SAMgO

April 14th, 2016 at 12:23 PM ^

Thanks for posting, good read. I can respect the writers Ramzy has brought in over there, even if their reading/commenting base is so out of their minds.

Truthbtold

April 14th, 2016 at 4:08 PM ^

When the underlying theme is about a successful and winning team. That's why 11w is so good. Winners talking about winners. What Mgoblog represents is also entertaining, but the theme is more whiners talking about whiners. But it is entertaining.

SAMgO

April 14th, 2016 at 12:51 PM ^

r/CFB is usually terrible, to be honest. That place surrounding the satellite camp saga was ridiculous, you couldn't even post in there as a Michigan fan without being told how Harbaugh actually caused the ban because he was "abusing the system". I saw some guy get upvoted for saying that Satellite camps were actually costing players scholarships because Harbaugh was signing them and then cutting them from the class. You can't even argue with that level of stupid. I read it to get a general sense of the national landscape, but the comments section is filled with a heavy southern bias and a huge disdain for anything Michigan/Harbaugh.

rambouhh

April 14th, 2016 at 1:23 PM ^

R/CFB is the best neutral forum. The vast majority of people on there were against the the ban of satellite camps. There were a few and the commented on each thread or always a little different but in general it is a great place to have discussion with other fanvases that doesn't turn into a "my team is better than yours" shitfest.

SAMgO

April 14th, 2016 at 2:01 PM ^

I don't think there are any good neutral forums. Like I said, I read it because it does a pretty good job of curating articles that show what's going on nationally, but the users commenting are mostly full of shit. I've seen many a fan get voted down into oblivion for pointing out specific instances of Ole Miss or Clemson or [insert recent success southern school obviously paying players here] cheating, and the standard response is "Can't prove it! Where's the proof?? And you think your school isn't doing the same thing? Ridiculous." There aren't any real conversations on there, just circlejerks of their already prevailing beliefs.

evenyoubrutus

April 14th, 2016 at 1:09 PM ^

Are you serious? Go through 11 Warriors posts about Michigan and count how many comments actually provide some kind of insight or a reasonable take, and then count how many are some stupid joke like "Hairball sux lulz" or simply "Fuck Michigan." If one person here on the board posted anything near as stupid as the majority of comments over there they would get negged to Bolivian. For example, have you seen what happens when somebody writes "Urban Crier" or "Spartinas"? There is no comparison, period.

mgoblue0970

April 14th, 2016 at 3:13 PM ^

I've been called out for saying moo u. 

I seriously don't give a shit though.  I despise those front runners with everything in my maize and blue soul.  A couple of losing seasons and "spartan nation" will go back to being the nothing it always was.

MEMSwolverine

April 14th, 2016 at 12:25 PM ^

I'm the same way.  I find 11W better to read than the MSU board because 11W actually has in depth analysis instead of a bunch of knuckleheads abandoning all logic in order to take any shots they can at M

Jalm

April 14th, 2016 at 2:27 PM ^

11W is a picture book tailored for 5 year olds which sometimes has an interesting piece to say look they made a finger painting. MGoBlog is more of a well written novel written for civilized learnt adults, good pieces are more the standard than fluff pieces. Good job and nice finger painting 11W.

mgoblue0970

April 14th, 2016 at 3:11 PM ^

If 11W is finger painting, just what the heck is RCMB.  Occasionally, just occasionally, you'll see reason on 11W.  I have NEVER (not that I go there much) seen anything but the dregs of humanity on RCMB!

Yes, debating the merits of 11W v RCMB is like debating virtue among whores.

evenyoubrutus

April 14th, 2016 at 12:29 PM ^

11 Warriors is hit or miss. This was a good piece but they also had a writeup looking at 2016 for Michigan and MSU a few weeks ago, and they said something like "Michigan loses the vast majority of their starters to graduation." Huh?!

trueblue262

April 14th, 2016 at 12:38 PM ^

has 2 losses before we meet them. Notre Dame & Indiana.....yes, Indiana.

Game is in Bloomington and Indiana has been a team in the past couple years with potential to be a real "home-wrecker" in the B1G. And based on early reports, this spring for the hoosiers has been their best under Wilson.

Also hoping Baker Mayfield starts his Heisman campaign against the Buckeyes

SAMgO

April 14th, 2016 at 1:40 PM ^

Yes, Indiana is a possibility...or Wisconsin or BYU or Northwestern or @Maryland. They don't have a ton of sure wins before they play us. Obviously they'll be favored in those contests and will win most of them, but two losses by the time we see them is not only not out of the question, it's a distinct possibility.

kehnonymous

April 14th, 2016 at 4:13 PM ^

Some of the 11w writers are good, but overall the tone of that site is set by Our Patron Saint of Perpetual Aggreivement and the attempts at humor just come off as forced and juvenile.  If we're being honest, M football has supplied no shortage of comedy material for our rivals over the last 8 years and those amateurs can't even make chicken salad out of that.  I kvetch about the state of the MGoBoard as much as anyone else but it's still far and away better than those provincial mouthbreathers and you can trace the difference to the vast gap in maturity between the MGoStaff and their counterparts down south.

Sopwith

April 14th, 2016 at 12:36 PM ^

I don't think there's any reason to be sheepish or apologetic about reading 11W. I only wish there was a site even halfway as readable for MSU. There isn't.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

poseidon7902

April 14th, 2016 at 5:01 PM ^

RCMB is a special needs group.  I've never seen a collection of people who find low brow humor enlightening as much as they do.  Their hypocritical approach to everything is beyond the veil of being a biased fanbase.  They truely are obsessed with everything Michigan does.  They can say that the little brother comment doesn't bother them, but in all honesty, there's little about the statement that isn't completely applicable to them.  

xtramelanin

April 14th, 2016 at 12:37 PM ^

wondering, 'what are they thinking?  trying to set us up for something?'   the article was well-reasoned and well written. 

pescadero

April 14th, 2016 at 4:28 PM ^

Peppers is listed at 6'1"

Charles Woodson was also listed at 6'1".

I was 6'1" when I was at Michigan - and I was about 1" taller than Woodson.

 

I've now shrunk to 6', and I highly doubt Woodson hasn't shrunk a similar amount.

...and Woodson is a good couple inches taller than Peppers.

I'd guess barefoot Peppers is somewhere in the 5'9"-5'10" range.

 

 

WestBrew

April 14th, 2016 at 7:24 PM ^

he was responding to a guy being critical of position changing our best cover corner (refering to peppers to LB) and this new guy pointed out that lewis is better in coverage and peppers better near LOS.  "Peppers was never Michigan's best cover corner. Jourdan Lewis is an all-american corner. He actually struggled in coverage, making the move to a more "close to LOS safety" position a decent one"

Not a completely unreasonable opinion... if we're going to call our blog the more sensible we might as well recognize their sensible opinions when they have one. which appears to be about 1/10 on that site.

jakerblue

April 14th, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^

the write-up was good.  The commenters not so much. Are any of them over 10 years old? The name calling is pretty sad, they act like they are the ones who haven't won in years. How can you be so dominant for so long yet still have an inferioirty complex.

LSAClassOf2000

April 14th, 2016 at 12:51 PM ^

In Ann Arbor, Brown faces a very different challenge than what he's seen before. While the chart above shows that his first year at a new school isn't usually overwhelming, he's taking over a defense left in a good position for the first time in his career.

I'll admit that this is what I am most curious about going into this coming season quite honestly, how does a really, really good unit get even better than it is. It is indeed a unique challenge unto itself anywhere you go to take on a high-performing team or unit and make them even better, and sometimes the changes are much less pronounced but make an even greater amount of difference. I am also really curious to see who looks as if they might start at each position (we won't know until basically the start of the first game, of course) as we head deep into August too.

trueblue262

April 14th, 2016 at 2:34 PM ^

last year as a "W" for us. We led the whole game except for the last second. And they won on a type of play that won't be seen in CFB for another 100 years......

Harbaugh has Dantonio's number and he(MD) is very much aware of it.......That's why he back-pedaled on his sattelite camp comments. Like Hollis sat him down and said, "do we really want to go down this road?"