Dior Mathis says two new schools has emerged as his leader.

Submitted by bluebloodedfan on
It seems that Mr. Mathis likes Oregon a bunch and is developing a crush on our little brother. At least, that is what I've heard. Maybe Other Brian or TomVH can correct me if I am wrong. Here is my thing, I think that we should recruit instate. I really do. I love seeing the home grown playing in the big house. But I must admit, I am growing a little weary of this kid. It is like he thinks he is the Otter version 2.

turbo cool

July 2nd, 2009 at 3:02 PM ^

We should always go for the best players but we should definitely try to rack up all the best in-state talent possible. It's one thing to lose out to State on a top prospect and a whole 'nother to lose out to a Tennessee or Florida State, or even, ugh, tOSU.

bluebloodedfan

July 2nd, 2009 at 3:50 PM ^

But doesn't it seem like there should be some type of allegience to the in state schools? It seems that they should have the inside track. This kid, I think, was a Miami fan. Something has to be taken into account that some of these kids playing within the borders of Michigan are not fans of the in state programs. So how can we really consider that a loss when there was no love in the first place?

mejunglechop

July 2nd, 2009 at 5:35 PM ^

If they live far away, football players at a program like Michigan's get to go home for maybe month a year. In that way they are not like regular college students and the strain of leaving everything they know is hard for many of those who do. The relative ease of recruiting in state is far more a consequence of these factors than who kids are fans of.

turbo cool

July 2nd, 2009 at 3:26 PM ^

I'd define a national power as being able to beat anyone, any day. Granted, with that comes a larger recruiting base but first comes results on the field. I believe that little things like being dominant locally does do good things for our program, like building a solid foundation, gain support from the local HS coaches, and attract more fair weather fans who would grow back and forth between us and State. Anyway, it just seems as if us fans (Mich) say that in-state recruiting doesn't matter and really it's just a bad excuse for why we aren't doing better. And this isn't a 'bashing RR' post like akin to why Barking Sphinkter might write. I've always supported him and always will.

turbo cool

July 2nd, 2009 at 3:33 PM ^

well if we're talking recruiting like Dane is, than yeah, when was the last time State was able to recruit from the West Coast, East Coast, South, and the Midwest... all in one class?

Spartyon19962001

July 2nd, 2009 at 4:20 PM ^

I agreed with you tUniversity of Michigan has more of national presence than MSU. My point is that MSU has a pretty good national presence though. Most of the credit goes to the basketball program.

mblood7

July 3rd, 2009 at 12:30 AM ^

My uncle is from LA (has never been to Mich) and is not a huge college football fanatic. Talking to him earlier I asked him to name the mascots for the Michigan colleges. he go the wolverines, got the chippewas and guessed the broncos. I asked him What was Michigan States and he finally got on the third quess.(first guess Warriors, second guess was the titans) how is that for lack of national recognition MSU. 300 post just saw it fitting to reply to your post Edit: reasons why he got CMU and WMU: I went to CMU and my sister currently goes to WMU.

mblood7

July 2nd, 2009 at 11:42 PM ^

I know th MSU name expands into Ohio, Penn, and Ill. I would like to see a chart on the 50 states and how many have Michigan pulled recruits from? and what states we haven't been able to/had no interest in recruiting? My guess Is we have pulled recruits from 35 different states.

Jlow

July 2nd, 2009 at 4:49 PM ^

Thats how I feel about our recruits this year. IMO, none of them are solid until they sign that LOI. Watch and see. Last year we lost a few supposed "TRUE BLUES." SEE BEAVER!

me

July 2nd, 2009 at 2:45 PM ^

http://michigan.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=961573 "Mathis currently lists Oregon and Michigan State - which has also made a strong recent push for the nation's No. 8 cornerback prospect - atop his list at this stage of the process. "Those are the top two right now," Mathis said. "Michigan State is making a real big impression. Even though they just had a cornerback commit, which is Mylan Hicks, they are still making a big impression on me.""

ChitownWolverine82

July 2nd, 2009 at 2:46 PM ^

The link is behind a paywall, but this kid is about as confusing as it gets. I hope there is something in the water at CT that is forcing him to act like Big Will. Ultimate bluffer or truly a scatterbrain? I'll go with the latter.

ThWard

July 2nd, 2009 at 2:58 PM ^

Yes, yes it is. Call your wife one, and then explain it's not an insult. "A giddy or thoughtless person; one incapable of concentration or attention." If you mean indecisive, say indecisive. Which, of course, is borderline redundant when referring to any 17 year old making a college decision.

Jay

July 3rd, 2009 at 11:17 AM ^

It means that accusing a 17 year old kid of being "scatterbrained" just because he doesn't have your favorite school in his top two when we're still OVER SEVEN MONTHS AWAY FROM SIGNING DAY is pretty fucking scumbaggish and says alot more about you than anything.

ThWard

July 2nd, 2009 at 2:55 PM ^

In June of my junior-senior year summer, I was considering 8 schools. I vascillated back and forth for awhile, and I didn't have the complication of having to evaluate the football programs, either. I made my decision in April of my SENIOR year after narrowing it to 3. Was I a scatterbrain? I thought I was being thorough, and I had the benefit of a kick-ass high school college admissions department to help me along. But we hold any HS junior with a football scholarship to a wholly different standard of decision-making? Unreal.