WoodleyIsBeast

March 3rd, 2017 at 8:36 AM ^

You make it sound like he sat around....when I'm sure he's known for awhile where he's at on flat bench, and no doubt dedicated a lot to getting better.

 

When I say that's all he's capable of, I'm saying it is possible that he has maxed out what he as an individual is capable of without PED's.

hfhmilkman

March 3rd, 2017 at 8:50 AM ^

For us little people 225 pounds is a lot of weight.  When I was 23 I decided to take up lifting.  I was five feet nine inches and weighed between 140-145 pounds.  I was not a dedicated gym rat but I was averaging hitting the gym 5 times a week for about an hour.  I did not do any special nutrition other than protein shakes.   When I was in my early 30ties I was maybe 175 and was able to bench 225 4 times.  For me to get to 225 once was a big deal.  So I always envied you big people who could banter about doing 10 of this or 20 of that as if all you had to do was put in the time.  

 

Magnus

March 3rd, 2017 at 9:06 AM ^

It is a lot of weight, but he should be preparing to lift a lot of weight.

I have a former player who was a 5'5", 150 lb. running back in high school. We go to the same gym now. He's benching about 320 lbs. now, and I think he weighs about 175 lbs. He's not a total gym rat, either, but he does hit the gym about five days a week for probably an hour or so.

hfhmilkman

March 3rd, 2017 at 9:28 AM ^

Not disagreeing that a pro prospect should do more.  If you begin weight training at 14, and have access to a professional staff for years you probably should be able to do more.  That all said it reminded me of an interview by a Lions linebacker several years ago.  He talked about how at the beginning of the season he was capable of benching 225 over 20 in preseaon yet by the end of the season he was lucky to get 8.   It would be really interesting to go into a mirror mirror universe and measure the performance numbers of players after 20 weeks after enduring the equivalent of automobile wrecks every day.  Aka its not so important whether you can perform a feat of strength in ideal conditions, but can you do it under duress.  I'm sure if someone could figure out a test for recuperation they would make a billion.  The guy still able to bench 225 10 times after 20 weeks of destruction is worth more than the individual who benched 25 in preseaon and is down to 6 because of injury and need to rest.

corundum

March 3rd, 2017 at 11:54 AM ^

'Didn't prepare' - He would have had to gain weight to increase his bench. If you are in peak physical shape, you can't gain strength without eating a surplus diet. Since bench is the second useless combine test for a RB, I'm sure he focused on not coming in overweight so he could put up the best forty time possible. Smaller backs cut block anyways, so he isn't going to get passed up for not benching enough reps. Also, I'm sure McCaffrey can bench close to 300 lbs at least once if he put up ten reps at 225. I highly doubt your gym buddy is putting up 320 lbs in sets of 10.

Magnus

March 3rd, 2017 at 1:03 PM ^

He's going to have to gain weight, anyway. He's not going to make it in the NFL if he's going to stay at 200 lbs.

He *might* get passed up if we're talking about going at the end of the 2nd round vs. the beginning of the 3rd or something like that. There are going to be 200+ picks in the draft. One little thing might sway someone one way or another, and then you drop down the board a little bit.

The combine is run by people who think some of these things are important. You say it's not important, but you're corundum. You're a nobody like me when it comes to stuff like this. The people in charge decide to have players bench for their tryout for a multi-million dollar career, so the logical conclusion is that they put more stock in bench press reps than you're acknowledging.

hfhmilkman

March 3rd, 2017 at 2:14 PM ^

Just playing devils advocate of those on the list only Charles has been a feature back for consistant years.  Bush pulled it off once.  The guy you want to list is Warrick Dunn.  He played at under 190 and was a feature back for years.  More impressively he ran well between the tackles.  Charles and Bush were always home run hitters.

hfhmilkman

March 3rd, 2017 at 4:13 PM ^

I had forgotten about Alstott.  Now that you have revived my memory I always thought Dunn was the better runner between the tackles.  He was one of those wiggly angle guys that no one could get a clean hit on.  If you were bigger than Alstott and hit him head on you stopped him.  But the same monster that could stop Alstott cold would get only 20 percent of Dunn and we burrow for another yard.

pescadero

March 3rd, 2017 at 2:44 PM ^

"He's going to have to gain weight, anyway. He's not going to make it in the NFL if he's going to stay at 200 lbs."

 

There are piles of NFL backs that play right around 200 lbs.

 

LeSean McCoy
Devonta Freemen
Bilal Powell
Jacquizz Rodgers
Jerick McKinnon
Theo Riddick
Danny Woodhead
Giovani Bernard
Dion Lewis
Shane Vereen
Ameer Abdullah
CJ Spiller
Andre Ellington

 

agp

March 3rd, 2017 at 1:18 PM ^

This is incredibly not correct. You can certainly increase strength w/o increasing mass. Source: my ten years as a collegiate strength and confidence coach and strength athlete.

corundum

March 3rd, 2017 at 1:54 PM ^

A beginner sure can, but someone in McCaffrey's athletic condition would have a very hard time doing so. It also contradicts the first law of thermodynamics. Link me one academic research paper that says a peak athlete can continuously add strength while in a deficit.

agp

March 3rd, 2017 at 2:30 PM ^

Someone with his size and genetics is nowhere near "peak ability" with benching 225 for 10. That's very much beginner strength, and could very easily be improved upon while in a caloric deficit, to a point. The reason athletes get weaker in-season is that more of the body's finite recovery resources are going towards game recovery with an eye towards optimal on field production. With regards to getting stronger (while it's obvious and shouldn't need to be pointed out) weight class sports such as weightlifting and powerlifting have elite athletes who get stronger while maintaining their weight class, and their out of season body weight. Neuromuscular efficiency and technical improvements don't care how much you weigh.

corundum

March 3rd, 2017 at 3:44 PM ^

So much broscience. You need to eat at a surplus to gain muscle. You need to gain muscle to get stronger. You can't make muscle out of negative energy. See the first law of thermodynamics. Powerlifters bulk and cut in the off/on season for a reason. Also, 225 lbs at 10 reps calculates out to ~300 lbs 1 rep max, which is definitely not beginner strength.

Lakeyale13

March 3rd, 2017 at 8:42 AM ^

Agreed.  NO WAY an elite athlete, like McCaffrey, with world class coaching, world class lifting, and world class nutrition all given / available to him should put up such a poor result.  Just unacceptable, unless he is hurt and shouldn't have participated then.

socalwolverine1

March 3rd, 2017 at 11:03 AM ^

I just hope McCaffrey goes undrafted to the end of the first round and is selected by the Pats.  Imagine if Brady has McCaffrey and McCaffrey once again has an excellent OL working with him (which was a huge problem for Stanford in 2016, rebuilding the OL).

M-Dog

March 3rd, 2017 at 9:10 AM ^

He lollops along like a camel.

He'll never amount to anything.  

Maybe take a flyer and waste a 6th round pick on him or something.  

Who knows?  It might work out.

In all seriousness, based on all the info available at that time, drafting Tom Brady in the 6th round was a perfectly rational decision.