jg2112

March 30th, 2010 at 9:57 AM ^

Well, not always (2005?). The Gophers have defeated Michigan TWICE in my lifetime, and I'm (EL GUAPO) 33 YEARS OLD. But your general sentiment is right. However, the Gophers will be improved in 2011 with 9 returning defensive starters, as well as MarQueis Gray at QB. They may be more competitive than in the past, but I still expect Michigan to retain the Jug.

jg2112

March 30th, 2010 at 9:55 AM ^

I'm a Gopher season ticket holder (why? I live in Minnesota), so I follow the Geauxfurs team. If you think the Wolverines have tough goings on defense (I would submit they will not this year), consider this: The ONLY Gopher defender that would start for Michigan is S Kim Royston, and that is debatable (if Emilien is healthy, or Woolfolk were to be moved to safety, Royston would be on the bench). Further, Jordan Kovacs is better than any defensive back on their roster, except, MAYBE, CB Michael Carter. So please, a little perspective. Michigan's got the depth and the numbers. And it is in no danger of giving up 65 points this year, like Minnesota very well may to USC on 9/18.

Search4Meaning

March 30th, 2010 at 11:32 AM ^

Complimenting Minnesota on their decisions to give young student athletes a second chance and how they out recruit Michigan in their state. They do everything the right way!

PhillipFulmersPants

March 30th, 2010 at 11:49 AM ^

"It's unclear if he'll return before the end of spring ball." Really? Man, if that's even a remote possibility, I guess I'll get even more cynical about the motivations of the typical college football coach.