Houston Cougars Schedule

Submitted by mickblue on

Some polls have Houston ranked above Michigan. How are suppose to pass them with this pathetic schedule?

9/10 Lamar

9/15 @ Cinci

9/24 TX St.

9/29 UConn

10/8 @ Navy

10/15 Tulsa

10/22 @SMU

10/29 UCF

11/12 Tulane

11/17 Lvlle

11/25 @Memphis

I'd feel a lot better if they added Cass Tech.

Rabbit21

September 7th, 2016 at 5:02 PM ^

The Committee will take SOS into account.  

But if they take care of business, OU and Lousiville have good years, and the AAC has mutliple strong teams like they did last year, then Houston will have an argument over a two loss Power 5 conference champ.

I have to admit I find Big Ten fans bitching about what they consider to be other team's weak schedules and then bitching about the SEC's "Big Boy football" attitude to be hilarious.  If it's annoying when other conference fans do it to us, then it's annoying when we do it to others.  

ChiCityWolverine

September 7th, 2016 at 5:12 PM ^

Well if you're worried a team passed us because they had a more impressive win in a given week, the fact that their schedule is garbage should be encouraging. Louisville may be the only game left that even holds a candle to any one of Penn State, Wisconsin, @MSU, @Iowa, and @OSU. We have several chances to pass them, and in the Playoff era, worrying about any single team is very silly. 

stephenrjking

September 7th, 2016 at 5:07 PM ^

It still surprises me how many people are attached to the old polls model where teams never dropped positions unless they lost or looked awful against a bad team, when we have two years of evidence from the committees conclusively demonstrating that the poll habits are no longer a factor.

The committee can and will drop a team that wins if another team behind them gets a better win that burnishes its resume. They actively reassess and compare each team, including their entire resumes, each week. 

The first year is a good example of this: TCU got jumped by Baylor and both got jumped by OSU on the final weekend despite everyone winning, because OSU looked better and TCU played a lousy team. 

The idea that somehow a team is going to stay ahead of us with a weak schedule because somehow the committee is going to follow the AP balloting is mythical. 

Don't worry. If Michigan wins its big games on the road, it is going to jump people.

jimmyshi03

September 7th, 2016 at 5:08 PM ^

They don't control the rest of their confrence. Houston, frankly, has done exactly what you'd want a team from the Group of 5 to do in order to "earn" a bid. They played and beat a playoff team from last year that was returning a ton of talent. They will play Louisville, which is currently a top 20 team, and might well be by the time they play in November. They beat Florida State to close the season last year. And they'll have a 13th game, quite possibly against a ranked team, like USF, if they're in position to get into the playoff.

And the AAC did produce multiple top 25 teams last year. 

I can see an argument if they're getting in over a deserving one loss team from a confrence that wouldn't other wise be represented. But since my guess is that probably at least two leagues will have conference champs with at least one loss (Big XII, PAC 12) that may not matter. 

crg

September 7th, 2016 at 5:32 PM ^

Houston has only done what they need so far (as in, after one week) - not "everything" they need to do.  Last year is over and only mattered for the purposes of preseason polls.  They still need to run their table (UConn got them last year at their peak, so someone can do it again this year).  They also need to win all games convincingly - poor showing does not help with a weak SOS.  Finally, this all only matters if there is a spot for them - meaning at least two conference champions have poor records and also ND.  Theoretically possible, but not likely.

jimmyshi03

September 7th, 2016 at 5:39 PM ^

What they did was the single most important thing they had to do. People are now talking as if Oklahoma's destined to go 8-4 or 7-5. If they beat OSU, which is still very possible, especially given the location of the game, we're talking about something very different, especially since they're probably stillt he best team in that league. 

Also note, the UConn loss came whn Greg Ward was out. I'd agree they'll probably have to winn convincingly, but, if you have two conferences (or ND) with two losses (quite possible, given the OU loss and Stanford's less than dominant look), you only need to get to four to get in. You're not putting them in at two. 

M-Dog

September 7th, 2016 at 6:20 PM ^

We have to beat OSU anyway to have any shot at the CFP.  At that point, we want that win to count big in the eyes of the committee, and push us ahead of anybody else with our same record, especially if we have a loss.  Beating an OSU team that winds up with 2-3 losses on their record will not move the dial. 

Your heart may want OSU to lose to OU, but your head needs them to win.

 

M-Dog

September 7th, 2016 at 6:40 PM ^

They barely got in.  They had to annihilate Wisconsin in an unprecedented manner, and have Baylor and TCU split the vote in a Big 12 with no declared champion to get in.  Plus the committee kind of wanted to teach the Big 12 a lesson about not having a true champion.  

You can't count on all that happening again.

An 11-1 Michigan would have made them a shoe-in.

 

lhglrkwg

September 7th, 2016 at 5:21 PM ^

You may as well imagine them having 1 more loss than all the other major power teams because they will lose out against other power 5 schools with the same resume. Four power 5 teams and Houston all go undefeated? Houston's out. Four power 5 teams and Houston all go 12-1/13-1, Houston is still out

That could've been Houston's only shot at a top 10 team. All the other contenders coming out of a Power 5 league will probably have a top 10 win or two

BlueinTC

September 7th, 2016 at 5:27 PM ^

they are non power 5 team who is better than many power 5 teams.  Their schedule is probably as tough as they can get for now and was probably set up years ago.  If we win out or have 1 loss and they do the same, our schedule should trump them (not a political statement). 

WolverineHistorian

September 7th, 2016 at 5:27 PM ^

Houston is the new Boise State, it seems. If they win the two big games on their schedule, they could become an annoyance to teams trying to make it in the playoff.

I know the joke has been beaten to death but I'm honestly not going to stress over this until after I see how we do against three opponents...and hopefully not stumble against somebody else.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

rice4114

September 7th, 2016 at 5:27 PM ^

Oklahoma-OSU

Lamar-hawaii

Cinci-wisconsin

TX St.-penn state

UConn-colorado

Navy-wisconsin

Tulsa-maryland

SMU-indiana

UCF-ucf

Tulane-rutgers

Lvlle-msu

Memphis-iowa

Its seems to me Iowa Wisconsin can make our schedule much better. If they flounder though these schedules arent that far off.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

StephenRKass

September 7th, 2016 at 5:30 PM ^

How would JH answer this question? He sure wouldn't whine or wring his hands. You control your own destiny. If you take care of business, and win your own games, that's all you can do. If Michigan won all it's games, and Houston won all it's games, it is my firm belief that Michigan would be rated above Houston. More than that, they would both be in the championship games, and would have a pretty good chance of meeting each other, to settle who is better on the field.