geewhiz99

July 23rd, 2012 at 1:52 PM ^

Fitz has not been convicted of a crime. This is also apparently his first offense so let's wait for details to come out before hanging him out to dry. At worst, I see this as a 2-game suspension.

marlon

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:00 PM ^

I don't think people here are hanging Fitz out to dry.  But, in any case, the reaction you're seeing isn't predicated upon his guilt or innocence, it's based on the fact that Fitz will now almost certainly be on the bench for the Alabama game.

reshp1

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:13 PM ^

Unless the article came out of someone's ass, if he gets off it will be on a technicality. It seems pretty clear cut he was pulled over behind the wheel and blew over the limit. So yeah, he'll be suspended for at least a couple games.

(edit, meant as reply to geewhiz)

Moleskyn

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:07 PM ^

How is anybody rushing to judgment? There's really no easy way around this: his BAC was above the legal limit for driving, he got in a car and drove somewhere. End of story. That is one of the dumbest things anyone could do. There is no measure of leniency to wait for additional facts to come out.

State Street

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:05 PM ^

Embarassing.  Kick Fitz off the team - I'm entirely serious.

If you cannot handle the responsibility of being Michigan's starting running back, especially with a game vs. the defending national champion looming, then go find some I-AA program to pay for your scholarship.

RBs are a dime a dozen (whether they are elite, remains to be seen).

Hope Hoke brings the iron fist.

State Street

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:27 PM ^

Glad this post has a lower score than the one below decriminalizing drunk driving and commending Toussaint.

This is not Penn State.  We can take responsibility for people at our university who do not live up to expectations. 

This is Michigan.  Any player that doesn't understand that doesn't deserve a place on the team, simple as that.

natesezgoblue

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:07 PM ^

A few things, is he 21? Will Hoke wait until he's officialy charged or sentenced? The reason I ask is if he get a lesser charge will it result in the same punishment?

these wolverines

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:10 PM ^

i just have to say this..how many of us have driven home when you shouldnt...everyone here has the limit is what 2 beers you have that at dinner....yeah hes under more light and im not making a excuse but no reason to go all crazy. Getting a pulled over or not getting pulled over is all luck lets be honest when it comes to getting a DUI

Wolvie3758

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:13 PM ^

the UNIV and th Fans DOWN!!!    beating Bama just became ALOT harder...I dont get it

YOU KNOW the consequences and you selfishly did it anyways.....

jtown8378

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:13 PM ^

I seriously do not understand what he was thinking. This hurts...I do think he does not play in Alabama game...but maybe A.F. or N.D. when he will be back...maybe not starting A.F.

snoopblue

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:13 PM ^

All hope for the Alabama game is basically lost. No proven running threat besides Denard.

Also, it's kind of ridiculous that the SALINE police department is looking for drunk drivers in Ann Arbor. This is why no one likes cops, bunch of jackasses.

marlon

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:31 PM ^

It's the cop's fault Fitz was driving drunk, right?

I'm the last person to defend police officers, but shouldn't we all be thankful in this case that a potential disaster (e.g., Fitz hits and kills someone while driving under the influence) was averted?  There are a million reasons to hate the popo, but this isn't one of them.

cp4three2

July 23rd, 2012 at 2:53 PM ^

I have a breathalyzer I keep in my car, you'd be surprised how few beers it takes to get to .08. I don't think a lot of people realize that they can feel completely sober and be over the limit, especially people who drink often.  Studies about BAC and risk of crashing have shown that legal-aged drinkers don't really see any risk go up from .08 until .125 BAC or so.

 

Of course, that doesn't excuse him for breaking a law, nor do I know how drunk he was. I do wonder how these checkpoints are legal constiutionally, I imagine there's an MGoBlogger here that can explain why. 

BiSB

July 23rd, 2012 at 3:26 PM ^

Sobriety checkpoints do not violate the 4th amendment. HOWEVA, they DO violate Michigan Constitutional law, and are not permissible within the borders of our fine state.

I'm guessing this wasn't a sobriety checkpoint. If it was, Fitz will be able to avoid the potential legal fallout. He'd still have to run hella stairs though.