Night_King

May 2nd, 2017 at 7:18 PM ^

Everything's pointing to him being innocent anyways, though. Unless there's new developments I'm not aware of? Sounded like the girl definitely fabricated what happened.

evenyoubrutus

May 2nd, 2017 at 8:03 PM ^

I have no idea whether he's innocent or not, but there have been plenty of cases of people lying or making false statements in a state of panic or simply in the midst of anxiety and stress, or in some circumstances even police coercion (see West Memphis Three). I really have no idea how I would respond if I were being accused of a crime of such magnitude.

Tunneler

May 2nd, 2017 at 9:05 PM ^

Do not fall for the good cop, bad cop routine.  They are only interested in crossing you up & turning whatever minor discrepencies they produce into major points of contention.

I made the mistake of thinking truth was on my side & I was bullet-proof.  Prosecutors only care about convictions.  

Bastards.

The Oracle

May 3rd, 2017 at 2:02 AM ^

Taking into account the comment, user name and creepy avatar, I believe he may have been convicted of something involving someone's tunnel.

ijohnb

May 3rd, 2017 at 10:02 AM ^

of the best scenes of all time having to do with this very issue was in The Night Of on HBO with Detective Box.  And a really thought provoking indictment of the legal system in the next episode when John Turturo says "don't talk to me about the truth, the truth does not mean anything because it doesn't help you."

Really good show for those that have not watched.

remdog

May 3rd, 2017 at 11:11 AM ^

Good point. There have been numerous cases of people not only testifying incorrectly under stress or interrogation but even confessing to a crime, only to be exonerated later. He's innocent until proven guilty and whether a sexual interaction occurred or not, the prosecution still has to prove "beyond a reasonable doubt" that it was non consensual. That should be a high bar.

Night_King

May 2nd, 2017 at 8:30 PM ^

Wow. Shoulda never lied in the first place, that's not a good look!

The sheer number of eye witnesses and a DNA test should be simple enough to prove if he did something wrong or not. Don't see this case taking very long, whichever way it ends up

Mgo_fly

May 2nd, 2017 at 7:32 PM ^

If you are going to hold anyone accountable for actions prior to the draft then you should hold everyone accountable for actions prior to the draft. The NFL should not be acting as jurors; let the legal system play out and make their determinations based upon the findings NOT the uniformed hysteria of the casual observer.

bronxblue

May 2nd, 2017 at 8:16 PM ^

What I'm a bit surprised is that apparently Conley has already changed his story from "we didn't have any sexual contact" to "it was a consensual sexual act".  I know the NFL doesn't give a shit about domestic violence, sexual assault, or really women in general, but if the guy has already been caught in a lie this early in the proceedings, you'd think the league would be a little more careful about putting out this type of statement, if for no other reason than the nuance (he wasn't technically employed by an NFL team when it allegedly occurred) is going to be lost in the court of public opinion.

Gucci Mane

May 2nd, 2017 at 8:27 PM ^

The NFL should NEVER discipline players. If someone is a free man according to the US and a team wants to employ them, the NFL should not have the right to punish them. I hope a team or player sues the NFL one of these times.

Blueblood2991

May 2nd, 2017 at 8:44 PM ^

While vastly different offenses, Deflategate proved that the courts will uphold the Collective Bargaining Agreement the union agreed to where the commissioner has absolute authority. I expect that is the first thing that changes when it expires in 2020. 

I think it's terrible and I agree with you, but that's what the players signed.

superstringer

May 2nd, 2017 at 9:04 PM ^

NFL exists for solely one reason: entertainment purposes. They are a PR business, nothing else. They dont save lives, they dont manufacture goods. They entertain. When they stop entertaining, they die. So its critically important that they maintain the public's support and attention. if a chunk of their viewers walk, revenue goes down. End of story.

That makes a pro sport totally different from most businesses. Its not about a right to work.

Apparently you dont mind if dog killers and rapists play. You just want to watch football and not care whatsoever about anything else. Fine. But not everyone ascribes to such a myopic view.

Gucci Mane

May 3rd, 2017 at 1:47 AM ^

If you are relying on the NFL to punish rapists that is sad indeed. It appears my entire point may have been missed. The legal system should handle legal issues. That is why it exists.

JetFuelForBreakfast

May 2nd, 2017 at 9:58 PM ^

Build a competitive athletic entertainment industry worth billions of dollars into an economic juggernaut, then let a bunch of 19 to 29 year olds do whatever stupid $h1t they want to the detriment of your business (rag-dolling women in elevators, electrocuting dogs, steroid abuse, drugs, rape, break league rules, etc.) with no consequence--and that's ignoring how many players, managers, and owners are equally appalled by those choices (rather than indifferent as some have absurdly implied.) When some state permits a player convicted of a crime to go through a rehab program and expunges the crime from their record, and another state's laws don't permit the same opportunity, then the team you're on determines whether you play or pay? Good plan. When the court of public opinion turns off the TV or stops buying tickets and merchandise to your industry, does it matter whether the legal system worked or broke down? Nope. Ray Rice got a bigger hit from the League than New Jersey, and people spend more time ripping the Commissioner than an entire state that EXPUNGED his rag-dolling from their records...wrap your brain around that...the rag-dolling DIDN'T "happen." ESPN vacillates between NEVER drafting Mixon (per Golic) or signing Greg Hardy to Ray Rice being black-balled (Greenberg) in some uber conspiracy...yep, if you rag-doll your fiancé and drag her by her hair in public (AND DEFINITELY ON CAM IN A CASINO) you've probably jeopardized your employability...sorry, Ray, when everyone sees you do it you're screwed, when enough don't want to believe you did it, they rationalize it and you walk (OJ)...and businesses (including sports leagues) have to manage employees whose lifestyle ranges from sainthood to prison.

Ali G Bomaye

May 3rd, 2017 at 10:07 AM ^

Teams are subject to the rules of the NFL. That's why they're "franchises" instead of completely independent entities.

If you owned a Subway franchise and you wanted to continue using pictures of Jared Fogle in all your advertising, I'm sure the central corporation would have the right to keep you from doing so. This is the same thing. The NFL tries to protect its profitability by keeping up the appearance that it gives a shit about people who do awful things.

SamirCM

May 2nd, 2017 at 9:11 PM ^

I was going to mention that but you beat me to it. I believe that TP was suspended for 4 games, the same 4 games his college teammates were suspended. From what I recall he agreed in advance to it though later spoke to the NFLPA about challening the suspension though I don't think that went anywhere. 

FatGuyTouchdown

May 2nd, 2017 at 9:43 PM ^

the fact that it's debatable is sad. I'd go 

1. BountyGate

2. DeflateGate

3. Terrell Pryor and the OSU boyz (btw, tattoogate is literally the best thing to ever happen to OSU, you lucky fucking pieces of shit)

4. Doing literally nothing on domestic violence until video of Ray Rice came out

5. Weed worse than painkillers???

6. Domestic Violence scandals outside of Ray Rice (Josh Brown, Ray McDonald)

 

buckeyejonross

May 2nd, 2017 at 11:50 PM ^

Whether you think Tom Brady cheated or not, at the very least, he 1. was an NFL player and 2. was accused of cheating during an NFL game. Regardless of the merits, at a minimum the NFL had some jurisdiction here to investigate (and punish) Brady.

Terrelle Pryor was a college football player exercising his completely legal and independent right to voluntarily bypass his final year of college eligibility to legally enter the NFL's supplemental draft. The NFL punishing him for ????? in violation of ???? NFL rules is patently absurd. 

maize-blue

May 3rd, 2017 at 8:49 AM ^

PED's don't matter in the NFL, violence doesn't matter in the NFL, other misc. crimes don't matter in the NFL. The only sure way to get discipline or face repercussions is to be a convicted murderer. 

Ali G Bomaye

May 3rd, 2017 at 10:09 AM ^

I have no idea what happened that night in Cleveland or whether Conley is a good/bad/whatever person.

But I'm pretty sure the NFL can't punish Conley under the terms of the CBA, because the incident happened before the draft. So this isn't a moral judgment by the NFL so much as a limit on what they can legally do.

Perkis-Size Me

May 3rd, 2017 at 10:11 AM ^

This is a matter for the courts, not the NFL. The justice system will decide if he's guilty, and if he is, he'll be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

remdog

May 3rd, 2017 at 11:05 AM ^

Well, there is that inconvenient "due process" and "innocent until proven guilty" before people are punished for alleged wrongdoing.