You Say It Is A Toenail; I Say It Is In Your Heart Nonetheless Comment Count

Brian

3/23/2017 – Michigan 68, Oregon 69 – 26-12, season over

33574662526_891917bf71_z

[Joseph Dressler]

There are few things more haunting in sports than coming up on the short end of a bonafide one-point basketball game. There are so many points and so many opportunities to get two more or prevent two more that it is impossible not to inventory all the slight tweaks in the universe that could have gotten you one step closer to the promised land, or at least destruction at the hands of Kansas.

The wide open DJ Wilson layup and two Duncan Robinson threes that were halfway down stand out in this regard. So too does the late Oregon free throw miss that Wilson couldn't box out on. And then there is the blizzard of threes that did not go halfway down, for reasons.

Oregon's approach seemed to be "leave Michigan blitheringly wide open from three and see what happens." Michigan took more threes than twos, and if any of them seemed unreasonable it was only in aggregate. There will be some complaints about Michigan launching early in the shot clock, but the vast majority of Michigan's 31 attempts from behind the arc were preceded by my inner monologue—and sometimes the external one, too—yelling "shoot that." A couple of ugly ones should have been rhythm catch and shoot opportunities that Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman and Mo Wagner, collectively 0-8 in this game, passed up on to dribble themselves into worse shots.

This is certainly a way to play against a John Beilein team. Usually it's a way to get your face melted off. The shattered corpse of Oklahoma State basketball would like a word at this point. That word is "aaaargh."

-------------------

And yet.

Michigan hit a respectable 11 of 31—36 percent. This was not enough. It was not enough even though they won the style contest on defense. Oregon only got up 10 transition shots, which they did poorly on. A third of their shots were the two point jumpers Michigan strives to force and Oregon is very bad at. They hit 25%.

If you'd told me all the peripheral numbers from this game beforehand I'd have taken it in a hot second. I would not have believed you if you'd told me that despite those numbers Michigan's offense would look like a hamster searching for a wheel for big chunks of the game.

Dana Altman's combination of the half-ass press a bunch of teams run now that the shot clock is down to 30 and 40% matchup zone got Michigan off balance. A plan to punish the incessant switching by replicating the second half against Louisville ended up with some poor Wagner shots and turnovers; Wagner spent the last ten minutes on the bench in favor of Duncan Robinson, who seemingly couldn't guard anyone on the floor.

The game was just... off. With virtually every ticket in the sweaty palms of Kansas fans the arena was near-empty at tipoff and dead throughout. That gave a tense, taught game an unfortunate NBA D-League or NCAA hockey regional vibe, and while I don't think that caused the ugly game it certainly reinforced it. It was weirdly muted for one of the most important games of the college basketball season.

It was ugly to the point where a final score close to 70 for both teams is unexpected. Michigan perpetually felt eight points behind and suddenly they were in the lead with two minutes left, sort of like the Oklahoma State and Louisville games. And then.

In the aftermath you're left grasping at opportunities spurned, at whatever air eddies pushed this ball a micron away from a good-enough trajectory, at this breakdown or that breakdown that would go almost entirely unremarked upon if not for the fact that Oregon had N and Michigan had N –1.

An inch; a point; it's been a year of almosts for Michigan athletics.

Bullets

Rather satisfying all the same. Losing a one-point Sweet Sixteen game is no shame. It's a hard thing to do, winning basketball games against good teams. Michigan picked up a banner, got a measure of Louisville revenge, and was amongst the best teams in the country for a full half season. Over the full span they finished 20th on Kenpom.

This wasn't a return to the Burke/Stauskas years but it was a solid top 25 season.

The Walton; the Irvin. I pulled the "Zak Irvin is happening" tag out of mothballs for this game because he was happening, man. His late surge as he re-found his excellent-third-banana level was such that everybody had to stop complaining about him. This is a monumental internet accomplishment. He held Michigan in this game, hit tough late-clock shots, and was clearly on another level from Duncan Robinson as he checked Oregon's perimeter guys.

Building on that? Obviously much hinges on the return of Wilson and Wagner. I'd guess with their tough final games and the super deep draft—DX has Caleb Swanigan 30th!—both will return for another year of that sweet Beilein development. Both guys are potential lottery picks if they continue to improve at a decent clip. Right now there are sufficient questions that they'd be borderline first rounders.

If Michigan does not have any unexpected departures you're looking at something like:

  1. Xavier Simpson/Eli Brooks
  2. MAAR/Jordan Poole
  3. Charles Matthews/Duncan Robinson
  4. DJ Wilson/Isaiah Livers
  5. Mo Wagner/Jon Teske/Austin Davis

Michigan does have an open scholarship they could use on either Mo Bamba—uh not likely—or one of the late risers they've done so well with; there are also a number of intriguing transfer options. Since Brooks and Poole may not be impact freshmen, an immediately eligible backcourt scorer would be real nice. You've probably heard about faintly ludicrous Chippewa Marcus Keene and his 37% usage. Keene shot 82/51/37 on incredible volume and had an excellent assist rate on a bad MAC team that was nonetheless 56th in offensive efficiency.

There's also New Mexico guard Elijah Brown, another 30%+ usage player with decent efficiency. His three point shooting fell off this year but he was near 40% a year ago (on 226 attempts); he gets to the line and his excellent FT shooting implies that his rough two point percentages are more about his situation than his talent.

Or Michigan could go the Matthews route again and attempt to acquire the services of blue-blood transfer Chase Jeter, who's leaving Duke after two injury-plagued years. Jeter is a 6'10" post and would have to sit out, so he's not an ideal fit for the roster. I'd still poke around there because the rate of big washout is so high. You can't count on both Teske and Davis being around in two years. See: all of college basketball.

Tourney coverage complaint. There are way too many fouls that don't get replays to check on them. DJ Wilson's second was a potentially dubious call on which a second look would have been very helpful; instead nothing.

Also in complaints: I have no idea how anyone can listen to Reggie Miller and think "I should pay this person to do this thing."

Comments

Blue Balls Afire

March 24th, 2017 at 1:54 PM ^

Weird game indeed.  Michigan looked rusty in the beginning, and like it ran out of gas at the end.  Oregon looked horrible all game.  There didn't seem to be any offensive flow from either team except for a couple of nice back-cuts from Michigan.  Oregon looked like they were trying to give the game away and I was positive we would win based on how the Ducks were messing up, and we almost did . . . until we didn't.  Strange, strange game.  

I know, "Nice hot takes, bro."

 

 

BornInA2

March 24th, 2017 at 1:59 PM ^

Back to Beilein ball: Live by the three, die by the three. 11 of 31 might be "respectable" but you can't win Beileinball at 36%.

Inside game? No.

Offensive rebounds? Never heard of that thing you just said.

Oregon looked more energetic all game. Remember before two weeks ago when the team got called white collar and people were saying there wasn't enough hustle/energy? That's what I saw yesterday.

J.

March 24th, 2017 at 2:07 PM ^

This is a tired take and not the least bit accurate.

Michigan eschews the offensive rebound because they prefer to set up transition defense, which worked remarkably well -- Oregon had its third-worst two-point shooting performance of the year.  (Admittedly, part of that is because Boucher is hurt).

I swear, some people would rather lose 90-70 in a fast-paced, inside game than win 71-69 in a slow-paced, outside game.  Michigan was within a bounce of doing the latter, despite having an off night offensively.

UMinSF

March 24th, 2017 at 3:36 PM ^

Hustle and energy? A reputedly poor defensive team very effectively controlled Oregon's most effective weapon - their transition game. That takes hustle and energy.

Not only that, but total rebounds in the game were 36-31. That's hardly domination. Yes, they failed to get (defensive) boards on two key moments at the end, but that has nothing to do with Michigan's overall strategy. 

How hard is it to understand that you win basketball games by scoring more points? Having 6 guys who can shoot is a tremendous asset. Beilein would be a terrible coach if he didn't take advantage of the team's greatest strength.

The best shots in basketball are layups and three pointers. Michigan is one of the most efficient in the country because they take advantage of that (and typically protect the ball very well). 

I think maybe some people don't watch much basketball. The modern game features smaller guys who can shoot, especially from three. 

Eberwhite82

March 24th, 2017 at 3:23 PM ^

I can count on one hand the number of times I've turned off the sound on a game... Any game. Last night, with about 5 minutes left, off went the sound in favor of a Spotify mix on my remote speaker.

Obviously, a devastating loss. But I was just so much more sane not having to argue with his nonsense down the stretch.

What  a moron.

Ty Butterfield

March 24th, 2017 at 3:31 PM ^

Just felt like a much better season than football. Yeah it ended with a loss but making it to the Sweet 16 with 2 great weeks of publicity for the program was really nice. Great 3 week run for these kids and Staee was sitting at home where they belong.

jmblue

March 24th, 2017 at 3:41 PM ^

Some have speculated that we didn't fully have our legs last night.  I'm not sure but we did seem to come up short on a lot of shots.  I do wonder why the NCAA can't arrange things so that teams that played Friday/Sunday the previous weekend can stay on that rotation the next one.  

 

J.

March 24th, 2017 at 3:56 PM ^

It's because of the pod system.  Pre-pod, it was set up exactly that way. However, with the pods, they now assign teams to a first/second round site regardless of region -- so Michigan played a Midwest Region game, followed by Kentucky playing a South Region game.

The only way to go back to a consistent Thu-Sat-Thu-Sat / Fri-Sun-Fri-Sun rotation is to scrap the pod system.

In reply to by J.

jmblue

March 24th, 2017 at 4:12 PM ^

I don't see why the pods have to be a stumbling block.  It should still be workable.  Worst-case scenario, you make the Sweet 16/Elite Eight games TBA, and announce their game times after the field of 64 has been set.

J.

March 24th, 2017 at 4:51 PM ^

It really doesn't work.

First of all, you want the people planning the regionals to know their schedule in advance.  The logistics involved are significant.  Hotels get reserved, practice locations get set up, etc. -- there's a ton of planning involved.

But that's not even the biggest problem.  The biggest problem is that you can have teams playing in the same Sweet 16 game who played in different pods.

Let's take a look at this year.  Last Sunday, you had three games in the Midwest region, three in the South region, and two in the East region.  It isn't possible for all three of those regions to be on a Friday / Sunday rotation without changing up the schedule substantially (2 games on Thursday, 6 on Friday, 1 on Saturday, 3 on Sunday). TV would never go for that.

doggdetroit

March 24th, 2017 at 4:09 PM ^

It was a circuitous route, and I was doubtful Michigan would ever get there, but ultimately this team met all my expectations for the program:

Top 4 B1G - For most of the regular season they were not, but in the end they won the B1G tournament.

Top 20 nationally - Finished the regular season ranked just outside at #23. Two tournament wins most likely moved them into the top 20.

Sweet Sixteen - I believe Michigan should be a threat to make the Sweet Sixteen every season. They got there this year.

It would have been great to get to the Elite 8, especially because I thought Oregon was the weakest of the three tournament teams Michigan played, but overall it was a successful season.
 

 

ca_prophet

March 24th, 2017 at 7:01 PM ^

He anticipated where the shot would miss and oléd the box-out to put himself in a normally-bad spot between the backboard and the rim.  Most misses bounce out a lot farther and if this one had, he'd have no shot at the ball.

That looked more like Bell making the play than Wilson failing to box-out.

 

Great Cornholio

March 25th, 2017 at 10:23 PM ^

As in "tater taut." Not tater taught. At least that's what I was tot in school. And dammit, that could be us taking Kansas to the shed tonight. I miss seeing our guys play already.

Bertello NC

March 26th, 2017 at 11:48 AM ^

I don't think we should totally rule out Watson in terms of contributors next year. Another year of physical and system development could really surprise us. We all saw what happened with DJ this year. Not saying it's automatic with every guy as we've seen others like chatman not make the necessary strides but it seems like Watson is a good enough athlete where he could gain some strength and work on his shot along with his all around game and could help out next year. There's a possibility albeit probably a small one that Beilein could be 10-11 deep next year providing the incoming freshman can play.

PG- Simpson, Brooks
SG- MAAR, Watson, Poole
SF- Matthews, Robinson, Watson
PF- Wilson, Livers, Wagner
C- Wagner, Teske, Wilson, Davis