CoachBP623

October 28th, 2012 at 2:53 AM ^

Haha you must be a psychologist to be able to perceive what I am and am not through a computer screen. Way to go!! Further validation that you trolls have nothing better to do then get on this blog and take shots at someone. I think the role is reversed there cockboy but excellent hypothesis.

AFWolverine

October 28th, 2012 at 2:37 PM ^

usually weigh in on interweb fights, but are you aware that your signature states that you are a coach of not 1, but 2 different football teams? Anyone with a first grade reading level can determine that. It doesn't take a psychologist to figure this out.

EDIT: a cursory look at the Finger Lakes Impact website reveals that all coaching positions are available. Guess this means you don't coach at least one of those squads any more. Too bad you potentially still mold high school boys' minds on the field.

LSAClassOf2000

October 28th, 2012 at 9:56 AM ^

We've got at least two. "The Game" is at noon on the 24th of November as well. ABC didn't waste a lot of time pulling in that one as well, it seems. I don't remember noon starts ever being this rare for us. 

In any event,the noon start next  week is fine. It will be what I watch while the awning for my back patio is finally, mercifully removed. 

snoopblue

October 28th, 2012 at 1:47 AM ^

As much as I think we win the next 3, Minnesota, NW, and Iowa aren't that bad where they don't need to be taken seriously. Minnesota and Northwestern actually look okay.

WingsNWolverines

October 28th, 2012 at 1:58 AM ^

yes we sucked tonight but sometimes you need a kick in the head to wake you up. We'll come out with a vengeance against Minny next weekend and unload a ton of frustration on the Gophers. I still think we have a terrific shot at beating Ohio st this year. The Buckeyes offensively still are struggling with hitting receivers and I believe Ryan and Kovacs can put a stranglehold on Miller. I'm still not impressed with Ohio st's OL which is giving up close to 5 to 6 sacks a game on Miller. If we can box him in and shut down Hyde we eliminate Ohio st's rush attack and win at the line. I still have great confidence looking into the next 4 games. Denard will be back. Faith guys.

Well actually

October 28th, 2012 at 1:59 AM ^

Fire. Borges. I dont actually believe that but it would feel sooooo good right now. and I'm not even drunk anymore. Bellomy is his kind of guy, right? That's why we recruited him? to be...this? the future of our offense? Woooooo!

Well actually

October 28th, 2012 at 2:13 AM ^

I don't think I've ever seen a quarterback's stat line worse than Bellomy's. I'm not trying to condemn him; the coaches bear the responsibility for that. It's just frustrating to see...whatever that was

 

Well actually

October 28th, 2012 at 11:04 AM ^

this is true. they really did not want to catch anything he threw at them. But Nebraska did the right thing by sending pressure to see if he'd freeze up and he did. He's young. but he's also as far into Borges' system as Denard, for all intents and purposes. I don't know if Shane Morris is actually any good (hopefully, but you never know with high school kids), but I would be worried about my development here under Borges if he is

[PS: did i say system? I mean random amalgamation of plays designed to...not relate to each other at all. If you run it straight upfield for 2 yards every third play, certainly the other team will relent and give you points! that's football, a gentleman's game of mutual respect for giving the ball to the running backs until nothing happens. Why was last year so much different?  And I know Borges had success coaching whats-his-name at SDSU, so I know hes had success. Im mostly concerned about how he thinks the whole punch-counterpunch thing works]

BlueUPer

October 28th, 2012 at 3:40 PM ^

I'm taking my boys to the game. I promised them we'd see Denard play. HS football football games have not allowed us to get to a game in the last 3 years. Finally, we have the chance and now....

Selfishly, we need him to play. Honestly, we need him to play. I'll worry about next season, next season.

Right now I'm worried about beating the Gophers.

inthebluelot

October 28th, 2012 at 11:25 AM ^

This looked to be a game where we could work on some things for OSU. Now, it looks like a game where we need to find a QB. I will not be surprised if this game is close. The worst part is that a loss to OSU seems imminent, so we have to pray that Nebraska loses to both Sparty and Penn State or we won't be going to Indy. Damn I hate rooting for Sparty.

Newbs

October 28th, 2012 at 12:32 PM ^

I'm not sure whether to be excited about this. While I haven't missed a Michigan game in 10 years I'm not sure whether I really want to watch this or not. It could be an offensive explosion with Denard or another "anemia-fest" trying to scratch out field goals to win.

SFBlue

October 28th, 2012 at 6:44 PM ^

That is three more than they should have got. 

1986: we're rated #2, they beat us in the Big House when they are 5-4, with a home loss to Pacific.

1977: we're rated #1, we go up there and lose 16-0.  I am less than a year old at the time, and my dad said that this one was not televised, so I have no earthly idea how that happened. 

2005: they break one up the sidelines when they are trying to run out the clock and play for overtime, right after we call a timeout to try to get the ball back in time to attempt a field goal. 

umaz1

October 28th, 2012 at 1:58 PM ^

I swear, the next road night game we get will send me to the asylum.  I don't know what it is about them, but we can not perform in that scenario.