BYU wants to feel the Power (...of a P5 Conf)

Submitted by superstringer on

BYU doesn't want to be independent anymore.

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/byu-ad--school-s-intends-to-play-in-power-5-conference-in--near-future-133956569.html

Big XII seems logical, if they can find a XIIth too, but the article says the conference isn't interested (at the moment).  More interestingly, BYU seems to think another wave of realignment is in the near future... not sure what's left to move...

But if this is in the works, can I ask ... can B1G trade Rutgers and Maryland for BYU?  Pleez?

Gulogulo37

February 25th, 2015 at 5:53 PM ^

Brian and others usually focus on how bad Rutgers is and how the TV revenue isn't all it's cracked up to be, but Stewart Mandel wrote a good article about how the expansion seemed necessary because of the shrinking B1G recruiting footprint.

Lucky Socks

February 25th, 2015 at 1:59 PM ^

I'm totally fine with Maryland in the Big Ten. And Rutgers maybe too. Their football is respectable in a Minnesota type of way, and at least they represent an easy win on the hardwood? Recruiting doors opened up a bit more in that area it seems.

If they could get some mature, responsible adults in their AD to stop the bonehead soundbytes I might be OK with them too. But Maryland has definitely worked out so far.

And if we ever add another...not BYU...

BlueHills

February 25th, 2015 at 6:30 PM ^

I am, too. And didn't both teams beat us last fall, one at home? 

I like having new opponents to play, even if they're not known as national powers. It makes life and games more interesting.

But BYU...that would simply not be a reasonable fit for the B1G in any way. They more closely resemble the TCUs and Baylors of the world.

Magnum P.I.

February 25th, 2015 at 4:48 PM ^

Cincinnati to the Big Ten would be great for us, and we should all be advocating for it. It's an unbelievable structural advantage for Ohio State that its the only major football program in the most talent-rich state in the conference. It's honestly a miracle that they don't win the conference every year. Their situation is almost the hypothetical equivalent to UF being the only major football program in the state of Florida. Only if the state of Florida were surrounded by Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, and other states that don't produce much talent.

The higher the profile of Cincinnati, the worse for Ohio State, and the better for us. 

Blau

February 25th, 2015 at 2:03 PM ^

Trade Maryland and Rutgers for BYU? Why stop there?

Let's trade Iowa, Indiana, and Minnesota for Evergreen State U, ITT Tech and Barnum & Bailey Clown College. 

 

/s

Tater

February 25th, 2015 at 2:07 PM ^

Their strict enforcement of the "honor code" which prohibits premarital sex pretty much puts them "out of the market" for 90% of the elite recruits in any sport.  Contrast this with the SEC, where so many schools use "hostesses" to "entertain" their recruits and one apparently likes to use two at a time.  

BYU does a lot of things right as a program.  Whether or not you agree with their religion, they do a great job of graduating their players and trying to help them grow into responsible citizens who are great representatives of their school.  Unfortunately, their message doesn't always resonate with the modern player.  

I can't see BYU being more than an 8-4 team in a major conference.  They should rejoin a lesser conference and play against schools with personnel closer to theirs. 

LS And Play

February 25th, 2015 at 2:34 PM ^

There are a lot of reasons to not want BYU, but success on the field is not one of them. They have 5 10-win seasons the last 10 years, with three of those being 11-win years. They have a national championship in somewhat recent memory -- yes, by beating Bo's worst team ever, but still. If we can add a team that will consistently win 8-10 games a year and occasionally competes for conference titles, that is a plus. Not that this would ever happen though. 

Alton

February 25th, 2015 at 3:07 PM ^

The WAC champion (Brigham Young) was tied in to the Holiday Bowl--there was no way they could get out of it.  As far as their opponent is concerned, I don't think any teams passed on the Holiday Bowl:  they wanted Michigan and Michigan wasn't about to say no.

Obviously there were better teams they could have invited, but there weren't any bigger TV/attendance draws to choose from.  The Holiday Bowl always seemed to like the Big Ten anyway.

superstringer

February 25th, 2015 at 4:22 PM ^

The answer to that question is:  HARBAUGH.

As in, Jim had been the starter that season, his first (as a sophomore).  Now, true, he broke his arm against Sparty IIRC and didn't play a down the rest of the year -- hence the 6-5 result -- BUT, his mere presence on the team earlier that year COMPELLED the Holiday Bowl to invite us.  THE POWER OF HARBAUGH.

Frankly, Oklahoma or Washington -- the #2 and #3 teams that year -- would have waxed BYU in a bowl game.  BYU was lucky it was "just" us that year.