Article on The Big Lead regarding Swenson: Opinion piece(no new facts)

Submitted by Mattavious on

I saw this article.  

http://thebiglead.com/2016/01/22/jim-harbaugh-erik-swenson-and-the-importance-of-context/

 

Edit: Fixed so that this is now just a link to another article you can feel free to read or not read. It is an opinion piece basing information from the Spath article that everyone except myself had read previously. Sorry for getting all your hopes up for some new bits of information. Go Blue.

ItsGreatToBe

January 22nd, 2016 at 3:14 PM ^

...they have to read another "opinion" piece about how the whole matter was handled, based on one side of the story. Then, someone might end their life.

But not me; I won't end my life until Mike Tyson publishes his views on the Swenson situation. Then I will commence death by hoverboard.

MC5-95

January 22nd, 2016 at 2:26 PM ^

The part you pull quoted was from the Rivals story already posted and widely discussed this morning. The rest of this one seems to be pretty middle of the road opinion. 

How about we stop posting Swenson articles from around the interwebz and start to move forward? We can continue the moral examination of us as a fanbase if this appears to happen again with another recruit. (And I'm not talking about Rashad Weaver.)

bronxblue

January 22nd, 2016 at 2:29 PM ^

Yeah, as a general rule, The Big Lead is a place you go for terrible #HOTTAKES and pictures of attractive women.  To expect anything substantive from that place is a bar too high.

And yeah, nothing particularly wrong with the article, but just a repeat of a dozen others (and with a nice big block quote to fill out the word count).

jerseyblue

January 22nd, 2016 at 2:45 PM ^

Ace and Wiltfong both put in their ballz picks for Swenson today. Ace for Northwester and Wiltfong for Wiscy. Thunderdome's rules are simple, gentlemen.Get to the weapons. Use them any way you can.

Wolvie3758

January 22nd, 2016 at 4:40 PM ^

this is a non story perpetuated by people who dont like Michigan..Can we please just not talk about this any further?  we gotz bigger fish to fry

LSAClassOf2000

January 22nd, 2016 at 6:25 PM ^

Another issue here is the way recruiting is covered. A “verbal commitment” is not a contract. It’s a media construct to keep track of recruiting classes.

ALthough the article doesn't reveal much that wasn't already known, this is a point that is worth mentioning because it seems like there are a fair number of people - on Twitter, on blogs, etc... - that seem to think that "verbal commitment" holds some real weight when it doesn't at all. I suppose I never understood why some people get irate when a teenager backs off a verbal commitment, as if it was binding.