pres70

November 24th, 2010 at 10:09 AM ^

Harbaugh took over a 1-11 Stanford team. RR took over a 9-4 Michigan team that was 6-2 in the conference and beat Florida in the Capital One bowl. In Harbaugh's third season he was 8-5 with wins over USC, Oregon and UCLA. RR in his third year has wins over Western Michigan, Notre Dame, Eastern Michigan, Indiana and Delaware State. In Harbaugh forth year he is 10-1. RR 7-4 and is 1-12 vs. Michigan State, Ohio State, Iowa, Penn State and Wisconsin.  I guess your right RR is a great coach and has Michigan football on the right track.  I'm sure he will turn this around NEXT year, right.. Hopefully DB is smart enough to fire this jackass monday..

 

OysterMonkey

November 24th, 2010 at 11:02 AM ^

Whoever posts posts full of fail is full of fail. You posted this post. Therefore, you are full of fail. Like, full all the way to the top.

RR didn't take over the 9-4 team that beat Florida. He took over the remnants of a 9-4 team after Henne, Hart and Co. went to the NFL. The 2008 team would have struggled w/ Lloyd as coach. Probably not 3-9, but would have struggled. 2009 was RR's second year, not third. This current year, in which UM is 7-4 is his third year, so getting to the Harbaugh approved 8-5 mark is still realistic.

NathanFromMCounty

November 24th, 2010 at 5:03 PM ^

..Harbaugh was going into a 1-10 program that was widely proceived as having nothing (for all the talk about Gerhart already being there, I just checked his recruiting profile and he was a 3-star recruit that received offers from nobody major all, so nobody really expected much of him).

 

T

November 24th, 2010 at 2:03 AM ^

Wojo's argument is more convincing than most I've read from those advocating for a change.  Still, I'm wary of another drawn out debacle of a coaching search like we saw under Martin (although Brandon seems less likely to make this mistake.)  Back then, people assumed that Miles would jump at the chance to coach in Ann Arbor.  How is the assumption about Harbaugh wanting to return any different?

If Brandon gets assurances from his targeted HC replacement, that's great; make a switch if it seems like the right time to do so.  Otherwise, start from scratch with the defensive coaching staff and give RR a one year audition for an extension.

moffle

November 24th, 2010 at 2:32 AM ^

Well, personally, I'm happy if our coach is either Rodriguez or Harbaugh.  I admit I had my doubts about Harbaugh before this season but after Stanford's success this year and especially after watching them absolutely destroy Cal last week, he's convinced me.  I think we will win with either one.

But really, I will be very, very surprised if Rodriguez is fired, regardless of what happens Saturday.

mabrsu

November 24th, 2010 at 2:44 AM ^

I think everyone is missing something  here. Wojo simply said he must go if we get blown out. I thought this was the case before the Wisconsin game. There is a difference between losing these last two games and getting back to back wake up calls that we have fallen so far from the top of the Big Ten. Getting blown out these last two weeks was going to put his job at risk. It is not a barometer of wins like Brandon said. Back to back blowouts to end the season make for a very tough to swallow December.

Keep the game competitive or beat the buckeyes! 

MGoPacquiao

November 24th, 2010 at 3:06 AM ^

Right.  I think Brandon has to consider if he feels that next year the team would have a great chance to win every single game next year.  Not that they'd be undefeated, but that there wouldn't be any obvious expected losses.  Before these 3 years, there were only a handful of games in which a victory seemed close to impossible ('91 FSU, maybe the PSU game when they were undefeated with K Collins).  Times have changed, but in year 4, we should be competitive in each game. 

ToledoWolverine

November 24th, 2010 at 4:02 AM ^

I thought the offseason message board was obnoxious, but this is getting ridiculous. According to my (amateur) calculations, we are on options 7 and 8 at cornerback. 1. Warren should still be here 2. Woolfolk 3. Turner was a 5 star who knew he was a puss? 4. Dorsey another 5 star, eff admissions 5. Cissoko 6. Floyd 7. Rogers 8. Whichever freshman. Show me the team with 8 good cornerbacks, starting in the Big 10 cornerbacks. I'm not saying the coaches are blameless, but let's be real, Buddy Fucking Ryan couldn't do any better. There is no instant cure for lack of depth or youth. Time and patience are the only solutions.

Lutha

November 24th, 2010 at 4:27 AM ^

Yes, our secondary is young and we've been hit hard by injuries. 

But it wasn't our secondary that was getting its asses whooped up and down the field when Wisconsin was running the ball 30 consecutive times to close out the game.

bringthewood

November 24th, 2010 at 9:07 AM ^

Ok, where are all of Lloyd's great defensive line recruits when we need them?  I'd venture to say DL (as well as OL) take time to develop.  Did RR do a great job recruiting the DL in year 1 and 2?  No, but year one was already mostly done when he got here.  So where are the 4th and 5th year players from those great Michigan teams from the past?  Greg Banks?  Adam Patterson?  Renaldo Sagesse?

So you have two of you better DL players hurt and out and you expect to stop Wisconsin with Banks, Patterson and Sagesse?  Blame RR for recruiting but don't expect him to beat Wisconsin with Banks, Patterson and Sagesse and a true Freshman at DL.

maizenbluenc

November 24th, 2010 at 10:24 AM ^

If his coaching staff had recruited defensive players who could academically qualify, maybe our defense would be deeper and more talented.

They chose the defensive / offensive balance in recruiting. They also chose who they recruited and whether they were an academic risk.

jmblue

November 24th, 2010 at 11:31 AM ^

1. Warren should still be here 2. Woolfolk 3. Turner was a 5 star who knew he was a puss? 4. Dorsey another 5 star, eff admissions 5. Cissoko 6. Floyd 7. Rogers 8. Whichever freshman.

So we should give our staff a pass when it shows questionable judgment in recruiting and continually experiences massive player attrition?

NathanFromMCounty

November 24th, 2010 at 5:09 PM ^

..unless Michigan shows far more than they've shown against other ranked opponents in the Ohio State game.  We've been embarassed in 2 of the 3 games we've lost to ranked teams (only the Iowa game was remotely competitive).  A third embarassment will send RR packing (note the almost *cold* tone in Brandon's words concerning Rich Rod in the Detroit News article yesterday especially compared to some surprisingly warm words for John Beilein). 

 

NateVolk

November 24th, 2010 at 6:02 AM ^

I don't think he is necessarily saying that if Rodriguez doesn't win this one he should be fired, and I don't think he is saying that he should be kept if we do win. What he is saying is Jim Harbaugh is a great candidate, and this hasn't worked as evidenced by tangible results that most average fans care about.

He is likely trying to get out front of something that looks increasingly likely to happen. If you read his recent articles, this is a definite departure from his more moderate tone. Take the Henning interview with Brandon where Rodriguez was not mentioned by name at any point by Brandon, but Beilein was giving a vote of long-term confidence, anonymous athletic department connected rumors here and there, Stanford about to hit their pre-bowl break, and it can be at least conjectured there may be something about to happen.

I think we all appreciate the numbers and what they say about the improvement from year 1 of the Rich Rodriguez program. People on here are highly knowledgeable and make good points about continuity and the potential of this offense. They may even be right that it would be a big mistake to let him go.

The key word though is "may". Michigan Football and the money and power it represents doesn't abide by hope in most cases. It looks at results and decides based on them.

 This might be one of those debates where it could be wise to get our noses out of the stat sheets and the recruiting blogs and look around at what's in the wind.  Don't try to outthink the room. If were losing like this to teams we have to beat, and the average fan (most fans) is jumping ship and there is a top flight candidate who may be available and willing, then there isn't a lot of point wishing it weren't so.

bringthewood

November 24th, 2010 at 9:12 AM ^

Harbaugh has 4 years of big time college coaching experience.  Is his body of work better than RR's?  No.  Is he hot right now?  Yes.  I hear Schiano was Edsal were once hot as well.  Want them now?

RR will be our Nick Saban in that he will leave and we will pine for him when he wins elsewhere.

NathanFromMCounty

November 24th, 2010 at 5:15 PM ^

...he built Toby Gerhart (a guy recruited by teams like Nevada & Duke) into a high level draft pick.  He can recruit in a program that is very difficult to recruit for, and his pedigree and background mean he'll be able to recruit better than Rich Rod has (RR's recruiting is overly maligned, but there has been some surprising decisions, particularly with the Defensive recruiting, even if I feel that Speilman's talent comment was out to lunch).

Rich Rod came into a program with a surprisingly decent amount of talent (the bare cupboard, save with the defensive secondary, is pretty much garbage) and crapped the bed *hard*.  He's Michigan's John L. Smith, only without the 8 win opening year.

It's entirely possible that you never see Rich Rodriquez as a head coach again after this debacle.

 

dearbornpeds

November 24th, 2010 at 6:25 AM ^

     If it's generally accepted that Harbaugh has interest in the NFL (and vice versa) does it make sense to bring him here?  Perhaps he could turn the program around but how long would he stay?  I personally don't want someone who might want to test himself in the most competitive venue in his field.  We have always had college coaches who wanted to be college coaches and that has been one of our strengths.

     I personally think it's a foregone conclusion that rr will be back next year.  If we're having this same discussion twelve months from now, the it will be time to pull the plug.   I would wager that Brandon has already had back channel conversations with other coaches re: our problem and possible solutions.  He (like Rich Rod) didn't get to be where he is by being either stupid or lucky.

 

     It is worth repeating that most of us were looking at 7-5 or 8-4 before the injuries.  I still believe that a competent defensive staff can produce an acceptable defense with this group of players next year and give us a 9-3 season.

NathanFromMCounty

November 24th, 2010 at 5:19 PM ^

...will be Tennessee'd (i.e. near permantently dead, Tennessee was reducing to hiring a guy who's main qualification was that he was Vince Dooley's son and a *very* junior position coach to Nick Saban because *nobody* wanted the job as the program had degraded that much).

 

I mean right now, we are down to Jim Habaugh because no one else with a portfolio wants the job because of the damage Rodriquez has done.  By next season?  No one with a portfolio will be available and we'll be reduced to hiring screwballs like Tennessee is.

bronxblue

November 24th, 2010 at 7:01 AM ^

While I understand the sentiment behind WoJo's case and I somewhat agree, UM fans need to realize that this team isn't anywhere close to OSU or Wiscy, so I'm not sure handing down a mandate that "this game has to be close" is really fair.  Against good teams, the defense tends to struggle to get off the field while the offense usually fails to score early on.  Those are the realities of this team - 7-4, good-but-not-great offense and an historically bad defense.  Broken record, I know.  But losing to Wiscy and OSU, one on the road, is what happens to mediocre teams like UM.  It hurts for the faithful to admit it because that wasn't the case even a couple of years ago, but since 2007 this team has been a largely mediocre program, and while I have seen legitimate strides the past 1.5 years, it is going to take more than a season to get back to the level of a senior-laden Wiscy or consistent top-5 OSU team.  That's just the facts, and while it should be factor, I hope Brandon does not try to hold RR against those impossible standards right now.  I'm not saying he should be absolved for the past 3 years, but wanting him to "keep it close" is purely cosmetic, like how mediocre teams used to "keep it close" against UM even though UM usually won.

jmblue

November 24th, 2010 at 11:36 AM ^

UM fans need to realize that this team isn't anywhere close to OSU or Wiscy, so I'm not sure handing down a mandate that "this game has to be close" is really fair.

When it's year 3 of a coach's tenure, it's fair.  In December 2007, everyone expected us to be in the top 10 right now.

Section 1

November 24th, 2010 at 7:51 AM ^

Really?

Does he get marginally more respect in this corner of the blogosphere by mere default, since virtually everyone who is associated with the other metro newspaper goes beyond annoying, into the realm of "malignant"?

This is not a good day for the Detroit News and its sports columnists.  Not one day following Lynn Henning's embarassing rumor-implosion.

coachclen

November 24th, 2010 at 7:59 AM ^

that usually Wojo is commonly referred to as "the one who brings sanity" and usually gets the "as usual, Wojo adds solid perspective" comments from this blog, but as soon as he writes something that is deemed disagreeable, he is worthless and doesn't know what he's talking about. 

Come on people. Don't slam the guy for a reasonable opinion. You don't have to agree with him. His point is solid. if Michigan gets killed, Rich will be 15-21 with two blowout losses, and Brandon has continually said he will use all aspects of the program, not just wins and losses to determine the next direction. Those facts (and yes, they are facts) make it seem very reasonable that Rich could get fired. 

Obviously, anyone may disagree and have solid facts to support your opinions too, but don't hammer a guy for making a reasonable argument just because you have a different perspective or desire. 

Njia

November 24th, 2010 at 8:01 AM ^

The article assumes that Harbaugh, "must surely be interested..." Oh, really? Says whom? Harbaugh hasn't said so. Dave Brandon hasn't said so.

Harbaugh is not stupid. He can probably see the level of talent on the defense and say, "Uh, no thanks." He will realize that the players recruited to play in RR's style of spread offense don't fit his system.

And, Wojo thinks Harbaugh will find that enticing? Who in their right mind would?

If DB fires RR, and Harbaugh turns down the offer, then what? We're back to where we were three years ago, and probably even worse off.

Finally, just because a guy played here, played for Bo, is a successful coach in his own right, is a hot commodity in the coaching ranks, etc., does not mean he will be successful at his alma mater. Just ask Notre Dame and Charlie Weis how it worked out for them.

coachclen

November 24th, 2010 at 8:23 AM ^

A) Just playing devil's advocate here........ You say that Harbaugh would look at the defense and say "no thanks". So what you're saying is that Rich Rod has taken the program to a level that would cause an alum that has publically professed his love for the University to "say no thanks"? Isn't that alarming? Don't you think taking the winningest program in football history (regardless of circumstances) to the point where you say "who in their right mind would" is a fireable offense?

Also you assume that Harbaugh would be as stubborn as Rich and would transform the O immediately. I only have opinion to back this up, but I would think Harbaugh would look at the boatloads of talent returning and tailor his offense to fit it. Rich was just stubborn and it blew up in years one and two.

 

B) Despite my playing of devil's advocate above, I tend to agree with your point that if Harbaugh isn't the guy, then we might as well hold pat and pray that Rich can get it together.

Njia

November 24th, 2010 at 8:33 AM ^

Nothing I wrote suggested that I think RichRod is not responsible for what has happened to the program. The problem is, what alternative do we really have at this point?

I am reminded of a quote from Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War. A Senator from Ohio, (appropriately) Benjamin Wade, berated Lincoln for McClellan's strategy, which the senator thought was ineffective, and would not lead to victory. He demanded McClellan remove him.

One day, Wade went to Lincoln and demanded that Lincoln find someone else. Lincoln asked whom he should appoint as Commanding General. Wade replied, "Well, anybody."

Lincoln responded, "Wade, anybody will do for you, but not for me. I must have somebody."

coachclen

November 24th, 2010 at 8:42 AM ^

And thank you for the enjoyable banter that sometimes turns negative on this board.

I am crazy enough to search through the colleg football database of coaches and I examined every coach and coordinator in the country. My parameters were to not include Harbaugh because he is obvious, but I wanted to see what else was out there. I came up with 10 names, and although it was based on my somewhat limited knowledge and my own speculation, the list was rediculously underwhelming. In fact, there wasn't really a head coach out there that I though Michigan had a chance to land. Sure, there were some longshots (Peterson, Patterson, Wittingham) but I really don't think we could land them.

To me the state of the program is unacceptable, but if Harbaugh isn't the man, I do think Rich is the best legitimate and viable option.

NathanFromMCounty

November 24th, 2010 at 5:26 PM ^

...Speilman's comments nonwithstanding (Speilman basically argued his way into playing time as a Freshman at OSU if memory serves, so maybe he doesn't realize players need time to develop).

 

As most of the players coming up as next year's sophmores and Juniors had offers by big-time programs and those don't go to scrubs (come on, the odds of Michigan being the committment of choice for every miss is less likely than the alternative).  The problem is that most of Rodriquez's defensive assistants have done a *horrible* job of developing talent (with the exception of Bruce Tall as I believe William Campbell is a work ethic issue).

 

If someone would both to develop them you should see some good things out of people like Craig Roh, Kenney Demens, Jibreel Black, Cullen Christian, Courtney Avery, Marvin Robinson, and Josh Furman (that goes without mentioning returning players who've already done decent to excellent like Mike Martin and Ryan Van Bergen).  If you get a D-staff that can *develop* players you'll see a defense step up a decent amount next season (I'd say to around 60th).

 

Ed Shuttlesworth

November 24th, 2010 at 8:29 AM ^

This (with the Henning interview) is, with 80% or more confidence, DB telling the fanbase what very well may transpire.  That's how he, and most corporate PRish types, operate with potentially big announcements -- like, say, how UM/OSU will be scheduled when Nebraska joins the Big 10.

He's laying the groundwork.

Not a coicidence that it's News, not Freep, guys being used as quasi-mouthpieces, for obvious reasons.

Section 1

November 24th, 2010 at 10:46 AM ^

I did think about that -- the significance of Brandon sitting down with Lynn Henning.  Henning is a former/sometime golf writer, and I expect that he and Brandon may be familiar with one another through golfing circles.

And oh yes.  Just like the Athleitc Department pointedly leaked the good news story from the NCAA to Larry Lage of the AP to trump the Freep, I see this as throwing a bone to the News during OSU week.

Fine way for Lynn Henning to repay Brandon; later popping off about an imaginary firing of RR that "wasn't based on any information."

jmblue

November 24th, 2010 at 11:47 AM ^

This (with the Henning interview) is, with 80% or more confidence, DB telling the fanbase what very well may transpire.

I was thinking the same.  There's an interesting amount of compartmentalization going on with some posters here; they maintain faith in Brandon while attacking Wojo for (quite possibly) serving as Brandon's mouthpiece.

Zone Left

November 24th, 2010 at 11:34 AM ^

They did get whipped, just like the 28-14 Rose Bowl. " if Rodriguez loses, he'd have dropped pretty much every contest against a tough opponent. He's 15-20 overall, 6-17 in the Big Ten, winless against rivals Michigan State and Ohio State, 2-1 against Notre Dame." Yeah, Michigan has beaten basically zero good teams in 3 seasons. I'm on the fence about another season.

robpollard

November 24th, 2010 at 12:45 PM ^

I'm not sure your definition of "whipped", but look at last year's box score:

http://scores.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=293250130

- OSU had 318 yards; UM had 309 yards
- The score was 14-10 in the 3rd quarter
- When down 21-10 in the 4th, Michigan drove the ball to OSU 6 yard line, where Tate threw his 4th INT of the game (which ultimately was the story of the game - two teams playing equal, except for the HUGE difference that our freshman QB made silly turnovers).

I'm not saying last year's game was a nail-biter, but any game in which both teams essentially have the same yardage and there never is a gap of more than 11 points is not a whipping/blowout/whatever.