Differentials And Scoring Margin In 2014 So Far

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on November 13th, 2014 at 10:52 AM

I thought we might take a moment here to look at a few differentials that normally get tracked (well, I normally track them because I am odd like this) and how they trend with scoring margin in games. We did this last year, of course, and for someone reason I called it “point differential” because I was on a roll with the word “differential” and I grew too lazy to change it. Anyway, it’s scoring margin.

First, we’ll look at yards per play, that differential and scoring margin. You’ll be pleased to know that we do in fact, on average, outgain our opponents this year despite everything that you have seen and the ugliness of some of it. By how much? The average is all of 0.76 yards, or about 27 inches per game, so we have this going for us. The average scoring margin, which will be the same in all three charts you’ll see anyway, is 0.3 points. By the slimmest of average margins, we somehow find a way to barely win half the time in 2014, if you will.

So, with two games to go and every opportunity for what I just mentioned to be completely untrue by the end of the month, here’s where we stand with this data:

 photo YPPDiff2014_zps6d9d5d8d.png

Much like last year, the worst individual performance for yards per play differentials was against Michigan State, except that this year’s number is worse than last year’s – it was -2.62 last year, and we slowed down by nearly a yard this year.  Overall, you can see that the two sets of data have a decent relationship though.

Before I introduce third down differentials, let me say that a most #B1G thing happened to us on Saturday in that ever so hideous win. We were, in fact, 41.67% LESS successful than Northwestern on converting third downs, so this is a metric where your worst individual performance in the season to date can still work out for you somehow.  The average differential for the season to date on third downs is 1.20%, so we’re barely winning this one typically as well.

Here’s how that and scoring margin look together:

 photo 3rdDownDiff_zps2f6ecd1b.png

The relationship isn’t quite as strong as yards per play perhaps, but it is there. If you want an R-squared value for this, it is actually 0.668 (sample size…grumble grumble, of course), which is not too bad for all of the confounding factors of a football game.

With first down differentials, we find something similar to third down. On average, we manage to get 52% of the total first downs in a game, so by the slimmest of margins again, we come out ahead here. I keep saying that in this diary – I should qualify it by saying also that there are perhaps 2-3 games which are responsible for these averages looking like they do, but this is normal in most seasons, it seems.

Anyway, here’s the first down differential charted against scoring margin:

 photo 1stDownDiff_zpsebbe8870.png

For kicks, the R-squared on this is 0.653, so as I said, very similar to third downs. 

Comments

VintageBlue

November 13th, 2014 at 2:37 PM ^

When I couple your numbers with my feelingsball read on this team, it sure paints a picture for me of a lot of good players on a bad team.  I guess we all sort of know that what with the dozen or so "CC" posts every day but I felt it worth mentioning.

mlax27

November 13th, 2014 at 3:43 PM ^

I was curious if the numbers this team is putting up would indicate improvement over the season, or regression.  I'd love to see some stats pointing to this team getting better over the year (maybe yards per carry), and maybe give me some hope for next year. 

It does look like if you ignore App State since they are just terrible, that from ND on, there is a slight upward trend.  But probably nothing significant if you account for quality of opponent.