January 4th, 2016 at 7:54 PM ^

Lunardi usually does a pretty good job with picking bubble teams (who's in and who's out). However, he's awful when it comes to seeding, but that's almost impossible to predict anyways.

Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad


January 4th, 2016 at 8:05 PM ^

Really? At what... 13-3 or whatever we are? I understand we've had some terrible losses and were no higher than a 5 seed at best, but I feel like we're a 5-8 seed at worst. 10 seed?...

Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad


January 4th, 2016 at 8:17 PM ^

has anyone done a study of just how god-awful (i'm assuming) these mock brackets are?  like in the history of this dumb ass phenomenon, have they even come remotely close to ever getting even some of the seeds correct (other than an occasional clear cut #1)?


January 4th, 2016 at 9:16 PM ^

Sounds about right.  It's stupidly early, but they do need to get a couple wins against Maryland, Purdue, and Iowa to make up for an underwhelming OOC.


January 4th, 2016 at 10:10 PM ^

I really am looking forward to the Purdue game. If Donnal, backed up by Doyle, can at all deal with their bigs, if LeVert is healthy, and if LeVert, Irvin, Walton, Robinson, and maybe Rahkman can continue to hit threes and pass well, we can win that game. At that point, we will know more about how this season will end up for Michigan. It would be totally awesome if Donnal continued to do well, and if the light went on for Doyle the same way it has for Donnal.


January 5th, 2016 at 10:27 AM ^

Because it's never too early to discuss Michigan anything.  However, I am tempering my enthusiasm, until I see Donnal against better bigs.  I certainly hope he can sustain his recent improvement in that scenario, because he is definitely the difference maker for this team, if that's the case.