Marley Nowell

September 24th, 2014 at 11:28 AM ^

If this happened in April how did no one know about it until recently?  If I was CMU i would be more angered about him not telling anyone about this, and them finding out when he was charged.

thisisme08

September 24th, 2014 at 6:37 PM ^

He was still finishing up requirements for his graduation from the University of Michigan at the time and was not enrolled at Central Michigan. According to Heeke, the Chippewas weren't aware of the incident until shortly before CMU's game against Syracuse.

-1 for reading comprehension.

Despite this Mt. P is a small town....the AD knew about this.   

Wolverine Devotee

September 24th, 2014 at 11:30 AM ^

They've scored 13 points in their last two games and rushed for only 135 yards.

Rawls had 276 in the two games he played for CMU. 

swalburn

September 24th, 2014 at 11:34 AM ^

That is insane.  That is a felony and he sits out 2 games.  I understand the article indicates High Court misdemeanor, but anything over a year is a felony despite the label of High Court misdemeanor.  You would think he would have some jail time coming as well.    This seems on the light side to me.

swalburn

September 24th, 2014 at 12:03 PM ^

I totally understand that philosphy, but it just feels weird to me having a guy plea to a felony and then reinstating him so you can squeeze a couple games out of him before he is sentenced.  Additionally the fact that Mitch got a 6 month suspension for marijuana from the NCAA makes  thisfeel even more ridiculous.  I understand Mitch's punishment came from the NCAA but the difference in punishments is tough to swallow when in my mind the felony theft charge is infinitely worse.

sadeto

September 24th, 2014 at 2:44 PM ^

Rawls probably thought he was pleading to a "misdemeanor", but as I understand it, not only does a "high court misdemeanor" proceed through the system as a felony, it winds up on an individual's record as a felony. That will follow him, forever, unless he manages to have it expunged at some point down the line. 

CalifExile

September 24th, 2014 at 3:40 PM ^

This seems to be his first major criminal act. If that's the case, it's probably best for society if he is allowed to pursue the path that offers the greatest possibility that he will become a productive member of society. I'd hate to see a downward spiral like we saw with Cissoko.

thisisme08

September 24th, 2014 at 6:41 PM ^

Eh, I deal with check/debit/credit fraud on a daily basis.  As long as his record was relatively clean then a plea is fine in this case.  

At the same time he probably recieved a little bit of home cooking considering Burdick isn't the county prosecutor anymore.