Whatever Comment Count

Brian

11/22/2014 – Michigan 16, Maryland 23 – 5-6, 3-4 Big Ten

15853739832_a2d96b08d1_z

[Eric Upchurch]

A version of this game happened in 2008, when a Michigan team headed for 3-9 had a dismal, rainy home finale against a bad team. That was Northwestern; Michigan blocked a punt for a touchdown but lost anyway. I spent halftime attempting to warm my hands on a pretzel heater.

It was tolerable because of its novelty. That team provided an opportunity for Michigan fans to demonstrate the vast depths they would go to in order to support their team. It wasn't fun, exactly, but it felt like a transitory period, a cost gladly borne for the promise of ass-kicking modern football to come. Merit badges were awarded to the hardy souls who stuck it out.

I don't have to tell you how that worked out.

I know I've referenced that game many times before as we've struggled to deal with Michigan's broken offense over the past couple years, but the similarities to the Maryland game are striking enough to bring it up again. While the weather wasn't nearly as bad, the slate-gray sky was highly familiar. So too the mutual Keystone Kops antics, what with receivers deciding it was that year EA's NCAA Football series decided that the way to balance their broken game was to have WRs drop half the passes they got their hands on.

So you naturally think about that game before and compare your mental state then and mental state now. The only thing I've got at the moment is relief I don't have to do that again. Humorous exclamations about how "we do this for fun!" are so 2008.

---------------------------

Michigan had built up piles of fan goodwill over their 40 year bowl streak; after Schembechler's arrival there were years Michigan wasn't great, but none in which they were actively bad unless their starting quarterback's leg broke. They started tapping that in earnest in 2007, and now it's all gone. I didn't want to go to the Maryland game even a little, but I did. I have a personal streak at stake here. And they fired Dave Brandon.

But there was no silver lining. The depths of my fandom have been tested; there's a bottom there. I'm fed up with ticket prices and the cookie-cutter inanity imposed on a Michigan Stadium experience that used to be unique.

15233989824_f18c1846cc_z

CAKE [Bryan Fuller]

There are bits and scraps of it left. I got bizarrely misty when they did the Blues Brothers cake, because it was a thing that was ours and still existed as what it had been since my youth. I was at Yost for the final game of whatever hockey season it was when the "Can't Turn You Loose" dancing extended from the most humorously overweight guy in the section to everybody. It was a thing that some people decided to do and they keep doing it.

Then that student section sat near-silent for the rest of the game because every space that wasn't filled with actual football was crammed with noise. It was especially jarring since the most interesting football on in the noon window was Manchester United-Arsenal, full of everything but Pitbull being piped in at deafening levels.

That's where we are right now, fighting a losing battle against the spreadsheet people. Jim Hackett may be a nice guy and vast improvement on Brandon, sure. Not much has happened to indicate that he's anything but another spreadsheet person making the columns add up and importing what passes for creativity at other places.

I don't know what's about to happen. I mean, I do: Ohio State is going to punch Michigan's delicates in and Brady Hoke's going to get fired. I don't know what happens after that.

During the last coaching search I used logic and common sense to declare that Michigan would not hire Brady Hoke because he was so transparently unqualified, so I can't do that again. Even if I was so inclined the fact that an interim AD is going to make the most important hire in the department would prevent me. Michigan is determined to do it weird in the ways they shouldn't and do it conventional in all the ways they shouldn't.

But whatever. It's over, and it ended in the way it probably had to: a sodden mess of football about as interesting as a pile of dirty laundry. Hopefully there's something to care about next year.

BULLETS

There is not going to be a UFR. I'll go back and get the relevant parts over the offseason but I am going to have a real Thanksgiving instead of one where I spend the first half of it in a bedroom putting up a post; it was just going to say the same stuff you already know anyway.

15830118306_3ddfa9f3ac_z

This fourth down was on Gardner [Upchurch]

I don't know what I expected dot gif. The same pattern of ludicrous errors part XVIII. Roughing the kicker, a block in the back on a punt return touchdown, dropped passes, penalties, throws nowhere near the target, an inability to deal with tempo or mobile quarterbacks—none of it was surprising. It's not even infuriating anymore. It's just the way it is.

Cripes, Funchess. His lack of GAF has been clear for big chunks of the year—I still go back to that bubble screen that was a likely touchdown if he blocks his guy at all—and it's getting more prominent as we near the end of the year. The dropped passes are epidemic, and they don't even try to use him as a blocker anymore.

It'll be interesting to see if any of this impacts his draft stock. I bet 1) it does and 2) not nearly enough to induce him to return for his senior year. This feels like a situation similar what went down with GRIII, where it might be a good idea for the guy to come back to establish himself an elite talent but the guy is clearly done with college.

The offensive line is kind of okay now. There was a period in the second half where Michigan was blowing the Maryland DTs off the ball on every single play; occasionally Maryland would get Michigan in the backfield with a blitz allowed by the fact that M really didn't want to throw but anything that ended up neutral on the RPS scale was a nice gain for Michigan. Even excluding the fake punt, Michigan went for 5.5 YPC.

That's not unusual for a putrid Maryland D, but Michigan bested MSU, OSU, and pre-Diamont Indiana. They didn't hit Wisconsin numbers or a rampant Syracuse(?), but they looked quite functional. Darrell Funk is going to get run out of town on a rail like the rest of the coaching staff but the improvement this year is real. With literally everybody back next year they could be good-ish.

Mad about carry distribution. I've seen a lot of ANGAR about the carry distribution since Johnson was picking up big chunks. That's one of the few things that I'm not incensed bitchy and eye-rolling about in the aftermath. Hayes picked up 6 YPC on his six carries and while Smith only had 2.8, he was the short yardage/goal-line guy and played much better than Johnson against Northwestern. Overall the run game was highly effective, and only the usual slate of derp and the broken Devin Gardner prevented actual offense from occurring.

15234727843_225f818eb8_z

this was not tempting apparently [Upchurch]

I will be mad snarky about this. I know Funchess was dropping balls left and right but how on earth do you go an entire game with a 6'5" WR against "5-7" Will Likely and not, like, try to use that fact? Everyone got peeved at one goal line play, and I'm with you. I would like to extend that peevishness past that specific series and apply it to every damn time this inept offense didn't punt the ball to Funchess 40 yards downfield.

When is the last time they tried a plain old bomb down the sideline at Funchess? I know it can't actually be the Notre Dame game but it feels like the Notre Dame game.

Seriously though. How do you rush for 240 yards on 44 carries, plus a 52-yard fake punt, and score 16 points?

Defense. The usual: pretty good against the run, though CJ Brown's QB stuff was highly effective because Michigan still regards that as cheating (or maybe it tends to be effective), highly iffy against the pass especially in the middle of the field, late collapse.

Brown's 6.9 YPA on 24 attempts isn't great, but you have to take the fact that Maryland was down two of its top options at WR and replacement slot Jacquille Veii dropped at least four passes. If Maryland WRs actually caught the ball this could have been significantly uglier.

It's clear that opponents have IDed the slot and TEs running against M LB/S types as a major weakness and targeted it.

The demise. Grimly appropriate that Maryland should get its key play on their go-ahead drive thanks to a fake bubble screen that went over the top. The end came thanks to a concept that's been around since Rodriguez's first year that Michigan could not deal with, nor successfully replicate except once against Miami(NTM). When they tried to imitate successful offenses they did it poorly because they were bad at coaching, and then blamed the concepts.

HERE

Inside The Box Score:

Meh Teams
* How do you lose when you outgain your opponent 398 yards to 312 yards? The answer is simple. Not-so-special teams (and turnovers, and failing on fourth down twice.)
* Maryland's fourth FG attempt is not in the boxscore because Jourdan Lewis roughed the kicker. On the very next play, Jourdan Lewis failed to keep contain and Maryland scooted in for a touchdown.
* Michigan's high point on the day, a 52 yard fake punt, was more than offset by a touch in the back penalty that resulted in Michigan losing 70 yards of field position, oh, and a game-deciding touchdown.

Best And Worst:

Yes, there have been meager signs (mostly on defense, but also with the offensive line) that this program was playing better, especially given the fact that Indiana has since nearly upset PSU and held tough against OSU on the road, while Northwestern upset Notre Dame and then demolished Purdue to, improbably, set up for next week’s intra-state battle with the Illini as a battle of two teams playing for their bowl-game lives.  They weren’t dominating wins, but if you squinted you could see something faintly resembling progress and improvement, and maybe with a new QB and some healthy running backs next year Michigan might be on its way “back”.

But all along, this team kept displaying the same numerous flaws that absolutely, positively shouldn’t be happening 50 games into a coach’s tenure.  The offense remains painfully predictable, to the point that pointing this out is equally reflexive.  The defense, while certainly the stronger unit during Hoke’s tenure, continues to play at a B+ level, seemingly never figuring out how to handle anything approaching tempo or a mobile QB.  Barring a Biakabutuka-esque performance against OSU, Michigan won’t have a running back break 600 yards total on the season, and for the second year in a row won’t have one even sniff 1,000 yards total.  Hell, Melvin Gordon and Tevin Coleman are going to significantly outrush this team as a whole, and that’s after dropping 292 yards rushing on Maryland in this game.  Devin Gardner went from pre-season All Big-10-ish player to a guy who’ll probably not throw for 10 TDs on the season, and one of the best runs of the year was a 52-yard run by a FB on a fake punt.  Timeouts continue to be called or saved without any regard for reality, and the team long ago ran out of feet to shoot with dumb penalties, incorrect number of players on the field, and turnovers.  Oh my gawd the turnovers, King.

ELSEWHERE

Sap's Decals nails Gardner:

DEVIN GARDNER – To me, New 98 is the LaVell Blanchard of the Michigan Football Team. Great kid. Smart kid. Face of the program for the past few years. Much like Blanchard, Gardner has been caught in the middle of a coaching change during his career. Caught in the middle of a program trying to find its way. Caught in the middle of a university trying to figure out what kind of identity they want their football team to have. Much like we do when looking back on the career of Blanchard, I’m sure we will say much the same for Gardner: “Oh, the Gardner years! Tough kid. Never quit. Never gave up. Sad that his record wasn’t better.”

Maize and Blue Nation:

So, things happened yesterday. A few of them good, some of them meh, and most of them bad. For Michigan, it was yet another in a long line of games everyone would just rather forget.

Brady Hoke knows what's coming. You can just tell. Nothing will happen before the Ohio State game, but its over. This is the end for Hoke at Michigan.

You know it's bad when newspaper folk don't edit out your uhs and ums:

A self-inflicted mess, toward the tail end of a self-inflicted disaster of a season that can't end soon enough, with a head coach who has only gotten worse every year he's been in charge.

Another game that made little sense, and more talk afterward that made even less.

"We just didn't, uh, execute at times when we had opportunities, and, uh, at times we did," Hoke said Saturday night. "We had some mistakes in the kicking game that, uh, obviously hurt us as a football team. Some of those were very aggressive mistakes and you appreciate that kind of effort and aggression. At the same point, we've got to be a little smarter.

"If that's the right word for it."

I think Zuniga is a fan of hair metal band Enuff Znuff. Alex Mitropolous-Rundus was in high school band.

Comments

Don

November 24th, 2014 at 2:39 PM ^

Most fans have a definition of "talent" that's basically a measure of size, speed, and strength.

To me, talent is the ability to get the job done at a high level of performance with reliability, particularly in key situations, game in and game out.

By that measure, the popular estimation of Funchess of having "first-round NFL talent" is laughable.

Yostbound and Down

November 24th, 2014 at 2:49 PM ^

That's not how most NFL scouts would evaluate it...they seen Funchess as a physical specimen, who's made pretty ridiculously athletic plays in the past and been a bright spot (until this year) in a dysfunctional offense. 6'5 230 Hulk vs a 5'8" guy like Gallon, who is and was undobutedly the better receiver here, and it's not really a question of who they think is more talented. Funchess meets the pro receiver prototype much better than someone like Gallon. Of course, these prototypes are changing as the NFL changes from more of the traditional "pro-style" to incorporate more spread concepts...this is why someone like Welker or Harvin is much more valuable now than in the past. They see Funchess as in the vein of the next Calvin/Larry Fitzgerald type...of course he has underacheived so he won't be a first rounder anymore. But that perceived "talent" is still there in a way that it isn't for someone like say Gallon.

 

Don

November 24th, 2014 at 3:55 PM ^

Reminds me of guys the Lions have drafted over the years that were "physical specimens" —like Mike Williams or Aaron Gibson—or who wowed them in workouts, like Andre Ware did to Wayne Fontes.

NFL franchises that draft purely on whether a guy is a "physical specimen" get what they deserve.

Yostbound and Down

November 24th, 2014 at 4:19 PM ^

it's not as easily statistically quantifiable as baseball but the NFL has been going through a bit of a "Moneyball" phase as well in terms of finding players who don't fit these prototypes. Who's good at that? Well, the Patriots. Saints. Seahawks. etc.

Who isn't? Well, the Lions. Finally hit on a good WR after two botches in Rogers and Williams who people both gushed over. Same thing as the Raiders

FreddieMercuryHayes

November 24th, 2014 at 12:46 PM ^

Meh.

I know not all corporate, spreadsheet types are the same, and I'm sure some can be successfull AD's.  Hackett sure doesn't seem like an asshat like Brandon for starters.  And while a lot could be happening behind the scenes, I'm a little disconcerted that there seems to be little movement on hiring a permenant AD.  Even though Hackett supposedly doesn't want to be a long term AD, could he be stalling or something because it turns out he likes the job?  I just don't think he's the type of AD UM needs to get the football program back on track and repair the damage with the fanbase and the athletic department, and make fans actually want to come to games again.

Salinger

November 24th, 2014 at 12:58 PM ^

Maybe I'm just naive, but I actually found his presser (see here) refreshing. Brandon was always pretty good in front of the camera, except when he wasn't, but his answers did not contain any of the eye-roll enducing synicism I'd come to associate with the Athletic Department. 

What I'm saying is for now I like the guy.

maizenbluenc

November 24th, 2014 at 1:00 PM ^

but in our defense - we tend to tell our leadership the truth of the analysis, and then our leadership just goes and does what they want anyway. The other scenario is, when we get yelled at enough for telling them the truth - then we just shut up and let them believe what they want to believe. Oh wait - then the is the scenario where the yes men (and women) around the leadership find a wait to discredit the spreadsheet in support of whatever the leader believes.

Yes men (and women) get promoted and big raises. Spreadsheet jocks - not so much.

Net: I don't think the spreadsheet types are the problem here: all of this smacks of "this is what the Miami Dolphins do for a wow fan experience, so should we". (Check the link - a wow fan experience is something they pursue in Miami.)

jmdblue

November 24th, 2014 at 12:53 PM ^

that Hoke hasn't "lost" the team.  And I think that for the most part it's been accurate.  Saturday though we saw that he's lost several players, or at least they've become disinterested.  Funchess and Lewis among them. This isn't necessarily Hoke's fault, but there was a serious disconnect out there between the way football should be played and what those two kids were doing. 

My three wishes for 2015? 1)  We stick with the same base blocking scheme.  2) The front 7 on defense has a great winter/spring in the weight room and they start worrying more about how to kick ass than how their abs look when being photographed 3) In the d-backfield Jabrill comes back fully healthy and a bulb lights up behind Dymonte's eyeballs and he figures out how to use his great athleticism. 

Remarkably, I have a good feeling that the skill postions on O and the head coach postion are going to work themselves out. 

Go Blue and bear in mind - we're earning our right to bask in future glory.

Magnus

November 24th, 2014 at 2:16 PM ^

"Saturday though we saw that he's lost several players, or at least they've become disinterested.  Funchess and Lewis among them."

Funchess has been disinterested for the last several weeks, but I have no clue what you're talking about with Lewis. Has Hoke "lost" him because he roughed the kicker? Or because he misread the C.J. Brown QB sweep touchdown?

You can screw up as a player without being disinterested, lost, a quitter, etc. I think your comment about Lewis is both off the mark and potentially hurtful. If I remember correctly, Lewis was the one guy who chased down a breakaway run by Brown that could have otherwise turned into a touchdown.

jmdblue

November 24th, 2014 at 2:55 PM ^

rundown on the breakaway (I'd forgotten it). I think he just mentally checked out on some plays Satrurday including the two you mentioned.   I'm certainly not trying to be hurtful to these kids.  It's such a young team and it's been a miserable season.  That they continue to fight (for the most part) is admirable.  All that said I'd value your opinion more than mine if I were young Mr. Lewis.   You are clearly more knowledgable that me.  Go Blue (I, like Bacari, believe that finishing with "Go Blue" is helpful in almost any situation.)

Blue in Yarmouth

November 24th, 2014 at 2:58 PM ^

I really liked the guys comment above you with the exception of the inclusion of Lewis. I agree completely that Funchess has been dogging it for sometime, but Lewis has played well most of the year and if anything that okay showed me how badly he still wants to make plays. Other than that I think the guy had some good insight. 

Magnus

November 24th, 2014 at 5:25 PM ^

I'm certainly hoping you're not boiling down their seasons to one play. No, Funchess isn't a hustler just because he chased down Ibraheim Campbell. There are too many other examples of him being lackadaisical.

On the flip side, Jourdan Lewis has been our best corner this year, has made multiple hustle plays (this one, the play against Utah, etc.), and has been right in receivers' hip pockets all year.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 24th, 2014 at 3:15 PM ^

They lost nobody to effort on Saturday..they were playing for a bowl opportunity....

I will digress here and say how wrong it is,

1. Hoke's legends patches    WTF.....  ok, give them something without earning it.... I can understand doing so after they were to win the Big Ten title and then allowing them to wear it in the bowl game only. AT BEST.

2. declaring so often that they are playing "for the seniors"     ....  this was an emotion that Hoke took literally and the wrong way.. .  play for the TEAM not the seniors...fact is I bet alot of the undergrad players cannot stand all the anoitnment and attention that a guy like Gardner got... they implied so last year with Lewan, don't forget.

3. having no captains               idiotic...

 

mGrowOld

November 24th, 2014 at 12:54 PM ^

"The depths of my fandom have been tested; there's a bottom there. I'm fed up with ticket prices and the cookie-cutter inanity imposed on a Michigan Stadium experience that used to be unique."

I hit that place last year right after the Nebraska game and decided to give up my tickets.  The sad thing is I dont miss them and I dont miss being at a place I lterally planned my entire fall around for almost 30 years.  Where I used to go to every home game, one away game and literally scream at the TV when not in attendance I now stay at home and just shake my head in disgust at what I'm watching.  There is no emotion, no sense of outrage and once the game is mercifully over I just turn off theTV and do something else and dont think about it again.

Does that passion ever return once extinguished?  Maybe if Harbaugh is hired it'll come back to me but I cant help but wonder if the coaching malpractice inflicted by Hoke these past three years didnt damn near kill what I once held dear.

SalvatoreQuattro

November 24th, 2014 at 1:03 PM ^

If UM is 10-1 with a curb stomping of MSU you'll be back with bells on blowing a Swiss horn and yoodling Barry Manilow classics.

Oh, wait, that's me. But still you'll be back. You can't quit it. Your heart is burdened now by grief and disappointment, but at the first signs of life you'll be like Arnold.

ST3

November 24th, 2014 at 1:20 PM ^

I saw something similar happen to my dad and my uncle. Dad was a 30+ year season ticket holder who went to every game, home and away for 20 of those years. When they started the money grab (seat licenses, etc.) he soured on the program. He'd still watch on TV and we'd talk after the games, but I could tell his heart wasn't in it anymore. Likewise, my uncle was a Dodger baseball fan; he had season tickets for years. When the players went on strike in '94, they lost him as a fan. It took him several years to start watching baseball again, and when he did, he was an Angel fan.

Wolverine 73

November 24th, 2014 at 12:56 PM ^

We have Tom Harmon throwing the ball to Anthony Carter, and we can't score TDs?  I hope the new coach retires the "legends" jerseys idea, and let's players keep their numbers and--we can hope--develop their own legends with those numbers.  I somewhat understand and can sympathize with Gardner's struggles this year.  I do not for the life of me get why Funchess doesn't seem to play with any real drive or desire.

My Name is LEGIONS

November 24th, 2014 at 3:04 PM ^

Why?  Because the spotlight here is mesmerizing...  give him the 1 jersey and everything that goes with it, and if he skates by its still a great life.....all the notoriety, none of the blame, etc... I wonder if the data supports both the play of both Gardner and Funchess tailing off a game or so after they first got the legends jersey.... I would beT yes....    I mean, to give that honor, without earning anything...no big ten title, no nothing...its on both hoke and brandon...  several posters here including myself, abhor the idea of the legends patch and/or legends jersey... it can divide a team because its INDIVIDUALISTIC and leads to a ton of dissent.

 

AmishRule

November 24th, 2014 at 12:56 PM ^

We had so many let downs this year. So many things that should have never happened in hindsight. For instance, Funchess should never have worn the 1 jersey. Sorry, even if he comes back that goes into lockdown and earned by a player after or during a "huge" year - not earned on expectation. Also I'm sorry but I had to listen to the radio broadcast. That is painful. Moving Jim Brandstatter to play-by-play was a big mistake. Like the guy, has been with us for years - but man he is a mess when following a play. Sad thing is Dan Dierdorf is good and should stay. The one thing I did gleam from Dan's comments was very sad..during the first half Norfleet made a fair catch. Dan pointed out for the season we had something like 26 fair catches and our opposition had like 6. What the hell.

BlueHills

November 24th, 2014 at 12:56 PM ^

In a relatively close game, who passes up a field goal go for a first down on 4th and Whatever? I get that the kicking game has had some issues, but no. Bad idea. Or at the very least, run another trick play.

That's a truly dumb coaching error. And it's evidence of a coach who is grasping at straws and is afraid to let his own players do what they're trained to do on special teams.

And yet I didn't even get mad. I was resigned to the fact that this team would not win. And in retrospect, I'm kind of glad they weren't able to get over the hump. Why?

It's obvious that an interim AD needs a serious kick in the ass to fire Brady, especially after bullshitting about how impressed he is at how the coaches are doing "in the face of adversity."

Really? What fucking adversity other than being a bad football team have they been facing? Brandon's firing hardly affects the performance of the football team, no coaches died, and the injuries haven't been season-changers. I'm sorry but for the coach of the University of Michigan to be the dimmest buib in the building really takes the idea of "adversity" to mind-boggling extremes.

As far as I'm concerned, I've seen literally nothing from the University or the team this year that makes me want to do anything other than scratch my head, shrug my shoulders, and say, "This  really is a tire fire, it isn't an internet meme, and something is very rotten in the state of Denmark."

I will never root against our guys, but if they get clobbered in Columbus I won't be upset. Because Hackett should not be given a single excuse to keep this coaching staff on.

Dubs

November 24th, 2014 at 1:05 PM ^

Yeah, that kind of rubbed me the wrong way a bit too.  We get it - Hoke is in way over his head and isn't exactly the most stellar of public speakers.  But there's no reason why he should jump into the "LOL Hoke iz fat and stupid LOL" narrative.  

I expect that from OSU Twitter or Sparty message boards, not a writer who's on payroll.

Dubs

November 24th, 2014 at 1:17 PM ^

That's fine.  He's not a public speaker though, he's a football coach.  It's one thing if you're getting graded in a college course, but it's another thing entirely to have those things put in writing with the intention of making the speaker sound incredibly stupid.

Yes, Hoke has not been a good coach. Yes, there are media obligations to the coaching profession. But that's no reason to lambaste the guy for his ability (or lack therof) to orate.

Shop Smart Sho…

November 24th, 2014 at 1:22 PM ^

Is it the job of a journalist to make the subject look better than they are?  Maybe if Hoke hadn't treated the writers with utter disdain for the last two years, they would be more willing to protect him a bit.

As far as him not being a public speaker, I never said anything about it, you've simply created a straw man.  The ability to speak intelligently in public has long been seen as a postive trait, especially for those who must deal with the public and reports on a regular basis.  Every college football coach should be fully aware of that by now.  I don't think it is asking too much to expect a guy who has been a head coach for approximately a decade to be able to speak better than Hoke does.