Funny RR Quote is Full of Wisdom

Submitted by Marley Nowell on

Insider Bruce Feldman Blog

"The main thing is to win, and we've won," Rodriguez said. "It's like winning a prize and winning $10,000 and being all upset because you have to pay taxes on half of it. Still going to take the money, you know, and be happy with it and move on. It may not be as exciting as taking [all of the] money, but you're still taking half or more."

briangoblue

October 5th, 2010 at 6:33 PM ^

Blitzing For Dummies

 

 

*WARNING: if you don't have experience in the secondary, this book could result in safeties covering receivers one-on-one. The author is not responsible for big plays surrendered to streaking tight ends or receivers isolated on freshman DBs. 

GradyWilson

October 5th, 2010 at 4:49 PM ^

UM was most certainly an "underdog" in quite a few games under (the good and honorable) Coach Carr - if the betting lines and final scores mean anything.

Good quote from RR but nothing's better than Brian's about water torture and Japanese school girl sex!

rtyler

October 5th, 2010 at 1:39 PM ^

Remember when some guy (from MI, I think) won $300 million or something in The Big Game and all the talk was about how he'd "only get half" due to taxes.  Yeah, I'll bet he was really sad about winning $150 million.  He deserved the full amount, right?  Seeing as he hard earned it and everything... I'm glad RR and I think along the same lines.  This and the "Obama has a hard edge" line (probably not real, as it is from an impersonation by one of the players) make me like his choices of example.

Mitch Cumstein

October 5th, 2010 at 1:41 PM ^

He did take the risk of losing his $1 or whatever weighed against the tiny probability of actually winning.  Also, I'm not sure the gov't provided any service to earn the $150M that he was forced to given them. 

That being said, he should have been aware of the tax laws and if it was so troubling to have to give away half, don't buy a ticket in the first place.

rtyler

October 5th, 2010 at 1:48 PM ^

I might be wrong about this, but don't state governments typically run the lotto? -- thereby providing the service of a fair lottery for the players, and providing the non-playing public the service of raking in a bunch of cash from such operations. Obviously whether the second half of that is okay is a matter of opinion not for this board.

STW P. Brabbs

October 5th, 2010 at 2:33 PM ^

Couldn't an economist make the argument that for a particular person, the utility of winning $150M could actually be sufficiently greater than the value of the $1 ticket that the horrendous odds are offset?  I'm not an economist, but once you start looking into the perceived value of things - which is really all utility is - things get a bit more complicated than simple odds, no?

Which, of course, is why economics is a bit of a crackpot science.  But that's another argument.