Mr Miggle

January 22nd, 2016 at 1:27 PM ^

He was very highly ranked early in HS, at one time perhaps the top prospect in Ohio. He peaked early as an athlete. There are similarities to Swenson although Gant was not highly rated by the time he committed. Never heard a negative word about him or his effort nor anything positive about his prospects to play while at Michigan,

markp

January 22nd, 2016 at 12:33 PM ^

Perhaps this year's LB corps will be like last year's WR group. There were a lot of questions before the season started and we ended the year with a solid group that was performing at a pretty high level and showed flashes of greatness.

winterblue75

January 22nd, 2016 at 12:12 PM ^

Now the media can spin "I have decided not to come back for my fifth year......" to "Jim Harbaugh said I'm not good enough to be here and he kicked my dog on the way out the door as well"

MI Expat NY

January 22nd, 2016 at 12:16 PM ^

I have to say, there have been some complaints (mostly from college coaches) about the use of the grad transfer, but it would be a shame for guys like Gant if it went away.  He's filled his commitment to the University admirably over four years and now he will be given a chance to find another place to see the field during his fifth year.  It would further expose the hypocrisy of the NCAA, who purport to care only about the "student-athlete," if it gets rid of the rule because some coaches can't stand to lose just a little bit of the control they have over a group of 18-22 year olds, 

The Barwis Effect

January 22nd, 2016 at 12:17 PM ^

A Michigan legacy, to boot. Too bad it never really clicked for him on the field, but at least he got that degree. I'm trying to remember. Wasn't he like the top HS player in Ohio after his sophomore year?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad