

October 6th, 2013 at 4:08 AM ^

After my sophomore year I had a co-op job and a full time offer to pay me a large sum ..... When I graduated. It was not for millions, but I still had to go back and pay for two more years of school. Nobody will feel sorry for the NFL team if they pay him millions and he does nothing and I certainly think it is in the NFL rights to require three years of experience before hiring someone.

Bill in Birmingham

October 6th, 2013 at 8:28 AM ^

I agree with much of the point you are trying to make. But you are doing a very bad job of making that point. Schools/conferences/broadcast networks/bowl official hacks/the NCAA are all making obscene amounts of money on the labor of players. It is a very reasonable position to believe that the labor, which is the entire source of that revenue, should receive a greater share. But referring to people who don't agree with you as "Wal Mart" is not the pinnacle of effective debate technique.

The FannMan

October 6th, 2013 at 3:34 AM ^

The guy is not being forced to play football. He has the choice to not play at all, or to just sit this year out and enter the draft. Now,those choices have consequences, both good and bad. But the choice is his to make. (Including whether he is too injured to play which may be all that this is.)

If he wants NFL money, he has to make his choices within the rules of the system. You will find a lot of folks who agree that those rules aren't always fair. They may even be exploitive to an extent. However, it is not comparable to slavery.

AtkinsDiet

October 6th, 2013 at 3:38 AM ^

Exploitive to only an extent? They are making young men with exceptional abilities at a young age put serious risks to their health and future earnings potential because they enjoy the free promotion of future players at the college level and want an optimal (and free) developmental system. That is shamefully exploitive.

 

AtkinsDiet

October 6th, 2013 at 4:01 AM ^

People who say HS football should be abolished will probably be viewed as being on the right side of history within 30 years. That's my main thought.

The people leaving comments on ESPN concussion articles like "This ain't soccer pussy! They know what they're gettin' into"? Yeah, I don't see that lot ever being remembered as terribly wise. Let's be honest.

DirkMcGurk

October 6th, 2013 at 6:24 AM ^

Maybe he should see the opportunity to get a education and not just a quick pay day. I am still paying on student loans 10 years later and these prima donnas can get it free and a nice pay day.

Slaves got nothing these brats get 20,000+ in free education and the free exposure that gives them the chance to make millions.

falco_alba15

October 6th, 2013 at 7:01 AM ^

Forces them into receiving a college education free of charge, which is worth close to 100k over 4 years. I know a lot of people who don't make that much money working in the real world.

If they worried so much about their bodies, they should just sit out for three years and patiently wait for the draft.

The NFL is exploiting a system, sure, but these young men are NOT slaves. They can walk away from the game at any moment. That is a horrible comparison.

Wendyk5

October 6th, 2013 at 9:13 AM ^

If he wants to protect himself for the NFL, fine. Then he should leave the team. The expectation when you're on a team is that you play, whether you have a potential NFL career or not, whether there is a growing sense that college players should get some sort of compensation, or not. His education is his form of payment, as the rules currently stand. He may not appreciate that, as some players see college as purely a stepping stone to professional football. I don't know Clowney personally, so I don't know whether or not he values his education. He's ultimately just hurting himself because what's valued out there - in football, in work of all kinds, in society - is pushing yourself and being a team player. And judging from the comment above about all the different maladies he's had, he's not playing for the team. He's playing - or not playing -  for himself. 

XM - Mt 1822

October 6th, 2013 at 7:28 AM ^

but i think i agree with spurrier on this one and his manner of talking about it was not over the top.  that kid has tons of talent but is loafing his way through his last season to get to the NFL.   assuming the rib injury is the real reason, it appears that all else with him is reasonably healthy.  even if he wasn't going to play, he should've at least suited up.  

 

wayneandgarth

October 6th, 2013 at 7:40 AM ^

The impression was that he could have played if it were a tougher opponent. if so, he left his teammates in a bad situation. They may not have his back from here on out.

BigJohn

October 6th, 2013 at 8:09 AM ^

Do you think the Ol' Ball Coach doesn't know exactly how hurt he is? I'm sure the trainers are working on Clowney around the clock and reporting directly back to Spurrier. Clowney has been pulling this Julio Jones garbage since fall camp. You may see this problem as the exploitation of college kids?, but I see it has a societal problem, "do it all for the money."

Maaly

October 6th, 2013 at 8:36 AM ^

"So far he has had a stomach bug for unc and it was too hot. Bone spurs for uga and vandy and another stomach bug appeared for UCF. Now he has a sudden surprise rib injury where he can't dress. He is either incredibly unlucky or something is fishy. Hopefully the first. Pray he is back at 100% next week"

 

 

XM - Mt 1822

October 6th, 2013 at 9:30 AM ^

i think we can pretty much put to rest the idea that spurrier was out of line when he gave a mild answer to a question put to him.  nobody is that hurt, and i'm sure he's in the weight room doing what needs to be done as well.  

clowney sounds like perfect material for the lions:  talent + selfish head case.  hopefully both he and the lions can put that behind them.