The Weekly Six–The Horror II, now with 99% less horror Comment Count

The Mathlete

15084435361_4ed1e20779_z

Taken moments after the final person complained about Funchess switching to #1[Upchurch]

The Four Factors*

  Field Position Bonus Yards Conversion Rate Red Zone
Michigan 29.0 pts 5.9 yds/play 80% 7.0 pts/trip
App St 19.3 0.7 25% N/A

Total domination of a weaker opponent in every category. Michigan’s huge advantage in field position is partially driven by starting a drive with an extra point after Gedeon’s blocked punt return**. But even without that play, it was a large field position advantage, especially considering Michigan didn’t force any turnovers.

The 25% conversion rate allowed is significantly better than any number from last season. Last year’s opener was Michigan’s best game when they allowed CMU 47% conversions. Both bonus yards and bonus yards allowed were better than any numbers posted during the 2013 season.

*A quick refresh:

Field Position is expected points an average team will score given the starting field position over the course of the game. Defensive/special teams touchdowns count as 7 points.

Bonus Yards are any yards gained beyond the first down yardline, a measure of offensive explosiveness. >3 ypp is elite offensively, <2 is elite defensively

Conversion Rate is first downs gains divided by first downs started, a measure of an offense’s ability to move the chains consistently. >80%  is elite offensively and <65% is elite defensively.

Red Zone is points per red zone trip. >5.7 is elite offensively and <4.3 is elite defensively. This is the weakest predictor of the four factors.

All factors except field position are only measured on competitive series (all series in the first half and any second half series that starts or ends within 15 points).

**I know some people don’t like that I include return TD’s in this number but I think if you are going to count it if he gets tackled at the 1, it doesn’t make sense to exclude it if he makes it all the way in.

Individual Performances

Devin Gardner: +13.3 expected points, +26% win percent added

Derrick Green: +2.9, +4% (+9.3 including second half)

De’Veon Smith: +7.4, +7% (+9.8 including second half)

Devin Funchess: +9.2, +18% on 8 targets

None of these numbers are opponent adjusted yet. De’Veon Smith is the highest non-adjusted total for a Michigan running back since Fitzgerald Toussaint added 9.4 points of value against Purdue in 2011.

[Jump, game chart and such]

Game Chart

Michigan’s calculated chances of winning as the game progressed.

image

The six biggest plays that swung the odds of the game:

6. Frank Clark finds out even after a decade in football you can still learn something new (-3.5%)

5. Upshaw gashes Michigan for 27 yards up the middle (-3.7%)

4. Derrick Green breaks off a 59 yard run (+5.0%)

3. Gardner to Chesson for 19 yards on 3rd and 10 on Michigan’s opening drive (+5.4%)

2. Funchess stiffarm vs hapless DB (+6.3%)

1. Devin Funchess, route-master gives Michigan the early lead on third down (+7.5%)

Games of the week

Laugher of the week: Michigan State versus Jacksonville State, average play run with 92.1% chance of victory

Comeback of the week: NC State versus Georgia Southern, the Wolfpack win despite being as low as 4.4% chance of victory

Closest game of the week: Georgia versus Clemson. Georgia blew the game open late, but the average play was run with the odds within 11% of 50/50. Illinois, Iowa and Ohio St all made the top 6

Swing-iest game of the week: the average play in  Tulsa versus Tulane changed the win percentage by 3.5%. In other words, Michigan versus Appalachian state had five plays with more impact on their game than the average play did in Tulsa versus Tulane.

Most Deceiving Final Score of the week UCLA 28 Virginia 20. UCLA had  multiple defensive touchdowns and an average team would have score 43 points in this game, let alone national playoff contender UCLA against lowly Virginia.

Dumb Punt of the Week

Some good dumb punt karma in week one as both Tulane and Montana played the game of the best way to hold a lead is to give the ball to the other team game:

Tulane punted on 4th and 2 at the Tulsa 41 with a  4 point lead in the fourth quarter and then lost in OT

Montana punted on 4th and 4 at the Wyoming 37 with an 11 point lead in the fourth quarter and lost

Wisconsin was a tough one as a punt trailing by 4 with 2 minutes left on the clock would normally get strong consideration, but to Brian’s point from Saturday night, it wasn’t like they had any chance. They were facing 4th and 12 and didn’t have a pass play longer than 9 yards in the entire second half.

Ron Zook Dumb Punt of the Week

Washington eked out a 1 point win opening in Hawaii, despite trying their best to punt the game away. Facing 4th down and 8 from the Hawaii 32 with 5 minutes left and a 1 point lead, Washington punted the ball back to Hawaii. You’re never going to believe this, but the punt went for a touchback.

Bonus Dumb Field Goal of the Week

Trailing BYU by 21 points in the fourth quarter, UConn kicked a 35 yard field goal, changing the game from a three possession game to a three possession game.

Prediction

Coming into the season, assuming Notre Dame had a full roster, I had Michigan as a neutral site 0.5 point favorite versus Notre Dame. Both teams took care of business over lower tiered opponents in the opening weekend. Adjusting for the current state of the Notre Dame roster should negate the value of home field advantage:

Michigan 28 Notre Dame 27

Comments

creelymonk10

September 4th, 2014 at 12:58 PM ^

I've been thinking of where to bring this up, and here seems like a good a place as any since I'm sure it drives the Mathlete crazy as well.

Scenario:

Oklahoma State is down 6 with 2 timeouts left. FSU has 1st and 10 and gets a 10 yard run for another first down. Gundy stupidly calls a timeout. Since the clock stops for several seconds to reset the chain while the play clock is still running, shouldn't you never use a timeout after a first down if you're going to need to use all of them?

In this scenario, FSU can run out the clock just by making sure each play lasts for about 4-5 seconds. If Oklahoma State had waited to call timeout after the 1st and 2nd down plays, they'd force FSU to punt with about 10-20 seconds left on the clock. 

How do coaches still make this mistake? Is there no one on the sideline that is educated on how to use your timeouts properly and how to manage the clock? 

Sorry for the rant, this just drove me crazy watching it.

enlightenedbum

September 4th, 2014 at 2:10 PM ^

Also in that game, a dumb punt, which was dumb mostly because of the third down playcall.  So Oklahoma State is down 3 and has 3rd and 9 at the FSU 35, I believe late in the third quarter.  They chuck it to the end zone incomplete and then punt.  This drove me nuts.  I'm generally opposed to punting at the opponent's 35 but if you throw something short you either have a much more manageable 4th down attempt OR you can try a long field goal to tie the game.

Instead, the football gods throw the snap into an upman, FSU has that highlight reel Winston TD a few plays later, and OkSU loses.

Dudeski

September 4th, 2014 at 12:58 PM ^

Yo Mathlete, 

Starting odds of victory at 50% for every game doesn't strike me as particularly reasonable. Could you build in some bayesian updating to your model, perhaps using Vegas odds as your prior?

BursleysFinest

September 4th, 2014 at 3:02 PM ^

I think that would subvert the whole exercise. To me at least, this analysis gives the most un-biased look at when Team A 'won' or 'lost' the game with no bias of what anyone thought should have happened. If anything, add a note that states what the spread was, but starting it at 50% rings truer as a reflection of what actually DID happen. Anything else would be adding in an unnecessary bias of someone's prediction.

m1jjb00

September 4th, 2014 at 1:11 PM ^

Would it be better to have a rule dependent on the probability of winning?  Sorry if it's the 10th time asked.  I'm thinking that a 16-poiint lead to start the 2nd half is not garbage time.

SF Wolverine

September 4th, 2014 at 1:35 PM ^

be interesting to see what these factors look like this week.  Be a good thing if we could at least keep that red zone # high; I have to assume conversation rate and bonus yards will fall off unless someone (else) on their D-line is copping a look at his neighbors quiz answers as we speak.

OKI'llStart

September 4th, 2014 at 1:38 PM ^

Why was the initial win percentage for Michigan 50% at kickoff? If I recall correctly, we were favored by 35 points. Being a 35 point favorite is inconsistent with a coin-flip chance of victory when the game begins.

Seems like our win percentage should have started from 80-90% and gone upward from there. The chart scale would have had to be adjusted to look more interesting, but wouldn't that have painted a more accurate picture of the game?

BursleysFinest

September 4th, 2014 at 3:35 PM ^

The question that this analysis (at least to me) aims to answer, is "When did Team A win this game?"

The only thing that really affects the outcome is the actual plays run on the field.  Since spreads, betting lines, polls, a predictive model or anything else that happened previously don't give you bonus points or better field position....they don't mattter as far as an answer to the basic question above.

Soulfire21

September 4th, 2014 at 1:54 PM ^

Maybe I like being contrary, but I like to 50/50 start for every game. Despite Vegas odds and prognostications, each team has an equal chance of winning before any plays are run. This win chance is, of course, affected by every play beginning with the first snap. It seems to be reasonable to me.

Cosmic Blue

September 4th, 2014 at 3:14 PM ^

Would you mind adding an arrow with a number for these? I always struggle to rember/figure out where these plays happened over the course of the game. Thanks and keep up the good work

harmon40

September 4th, 2014 at 4:50 PM ^

Because maybe our guys did more than just beat up on a cupcake non-conf opponent. 

Maybe they just shut the door on an entire era that began with The Horror and ended with The Exorcism, and maybe they are ready to begin a brand new era in South Bend on Saturday.

I'm hoping...

Gulogulo37

September 4th, 2014 at 8:20 PM ^

I believe Wisconsin had a dumber punt earlier in that game. One of the ones you see on The Weekly Six a lot, 4th and less than 10 yards to go on LSU's 40-something yard line. I don't remember the situation exactly.