itself

January 23rd, 2015 at 11:29 AM ^

Sam Webb offered his take this morning and suggested the key to the Weber quote was his expressing doubt about taking an "official" visit. Sam intimated that while Weber might not take an official visit, an unofficial visit is still possible, if not more likely. Weber's from Detroit and his visited UofM numerous times. It's an easy trip so this by no means closes the door.

Also, if I remember correctly Urban Meyer threatened to pull Bri'Onte Dunn's offer when he planned to visit UofM a few years back. Weber may be defending against a similar situation with his public comments. Then again who knows. All recruiting is far from over.  

 

EDIT: Didnt mean to step on anyone's toes if someone offered similiar information further down the thread. I didnt read the entire thread. 

Scarlatina

January 23rd, 2015 at 3:07 PM ^

I doubt it because Dunn did end up taking two visits to Michigan after Tressel "resigned." IIRC, Bri'Onte Dunn was going to switch his commitment mainly because he didn't think Urban's offense would properly utilize a "power back." Urban and RB coach Stan Drayton had an in-home visit and Urban basically said, "the only reason you haven't seen me produce an elite power back is because I've never had an elite power back." So Dunn reaffirmed his commitment after the visit.

ak47

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:28 AM ^

Not to be a debbie downer or anything but in the next two years osu has a much greater chance of playing for nationals championships.  We are going to be pleased with a 10 win season, they are going to upset with anything other than a return to the playoff.  Not to mention he just watched ezekiel elliot dominate behind an oline that is returning 4 starters.  If you don't think that osu's situation over the next 3 years compares favorably to Michigan I don't know what to tell you.

Now if you are talking more than 2 years out once Harbaugh gets a class or two in and has remade the team than sure the future looks bright but I think Mike Weber is probably more interested in the next 2 years rather than the next 6.

gustave ferbert

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:37 AM ^

right now, "we've got ourselves a game, folks."  

Eddie George went on to win the Heisman but not before Tim Biakabutuka ran for 314 yards and beat him. 

Michigan could have beaten OSU the last two years had they had a play or two go there way and some competence on the coaching staff.

They may be in a better position to compete for NC's, but that doesn't mean we can't beat them. 

 

and rest assured, I will be leading the chant come next November: "Should have been a wolverine!!!!"  

Wolverine 73

January 23rd, 2015 at 11:52 AM ^

With OSU having secured a commitment from one of the top backs in the 2016 class already, and with Elliot ahead of him for another year or two--and others there also--Weber might consider extrapolating to 2016 et seq., and might conclude that (1) Michigan likely has a top notch OL by then, and (2) he will have a better chance at PT at Michigan than OSU. 

93Grad

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:12 AM ^

It is so hard for a staff to pull in big time commits this late in the game.  I think we are going to see mostly 3 star and sleeper types to finish out this class, with the execption of maybe Wheatley Jr. 

PapabearBlue

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:24 AM ^

Ehhh, I have to disagree with this. Then again, Im of the opinion that a student should be picking a school for the education. Id love to see a 10 year after survey of both ex college players to find out how many wished they had picked better schools or taken school more seriously. Id be willing to bet the resupts would be pretty dramatic.

joegeo

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:44 AM ^

The Michigan degree has a slight edge over OSU's. I'm fairly certain the Michigan Kinesiology degree doesn't hold any more water than does the OSU Kinesiology degree (or whatever it is that most football players are majoring in these days).

I'm sure many people (athletes or not) regret not taking school more seriously, but as satisfying as it would be, I don't think many with an OSU degree think 'if only I had a Michigan degree.' US News: Michigan 29th, OSU 54th. We're not exactly comparing an Ivy to a Tier 2 school here.

GoBlueDenver

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:16 AM ^

That's not fantastic for us, but just because he isn't going to use an official to see M doesn't mean that we don't have a chance to flip him. He lives 45 min away. No need to use an official, and no need to enrage the bucktards (sorry I'm not sorry for that one)

amaizenblue402

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:18 AM ^

Ohio State just won the National Championship, of course he's going to pick them over us. We haven't been relevant for how long? He's going with the team that's hot and is winning NOW.

gustave ferbert

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:21 AM ^

he just said no to a staff with how many years of NFL experience?  And chose to stay with a staff that has how 0 years of NFL experience.  

I would imagine in a prospects eyes, that would have to count for something. 

Shaun

January 23rd, 2015 at 10:26 AM ^

Why would it?

College coaches have experience in taking HS kids, winning a lot of CFB games with them, and developing them so they get drafted into the NFL.

NFL coaches have experience drafting college kids and then winning NFL games with them.

Wouldn't the college coaches who have been turning HS kids into drafted CFB players be more relevant to a HS kid than an NFL coach? It seems to be that college coaches are the ones with experience developing kids.

I doubt it plays a huge role either way, but I don't see the advantage the NFL coaches have in this instance.

1464

January 23rd, 2015 at 11:10 AM ^

I'm honestly not sure.  My thoughts are that an NFL coach would be able to mold kids into what they WANT them to be in the NFL.  I'd probably side with the NFL coaches being better at that, but I'm not exactly adamant about it.  Plus, a good portion of the NFL guys were NCAA guys who were good at doing the NCAA thing and got called up to the major league.

gustave ferbert

January 23rd, 2015 at 11:29 AM ^

things:

who has Urban Meyer successfully put in the NFL?  Aaron Hernandez?  Tim Tebow? That kid from the eagles who vowed to fight every (N-word) at a country music concert? 

 

Troy Smith won  a Heisman trophy and look how far he got.  

No Ohio State quarterback has ever played in a super bowl.

It's like Cardale Jones said, they ain't come to play school. . . which I believe is true, but did they come to play so that Ohio State could win National championships?  Or be able to compete at the next level???? 

 

 

Shaun

January 23rd, 2015 at 12:33 PM ^

Do you think the Michigan coaches made Tom Brady the NFL player that he is or do you think Tom Brady deserves most of the credit (along with BB)?

The Michigan coaches coached Brady up to be a 6th round draft pick. Would you assign his success in the NFL to Michigan, or to his development since then?

By my count, Urban put 16 players into the first 3 rounds of the NFL draft from 2006-2011. At OSU, he has put 5 players (not his recruits, whether you want to count that for or against him) into the first 3 rounds in 2 years.

Urban took a 2 star QB in Alex Smith and turned him into the #1 overall pick and he's still a starter 10 years later.

Success in the NFL is very much dependent upon the player and being lucky enough to land in a good organization.

College coaches can develop players into highly regarded prospects who get drafted into the NFL and get paid. Once there, what more can a college coach do?

For what it is worth, OSU has 3 rookie OL who were drafted last year and are now starters. They have a WR starting for the Panthers, a CB starting for the Broncos, a LB starting for the Steelers, and a RB splitting time with Frank Gore, all from last year's draft class.

Trying to point out that past OSU coaches have not developed draftable QBs doesn't seem very relevant to Urban.

If you are trying to say that Urban doesn't develop NFL talent, then the numbers don't seem to back you up on that.

west2

January 23rd, 2015 at 2:50 PM ^

in the first paragraph you imply michigan had nothing to do with Tom Brady's success in the NFL then in the last paragraph you claim urban meyer develops NFL talent.  So which is it college coaches develop talent for the next level or not?    How about this Meyer has no-zero-zip NFL experience contrasted to Michigan's head coach & staff that not only has experience at that level but knows what it takes to win at level.  Who would rather play for if you want to get to the NFL, experienced coaches or a coach with a big ego that overshadows the players. Buckeyes won't have the underdog label next year and with expectations sky high it's going to be difficult to repeat. I see a lot of player squabbling and problems keeping people happy. Agreed Michigan's a couple years away but then if you love the buckeyes so much what are you doing here?!   Go back to c-bus and get a tattoo

Shaun

January 23rd, 2015 at 3:44 PM ^

My point is that a college coach wants to develop his players into high draft picks (I picked 1-3 rounds but that could be debated). Teams pay good money to these picks and want to ensure they succeed.

I pointed out that Michigan did not develop Tom Brady into a desirable draft pick. If they did, he wouldn't have gone in the 6th round. Does the fact that he became a much better QB in the NFL than college serve as a compliment to his college coaching?

Recruits want to be turned into high draft picks, not draft sleepers who pan out a low percentage of the time. If a coach is producing lots of high draft picks, they are doing a good job at the college level. Once the players get to the NFL and get nice contracts, it really is up to them to put in the work to determine if they are going to be decent or great.

The last half of your paragraph has really nothing to do with my previous post.

west2

January 23rd, 2015 at 5:45 PM ^

it's better to be a high draft pick and appear to be NFL ready but not really have the capability to be successful and flame out in 2-3 years, than be coached well have the ability to sustain a 15 year or more NFL career as Brady and Harbaugh have done.   Yeah ok I see your point. 

Shaun

January 23rd, 2015 at 6:49 PM ^

Your example is the exception rather than the rule. Of course you would rather be Tom Brady rather than Jamarcus Russell, but, in the long run, you would rather be a 1st round pick instead of a 6th round pick.

It's a similar argument that fans make every year about recruiting. Ah, recruiting isn't that big of a deal because great player XYZ was only a 2 star but that 5 star was a bust. Sure, you can always pick out exceptions, but, looking at the large picture, your team has a better chance of winning with 5 stars rather than 2 stars.

This discussion has taken a strange turn anyway. The NFL careers of Troy Smith and Tom Brady have no real relevance to whether a recruit wants to be coached by Urban Meyer or Jim Harbaugh. The fact that this was prompted by a RB recruit makes it even less relevant.

west2

January 24th, 2015 at 12:35 PM ^

the most overused word these days relevant to college sports.  Everything is relevant darlin when it comes to AA vs c-bus.  Heres whats relevant, why are you, an obvious buckeye, bothering to respond on a Michigan blog more often than diehard M alums or AA residents (oh yeah and walmart wolverines too-haha kidding here)?  Are you that worried about whats happening here?  How about this for relevant-the new M coaches have been recruiting now for about 2 weeks and are left with only flipping kids at this point-so whether they get a kid now or not is irrelevant, next year will be a totally different experience.  How about this for relevance-if I was a buckeye fan I would be worried that Meyer only stays another year with this group goes as far as he can with them then jumps to the NFL as offers are pouring in.  He is relatively young and what else is there for him to prove at the college level?  Yeah you heard me!  Its happenin...

So take that c-bus troll with a new tattoo.

drjaws

January 24th, 2015 at 12:36 AM ^

"Recruits want to be turned into high draft picks, not draft sleepers who pan out a low percentage of the time."

I don't think kids care I think they just want to have a shot. Clearly first-round would be better but they'd take a practice squad spot over folding pants at JCPenney's