I hope that the jihad furor doesn't detract from what we really should be discussing.

Submitted by wolverine1987 on
Which is, of course, whether Tate or Denard will win the QB position. And if 3 QB's against WMU is a wise course.

Sebie

August 30th, 2009 at 6:31 PM ^

Shut up Bouje the last thing I need to read right now is one of your rediculous posts. Sheridan has a decent chance of starting just say that I don't need to write a friggen NCAA tourney comparison to say that. Its not hard to explain simple stuff.

Goodbye... Columbus

August 30th, 2009 at 5:35 PM ^

I was so sure this was going to be an awesome post about whether Denard is faster than Tate or not. The setup was beautiful. That being said, I would agree- I have probably heard enough about Free press investigations to hold me for a while, and will now return to pacing around, trying to figure out how to speed this week up until football finally starts.

octal9

August 30th, 2009 at 5:39 PM ^

Denard is faster than Tate. The real question is, is he game faster than Tate? To truly answer this question we have to look at a number of different factors - his reads, his throwing motion, his GPA, his control of the offense, and of course - measurable intangibles like his 40 time.

umhannon

August 30th, 2009 at 6:22 PM ^

I was hoping this would be about how running back carries would be distributed: Minor @ 45% Brown @ 20% Shaw @ 15% Cox @ 10% Smith @ 10% That would be a nice split, methinks. Shoelace's speed > Denard's speed > FREEP's fear-mongering

jg2112

August 30th, 2009 at 6:54 PM ^

Someone on Scout posted that Denard's current Facebook post is....to this effect.... We're not worrying about all this outside media garbage, we're getting ready to do what we need to do next Saturday. So, for the kids who will affect the game next Saturday, this issue is a non-starter.