Let's Predict the Big Ten

Submitted by steve sharik on

Back on August 8, I posted this in a thread (edited to bring up the word count):

I see clear-cut top teams in Ohio State and Wisconsin.  After that it's a toss up for 3rd with Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Northwestern, and Penn State. 

  • Iowa: home versus Penn State and Michigan State, at Michigan and Northwestern
  • Michigan: home versus Iowa and Michigan State, at Penn State, Northwestern off
  • Michigan State: at Iowa, Michigan, Northwestern and Penn State
  • Northwestern: home versus Iowa and Michigan State, at Penn State, Michigan off (also OSU off)
  • Penn State: home versus Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern, at Iowa

If we see these teams as evenly matched and hold serve at home in these matchups, and we assume that when any of these teams play Ohio State or Wisconsin they lose and Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, and Purdue as wins, we get:

1/2: Ohio State/Wisconsin (8-0/7-1)

3: Penn State (6-2)

4: Northwestern (6-2) (loses tie-breaker w/Penn State based on head-to-head Penn State win)

5: Michigan (5-3)

6: Iowa (4-4)

7: Michigan State (3-5)

8-11: I don't care

http://mgoblog.com/mgoboard/now-if-we-look-sites-old-predictions-we-can…

I'd like to start a rational discussion on what we think might happen in the Big Ten season this year.

Obviously, the above is according to Hoyle, but I think the surprises will even out for the most part.   Prediction: one of the teams in the "Fight for 3rd" category will implode and one will catch fire.

So, let me hear you, MGoNation.

Comments

imdeng

September 27th, 2010 at 12:10 PM ^

If I have to put my money - I would bet that Penn State will implode and Michigan will catch fire. OSU will perform as per expectation (which includes one loss in their B10 schedule), Wisc will perform marginally below expectation (lose to OSU, lose one more), Iowa will significantly disappoint and Michigan will beat everybody except Wisc and OSU.

This is just my accumulated impression after past four weeks of game action.

First Tier: OSU - 7-1,

Second Tier: Wisc 6-2, Michigan - 6-2

Third Tier: NW, Iowa, PSU: 3 losses, MSU: 3-4 losses

Fourth Tier: Purdue, Minnesota, Indiana, Illinois - who cares.

pete-rock

September 27th, 2010 at 1:08 PM ^

If UM and OSU go into The Game at 6-1, they will both be in the Top 10 with at minimum a Rose Bowl berth on the line, and a possible (for OSU, maybe) BCS Tilte game berth.

That would be quite a way to end the last season before next year's expansion, wtih UM and OSU back where they're accustomed to being.  But I'd rather see how UM performs against IU and MSU before being that bold.

Beavis

September 27th, 2010 at 12:12 PM ^

Don't have the time to predict the entire Big Ten, but I will provide my thoughts on Michigan.

The only real way to do this is a decision tree-like model:

If we beat Indiana and cover the spread (~14 point favorites = likely chance):

Wins: MSU, Illinois, Purdue, 2 of the 4 "big" games (OSU, Iowa, Wiscy, PSU)

Losses: 2 of the 4 "big" games (OSU, Iowa, Wiscy, PSU)

If we either beat Indiana and don't cover the spread or lose to Indiana:

Wins: Illinois, Purdue, 1 "shocker" (e.g., Wiscy, Iowa, OSU, etc.)

Losses: All the remaining games

My logic on this is if we go on the road and beat Indiana handily = this team is for real and won't collapse like last year's team.  That'd put us at 10-2 for the season.

If we go on the road and lose to Indiana, our record works out to 7-5.  If we beat Indiana but don't cover the spread - 8-4. 

Of course we need our guys to stay healthy and focused and anything can happen - but I'd say a reasonable expectation is somewhere between 8-4 and 10-2. 

Michigan4Life

September 27th, 2010 at 12:12 PM ^

Big Ten will be like this:

 

1. OSU (7-1) (get an upset similar to Purdue game)

2. Wisconsin (6-2)

3. Michigan (6-2) (lose to Wisconsin and OSU)

4. Iowa (5-3)

5. MSU (5-3)

6. NW (4-4)

7. PSU (4-4)

8 - 11. Who cares

StephenRKass

September 27th, 2010 at 12:16 PM ^

There are three unknowns for me in our analysis.

  1. One variation is that I see Michigan possibly winning vs. Penn State, but also possibly losing vs. one of the expected wins (Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Purdue, MSU, & Iowa.) I am not convinced that Penn State will have a good year, after seeing their performance against Temple. And the next week or two will shake out pretenders and dark horses in the Big Ten.
  2. I believe, as stated in numerous other threads, that our defense, being very young, has the potential to improve at a high level over the season. If this, in fact, does occur, and our defense improves from "bad" to "meh,", I believe Michigan will be the clear over-achiever, pushing us to 6 - 2 Big Ten, 10 - 2 overall.
  3. Because of our lack of depth in several areas, the secondary and the linebacker corps in particular, Michigan is especially vulnerable to injury. If we lose any two of Mouton, Cam Gordon, or Rogers, let alone Mike Martin or Roh, I believe we would drop to 4 - 4 Big Ten, 8 - 4 overall. This still would be better than the 7 - 5 I predicted at the beginning of the season.

M-Wolverine

September 27th, 2010 at 12:25 PM ^

I like your standings, but after seeing them, I think NW gets moved down. They have not impressed this year.  I still like Iowa better than Penn State, so Iowa 3rd.  I think 4th is a head to head between PSU and Michigan, and since I originally picked that as a loss, I'll stick with it, and have PSU 4th...but it could easily flip-flop.  Likewise, 5th could be the head to head between MSU and Michigan, and since I picked us to win, we'll go M then MSU. Then probably NW...with Indiana not completely sucking, Illinois looking pretty bad, Purdue looking like the worst team in the league except for the fact that Minnesota exists.

uofi17

September 27th, 2010 at 12:42 PM ^

I think it is clear that OSU is an elite-level team and the clear favorite in the conference, but I don't understand the assumed faith in Wisconisn.  Wisconsin has squeaked by one middling BCS team at home (ASU), beaten but not blown out two cupcakes (SJSU and UNLV), and clubbed one baby seal (Austin Peay).

I think it is safe to suggest they are probably somewhat better that a group of teams below them, but an upset of UW by one of those teams would not be at all surprising.  OSU being beaten by anyone would be a considerable surprise (though it will probably happen at some point). 

I see the league this way:

1. OSU

Large Gap

2. Wisconsin

3-7. UM, MSU, PSU, Iowa, NU

8-10. IU, PU, Illinois

11. Fightin' Brewsters

Michigan4Life

September 27th, 2010 at 12:48 PM ^

it's the function of their playing style.  They grinds out wins regardless of opponents and they do it well.  They rely on their running game and defense to win games.

ASU is an underrated team.  Their defense is very good who is led by probably the best LB in the country in Vontaze Burfict(he's a beast).  I love the way the defense play because they're fast and physical.  They were able to handle Wisconsin offense pretty good.

 

I don't think that there's a large gap between OSU and the rest of the Big 10.  OSU is beatable, although they have been impressive this season thus far.

uofi17

September 27th, 2010 at 1:02 PM ^

but I understand your point about Wiscconsin's playing style not leading to massive blowouts.  I do think they are the second best team in the Big10 given the information we have to date, I just disagree with the original poster that they are a 1a/1b with OSU, and the suggestion that the only game either would drop would be loser of their shared game.

Michigan4Life

September 27th, 2010 at 1:23 PM ^

is the type of team that you know what you're going to get or come to expect.  A tough, big physical team who will try to wear you down with their running game.  They will win a lot of games but they won't win the Big Ten.  They'll lose to the team that they don't match up well like Iowa, OSU.  If Michigan defense is average, I would be confident about Michigan beating Wisconsin, but I'm not because their style is similar to UMass except that Wisconsin is a lot better.

steve sharik

September 27th, 2010 at 1:47 PM ^

With all the injuries they've sustained, I think they're in the second group at this point.  And if we use the same analysis (beat those teams at home, lose to them on the road), that would make the Badgers 4-4 in the league:

  • at MSU = L
  • home vs. Minn. = W
  • home vs. OSU = L
  • at Iowa = L (at this point at 1-3 in the league they could implode a bit)
  • at Purdue = W
  • home vs. IU = W
  • at M = L
  • home vs. NW = W

Now, I would bet that Wiscy beats at least one of MSU, M, and Iowa on the road, if not two or even three, but who knows?

snowcrash

September 27th, 2010 at 12:44 PM ^

First tier: OSU. Only OSU has looked really good so far. I expect them to run the table unless Iowa or Wisconsin plays at a much higher level than they have so far.

(gap)

Second tier: Iowa, Wisconsin. Iowa has a good defense again, but the OL has been very weak. Wisconsin has no glaring weaknesses, but they seem to drift in and out of games and struggle to put weaker opponents away. They'll probably blow at least one game against a team they should beat on paper.

(smaller gap)

Third tier: PSU, MSU, UM in no order. PSU's offense is a train wreck, MSU can't stop the pass, and UM doesn't have the horses on defense. All 3 games among these teams are pure tossups.

(gap)

Fourth tier: NW, Ill. NW has been pretty mediocre across the board. Illinois seems to be improving on defense, but the offense is rebuilding.

(gap?)

Indiana is still a question mark, having played no real games. Their passing game looks ok, but they've struggled enough running the ball and on defense to suggest that these will be major weaknesses.

Fifth tier: Purdue, Minnesota. Purdue's offense was shaky when healthy and is now a disaster area with all the injuries. The defense has also been awful. Minnesota has been horrible, especially on defense where they are very green. It will be an upset if either of these teams beat anyone but each other or maybe Indiana. 

3rdGenerationBlue

September 27th, 2010 at 1:19 PM ^

I'll be happy if the following scenario plays out:

Expected Wins - Indiana, Purdue, & Illinois

Toss-ups - MSU, Iowa, & Penn St.  (expecting to win 1 of the three)

Losses - Wisconsin & Ohio State

I'd like to see convincing wins over the first three, very close games against the toss-ups that end in Michigan's favor, and competitive games against the final two that demonstrate Michigan's ability to play with anyone.

Token_sparty

September 27th, 2010 at 1:21 PM ^

Only Penn State's schedule will keep them from having a 'ZOMG, JoePa became a zombie and is eating our QB!' moment- remember Threetsheridammit?  If you don't have a serviceable QB, you will get murderized in B10 play.  I expect them to lose multiple games by embarrassing margins.  MSU has a manageable schedule (hard road games at UM and Iowa, home w/Wisky, which beats the alternative) but no one knows how their defense will handle B10 athletes (similar to UM in that respect, I guess).  I don't think there's any question that OSU is the best team in the conference- but then again, they were bushwhacked by Purdue last year, so anything's possible.

I know many of you would like to classify MSU as an easy win.  Without posting flame bait, the best I can say is this- Denard will get his, Cousins will get his, take the over and be prepared for a shootout.  I don't think this will be easy for either team, and expect a close finish no matter who comes out on top.  Neither team can stop a good offense, and both teams have good offenses.  We can agree to disagree on who wins, but to say that UM is going to roll MSU, you'll need something more than 'sparty sux, lol' to get serious consideration.

Tapin

September 27th, 2010 at 3:07 PM ^

I don't see too many voices being raised around here claiming that MSU's going to be an easy game.  Lots of predictions of a UM win, but nobody's saying it'll be a blowout.

(I'm too much of a coward to make a prediction, myself.  I was over the moon last year after 4-0.  I remain cautiously optimistic that this year is indeed different.)

mackbrune

September 27th, 2010 at 1:31 PM ^

At the start of the season, I figured:

OSU

IOWA

WISKY

PSU

M/MSU (tie)

Now I'd flip M/MSU with PSU. I just don't see PSU scoring on anyone; its defense is good but not great. I actually see that as a winnable game for us. We normally do pretty well there, whiteout or not. And I see us winning one of two with Wisky/Iowa. Good teams. But neither is scary. Pretty much all Iowa game (in the B10) are close. And we know that Wisky, in its heart, fears us.

jamiemac

September 27th, 2010 at 1:42 PM ^

OSU 7-1

Iowa 6-2

Wisco 6-2

NW 5-3

PSU 5-3

MICH 4-4

MSU 4-4

Illini 2-6

Boilers 2-6

IU 0-8

Minny 0-8

OSU and Wisco go BCS bowling. PSU, Iowa and MICH play on New Year's Day in the SEC/Big 10 matchups. They get the nod over NW and MSU with basicaly the same records because, well, why wouldnt you pick MICH with Denard over those guys to fill your both slots.

Just what I think, off the cuff, as I slog through a Monday at the office. Translation: These picks are a fluid situation

TXmaizeNblue

September 27th, 2010 at 1:47 PM ^

I see the Big Ten endng up like this:

1.  Ohio State
2.  Iowa
3.  Michigan State
4.  Wisconsin (they will choke at least one game away - I know same could be said above)
5.  Michigan
6   Penn State
7.  NW
8-10.  who cares

 

canzior

September 27th, 2010 at 1:48 PM ^

I'm not sold on Wisconsin either.  They haven't looked very strong against BCS level competition.  I think Miami and ASU would be a toss up game and you see how well OSU played.  I'm not saying that the Badgers are awful, but I don't see any team in the Big 10 that looks exceptionally better than us other than OSU. 

Iowa has played shaky at times against BCS level competition as well, and the only explosive offense in the Big 10 other than Michgian is OSU.  Our run defense wasn't bad this weekend and Denard is a difference maker.  We are #2 in the country running the ball which is amazing.  And all things considered, we could very well go to Columbus undefeated. 

PhillipFulmersPants

September 27th, 2010 at 3:23 PM ^

half against a Top 25 team on the road, gave up a KO return for a TD and a threw Rick 6. But they still made it a ball game that wasn't decided until late in the 4th. I don't quite get the doubts about these guys, especially relative to the optimism for Michigan one week after the chatter was all doom and gloom post-UMass defense performance.  

the only explosive offense in the Big 10 other than Michgian is OSU.

Really? Big 10 is full of high octane offenses right now. Half the conference is in top 25 nationally.  Obviously Michigan and OSU. But Wisconsin is 13th in in Total Offense at 484 yards a game (vs. OSU's 506, ranked 8th).  MSU is 21st and Iowa is 26th.

Scoring offense: Michigan is trailing OSU and ahem Indiana.  Wisky is 15th. MSU is 24th and Iowa's 28th.

Passer ratings nationally: Persa #3, Stanzi #5, Chapell #6, Tolzein #8, Pryor #13, Cousins #17, Robinson #18.

Our defense is going to see a considerable upgrade in the the offenses they'll be facing the next few weeks. 

we could very well go to Columbus undefeated. 

Anything's possible, I guess, and I'm all for the optimism, but it's highly unlikely we're undefeated going to OSU.

Getting past IU will show me something as we're facing senior QB whose thrown 9 TDs and 0 picks this year, with two receivers in the Top 31 nationally in Belcher and Turner (former is tops in B10 right now), plus a guy in Tandon Doss capable of breaking out.

abcdefghijklmnop

September 27th, 2010 at 3:45 PM ^

Agreed on the Badgers-- they are never predictable. 

I would like to think that we will be undefeated after Columbus, but our D is so suspect, I think we will drop a game or 2 that we shouldn't. That being said, the way our offense looks, every game on our schedule is winnable. I'm just glad our defense doesn't have to try to contain Denard for a whole game-- it's nice to have the shoe on the other foot for a change.

DesHow21

September 27th, 2010 at 1:50 PM ^

if you think NW,Iowa and PSU are on the same level as MSU and Mich.

 

RIght now (barring injuries) MSU is ahead of us but it will still be a close. Michigan takes down the other three by 2 TD's at home or 1 TD away.

ohiomaize

September 27th, 2010 at 1:53 PM ^

1.  OSU - Playing as well as I've seen them play in a long time. (Unfortunately)...  Hopefully they choke in a close game. 10/16  Possible loss in Madison.  (Night Game) or a lose to Iowa getting caught looking ahead to Michigan.

2.  Wisconsin/Iowa - Very similar, but I like Iowa's defense a little better.

3.  Wisconsin/Michigan - If it comes down to the winner of UM and Wisc, I think UM wins.  The game is at UM.  UM defense is growing up every week.  The problem for UM is that this is the game before OSU.  Still, if Steve Threat can beat Wisc.  I mean, come on.

4.  Wisconsin

5.  MSU - Good but not as good as I thought at the beginning of the season.

The rest.

6.  NW

7. PSU

What happened to Purdue????

At the beginning of the season, I had UM with 6 wins.  I now think they can pull off 9 or 10.  Amazing what a year makes at QB/O-Line.  I hope these guys stay healthy and BEAT osu.  I've taken enough crap from these people in Ohio.  I need to start give some back.

zlionsfan

September 27th, 2010 at 5:03 PM ^

The current theory is that Tiller used his oatmeal powers for evil and forced the AD to hire some guy off the I-AA street as his successor; unlike the basketball deal (where Painter at least kept a solid team on track for a season), there was no I-A internship anywhere. Between that, Tiller's seeming nonchalance re: recruiting his last year or two, and Hope's similar struggles, the cupboard was maybe half-full in the first place, and knocking out Bolden and Smith doesn't help any.

Hope certainly appears to be in over his head right now: while it's fair to suggest that the offense is somewhat hampered by injuries at the skill positions, the defense doesn't have any such problems and blows goats. The offensive playcalling is strongly disliked; it may be partly a function of the lack of experience under center, but then that would suggest serious problems given that even the Purdue-style spread isn't going to work well with vanilla plays.

Burke should have hired someone with a) I-A coaching experience, b) outstanding I-AA experience, or c) I-A coordinator experience.

grand river fi…

September 27th, 2010 at 2:09 PM ^

My predictions

1. Ohio State 7-1

2. Wisconsin 6-2 Their style of play and solid defense will see them grind out a lot of wins.

3. Michigan - Iowa 5-3  I think Iowa takes care of Penn State and MSU at home, and beats Michigan on the road but their offense line will see them self destruct a couple of times.  I think Michigan wins a lot of shoot outs, beats MSU at home and PSU on the road, but comes up short against the conferences top teams.

4. MSU-NW 4-4  I'm not too sold on Northwestern, but avoiding OSU and Michigan will see them put up a decent record.  I think Saprty will struggle on the road.

5. Penn State something bad.  Without a functional O-line and QB I can see this team imploding in conference play.

6 Don't Care, just hope we don't end up in this group again.

zlionsfan

September 27th, 2010 at 5:05 PM ^

that the laws of physics would prevent Purdue and Minnesota from playing more than three times ... or at least the BTN would cry uncle.

It's too bad. For a while there, that series was crazy: scores in the 50s, and that was the losing team. I doubt those teams could score 50 this year if you took the defenses off the field.

uminks

September 27th, 2010 at 2:47 PM ^

b10 standings

1. OSU...has both a good offense and great defense

2. WI...good running offense and a good defense

3. IA...may have a good defense but really not much above the 4 th place teams.

4. PSU- good defense and sub-par offense, UM great offense and sub-par defense. MSU average to good offense, average defense.

5. Northwestern- average offense, average defense

6. IU, MN and IL - fair offense, sub-par defenses.

7.) Purdue - sub-par offense and sub-par defense

UM may be the wild card and they could finish up with WI. In fact the WI game in Ann Arbor is one of my upset specials.  They will have major problems with our spread and if we can control their run game, then we have a good chance to beat WI at home.

griesecheeks

September 27th, 2010 at 4:22 PM ^

as per usual, I see us winning a game many expect us NOT to win, and losing a game we really should win.

 

IME:

2-1 against IU, Illinois & Purdue (1 bad loss that we shouldn't have)

2-1 in the MSU/Iowa/PSU trilogy (this would be a win, IMO, but I have a feeling we lose in Happy Valley)

1-1 vs Wisc/OSU (one of the teams we'll be underdogs to will get Denarded)

best case, IMO, we don't get that bad loss and wind up at 10-2

predicted case, IMO, as above, 9-3

sad panda case: we win the three easy ones, lose against the top (and middle tiers), heading to a Sad Panda Bowl. :(

worst case, we lose one of the easy ones, and implode against the top half of the B10, finishing 6-6, earning a spot in the Sad Panda Express Bowl in Sasketchewan against a CFL practice squad. this case would require a season-ending or chronically debilitating injury to denard.

 

we'll be fine.

WildcatBlue

September 27th, 2010 at 5:08 PM ^

  • Iowa: home versus Penn State and Michigan State, at Michigan and Northwestern
  • Michigan: home versus Iowa and Michigan State, at Penn State, Northwestern off
  • Michigan State: at Iowa, Michigan, Northwestern and Penn State
  • Northwestern: home versus Iowa and Michigan State, at Penn State, Michigan off (also OSU off)
  • Penn State: home versus Michigan, Michigan State, and Northwestern, at Iowa

 

PSU @ Iowa:  Iowa by 14 or so.  Claybourn makes haggis out of Bolden's innards.

MSU @Iowa:  Iowa  hangs on.

Iowa @ UM:  Iowa's RB corps has by this point been reduced to a walk-on border collie named Squiffy.  MM fears no scatback, Denard throws for 350 and UM rolls by 21.

Iowa @NU:  Shootout.  Iowa wins in OT.

MSU @UM:  RR breaks out some new tricks.  This one gets ugly.  56-24 UM.

UM @PSU:  UM, this one's close.

MSU @ NU: Persa's been held back in the OOC, as Fitz sought in vain a functional running back.  The quest will be abandoned, and Persa will launch 45 or 50 passes, completing 45 or 50 of them against that Spartan back 4 that reminds me of that Python sketch called "Upper Class Twit of The Year Contest" except of course on the class front.  NU by 20.

MSU @ PSU: The Twits handle the Haggis;  ugly.

NU @ PSU:  NU by a TD.  The two best LBs in this game wear purple.

 

Bonus:  Pryor is injured for at least three games, OSU dropping two of these.  Results:

 

Michigan: 8-0

NU:  7-1

after that

 who cares?

 



Blumanji

September 27th, 2010 at 5:23 PM ^

I will be satisfied with shutting IU up about that "interception" at the end of last year's game. Then I can have a clear conscience when I start focusing on Can't Read Can't Write. No predictions for me. Last year caught me with my pants down.

BrewCityBlue

September 27th, 2010 at 5:23 PM ^

1. OSU 7-1 (loss to wiscy in mad-town) OSU is the clear favorite for the conference right now.

2. Iowa 6-2

2. Wiscy 6-2

4.Mich 5-3

4. PSU 5-3

4. MSu 5-3

Who cares about the rest.

I believe Wiscy, PSU and Iowa are all over-rated, but are still pretty good football teams capable of beating or losing to anyone. I guess you could put us relatively in that same boat as well due to our incredibly explosive offense and just as incredibly suspect defense. 

Our losses will be OSU (damit!) and two of Wisc, Iowa, PSU, MSU (i really hope not)

After reading everything i just typed, this is very futile. IMHO, we don't know enough about Iowa, Wisc, PSU, us and MSU yet, despite the fact that we expect those 5 teams to round out the top half of the conference behind OSU.

But i am not as "scared" as i was at the beginning of the year of Wisconsin. And i've been saying since before the season that Iowa and PSU were overrated.

should make for an awesome season in conference!

Here's to kicking off the revenge tour on the 9th!!! (but not overlooking IU and pasting them in bloomington)

Blumanji

September 27th, 2010 at 5:23 PM ^

I will be satisfied with shutting IU up about that "interception" at the end of last year's game. Then I can have a clear conscience when I start focusing on Can't Read Can't Write. No predictions for me. Last year caught me with my pants down.

Blumanji

September 27th, 2010 at 5:23 PM ^

I will be satisfied with shutting IU up about that "interception" at the end of last year's game. Then I can have a clear conscience when I start focusing on Can't Read Can't Write. No predictions for me. Last year caught me with my pants down.

zlionsfan

September 27th, 2010 at 5:24 PM ^

1. Ohio State 8-0.
I have seen nothing to suggest otherwise, sadly.

2a. Wisconsin 6-2.
I think their lack of non-conference opposition will cost them next weekend against little brother. Too bad they don't play Penn State this season.

2b. Penn State 6-2.
JoePa will retire with about 250 more wins than Bobby Bowden. The NCAA will then discover that Paterno actually died prior to the 2014 season, but Penn State's challenge that the wins can't be withdrawn because no one noticed at the time will hold up in court and the record will stand.

4. Michigan 5-3. (win tiebreaker by beating Iowa and MSU)
The schedule works against them: losses at Penn State and Ohio State plus a home loss to Wisconsin almost keep Michigan home on New Year's, except now there are about 70 bowls on January 1.

5. Iowa 5-3. (win tiebreaker based on win over MSU)
Home field isn't everything: losses to Wisconsin and OSU keep Iowa from repeating last season's lucky run. An extra week off won't keep them from being Denarded at Michigan's homecoming.

6. Michigan State 5-3.
Not bad for not playing OSU, and an early win over Wisconsin makes things look good, but the Spartans just aren't good enough to get any higher than this.

7. Northwestern 4-4.
Minnesota, Purdue, Indiana, Illinois. Good thing they miss out on UM and OSU.

8. Illinois 3-5.
A late-season game with Fresno State gives Zook the chance to sneak into a bowl game. A late-season thrashing by the Bulldogs gives Illinois the chance to hire a new coach.

9. Purdue 2-6.
Of course, they'd be one of the worst 4-8 teams in the country. A win over Indiana allows Purdue to keep the Bucket and Hope to keep his job, much to the dismay of many fans.

10a. Indiana 0-8.
Fred Glass immediately begins negotiations with the Big Ten to play all IU's conference games at neutral sites, hoping eventually to swap in weaker teams so that the Hoosiers can sneak into a bowl game.

10b. Minnesota 0-8.
Good thing they built that outdoor stadium. There's nothing like watching bad football in cold weather.