Lewan #11 Overall player, M player rankings and team rankings on NCAA 14

Submitted by Wolverine Devotee on June 13th, 2013 at 11:46 AM

Here are the teams ratings for all 126 teams in the game.

Ones of note-

Michigan- 91 Overall, 91 Offense, 92 Defense

ohio- 95 overall, 97 offense, 92 defense

sparty- 91 overall (LOL), 90 offense (LOL!!), 93 defense

Alabama- 99 overall, 99 offense, 99 defense

Notre Dame- 93 overall, 93 offense, 93 defense

I shall post more details on this game as the day goes on because I am currently digging through the interwebs for more information. 

Taylor Lewan is the #11 overall rated player in the game at a 96 OVR.

Screenshot from the game-

Here are the top-10 rated players on Michigan's roster, per Operation Sports video

1. Taylor Lewan - 96 
2. Jeremy Gallon - 90 
3. Devin Gardner - 89 
4. Jake Ryan - 89 
5. Matt Wile (Listed as Punter) - 88 
6. Brennen Beyer - 88 
7. Brendan Gibbons - 88 
8. Thomas Gordon - 88 
9. Raymon Taylor - 87 
10. Desmond Morgan - 87 

Comments

1464

June 13th, 2013 at 11:49 AM ^

LOL.

Aside from Bama, those ratings are incredibly stupid.  Bama > OSU >= Michigan > ND > State.  I try to stay unbiased, so those reflect my honest opinion, not homerism.

But I guess I wouldn't expect the team that created the Tebow package that may break open the case against the NCAA to be very good at what they do...

MLaw06

June 13th, 2013 at 12:29 PM ^

 

Ohio State

95

97

92

Notre Dame

93

93

93

Michigan

91

91

92

Michigan State

91

90

93

Iowa

88

88

90

Nebraska

88

91

85

Wisconsin

88

88

88

Northwestern

86

86

87

Maryland

86

86

85

Penn State

84

86

85

Rutgers

84

86

82

Purdue

84

84

85

Illinois

83

86

80

Indiana

81

83

82

UConn

81

84

80

Minnesota

79

79

80

Central Michigan

72

72

71

Akron

63

61

65

 

1464

June 13th, 2013 at 12:44 PM ^

Their version of the B1G is so off par with mine, it's funny.  Who do you agree with?  Random message board guy or multimillion dollar company?

- - -

OSU

Michigan

Northwestern

Nebraska

Wisconsin

MSU / PSU

Iowa / Purdue

Illinois

Indiana / Minnesota

Moleskyn

June 13th, 2013 at 11:57 AM ^

Well, the most recent version I have is 2011, so I suppose it's time to get an upgrade. I'd be getting this one anyway, what with Denard on the cover and everything, but I'm really not expecting much of a difference from 2011.

JHendo

June 13th, 2013 at 12:22 PM ^

Wow, so you lose your main source(s) of productivity from your already inept offense, and that part of your team still gets an A- grade?  Really?  On the other end, I would think their defense would've been ranked a smidge higher.

Huss

June 13th, 2013 at 1:01 PM ^

The player renderings in the game look exactly the same as previous iterations.

The ratings are dumbfounding as usual.

And the lemmings will continue to dish out $60 for this rubbish.

Good job; Good effort, guys.  Go play a real EA game like FIFA instead.  This franchise checked out a long, long time ago.

 

(PS: I too am a huge fan of the 06 NCAA soundtrack.  Good call.)

Darth Wolverine

June 13th, 2013 at 2:05 PM ^

I believe there is a glitch in the '13 version because I downloaded a roster, but it would never load. I did some research and several people had the same issue.

Also, this is probably the last time I'm going to buy the game. I didn't buy the '12 version (and quite frankly, didn't miss it much), but all other games since the '03 version on Gamecube was purchased and played a lot. As noted, I bought the '13 version, but I just didn't play it as much as I used to. I used to play NCAA so much, but it has gotten boring for me. Now of course, when I get the '14 version, I will play it a lot for about six months because I like doing the dynasty mode, but I'm sure by January I will be bored with it.

ChiCityWolverine

June 13th, 2013 at 2:30 PM ^

As usual, I'll be doing a fair amount of editing. Beyer should be around 80, not 88. The young players will probably be woefully off. Hope this is the yet they expand rosters to 85 from the freshmen killing 70 it's always been. Oh wait, no chance.

RagingBean

June 13th, 2013 at 3:07 PM ^

I hatehatehatehatehatehatehatehatehate the 70-player roster limit. Why not just decrease the total number of yearly scholarship or cut you off from getting another commitment once you've reached the limit? There's a million things in these games that drive me crazier (hello flying linebackers), but that one really stick in my craw for whatever reason.

 

Anyway, I guess I might buy this year because...Denard?

Minus The Houma

June 13th, 2013 at 5:13 PM ^

Braxton is only an 87 speed?  Gardner is 90, which I am probably ok with.  Braxton should probably be right there too.  I will say that I kind of like that Clowney is a 99 and the next highest guys are 97's