Devin Funchess #26 overall on Kiper Mock Draft 1.0

Submitted by TRAILofVICTORY on

"It's not really fair to call Funchess a tight end based on where he typically lines up, but at more than 6-foot-4 and at about 235 pounds with the ability to simply overpower most cornerbacks, he's not exactly a flanker, either. What I'd call him is a perpetual matchup problem, a guy you can move around, with the quickness to run crisp routes and easily create space if linebackers try to cover him and enough size to make cornerbacks have to go through him for the ball. Joe Flacco can use a weapon like Funchess, as could Gary Kubiak, assuming he passes on any other overtures."

 

Other noteworthy things:

1 - Jameis Winston

2 - Marcus Mariotta

4 - Amari Cooper

16 - Trae Waynes

24 - Melvin Gordon

32 - Devin Smith

Jalm

January 15th, 2015 at 9:42 AM ^

We all know how accurate mock drafts are. Based on this he could go anywhere in mid to late first to anywhere in second round.

Magnus

January 15th, 2015 at 10:04 AM ^

The fact that Kiper makes about 20 of these mock drafts indicates that he doesn't put a ton of stock in them, either. All Kiper - or anyone - can do right is project based on what they've seen and heard so far.

You might think that you want to buy a Ford F-150 when you have the money to purchase a new vehicle in two months. But if there's suddenly a bunch of recalls, a bunch of Ford F-150's start blowing up on the highway, etc., then you might change your mind and buy a Dodge or a Toyota.

Right now these mock drafts are conversation pieces. Really, that's all they ever are. They're created so fans have something to talk about, and Kiper/McShay/whoever are considered the "experts." Kiper's job is to get viewers, get people talking, get internet clicks, etc. Whether he's right or not isn't really the main goal.

bronxblue

January 15th, 2015 at 2:25 PM ^

That was the same thing I was going to say.  You'd think when the goal of the reporting is "is car X dangerous?" and you can't create said danger without rigging it, that's a story in and of itself.

DBMCT

January 15th, 2015 at 9:44 AM ^

Mariotta is a system quaterback.  I just don't see him succeeding in the pros.  He doesn't take snaps from under center, no 3 step drop, etc.  Of course he can learn it (or if the Eagles can grab him) but I think Winston (putting aside character issues) is the more sure fire prospect.

Going in the late first round would be great for Funchess.  Let him fit into a team/system where he can ease in.  Let's hope he steps it up.

 

 

maizenblue92

January 15th, 2015 at 9:55 AM ^

But that is the point that the other poster is trying to make. Mariotta is a system QB. His numbers are enhanced by a system that provides easy decision and large throwing windows. While a guy like WIlson was groomed in a pro style offense and is an anticipatory passer. Wilson also has a stronger arm and I feel like more lateral quickness.

HarbaughorBust

January 15th, 2015 at 10:10 AM ^

I'm starting to get the impression these NFL head coaches and GM's are getting tired of these read-option spread QB's they have to choose from.

They all seem like head coach killers and franchise killers at the next level.

I see far more differences than similarities between Wilson and Mariotta.  

Probably why Indy was ready to get rid of Peyton even though Peyton still had 3-4 years left in him at a pro-bowl level.   They had a chance to grab a QB who could function in a pocket, which in the NFL, will ALWAYS be the safest place for a QB.   

You can't only out athlete the defense at the next level.  

 

ST3

January 15th, 2015 at 11:46 AM ^

I'd be more inclined to look at the effects of "tempo" on the injury rate. For example, Oregon runs tempo so they probably average 80 plays a game on offense. Michigan was around 60 plays this year. So just on a per play basis, if injuries are random, you'd think that Oregon would have 33% more injuries on offense than Michigan since they have 33% more opportunities to get injured. (The argument being that you don't get injured in the huddle while the play clock is moving.) However, it could be that practicing at pace makes your body more flexible/resilient/less-injury-prone than POWER MANBALL teams that stress strength over flexibility. I don't have the answer, I'm just curious to know if anyone has looked at that.

Willis

January 15th, 2015 at 11:21 AM ^

I don't know. There's been a lot people who were "system" QB's that supposedly didn't have to make tough reads and none of them ever had 50 more TD's than turnovers. He makes good decisions, holds on to the ball for a guy that runs frequently, and he's an accurate passer. He might not be ready to start day one but I think he'll be good in the league.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

mGrowOld

January 15th, 2015 at 9:58 AM ^

No way in Hell does Mariotta go #2. Every year Kuiper overvalued QBs relative to how the NFL sees them and this year is no exception.
Jamis may be a knucklehead but he's a cannon-armed knucklehead who can read defenses and play under center.
Marcus may be the nicest guy in the world, smart as hell and have Boy Scout's sense of right and wrong but he doesn't have arm strength and he can't read defenses.
I don't think he goes in the top 20 of the draft.

LSAClassOf2000

January 15th, 2015 at 11:10 AM ^

Fair enough, although he did just hire Jack Del Rio and - at least on paper - manage to one-up his rivals across the bay in the area of coaching hires. Then again, if we zoom out to the 10,000 foot view of things, this is the same man who - after the Del Rio interview, per Yahoo! - went to Hooters with Marcel Reese, so if nothing else, Davis is on a different wavelength than other owners. 

CompleteLunacy

January 15th, 2015 at 10:25 AM ^

Personally, I think Mariota has a better chance to succeed despite being a system guy, if only because of his intelligence. Jameis may be able to read defenses at the collegiate level, but that doesn't automatically mean it translates to the NFL, where D's will excel at deception and messing with a QB's mind. I don't see Winston being able to handle it. Mariota, on the other hand, might just possess the same type of intelligence that makes Wilson such an effective QB.

Just my opinion, of course. I could be way off. But it seems to me the best QBs in the NFL possess a level of football smarts that I am very skeptical Jameis would be able to achieve, given his history at FSU.

stephenrjking

January 15th, 2015 at 11:18 AM ^

Totally disagree. I understand why you say this--it is quite possible that nobody SHOULD take Mariotta in the top 20. But history shows that football teams desperate for a quarterback will take the best available guy in the first round. This is how Blaine Gabbert, Jake Locker, and Christian Ponder all went in the top 15 in one season.

Mariotta needs to learn to read defenses, but his arm is decent and he works hard. Someone in the top ten is going to take a chance on him unless he totally melts down in pre-draft work (see Teddy Bridgewater for an example of that).



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

huffstet

January 15th, 2015 at 11:06 AM ^

Both have bust written all over them.....Winston looks like a sure fire bust and I am not sure about Mariotta (He at least seems like he has the work ethic/personna to be a good NFL QB).

HAIL2VICTORZ

January 15th, 2015 at 9:47 AM ^

I will be curious to see how Funchess does on his pro day.  I want to believe he is hungry enough and desires the ball enough to be a first round pick.

stephenrjking

January 15th, 2015 at 11:13 AM ^

I think it will be good. Winston's problems are problems of judgement and choice, not intelligence. Intelligent people choose to do bad things all the time. He'll be so carefully managed in his pre-draft work that the teams will be blown away by him.

The issue is whether or not he raped someone. If he did, he ought to be in prison. If he did not, then a lot of this other stuff is low-grade college kid stupidity; I find it personally bothersome/offensive (what he said in the cafeteria, etc), but not a giant don't-draft-him red flag.

The problem is that people kind of factor in the rape allegation without actually factoring it. It's like the percentage possibility that he did it is priced into the stock--people are treating him like he gets 50% of the negative points for "maybe" raping someone.

But either he did and he has no place in the NFL, or he didn't and the rest of this is small potatoes.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

stephenrjking

January 15th, 2015 at 11:04 AM ^

Maybe. Or maybe he has another year that is statistically underwhelming, stranded by quarterbacks that can't get him the ball, and the bloom falls off of the Rose.

His early (pre-CC) decision suggests to me that he couldn't wait to get out anyway, but even if he was carefully evaluating his options a top-two round outlook is a good reason to go. Right now he still has "potential;" next year he will have "flaws."



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Perkis-Size Me

January 15th, 2015 at 9:51 AM ^

Really wish he would've stuck around for next year. I think Harbaugh could've worked wonders with him, but obviously, that's not our decision to make.

Hope he has a great career. I'll be rooting for him.

WestSider

January 15th, 2015 at 9:54 AM ^

under performed at UM, with flashes of great talent, a career peppered with images of dropped passes, too many attempts to one-hand the ball, etc. Hope he blows up at the combine and has a great NFL career.