Another insane UCL game - Real Madrid avoids insane Juve comeback

Submitted by superstringer on

What a horrible way for Buffon's UCL career to end.

On heels of Roma's insane comeback against Barca, Juventus comes back from a 0-3 aggregate deficit ON THE ROAD in Madrid to pull level at 3-3. Then deeeeep into stoppage time, a questionable call in the box gives Real a PK.  And the historically great goalie Gigi Buffon, incensed, playing admittedly his last UCL game (if it would be a loss), protests a bit too much and is redcarded.  And CR7 puts the PK past Buffon's replacement (in fairness, NO human would have stopped that kick), and Real avoids total disaster.

WOW.

TrueBlue2003

April 12th, 2018 at 11:17 AM ^

UCL goes by the away goals rule, which means that if after 180 minutes the score is tied, the team with more away goals wins.  It was 4-4 but Juve had three away goals to Madrid's 1 so they would have moved on.  No extra time.  No PKs.

I could be wrong, but I just looked up the away goals rule and that's the way I understand it to work.

A tie is not a tie in a two-leg competition unless away goals are also tied.

TrueBlue2003

April 12th, 2018 at 12:39 PM ^

I had it mixed up with the other insane UCL come from three goals down comeback this week which was 4-1 in the first leg.  You are correct.

In that case, I'd agree that the justification for swallowing a whistle on anything close is stronger.  But again, I don't think this was close.  This was a pretty blatant foul on a guy in excellent scoring position.  Still think they did the right thing.

garde

April 11th, 2018 at 6:47 PM ^

Great quote from Buffon post game

“You cannot ruin the dreams of a team. I could’ve told the referee anything at that moment, but he had to understand the degree of the disaster he was creating. If you can’t handle the pressure and have the courage to make a decision, then you should just sit in the stands and eat your crisps.”

jbrandimore

April 11th, 2018 at 7:03 PM ^

Any chance they would move it back 15-20 yards to give the goalies a shot and perhaps more importantly, make the refs not as much of a focal point of every game?

turtleboy

April 12th, 2018 at 8:13 AM ^

In the US we had done it differently and all the European stars life Cruyff and Beckenbauer who played here loved the way we handled our pk. Similar to hockey you had a dribbling run up from distance, 1 v 1 with the goalie, and a short time window, I believe. More about skill than just guessing which direction.

LandryHD

April 11th, 2018 at 7:58 PM ^

Correct call and if you think otherwise you're a Barca or Juventus fan. Easiest call that guy made. Also Juventus didn't do them any favors with all them yellows. They were playing some dirty soccer.

Zoltanrules

April 11th, 2018 at 11:53 PM ^

Ref was in perfect position to make an easy call for the push on hte back.

Ronaldo should get a yellow too for prancing around showing off his abs. What a character.

Gigi is one of the classiest players ever but he just lost his composure. Tough loss but not the ref's fault.

Sten Carlson

April 12th, 2018 at 2:01 AM ^

This common meme that refs should or shouldn’t make calls based on the situation in the game is nonsense — make the right call ALL the time, regardless of the game situation. People complain about refs deciding games too often but not calling a blatant foul (which this was, IMO) because it’s stoppage time is just the other side of bad coin. To wit, US National Side at Azteca during WCQ, not one but TWO blatant violent elbows go unpunished within the opening minutes of the match. Both deserving of red cards, but I cannot help believing that the ref didn’t make either call because he couldn’t imagine ejecting a Mexican player, in Aztecs, during the Hex, in the 3rd minute of the game. Further, I have to believe the offending player believed this as well and was emboldened by a lower likelihood of getting a (deserved) red card. If there’s an obvious call, make it, regardless of the consequences — that’s what the rules are for and why the refs are there to enforce them. Michigan has been on the short end of many of those sticks (NC v Louisville, ‘16 OSU game), to say the ‘89 NC shouldn’t a foul is insane. It’s called over and over because, and shouldn’t be “let go” because it’s late in an NC game.

snarling wolverine

April 12th, 2018 at 2:44 PM ^

I get what you're saying.  On an intellectual level, yeah, it makes sense.  But I still don't like seeing a tied match decided on a penalty in stoppage time. This wasn't objectively bad officiating, but it was a crappy way for a really exciting match to end.