Florida Pursuing Horford

Submitted by alum96 on

Obviously there is a connection there due to his brother but it is interesting Horford is leaving one Elite 8 team for another a Final Four team.   If he does land there it would quite a landing spot in terms of basketball and we'll definitely get to see if Horford's family's view of his skill set is realistic (and by definition he was being held back by Beilein's "emphasis on guards / wings") as UF plays a more traditional brand of bball.   Morgan seemed to do ok in this system last year as did Mitch but we'll see.

LINK.

UMaD

April 17th, 2014 at 2:28 PM ^

There is a big window of opportunity between how good Al is (elite player) and being on an NBA roster.

Jon potentially has NBA-level skill.  His rebounding is good enough already.  If he can refine his mid-range jumper and keep improving defensively there's a long career as an NBA backup in the cards for him.

Florida would provide an excellent opportunity for Jon to show off his abilities.

As a grad and 4-year contributor and quality guy, I wish him nothing but the best.

WolvinLA2

April 17th, 2014 at 2:33 PM ^

I hold no ill-will toward Horford at all, but he's not an NBA player, not even a back up. There are lots of 6'10" dudes who can do what he does or better. I'm not glad he left because I believe he can still be a quality college center, but he will not have an NBA career. I would much rather have Morgan on my NBA team, and I don't think he has a shot in the league either. If DaShawn Sims can't get into the league, Horford doesn't have a prayer.

UMaD

April 17th, 2014 at 3:38 PM ^

I'll agree that Horford isn't there yet, but that's why exposing himself to a new coach (with an impressive track record) and new system will help him develop his game more than coming back for another year at Michigan would.

Morgan is not big enough or skilled enough.  He made the most of his skills and deserved to start ahead of Horford, but if you're interested in upside Jon has an NBA ready skill already (rebounding) is bigger, more athletic, and has a wider skillset.  If he can up the other elements of his game (defense especially), he can have an NBA role.

Sims was a classic tweener and had no NBA skill to hang his hat on.  There's a very clear and defined role for Horford in the NBA if he can put his game together in the next year.  The NBA is not about who wins at one on one.  It's the same reason why GR3 could easily be a better NBA player for longer than Nik.

Genzilla

April 17th, 2014 at 3:47 PM ^

He's not athletic enough to play the 4 in the NBA or big enough to play the 5 in the NBA.  He could be a hell of a college player, but he'd have to be as athletic as McGary to have a shot at playing the 4.  

If he was a great shooter he'd have a chance at the NBA, but if he was a great shooter, Beilein would've take advantage of that.

UMaD

April 17th, 2014 at 4:56 PM ^

His lack of development in strength is the bigger concern to me.  He can guard most non-elite 4s I think, but at times he gets overpowered by strong post players.  Strength can be improved though. 

I don't think anyone thinks Horford is going to be a Blake Griffin type of player, but people like Tyler Hansborough, Jason Maxiell, Udonis Haslem can have long NBA careers just by rebounding, playing decent defense, and hitting open wing jumpers.

 

UMaD

April 17th, 2014 at 6:26 PM ^

Horford had the second best PER on the team and the best defensive rebound rate in the conference.  His rebounding is better than 1st rounders like Vonleh, Payne, Kaminsky and other people with more impressive reputations.

Give him 30-35 minutes per game and more offensive responsibility and there's a good chance he can put up numbers comparable to people like Jordan Hill, Taj Gibson, Josh McRoberts and other serviceable NBA forwards put up.

My point is not to compare their college careers but their NBA roles.  Rasual Butler wasn't as good as Jimmer Fredette in college, but one of those guys had a very long NBA career and the other can't see the floor and is probably headed to Europe anyday now.  Hansborough is a good scorer, far better than Horford.  Doesn't matter one bit in the NBA because his job is to rebound and defend.  Horford can do that job if he rounds out his skills in the next year.  He's far from a lock but he's got a realistic shot.

 

Arlo Pear

April 17th, 2014 at 3:54 PM ^

Doesn't Florida shoot a lot of three pointers with pressure defense? Every now and then dumped it down to Young but most of his points came from putbacks and transition. Much like Mitch. I guess change of scenery is the most important factor. I hope he finds what he's looking for.

Naked Bootlegger

April 17th, 2014 at 1:26 PM ^

I'm not sure what Jon' major is, but doesn't he have to enroll in a grad program that is not offered by UM?   My question...is there any real enforcement of this rule (if this indeed a rule)?  Or is a wink and a nod and "Welcome to the grad Hotel & Hospitality Management* dept, son.  So sorry that Michigan didn't have what you were looking for, but you'll get a great education here!"

*Not intended to slight Hotel and Hospitality Management in any way, shape, or form.  But I don't think UM has such a degree.

feanor

April 17th, 2014 at 1:33 PM ^

You just find something obscure, transfer, and then pursue a degreee that you are actually interested in. As in, Florida has a graduate program in the stdy of Walt Disney World Character Costume Design but Michigan doesn't, so you transfer to Florida and then apply to pursue a degree in psychology.

MGoChippewa

April 17th, 2014 at 2:06 PM ^

Walker and Finney-Smith have a pretty clear lock on the frontcourt spots.  I suppose he'd be their main backup in the post, but he would've been no worse than that here.  If he ends up there, he disliked being at Michigan more than he disliked his PT, imo.

mackbru

April 17th, 2014 at 2:13 PM ^

Florida, having graduated all its key players, will likely be ranked lower than Michigan's team next season (assuming Mitch returns). But he likely would get more PT. So it's kind of a wash basketball-wise. Academically, though, he could do better. He seems like a kid who should have erred on the side of academics. There are a number of schools with better grad programs and tournament-caliber basketball: Cal, Stanford, Texas, Harvard. Florida seems a tad short-sighted, all things considered. But, hey, priorities.

 

 

shallowcal

April 17th, 2014 at 2:25 PM ^

i cant remember how many times i cursed at horford and morgan for not finishing around the basket pre mcgary era.  morgan turned it around this year and had his best year.  horford i dont see doing that.  he doesnt have that mean streak around the rim that you need.  hes fucking soft.  hope he plays for state next year so we can have beilfeldt beat his ass in the paint

Franz Schubert

April 17th, 2014 at 5:00 PM ^

Do you think Horford is tough? He is soft and it's been said for 4 years. Not a new development as you want to paint it. Any courtesy he deserved went out the window when he opened his mouth and basically took a shot at Beilein's system. Even if it were true, shut up and move on, no need to say anything at all.

In reply to by Franz Schubert

goblue20111

April 17th, 2014 at 8:59 PM ^

Oh my heavens.  He said a system where the bigs don't play a lot with their backs to the rim isn't a good fit for him.  How terrible.  

UMinSF

April 17th, 2014 at 4:13 PM ^

Just as Morgan did this year.  Maybe Beillein's system or personality just wasn't right to light Horford's fire.  I always thought he has potential - and he certainly showed flashes of it.

Coach Beilein has a fantastic system for developing guards and winning college basketball games; not as clear his system is as strong when it comes to developing bigs.

McGary and Morgan demonstrated that you can be a successful big in JB's system, but that doesn't prove it's an ideal environment or system for everyone.

Sad to see him go, best of luck to him.

Franz Schubert

April 17th, 2014 at 5:09 PM ^

You just acknowledged that Morgan broke out this year? He developed tremendously as did Mcgary his freshmen season. Nevermind just continue perpetuating a myth about Beilein that could have a negative impact on future big man recruiting.

In reply to by Franz Schubert

UMinSF

April 17th, 2014 at 6:18 PM ^

Respectfully, I don't agree that it's a "myth"; I think it's more of an unknown.  Sample size of big men who really developed under Beilein is tiny, as is the list of those who didn't. JB's teams (and his system) haven't placed much emphasis on traditional big man play.

JB has an impressive list of guards who exceeded expectations, with dramatic improvement year to year. Not so much with bigs.

I've been watching Michigan hoops forever. IMO, Beilein is absolutely the finest coach we've had; one of the best I've ever seen.  John Thompson was a master at developing bigs, yet he still helped Iverson; JB is a master with guards, and his system is fun and successful.  Of course he can be a great coach for some bigs.  That doesn't mean it's an ideal fit for everyone.

My opinion has no impact on any kid's choice of college.

SanDiegoWolverine

April 17th, 2014 at 7:47 PM ^

It's possible that his system works for some and not others. Morgan and Mitch are mobile bigs and horford is not. It's possible his skills weren't maximized under this system, maybe they were, maybe they weren't.

ca_prophet

April 17th, 2014 at 5:11 PM ^

Florida has had a lot of recent success, its coach is well regarded, and you have the lowdown on the scoop from your alumni brother. Hopefully you'll get the chance to prove the doubters wrong and take the next step towards an NBA career.

gord

April 17th, 2014 at 5:49 PM ^

No major program wanted Horford out of high school.  Beilien did him a favor by recruiting him but in Horford's interview he acted like he did the team a favor and should have gone somewhere else.  Where?  Now he graduates, quits the team, criticizes the coaches, makes excuses and is thinking about transferring to a team that had not interest in him?  Nice.

gord

April 17th, 2014 at 11:24 PM ^

He took a medical redshirt his sophomore year because of an injury.  He contributed very little that year while taking advantage of the free rehab the university offered him.  Now that he has a 5th year of eligibility he's quitting on the team and transferrring using a BS loophole in the system that allows a player that graduated with some easy degree to transfer to another school that offers some BS grad program his current school doesn't offer.  The staff was counting on him to return for his 5th year and he bailed showing no loyalty to the school that gave him a chance when no one else would.  Florida didn't want him coming out of high school.  They weren't there for him when he was injured.  What does Europe have to do with this?  Are you saying he has a better chance of making it to Europe if he transfers?

MChem83

April 17th, 2014 at 6:21 PM ^

that Beilein's system is heavily geared towards guards and wings, especially guys who can shoot the 3, Horford had more than enough chance to earn PT for himself this year, especially when McGary was out.  But, as another poster pointed out, he's soft around the basket, and he also has poor hands, doesn't finish strong, and misses a lot of easy shots.  He's a decent backup center in college, but that's all.  I don't blame him for tranferring though, because if McGary comes back, between him and Donnal, there would not be many minutes for Horford at a 4/5 spot.  Donnal is much better suited to Beilein's style, and if he's as good as his teammates are talking him up, Horford wasn't going to pull more than 5-10 minutes a game.

BlastDouble

April 17th, 2014 at 6:53 PM ^

of Beileins offense not being suited for bigs is really starting to bother me. Mostly because HE HASNT HAD A "BIG MAN" RECRUIT ABOVE A 3 STAR! So Morgan took a while to develop because he wasn't an elite athlete right away. What big other than mcgary has beilein had to work with? Im sure that if we landed some better bigs then his offense WOULD/COULD be suited around post play. A good coach adapts his offense to his players strengths, and that is exactly what hes done. Just so happens bigs have never been a strength. Not because beilein cant develop them or his O isnt suited for them, he just hasnt had anything to work with. Watch how well it suits bigs next year when we have Donnal and McGary.

MChem83

April 18th, 2014 at 6:58 AM ^

top notch bigs other than McGary has Beilein recruited hard? None, I would say. And looking back, we haven't had a recruiting class under Beilein with two bigs who actually played and contributed. Maybe he COULD develop more bigs, but that's just not his style, and not the kind of lineup he favors putting out on the floor.