Football Helmet Viewer's Guide

Submitted by Bronco648 on

I've been wanting to do this for some time but always get caught up in the excitement of the upcoming season. That said, quite a few years ago I noticed that not everyone was wearing the 'tried and true' Riddell (the GOAT still does):

helmet image

So, here's a "Viewer's Guide" so that maybe you can identify what each player is wearing (if you're so inclined). I did my best to use arrows (red, mostly) to identify unique characteristics of each helmet shell.

Disclaimer: There is an awful lot of technology involved with today's football helmets. I did not delve into that particular area. I just tried to provide some visual cues so as to identify different manufacturers and models.

Riddell
Riddell's top-of-the-line helmet is the Speedflex. It is easily identified by the unique "U" shaped cutout on the crown of the helmet:

There's also a ridge that runs horizontally across the rear of the shell:

The vent holes also create a unique pattern, as seen from the side. There's also a slight raised portion that forms a kind of "mohawk" that runs all the way to the horizontal ridge:

The remaining Riddell helmets (Speed Icon, Speed Classic and Speed Revolution) appear to use the same shell, the differences are internal. These helmets also have the raised 'mohawk' feature but it only goes are far as the top of the helmet before it disappears (blue arrow). The ear hole is diamond shaped with the area between the hole and face mask protruding slightly. The rear horizontal ridge is also present but is lower and closer to the neck pad. From the back, there are two vent holes, at the top of the helmet, that angle inwards, slightly.

Schutt
Schutt seems to have two "top-of-the-line" helmets in the Z10 and F7. Again, internals are different on each model and the Z10 seems to use the same shell as the rest of the Vengeance line. The F7, on the other hand, is very different, visually.

F7
The F7 has a very unique 'box' that is referred to as "Tektonic plates". These plates allow movement in three dimensions. It also has slot shaped vents at the shell's rear:

Vengeance
The Vengeance Z10, Vengeance Pro, Vengeance VTDII and Vengeance DCT all use the same shell with the Z10 having an additional vertical "chevron" shaped hole just behind the ear hole (the remaining models do not have this). There's also a recessed 'channel' that runs from ear hole to ear hole along the rear of the shell. The 'mohawk' style ridge, along the top, is wider (than Riddell's) and has a saw-tooth appearance on the edges. The vents holes are incorporated into the periphery of this raised area.

Z10:

Pro, VTDII & DCT:

AiR XP
The shape of this shell is simpler than the Vengeance line. Instead of the recessed channel, there's a simple ridge that runs from ear hole to ear hole. Venting is provided by slight larger round holes, arranged in a circular pattern, at the top of the shell.

Vicis
The Zero 1 helmet has rather distinctive vent slots at the top of the helmet, triangular vent holes just above the face mask and a larger than normal 'slot' type ear hole. The rear vents angle outwardly. According to their web site, they will be outfitting Notre Dame, exclusively, this year.

Xenith
The Epic helmet has a rather smooth shell with vent slots along the top. They angle outward from just above the face mask and then meet and cross at the back of the helmet (forming a subtle "X"). Xenith seems to have very different face mask configurations (as compared to the other manufacturers).

If any of you are more familiar with these products, please provide feedback. I know there are a lot of folks on this site that are much more intimate with football equipment than I. I just hope I can make your football viewing a little more enjoyable. Thanks for reading. Go Blue.

Comments

pz

August 23rd, 2018 at 5:01 PM ^

This is an awesome post. I don’t have anything to add re: helmet tech but was seriously fascinated by this breakdown. Thank you!

Section 1.8

August 23rd, 2018 at 5:18 PM ^

Don't forget Spalding's top-of the line FH5 helmet!

All leather, with durable cotton stitching, special padding in front "wing" and in three longitudinal leather stripes which aid in your half-back's ability to spot ends downfield for forward passes. Integral chin strap and newly-incorporated ventilation holes at the ears and in the crown. 

May be ordered in standard tan and black, or special-ordered in team colors.

Face-mask unavailable.

A classic design since 1937.

 

bhl_bl016898_full_306_370__0_default (1).jpg

 

Hold This L

August 23rd, 2018 at 7:55 PM ^

The Xenith design has always looked kinda odd, but hey, to each his own. 

Do many players wear the F7? 

Hold This L

August 24th, 2018 at 1:19 AM ^

Thanks for the read! It’s cool they keep those types of records and identify which helmets are ineffective, or defective. The F7 just seemed so different from the pictures above but now that I think about, I always thought khaleke’s looked a little different than what I was used to seeing on players. 

Bronco648

August 24th, 2018 at 7:36 AM ^

I knew that a few Wolverines wore the F7 last year but wasn't sure who. Additionally, it's easier to identify a helmet that's a light color because the vent holes are dark(er). With a dark blue helmet, the identifying marks can be difficult to see. I could have sworn that Denard wore an F7 as well (during his last year) but I couldn't find anything to back that up.

Ghost of Fritz…

August 24th, 2018 at 7:20 AM ^

Why do they still have the 'bumper' on the front forehead area?

Seems unnecessary and ugly.   Just there so they can put branding on it?

Also, why aren't they using MIPS technology?

MIPS:  http://mipsprotection.com/technology/

oriental andrew

August 24th, 2018 at 9:23 AM ^

These are the kinds of questions I wonder about. I need to replace my ancient snowboard helmet and have been looking at MIPS models. Seems mostly limited to motorsports, biking, ski/snowboard, and skate (board/blade). 

Looks like the Vicis helmet has an alternative to MIPS in its design, although it aims to achieve similar outcomes:

https://www.wired.com/2016/01/the-zero1-flexible-football-helmet-may-save-players-brains/

What kind of safety innovations do these helmets have? Does hole size/shape matter? What about the cut-outs like on the Speedflex (which I assume are to dampen impact, but that's an assumption)? Basically, what do all those holes, lines, ridges, cutouts do for safety? What's on the inside that makes them better (or less so) from a safety perspective?

For the record, according to VT's helmet lab, the Vicis is the top-rated helmet on the market (lower score is better).

https://www.beam.vt.edu/helmet/varsity-football-helmet-ratings.html

The NFL's helmet ratings agree on Vicis, but have some differences with some models like the Speedflex, likely due to different test/rating methodologies:

https://www.playsmartplaysafe.com/resource/helmet-laboratory-testing-performance-results/

agp

August 25th, 2018 at 2:07 PM ^

As someone who owns two Bell Race Star MIPS motorcycle helmets, my impression is that most action sports MIPS applications are designed for one massive impact as opposed to hundreds like a football helmet. This is also due to the shell materials, but the MIPS could also fare similarly.

wolverinemayhem

August 26th, 2018 at 11:12 AM ^

Thanks for the post, this is great content! Love the F7 the Khaleke wears! I don't love the light blue padding they use inside of the Schutt helmets, though. It looks really tacky on the field. Love all the Riddel helmets, but think the Xenith looks pretty bad.

Anyways, love seeing the different helmet styles and looking forward to seeing them all with maize and blue wings next weekend!