3-star Speedy Smurf Recruiting Tactic
There have been some discussions on this and other blogs lately regarding whether or not Rich Rodriguez has signed too many small, speedy, three-star athletes. I've been thinking about this lately and had a few thoughts. I think this topic has softened some since we just signed two stud defensive ends, but outdated as it may be I'll post it anyway.
- First of all, the change in offensive philosophy requires a collection of athletes that weren't already on the roster. Therefore we need to stock the cupboards and signing a bunch of them in these first two classes is important.
- I think too much has been made of the class size, which is becoming apparent. Originally we all thought the class would be 17-18 players. Now we're seeing that the available scholarships have grown. With a couple of more unexpected departures before next season the total number will be around 22-24. Therefore it is easier to afford a few spots reserved for the smurf-like track stars.
- There is no way the coaching staff is going to turn away 5-star recruits if they come knocking on their door. Even without resorting to Saban-like tactics they'll find room in the recruiting class.
- Not too long go a discussion was sparked on www.umhoops.com about whether the basketball team should sign mid-level recruits or save scholarships for the hope of future high-level recruits. My feelings on that subject are the same as with the football team - you don't "save" scholarships for the hope of the 5-star recruit the next year. There will always be spots available in the next class. You fill the scholarships you have available, you keep the depth chart full, and you take a gamble on the occassional underrated prospect.
September 20th, 2008 at 12:35 AM ^
September 20th, 2008 at 5:06 AM ^
September 20th, 2008 at 8:33 AM ^
September 20th, 2008 at 11:10 AM ^
September 20th, 2008 at 11:33 AM ^
yeah rivals does. Michigan is # 6 right now. However, they haven't updated Anthony and Craig's commitments yet.
And if Campbell recommits, it'll look pretty good. # 3 or 4 probably.
September 20th, 2008 at 11:47 AM ^
Well, then why are people bitching? I mean, if you can at least stay in the same ballgame as USC, OSU and Florida (top 10) then you should be happy. At least Michigan's not like West Virginia pulling in a class ranked like 40th. JEEEZZZZZZZ.
Plus, and I truly believe this, Lloyd's teams always performed under their capablities. I think RR can maximize his talent.
September 20th, 2008 at 11:59 AM ^
September 20th, 2008 at 4:47 PM ^
I hear that loud and clear Bark.
The only player I'm iffy on is D-peace. I've seen some of his film, and it's average at best. Bet you a Zingerman's sandwich he will not play WR at Michigan.
September 20th, 2008 at 6:43 PM ^
September 20th, 2008 at 7:06 PM ^
Recalling an earlier thread, it's ok that Peace is a 3* because he has intangibles like catching the ball.
And no, I'm not the person that said this.
September 20th, 2008 at 10:32 PM ^
September 21st, 2008 at 12:45 AM ^
September 21st, 2008 at 8:32 AM ^
September 21st, 2008 at 8:20 PM ^
September 22nd, 2008 at 9:44 AM ^
September 22nd, 2008 at 9:58 AM ^
September 22nd, 2008 at 11:00 AM ^
September 26th, 2008 at 11:13 PM ^
that is all.
Carry on.
Comments