MSU Still Billing Abuse Victim

There was an attorney on WTKA this morning. I didn't catch his name, but he seemed to be saying he was a prof in Lansing (so Cooley or MSU Law).  It sounded to me like he was a regular caller or Sam called for some inside perspective. 

I could be wrong but this guy seemed to be making up facts.  Sam asked :who is going to pay for this"?  This guy said that it would be 100% paid by insurance even if it were a billion dollar settlement. He also said the governmental immunity defense MSU is using was not only a good strategy, but implied it was iron clad, and he seemed to be towing the MSU line on every issue.  

 I am not following the legal defense aspects of this case to closely, but it don't  seem like this guy, who is presumably an outsider, knows MSu's insurance policy let alone what their legal strategy is.  He seemed to me making broad assumptions but what floored me is that he presented them as fact and was doing the same with his students (or so he said).  It's true that the an insurer could be calling the shots behind the scenes, that's they way it works in commercial litigation. 

He also was completely devoid of any emotion for the victims and I felt he was trying to belittle Sam and the MSU backlash coming from the Mgo community.  The interview frankly made me want to vomit, and I'm a lawyer and understood everything he was claiming.  It's just that he was spewing opinion and speculation as fact to Sam (over the air)  and I thought that was very unprofessinal. I could be wrong but this guy soundled like a part of the MSU public relations machine. 

In fact this fellow said that he used this case as an example of how lawyers need to remove "emotion" from their decision making and stragey and be lawyers.  I get it but this is exactly what's wrong with this case.  MSU is an extenion of the State funded mostly with public funds. I'm sure it's charter claims that extists for the students and residents of the State.  It is acting like a citizen with no obligation to taxpayers, residents, students, etc.  Very very sad and frankly pathetic.    

Sorry if this was already posted in other thread but I didn't see it. This Detroit News Artcile was the first I'd seen the details of these examples from the 1990's of the culture of denial at MSU.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/tech/2018/01/18/msu-president-told-nassar-complaint-2014/1042071001/

It's amazing to think that Lianna Hadden and Destiny Teachner-Hauk are both STILL EMPLOYED TODAY, while it's quite likely Teachner-Hauk ends up in prison after lying to the FBI last year and to interal investigators during the 2014 Title IX investigation. But MSU doesn't feel the need to suspend them. Two victims testified last week that they told these women about Nassar in the 1990's.  The fact that both of them are not at the very least suspended is a clear example of why Simon and the entire BoT need to go.  What could MSU possibly be waiting for to suspend them? These women are accused of silencing victims, one lied about it to investigators, and they both continue to be trainers at MSU to this day.  I get that they're trying to shed any blame, but what happens if it turns out there's another predator still on staff that these people are covering for? How do you defend yourself if once again your inaction results in additional uneccesary victims?