Opponent Stock Report (and Self Analysis) - Week 10

Submitted by alum96 on

This is my weekly feature to look back at summer previews, get egg on my face, look over what Michigan did, and then project the rest of the year as we get more real time data.  Last week's taking stock report can be found here.

Prelude:  I did season previews on most UM opponents - I skipped UNLV, Indiana and Rutgers out of boredom, and OSU out of fear.  The rest are below

---------------------------

Dear readers - the deeper we go into the season the more off my summer views will become as naturally teams will evolve from what we thought they would be and injuries happen.

Image result for rutgers football tire fire

(what is not shown is the smoke is coming from smoldering tires)

So I didn't do summer previews on Rutgers or Indiana as I thought they'd be bad.  Rutgers is horrid.  Indiana is just Big 10 bad (0-5) but has enough offense to scare people.

Therefore, no summer evaluation of Rutgers but last week I wrote this based on data up to that point:

Rutgers has been imploded by Wisconsin and OSU back to back.  Carroo is the entire offense and even if he is back won't be 100%.  As I said above, if we give up 20+ to Rutgers I will have to consider the defense a bit fraudulent and feasting on 4 really bad QBs early in the year in (a) Seth Collins, (b) Caleb Rowe, (c) the backup at UNLV after Decker got hurt, and a (d) mediocre Thorson at Northwestern.   We cannot make Laviano look like Gary Nova. 

Rutgers defense is also putrid giving up nearly a zillion points to OSU and Wisconsin.  Now with that said Clement was back for Wisconsin and we sure don't have a Clement and OSU is OSU but damnit I guess Peppers or something.   This is by far the easiest game left of the 4 and at home so UM needs to find their form going into the final stretch of 3 games.  It will be interesting to see how things shake out at QB - I am sure a healthy Jake will get the start but will he be healthy?  And if not, how does Speight look with a full week of 1st team reps and confidence?  And can we get back to the defense of pre MSU at least for a week please?

Laviano did not look like Gary Nova.  Defense plays well but gave up some points but special teams was a bit off and 7 of those pts were directly on a kickoff return and I'd claim another 3 were due to special teams issues.  So I'll put 6 on the defense which is ok.  OSU had a shutout vs Rutgers until 4 minutes remained in game and surely a bunch of 2nd stringers in (with Carroo playing in NJ) so on that measuring stick I'd have liked to see a bit better but it's good enough.  Jake did look like Gary Nova - which in this case was good.

A Look at Michigan

It was a comforting game in that Michigan did what you are supposed to do to very bad teams.  After 2 sub 300 yard outings vs good (not great) defenses, Rutgers D came in on a silver platter.  This was probably Rudock's best game at Michigan and only his second positive rating via Pro Football Focus this year, so let's do that again 3 more times (or 4 with the bowl) (or 5 with a championship game and a bowl) (or 6... well...)  Yes you have to account for Rutgers S&P ranked 116th defense ....which is 122nd vs the pass but beggers can't be choosers.

Image result for rutgers michigan football

Jake was 18/25 for 337 yds with 2 TD and 0 INT.  More importantly in the eye test he was zinging it out there with some nice velocity on intermediate passes - and a lot better accuracy.  In fact I think the WRs had 2 drops which hurt his stats. It's been difficult to tell how good our WRs hands are this year because they get so few opportunities so that was a minor ding but unlike prior drops these were mostly pretty catchable balls if I recall correct.  The screen game was beautiful - obviously something was seen in film and unlike the prior staff, plans were made to exploit said holes.  Pass protect was good vs a team that rarely gets to the passer.

Pass distribution was 5 to TEs, 7 to WRs, 5 to RBs/FBs, and 1 to Peppers.  That's a very Harbaugh @ Stanfordish distribution.

The run game continues to be meh.  The stats say it was ok 42 carries for 150 yards. But that's a measly 3.6 per against the S&P 108th ranked rush defense.  On a day the safeties actually had to play intermediate passes and hence  could not stack into the box.  So it's not that good - but a consistent issue all year at this point.  Smith did look the most healthy he has in a few weeks so let's hope that continues as we need a Thunder and Lightning mix vs PSU and OSU.  The Drake was pretty pedestrian this game with 7 carries for 27 yds.  Houmatime was fun to watch and at this point he seems to have passed the human victory cigar in the rotation as a RB??!  I continue to see this team struggling to run on a consistent basis vs the PSU and OSU DLs - esp if bad Jake returns.

This game helped move UM up from 98th to 87th in total offense via NCAA (which ranks offenses only on total yards).  Advanced stats look more kindly on UM but its generally a 50ish type of offense in that regard.   The staff continues to make do with what they have and the addition of Peppers surely helps - his TD run was a "make something out of nothing" play that only truly elite playmakers make.

Defensively there was a lot of this:

Image result for rutgers michigan football

 

To the untrained eye Morgan had a nice bounce back game, Wormley was causing all sorts of havoc (2 sacks, 2 TFL), Peppers seems to be improving in pass coverage, and Lewis was Lewis.  Jarrod Wilson had a nice pick.  PFF liked Taco Charlton's game - stats show he had 3 tackles and 1 TFL.  Glasgow was dinged and sat out much of the 2nd half and Hurst was quiet. 

Rutgers only had 225 yds and less than 100 thru the air.  The one big bust this game was a 54 yd run so take that out and Rutgers only had 171 yards which is very good.  They did get 17 first downs which is more than you want but were only 3/13 on third.  

Image result for rutgers michigan football

There was a bad kickoff return from Grant who already had 2 TDs this year so that was not pleasing.  But in general the special teams continue to give UM's offense short fields. UM's TD drives were:

  • 46 yds
  • 58 yds
  • 60 yds
  • 43 yds
  • 40 yds
  • 60 yds

That's an average of 51 yds i.e. UM started those 6 drives on average at their own 49 yard line.   This has been a theme the past month.

 

DEGREE OF DIFFICULTY (DOD!) RANKINGS

Basing games on WHEN they are played and WHERE this was my general view on degree of difficulty for each opponent coming into the year and adjusted weekly,    Again this is not how good the team is in a vacuum but how they match up vs UM.

  Week 10 Week 9 Week 8 Week 7
1 OSU OSU OSU OSU
2 @Utah @Utah @Utah @Utah
3 MSU MSU MSU MSU
4 BYU BYU BYU BYU
5 @PSU @PSU @PSU @PSU
6 @Indiana @Indiana @Indiana Northwestern
7 @Minn @Minn Northwestern @Indiana
8 Northwestern Northwestern @Minn @Minn
9 @Maryland @Maryland @Maryland @Maryland
10 Rutgers Rutgers Rutgers Rutgers
11 Oregon State Oregon State Oregon State Oregon State
12 UNLV UNLV UNLV UNLV
         
  Week 6 Week 5 Week 4 Week 2
1 OSU OSU OSU OSU
2 @Utah @Utah @Utah MSU
3 MSU MSU MSU @Minn
4 Northwestern Northwestern @Minn @Utah
5 BYU BYU BYU BYU
6 @PSU @PSU Northwestern @PSU
7 @Minn @Minn @PSU Northwestern
8 @Indiana @Indiana @Indiana Rutgers
9 @Maryland @Maryland @Maryland @Maryland
10 Rutgers Rutgers Rutgers @Indiana
11 Oregon State Oregon State Oregon State Oregon State
12 UNLV UNLV UNLV UNLV
         
  Week 1 Preseason    
1 OSU OSU    
2 MSU MSU    
3 @Utah @PSU    
4 @Minn @Utah    
5 BYU BYU    
6 @PSU @Minn    
7 Northwestern Northwestern    
8 @Maryland @Maryland    
9 Rutgers Rutgers    
10 @Indiana @Indiana    
11 Oregon State Oregon State    
12 UNLV UNLV    

 

Image result for stock up

Stock Up

Nah

 

Image result for stock down

Stock Down

Not this time bro

 

Image result for balanced things

Stock Flat

  • OSU - OSU sort of sleepwalked thru a game with Minnesota.  But they are nowhere near the offense with Cardale that they are with JT.   I hope JT celebrates the victory over MSU with a lot of drinks and is found with an open container immediately after with Joey Bosa and Darron Lee.   OSU goes to Ill next week - a team that strangely has given them trouble the past 3-4 years if I recall correctly.  Maybe they will look ahead to MSU and make it a closer game than it should be.  OSU D continues to look pretty solid and absolutely mauled MN's run game (33 yds total - even if you take out Leidner's -13 it was only 46 yds)
  • Utah - Utah had a tricky road game vs Washington and prevailed even with Travis Wilson channeling Jake Rudock for most of 2015 (12/25, 155 yds, 6.2 ypa, 1 INT).  Booker continues to be used like Lorenzo White circa 1987 to the tune of 150 yds.  (younger people ....google Lorenzo White)  On a side note future New England Patriot and true freshman Britain Covey continues to play well with another 5 catches and him doing well v Peppers in week 1 makes more sense by the week.
  • MSU  - Simpsons-haha.gif.   After playing with fire all year and selling many souls Dantonio finally ran out of humans to sacrifice.  Truthfully this should be a 3 loss team with Vernon Adams completing a wide open pass, Blake handling a punt, and then Neb doing Neb.  You could make a case for the Rutgers and Purdue games as well.  The pass defense remains a tire fire and any teams with legit passing QBs have a chance.  Unfortunately Maryland is not one of those teams next week.  Cook was off in the 1st quarter but again carried the team the last 3 quarters.  But he can't play defensive back.
  • BYU -  BYU barely beat the Flying Borges' this week in an uninspiring performance.  The rushing game was horrendous - 36 yds on 25 carries.  BYU is sort of a team that should be ranked 35th to 40th - advanced stats also support this.  But they are 7-2 without many tests on their schedule.
  • PSU - Yes PSU lost to NW but it ended up being a last second game and NW was doing its best to derp it away.  I have come to the conclusion that home field is worth more than 3 pts in college (v the NFL) and I expect a home PSU to be a lot better than a road PSU.  Hack can do enough to cause issues and PSU DL continues to be a worry.  Hack was 21/40 but his 5.1 ypa was Joey Harrington-ish (Lions version)  That said he was over 9.0 ypa for 3 weeks in a row.  Saquon Barkley had a good game vs a decent rush D.
  • Minnesota - Leidner had a pretty decent game (27/44) but his ypa was down in the 6 range so his ability to deliver arm punts was not quite as good as with UM.  He still threw for nearly 300 as Minn was behind the whole night and OSU took away the run completely.   This is a well coached team who is coaching up a lot of 3 star talent but aside from the seconday lacks playmakers.
  • Indiana-  Indiana continues to be a hard luck team.  If you squint your eyes they have lost 3 times to teams with a combined 2 losses (err 1 loss damnit) in Iowa, OSU and MSU.  Unfortunately when you open your eyes you see a team that game up 55 to Rutgers.  Indiana seems to be a pretty good team for 50-52 minutes a game.  Then they revert to Indiana.  Worry is Nebraska type luck in that fortune has not been there way of late and at some point that turns around.  Hopefully not next week.  Sudfeld was worse than usual this game - 16/37 and a measly 4.9 ypa ...way below his average.  Jordan Howard looked like the Howard of early in the season with 174 yds on 22 carries.  Going to be very important for UM defense to contain this guy to 80ish yards.  
  • Northwestern - NW has a nice record but it strikes me as a bit fraudulent.  You could see that vs Iowa and Michigan.  The Duke win is looking worse by the week and the Stanford win at this point you chalk up to the crazy stuff of week 1.  They looked decently in control v PSU but then began to remember they were Northwestern.  Oliver came in for Thorson and was just as mediocre.  Saving grace was Justin Jackson who has looked bad most of the year after a great year last year - 186 yds.  To me this is a fringe top 30ish team that benefits from playing in an awful division.
  • Maryland  - Maryland is a bad team with bad QBs but gave Wisconsin a bit to think about at least.  Corey Clement was out again after a big game last week and Wisc turned to uhh.... star linebacker Joe Schobert.  Well he had 1 run for 57 yds on a fake punt as he tried to channel Peppers. MD also scored on an onside kick.   This is a bad team with 2 wins and is only saved by the array of horrid teams below them - at least Maryland has one half decent unit (defense).  This summer I had projected Maryland to struggles to get to 5 wins - they have 2 right now.
  • Rutgers  - They are a bad team.  A very bad team.
  • Oregon State - My preseason prediction was OSU would be the worst P12 team and they are doing nothing to make me look bad.  OSU lost 41-0 to UCLA.  Rosen crushed OSU's D (22/33 for 333) I am seriously considering moving UNLV ahead of them.  At least UNLV has a QB when healthy.  OSU finishes with @Cal, Wash, @Ore - the path to 0-9 in conf is clear.
  • UNLV - UNLV beat Hawaii 41-21 and now has 3 wins. Blake Decker was healthy and the team is different when he plays. 

 

Image result for rutgers michigan football

Overall

Last week we said get this easy game out of the way and then things toughen up to finish off the season.  So mission accomplished.  7-2 with 3 to go has UM in a nice position for a very nice season in year 1. 

UM is better than Indiana and PSU but those are both road games and of the 6 halves we've played on the road this year I'd say we've played well in about 2 of them (2nd half Maryland, and maybe 30 of the 60 minutes vs Minn)  Jake in particular has really struggled on the road.

2-1 would be great from here; 1-2 not so great, 3-0 fantastic.   I am actually expecting 3 nail biters here on out.

Image result for rutgers michigan football

Next Week

Most of the talk will probably focus on Sudfeld but Jordan Howard could be next week's X factor.  UM has a strong rush D but this might be the best RB (yes better than Booker) we face until OSU.  He has been hurt for the past month but looks to be rounding back into form.  It's ok to give up yards but the gash yards for 20-25 is where we need to be careful.  Also, Lewis won't be able to focus on a "top WR" as was possible with some other teams as Indiana spreads it around pretty well.   Clark and Stribling need to show up and make plays.  A good pash rush to get to Sudfeld would also help.

Indian's pass D is 66th in S&P+ so not nearly as bad as Rutgers but you can throw on them.  Their rush D is near 100 so getting some yards on the ground and keeping the TOP high would be good things to do.   Need to see a quality game from Jake on the road as well.  UM will need to score points as Indiana will get  yards and points.  I expect a quite tricky game as Iowa and Michigan are actually quite similar in advanced stats (Iowa not playing two top 15 teams however) and hopefully UM pulls away in the last 10 minutes as has been Indiana's MO this year vs quality teams.

 

 

 

Comments

Everyone Murders

November 9th, 2015 at 1:35 PM ^

That sounds about right.  IU has shown that they can keep a game close against a superior opponent before imploding spectacularly.  Time and time again.

PSU is in Happy Valley at night [EDIT - ehhhh, not so much], so that could be close too.  Hackenberg could do an imitation of Minnesota's QB and become suddenly and spectacularly accurate.  (Or he could revert to Hack '15 mode - yes, please.)

And OSU.  I'll know a helluvalot more about that team once they play MSU. 

Anyway, great write-up as usual.   

alum96

November 9th, 2015 at 3:35 PM ^

Yep Hack is so variable week to week.  Still PTSD from Nova Leidner and uhhh 30 yrs of watching QBs become Matt Flynn vs Lions I just expect QBs with some arm talent to "find it" vs UM.

PSU gave OSU all it could handle last year in Happy Valley and except for a phantom call prob should have won so until i see otherwise a hyped PSU team at home with a host of 4 stars - even if poorly coached on offense - still will be a handful.  Dont like the matchup of our run blocking vs their DL so Jake will need to be present.

alum96

November 9th, 2015 at 3:33 PM ^

By the way Hurst apparently got hurt at some point Sat - didn't realize that until after I posted and went to read other people's diaries/recaps.

Hope not too serious.

michiganman001

November 9th, 2015 at 6:25 PM ^

I wouldn't say 2-1 would be "great." Maybe "good" but I really want this team to beat OSU and a win over OSU and a loss to PSU/IU is betterr than the other 2-1 alternative, I can't really call that "great" either. 

alum96

November 10th, 2015 at 12:14 PM ^

Well to me when I consider we have 3 games we are not a sure thing in and 2 of those (PSU/OSU) will probably be last drive type of games I think grabbing 2 of those 3 would be pretty damn swell.  If we struggle in a half v Indiana and PSU those will be tough to overcome and we've struggled at minimum a half every road game.

I probably see the @PSU game as a much higher loss prob than 90% of the board so that clouds that view.  I think its a coin flip game even if we are better which I think we are. If I was thinking "2 sure wins and 50/50 vs OSU" then yes I'd probably say 2-1 isn't so grand because I'd already consider Indiana / PSU in the pocket wins.

5-7 to 9-3 (and should have been 10-2 outside of *THAT* event) would be a hell of a jump.  So 2-1 is still going to be a very darn good finish if that is how it ends up.

EGD

November 9th, 2015 at 10:52 PM ^

I think Northwestern deserves more credit than you are giving them. You can attribute their win over Stanford to "week one craziness" all you want, but that was still Stanford and Northwestern still beat them. Northwestern was also in control of that game against Penn State until a series of dumb mistakes and penalties--not to mention their usually reliable kicker missing two FGs and a PAT--but Northwestern still pulled it out, and with their backup QB. I would definitely put them ahead of IU; I realize M got Northwestern at home and plays IU on the road, but Bloomington isn't exactly The Swamp.

hunterjoe

November 10th, 2015 at 12:02 PM ^

Wasn't it 2 PATs?  Not to discredit you, but it makes it sound much worse when you miss 2 PATs.  And they were aweful kicks.  One was blocked by the D-Line, but it probably wouldn't have made it above the O-line if he hadn't.  

alum96

November 10th, 2015 at 12:26 PM ^

Maybe but getting destroyed by Iowa and UM dours my view of them.  If they lost those games 24-10 or something I could understand. They didnt even put up a fight in either game. Top 20 teams don't lay down like that. 

I thought the Duke win was more impressive earlier in the season as well - Duke is getting exposed now and wins over VA Techh and GA Tech proved to be over mediocre teams.  I can't find a good team that Duke beat.

NW is a decent team but sort of like what MN as been the past 2 years - just not that talent level individually but well coached with 1 unit doing pretty well.  They go into Wisconsin in 2 weeks so if they win that I'll maybe change my tune a bit.  They avoided both OSU and MSU this year in schedule as well.

And again this is a DOD - not a "is this team better than the other".  UM has mostly been a beast all year at home save for 1 game.  NW was at home. On the road they have played IMO 60 of 180 minutes well. MN/PSU/IND on the road.

EGD

November 11th, 2015 at 8:02 AM ^

Fair enough. Once you get past the top few teams, all these teams are going to have their flaws so there is plenty of room for debate about which characteristics are more or less important. It's hard to argue that Northwestern was a tough opponent for Michigan when M won 38-0, and I agree the Iowa loss was jarring--I did think Northwestern would bounce back against Iowa, let alone lose by 30. But, IMO, at least Northwestern has a few big wins that suggest they really could hang with Michigan. To me that's more of a reason to consider Nortwestern a threat than some of these teams like IU and Minnesota who don't have the wins but played good teams close.

707oxford

November 10th, 2015 at 7:44 AM ^

Considering M was literally an inch from losing to Minn, I guess you think we'll be losing to IU with them ranked higher in the DOD? Or will we win by a half inch?

alum96

November 10th, 2015 at 12:24 PM ^

Not a huge believer in transative.  More of a believer in matchups - hence why PSU gives me pause just because they matchup pretty well with us.

Still boggled how MN stayed that close - on paper that was a great matchup for UM but when the QB throws 30-40 yd bombs half the night and completes them all.... that happens.

Indiana's offense is going to be tougher on UM but Indiana's defense is going to be much easier.  And Indiana likes to revert to sucking late in games so thats a good thing.

EGD

November 11th, 2015 at 8:13 AM ^

If I was going to build a team to take on Michigan, my first priority would be a defense that can stop the run and force Rudock to beat me through the air. My second priority would be a QB with great accuracy and decision-making skills. My third priority would be either an offensive line that can protect that QB, or for that QB to be mobile enough to protect himself. And then my fourth priority would be kickers who can keep M from destroying me in the field position game. IU might have the QB, but that's about it. Penn State has the defense and probably the QB; I don't know what their kickers are like this year, but the big hole seems to be their crummy OL combined with Hackenberg not being mobile.