backtoblu

January 5th, 2013 at 3:13 AM ^

I'm giving this one a little more time before I get excited.  Last year the rumors were all about Texas A&M offering him around a million/year.  This season it seems to be USC a little north of a million.  It could happen, I guess, if the rumors are true, but I'm gonna wait until we start hearing from outlets and sources we do know.

LSAClassOf2000

January 5th, 2013 at 6:49 AM ^

For some added context here, Lane Kiffin mentioned that he wanted someone with no previous Southern California ties. A summary piece about Narduzzi in Reign Of Troy is here - (LINK). 

Some of the other candidates that are / were supposedly being considered (this article is from the 29th of December, so who knows where the selection process is at now) include Gene Chizik, Kent Baer ( formerly at SJSU, who was going to Colorado as DC, I thought), Clancy Pendergast (former Cal DC), and Tosh Lupoi (Washington D-Line coach). 

cozy200

January 5th, 2013 at 6:49 AM ^

1.2? If thats true how the hell can USC look at an assistant salary like that but we cant find a top OC and pay them fuck you money like that? This isn't really pure hate on Borges, but thats a lot of cash and we look more then cheap by not doing so with all of our coaches!

cozy200

January 5th, 2013 at 6:54 AM ^

For Dave Brandon? Is it how profitable we are or how many titles we win? The two are somewhat linked i suppose but we have historically never paid for top coaching talent. Like top 5 school money. I understand Gmatt is paid well as he should be but this is rare no?

Taps

January 5th, 2013 at 9:17 AM ^

Upon assembling all the evidence, it seems obvious to me that there are only two conceivable explanations:

1) DB/Hoke think there is absolutely nobody better than Al Borges.  I suppose it's not impossible for someone to think this, but it's a longshot.

2) Athletic Department money is better spent on a 40 million dollar facility for rowing or some kind of highfalutin billboard in a parking lot.  I'm pretty sure this is it.

Dave Brandon makes me sad.

OmarDontScare

January 5th, 2013 at 8:46 AM ^

Disagree. This would be a huge blow to their football program. Losing the person responsible for the one bright spot (defense) of your team while simultaneously losing your best recruiter is about the worst thing that could happen. It's also another clear signal to that fanbase that MSU is simply a stopgap for good coaches.

APBlue

January 5th, 2013 at 8:39 AM ^

This has a familiar ring to it.  Almost one year to the day, this article was posted about his flirtations with Texas A&M:

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/43358/msu-passes-big-test-in-k…

Is he going to leverage this into just another raise with MSU?  This was Dantonio's quote from the article linked: 

"Mark Hollis had already identified the financial resources to make sure that not only Pat, but all of our assistant coaches, had salaries that are competitive in the Big Ten."  

Something else that I haven't seen mentioned in the posts above is that Dantonio was a DC at Ohio State before going to Cincinnati.  I think their defense will still be okay, even if Narduzzi leaves.  However, I thought their defense was going to take a step back next year anyway.  

Unfiltered Manball

January 5th, 2013 at 8:46 AM ^

Dantonio's requirements for new DC candidates:

 

-  must respond well to eternal scowling

- can wash Lord Izzo's car

- strong knowledge of area correctional facilities

- strive for consistent mediocrity

- recruit well in Canada 

- can bring Rich Rod back to Michigan

gbdub

January 5th, 2013 at 9:21 AM ^

This seems odd - Narduzzi could get an HC job if he wanted it, why go to USC to be a coordinator for one of the few guys in the same douche league as Dantonio?

TyrannousLex

January 5th, 2013 at 10:00 AM ^

Thinks he can parlay the DC spot into HC when Kiffin leaves? Figures that DC at USC is a much higher profile gig and when he takes a shot at HC jobs elsewhere he might be able to skip the MAC coach career stage? Or even doesn't figure that he'll ever be a HC so taking the DC spot at premier school makes great career sense.

Leonhall

January 5th, 2013 at 10:01 AM ^

Obviously SC is a better gig than state but I'm kind of shocked he is leaving for something other than a head coaching job. Especially with Kiffin presumably on the hot seat. Supposedly if true,it won't be announced until Tuesday, this could change the mind of reschke....what a week for Sparty.

NateVolk

January 5th, 2013 at 10:11 AM ^

I was in Los Angeles at the end of November. If you haven't spent time there, the lifestyle tangibles blow the midwest away. Start with 300 plus sunny days a year and list them out.  USC is private too, so no state imposed red tape if they want to pay their assistants huge money. He'll got a monster raise if he takes the job.

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

January 5th, 2013 at 11:18 AM ^

over LA especially with million dollar salary to let him enjoy the best of LA. Regardless, I suspect Narduzzi would choose the talent, resources and visibility of USC over the LA lifestyle. He has to salivate over 3-4 five star DBs in one class - he can scheme and blitz to the nth degree with his front 7.

Magnum P.I.

January 5th, 2013 at 12:59 PM ^

Also, don't plan on buying a house of even modest quality in SoCal unless you've got a cool $100K sitting around for a down payment (NBD, right?). And about $3K a month from there on. Throw in the $10,000 you'll spend on gas and auto maintenance per year and taxes, and you better be making some good money. Same salary would give you a ridiculous quality of life in Michigan.

lhglrkwg

January 5th, 2013 at 9:39 AM ^

Narduzzi and Kork were the reason they were so good the last few years. Now there's no Coupons and no Narduzzi so they'll just suck again.

On the other hand, this may get USC a national title. If Narduzzi can turn a bunch of MSU 3 stars into a soul-crushing defense, he is going to obliterate some teams with USC's talent

Alumnus93

January 5th, 2013 at 10:42 AM ^

its amazing how far down our program has come, and how much higher msu's has...

this is contrived by msu, to draw attention in the recruiting world to msu... they are trying to make a move to being able to recruit nationally, in the future. narduzzi isnt going anywhere...and if he did, tressel would take his place anyway. 

the m nation needs to worry far more about our program, than others...b/c our program is still in reboot mode, whether you want to believe it or not.

Kaminski16

January 5th, 2013 at 11:25 AM ^

Tressel coaching under Dantonio, as his DC? Not in a million years.

Michigan State recruiting nationally? If they couldn't do that after back-to-back eleven win seasons, it sure as hell isn't going to happen after they went 0-4 at home in the B1G and barely snuck into a bowl game.

As for Michigan, we're going to be fine. Thanks. 

Don

January 5th, 2013 at 3:58 PM ^

Thanks for the backup, but I was referring to Jim Tressel, and it was entirely in jest anyhow. I know Senator Tressel ain't going anywhere right now, and certainly not as a coordinator.

Alumnus93

January 5th, 2013 at 10:43 AM ^

its amazing how far down our program has come, and how much higher msu's has...

this is contrived by msu, to draw attention in the recruiting world to msu... they are trying to make a move to being able to recruit nationally, in the future. narduzzi isnt going anywhere...and if he did, tressel would take his place anyway. 

the m nation needs to worry far more about our program, than others...b/c our program is still in reboot mode, whether you want to believe it or not.

wresler120

January 5th, 2013 at 3:21 PM ^

It's being reported that he is currenlty meeting with USC right now. Coaches always come out and say things aren't true ... about 24 hours before they take a job