Xavier 86, Michigan 70 Comment Count

Ace


Michigan's defense provided little resistance. [Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog]

Michigan has a long way to go.

The good news is the season is far from over. In fact, Michigan probably hasn't yet played a game with what will become their standard starting lineup. But there's no glossing over the holes Xavier exposed in Michigan's defense tonight.

None is bigger than the hole in the middle. Mark Donnal gave up a bucket and a foul to Xavier's Jalen Reynolds on the game's opening possession and his night didn't improve from there; despite starting the game, he finished with four fouls, one rebound, and a turnover in six minutes. Ricky Doyle at least provided a little resistance in the post, but his poor hands cost M on both ends of the court, and time and again he found himself too far from the hoop on pick-and-rolls that resulted in open looks. Mo Wagner and DJ Wilson flashes some promise, especially the former, but they're both still getting used to the position; neither was ready for extended time against Reynolds.

Add in Michigan's porous perimeter defense and Xavier simply overwhelmed the Wolverines. Reynolds finished with 15 after getting to the line at will in the first half. The Musketeers hit nine of their 21 three-point attempts, usually wide open looks off the high screen. They missed 39 shots and rebounded 18 of them. Michigan's desperate late attempts to run a 1-3-1 zone only hurt in that regard.

It not for Caris LeVert posting 29 points on 21 shot equivalents, this would've been even worse; LeVert was the only Wolverine who could consistently produce his own shot, and while he sometimes forced it a little too much, someone had to carry the load.

For a brief period in the second half, Michigan looked like it would mount a comeback, getting as close as two points down on two separate occasions after triples by Duncan Robinson and LeVert. Each time, though, Xavier immediately responded with a three of their own and a dunk on the following possession, which aptly sums up the defensive effort from the Wolverines.

While the offense went in fits in spurts, it was at least decently effective, and Michigan easily could've surpassed the 1.05 PPP they posted if a couple open three-point looks didn't rim out. Their effort for most of the game, especially midway through the second half, was good enough to win a lot of games, but not this one given what was happening on the other end. Rough shooting nights from Derrick Walton (1/5 FG) and Aubrey Dawkins (1/6) didn't help matters. Robinson (nine points) and Zak Irvin (seven) were the top scorers behind LeVert, and that simply wasn't enough.

Michigan will have to learn from this game in a hurry. They head to the Bahamas for the Battle of Atlantis next week and will face UConn—featuring seven-footer Amida Brimah and plenty of size across the board—in the opener on Wednesday.

Tonight will hopefully prove to be one of the team's worst performances of this very young season. There are plenty of reasons to expect it to be so; this was a bad matchup given M's still-developing centers—who will have to grow up in a hurry—and uncertain rotation. If the effort on defense doesn't improve by next week, though, this team will take some serious lumps even before conference play begins.

Comments

Trader Jack

November 20th, 2015 at 11:49 PM ^

I'm not that worried. Xavier is a really good team and, as Ace mentioned, a bad matchup for us right now. Irvin and Albrecht getting healthy will help, the rotation will get figured out, and we'll be playing really well by the end of the year.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

alum96

November 21st, 2015 at 1:43 AM ^

They beat a 11th seed and 14th seed to get to the sweet 16.  I mean congrats but they didnt beat a 3 seed or something.

They were 9-9 in the Big East last year.  They lost to Villanova (a good team that UM did quite well with last year) by 17 a week before the NCAA tourney.

They lost their leading scorer and rebounder off the team (Stainbrook).  They lost their PG as well who was their leading assist man.  So they returned 3 starters.  They have 1 starter over 6'6 this year.

Stop with the overinflating of who they were.  They were not ranked because they were a .500 team in their conf last year who got waxed multiple times by Villanova (a team that lost to NC State in the tourney) who then lost their best player and starting PG going into this year. 

It's one thing to lose to a team like that; its another to be blown off the court like you are Penn State basketball.

 

Trader Jack

November 21st, 2015 at 2:00 AM ^

I'm confused. Does making the sweet 16 not count if you only beat the teams that knocked off the higher seeds, but not the higher seeds themselves? They've made the Sweet 16 give out of the last nine years... Xavier is a good program, and they're really good this year. Reynolds, Bluiett, Davis, Sumner, Abel, etc. are all very talented. It was the 3rd game of the year, without a healthy Spike or Irvin. We'll be fine.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

alum96

November 21st, 2015 at 2:19 AM ^

Again congrats for being S16 but there are various ways to get there.  Beating Ole Miss and Georgia State is a bit different then say beating a team ranked in the top 25 in the country in 1 of those 2 games as you fully know.   Just a few days before beating those powerhouses they got demolished by an actual top 10 team.

How do you know what they will be this year ?  What is "really good"?  They look like a top 20-25ish team.  That could mean 10-8 in the Big East. You are making them sound like UK.   They beat Miami of Ohio 81-72 last week.  Powerhouse team that they are.

I didnt say they are not a good program.  Good programs ebb and flow.  They didnt add a phenon freshman this year, they lost 2 of their top 6 players last year including their best.  So they likewise have 2 new starters and we made them look like Loyola Maramount of 20 years ago.

There is no shame in saying we looked bad without trying to build the opponent into a powerhouse.  Both teams had a good amount of returning players.

I cant wait to hear your explanation after UConn next week.  UConn was 20-15 last year and lost in 1st round of NIT.  So therefore must be great if they wax ux because....the jersey says UConn.

Put another way if we lost to UConn LAST year you'd say "they have a great program the past decade so must be Very good." 

If Xavier ends up 28-5 I will come back and apologize to you for seeing the future. 

Trader Jack

November 21st, 2015 at 2:38 AM ^

Ha. I never said we didn't look bad, I said I'm not that worried about it. How is saying that I think Xavier is a really good team "building them into a power house," exactly? We obviously have different views of what the 'really good' means, which is fine. I mean that I think they're underrated, have a lot of talent, and will be in the top 20 for most of the year. I also think losing to them in the 3rd game of the season, without a healthy Spike or Irvin, isn't a big deal.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

ruraljuror

November 21st, 2015 at 8:38 AM ^

The top 10 team that demolished Xavier happened to be in the Big East championship game. They didn't add a freshman 'phenom' but did add a redshirted Sumner from last year and he is light years better than Dee Davis at the PG spot. And Stainbrook was good but not their best player. Losing him made Xavier a much more athletic and aggressive team on both ends of the floor. Rankings don't mean crap in college hoops. Syracuse was unranked at the end of February in 2003 and won the National Championship.

ak47

November 20th, 2015 at 11:54 PM ^

Every team with a competent center is a bad match up right now, that's a lot of teams. We haven't had a good defensive game yet this year. The team obviously has plenty of time to turn it around but blaming what happened tonight on a bad match up is sticking your head in the sand about this teams issues.

Huma

November 20th, 2015 at 11:56 PM ^

Agreed we will get better but there is absolutely no excuse for Donnal and Doyle to have played so poorly. I seriously think we need to give up completely on Donnal and Doyle is not far off from giving up. I hope I am wrong but the skill set and effort from Donnal and Doyle is just not there. At this point we may be better just giving Wilson and Wagner the PT to give them the experience. At least they have some upside. I just don't see any upside at all with D&D - terrible D, no rebounding, lazy effort, and contribute nothing on offense.

alum96

November 21st, 2015 at 12:17 AM ^

Here is the problem.  We foul a lot because (a) new rules and (b) when you are slow footed big man you foul a lout because you are out of position.   We need people to absorb 15 fouls as we have a lot of bigs who are not in the right position or getting beat to spots on the floor because they are not quick twitch athletes.

So you sit Donnal and what do you have left at 5?  Doyle.  Who'd foul out a lot of games within 25 minutes on his own.  So then you play Mo.  Who is basically learning the game here on the fly.  Wilson is a project too.

Donnal is basically here to try to eat up 10 minutes a game.  And absorb 5 fouls. 

Looks like Bielfeldt should have been kept around. It is going to be sad when we play Indiana and he is schooling our 5s.

Gulogulo37

November 21st, 2015 at 7:13 AM ^

Of course Donnal was horrible, and the other 3 weren't great, but they're better than Donnal and I think at least as good as Bielfeldt.

I think Bielfeldt absolutely would have been an immediate liability on the other end. He got owned by guys as talented and athletic as Reynolds. Xavier was big and talented down low, and I just can't see how a short, unathletic center would have changed things in this game.

Stringer Bell

November 20th, 2015 at 11:51 PM ^

This team shouldn't need time to gel.  This is the same team we had last year.  The same team that lost to NJIT and Eastern Michigan.  The same team that lost by like 25 at Ohio State.  They should not be getting physically abused at home by a solid but unspectacular Xavier team.  They should be a lot closer than they are quite frankly.

alum96

November 21st, 2015 at 12:14 AM ^

Agree.  Other than Zak and Spike due to injury this is not a team full of freshman starting for the first time like has been the case since 2012-2013.  We had to rebuild on the fly the prior 3 years inserting freshman into key roles.  Not this year. 

You have "NBA early entrant threat Walton" as a 3rd year PG, a conf POY next to him, a 3rd year center who was making "Morgan look silly in practice" 2 years ago, his backup making the fr to so jump, a top 25 player SO forwad who "had the off season to get his head around the game and make the game slow down for him", a fr to so jump Dawkins etc etc.

It's an experienced first 7-8 now.  Not like last 3 yrs where we relied on freshman.

Lost in the sad defense and rebounding was 8 assists or something awful like that.  Walton was awful in running the team and Caris had to resort to hero ball.

I dont even care about the offense though.  We scored enough to beat a team if we had any ability to play defense or rebound.  Xavier is an undersized team which is the scary thing.  1 guy over 6'6 who really did much.  Yikes.

Michigan Fan L…

November 21st, 2015 at 8:39 AM ^

Prior to the season I thought we might have 2 NBA prospects - Levert and Dawkins.  But there was a caveat to Dawkins' chances.  Would this athletic player with great potential pull a GRIII and play passively with 1 or 2 highlights per game, or would he get after it?

So far all I'm seeing is "passive/aggressive" Dawkins.  And I can't see anyone else on this team getting drafted or even making it onto a summer league team.  I hope someone surprises me, but as of 9:38AM, Nov 21, 2015, I see one NBA prospect.

Go Blue!!!!!

ak47

November 20th, 2015 at 11:52 PM ^

Got punched in the face and folded. The team got outplayed, out worked, out desired, and Xavier was more athletic. Unless the team suddenly can play defense the ceiling on this team is way lower than we thought it was.

Erik_in_Dayton

November 20th, 2015 at 11:54 PM ^

...step on the path to something good. That looked like a 2010 RR defense trying to stop a good offense. The guys - especially the centers - often looked like they'd just met their teammates today. Watching them guard the paint was like watching a drugged flamingo try to fight a wild boar. It's really hard to imagine this team not getting absolutely crushed inside all year long. Max Bielfeldt would be the best center on this team by a wide margin.

Padog

November 20th, 2015 at 11:54 PM ^

I'm so tired of the crowd guys, the seats across from the maize rage are filled with theater fans. We cut it to 2 points twice on huge threes and nobody over there was even standing. We need the crowd to be flipping out there not putting down there binoculars saying "good show sport."



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BornSinner

November 20th, 2015 at 11:59 PM ^

MSU is gonna maul us... and they're only gonna get better from here on out since Izzo is out here recruiting like a maniac. 

Erik_in_Dayton

November 21st, 2015 at 1:37 AM ^

They went after Winston, Langford, Battle, and Bridges and missed. They went after Winston, Battle, and Langford for a lot longer and harder than they went after anyone they landed. Part of the class's ranking comes just from it's size. I'm not throwing in the towel. I'm just saying what I see. I'm still going to root for the team - not that it matters, because what I do has no effect on the team at all.