Wednesday Presser 11-12-14: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

Hoke presser 2

file

News bullets and other items:

  • Dennis Norfleet will play against Maryland
  • Derrick Green may or may not be back against Maryland. He, like Devin Gardner and Jake Butt, are getting healthier every day
  • President Schlissel called Hoke to apologize for his comments regarding academics and athletics. Hoke said that they recruit kids that fit the Michigan blueprint and that it’s not for everyone
  • Hoke said the Northwestern game was the offensive line’s best of the season
  • Nussmeier and Fred Jackson make the decision on which RB has the “hot hand,” and the decision can be made as early as the third series

Opening remarks:

“Thanks for coming out. Number one, yesterday we had a good chance with the players to look at the Northwestern film [and] make the corrections we need to make, but really emphasize the good things because really that's what you want to see are the good things. We've got to keep emphasizing those things. We practiced and it wasn't long but there was a lot of energy and a lot of good timing, and the one thing when you talk about bye weeks a little bit is the timing. You don't want to lose that part of it or if you need to get a little better you need to get a little better, especially in the pass game and all those things, so that was really productive.

“Start a little bit on Maryland today. I think the most exciting part of it is we are going to scrimmage some of the young guys against some who have played a little bit and those who haven't. We'll do about 30 minutes, probably 25 to 28 plays. When we do that we have to make sure it's going to help the team because those are your look teams going into the next week so I think it will be very good for us.

“Bye week again gives us a chance to rest some guys. I think getting Dennis [Norfleet]back will be very good for us. He'll be healthy. I think the health of Devin keeps – Gardner keeps improving and so in a lot of those guys there's a lot of guys who're just beat up a little bit. That's the way it is in football.

“The other thing is the president made some comments and I've talked to him. He called and apologized for his comments and I'm not going to speak for him. He put out whatever statements or interpretations that he needed to. We have always believed that this is truly an academic University. I was here for eight years before, as you all know, and I think the one thing you know being a former player and a coach is you only play so long and that's what this degree, a Michigan degree, is all about. And being the truly academic institution that it is, that degree will last forever so we take it very seriously. We try and recruit the best football players, the best student-athletes, and people that fit the blueprint here at Michigan. It's not for everybody because it is demanding and that's the way it should be.”

 

You kind of had the incident with Jake Butt. How much is he a work in progress on and off the field in terms of what he can be?

“I think Jake, he – from an athletic standpoint and all those things he continues to get healthier. He's one of those guys who another week, if we continue to do the right things with him… and the double edge sword is the timing of the routes and all that because you do want to rest guys so that they get a little healthier. I think he’s always developing and we are happy with his development.”
Have you seen the jerseys that his family where is when they come to games?
“I have not.”
Papa butt and headbutt and stuff like that. Have you seen him embrace that? He talks about getting teased about his last name.
“Yeah, he gets teased but… he gets teased.”
[After THE JUMP: We are grinders. It is stupid. Also some academic stuff.]

You just said you recruit the best student-athletes. You know their 40 times, how big and tall they are, so you must know about their GPAs coming out of high school. Where's the line in the sand for you? Have you brought in a guy with under a 3.0? Under a 2.7?
“I'm not going to talk about that. It's not fair to those kids.”
But you don't have to name names.
“That's okay.”
Where is the point where you say this kid isn't good enough to go to Michigan academically?
“You know, I think they're all just so different. If you base things just on that [GPA, I assume] totally I think you're making a mistake. There's so many things that you look at in a kid. You try to get all the information that you can.”
For a normal student coming here it's ACT and it's GPA. There are kids who are waitlisted with a 4.0. Where is your point at which look at a kid and say, ‘Boy, he's under a 3.0. We can't touch him.’ Is there a point?
“You know, we go through the proper admissions [process]. We do everything the right way. We get as much information as we can and that's what we go from.”
Can you give me an example?
“No.”
So is there a limit?
“The admissions office does a great job with it.”
Has that changed at all with the new president?
“Oh, I have no idea.”

When you say you spoke with President Schlissel, did you comment on how you view football’s perception at the school?
“Well, it depends whose perception it is. We've graduated 69 of 69 guys since we've been here, seniors. We’re at 975 APR which is the highest it's been and it'll be higher the next year. We’re engaged and we’re committed as a staff to the academics and what this university means.”
Did you address if there is any kind of gulf between how the University views football versus how football –
“Jim Hackett will do a tremendous job of talking about the academic success of our student-athletes.”

It seems like the offensive line played one of its better games of the year. Did that bear out on film?
“Yeah, we thought it was their best game and I think when you’ve got five guys who played six games together that helps, the continuity there. Knowing each other, if you want to call it that, what they expect. I think that's been good. Communication: Jack has done a really good job when they start making they are different calls and it always starts with the center and then between the tight ends in the tackles, that's important.”


To follow up on Jake Butt, did he respond well to the disciplinary action would you say?
“Yeah. Oh yeah.”

What about Mason Cole and how far he’s come since January?

“I think he was asked how many sacks he’s given up and I couldn’t tell you. I know two for sure, but when you don’t talk about him a lot I think it tells you a lot about how he’s doing and how comfortable he is in what he’s doing. He doesn’t seem to have any kind of problems with picking up things or getting ready for the games.”

Do you have an update on Derrick Green? Do you think he could be back by Maryland?

“Well, I don’t know. We’ll see. He’s doing a little more every day we go out.”

You talked a little bit yesterday on the call about this team’s identity. Is that what you were getting at? That this is sort of a team that’s going to have to grind out wins and is capable?

“I think that’s who we are. I think we’re not going to score 30 points every game or anything like that. We haven’t besides one or two, but we’re going to grind it out. Our offense is going to do their part and the defense is going to respond and that’s what we’ve got to keep doing.”

Can I ask you one thing about Funchess? You mentioned last week something about a toe injury; I think that’s what you said. Is that- he’s had one touchdown since the first game. He’s obviously not had the productivity that maybe you thought or a lot of people thought. Have injuries slowed his production?

“Well, I think he’s…not talking about injuries, but he’s had some things that have developed over the year, yeah.”

MGoQuestion: To go back for a second to the team identity; you said that you think you know what you are but that you want to keep improving on what you are, so what specific improvements are you looking to make between now and Maryland?

“Well, number one we weren’t very good in the red zone. We had been pretty good earlier in the year and that has to improve when we have the opportunities. That drive at the end of the game, we had some opportunities to get off the field with some third-down conversions and we didn’t get that done. I have been and I think we have been pretty excited about the special teams and how we’ve responded there. We weren’t as good, I thought, on some of the returns, opposing returns a week ago and we were much better this week.”

On the running backs question obviously you’ve had two different guys who’ve had 100-yard games, and if Derrick gets back in the mix here how are you evaluating how you’re going to rotate them through, and is that a game-by-game evaluation?

“Well, now you’ve got the three and so to think ahead we wouldn’t do that just because you don’t know if he’s going to back or not. Obviously got the hot hand, if you want to call it that, and it was a DeVeon kind of game in some ways because of how he runs the ball and his style. We’re real excited about all three of them.”

At what point in the game do you guys assess that hot hand thing? Second quarter? Third quarter?

“Sometimes it’s like the third series. You know this guy’s going to go in. You do the same thing on defense with your defensive linemen depending on the tempo of teams and who we’re playing. Ryan Glasgow may get the start and Mone’s going to come in that third series, so it works kind of the same way.”

Who’s making that call [with the RBs]? Nussmeier? Freddy [Jackson]? You?

“Nussmeier and Fred, and that’s stuff we’ve talked about before.”

Comments

Amaizing Blue

November 12th, 2014 at 6:54 PM ^

I am a high school counselor, and UM's admissions department is the least transparent about what it takes to get in out of all schools in Michigan. They take so many different things into account that we often can't predict with any certainty who will get in. It also depends which college they are applying to, with Engineering obviously being the most difficult. We had a 4.2 student with a 31 ACT and lots of significant extracurricular stuff waitlisted and eventually rejected last year. However, students with special talents are under different guidelines, and football players are included in that. Many of us who graduated 20 or 30 years ago wouldn't get in today. '86 LSA, English.

Amaizing Blue

November 12th, 2014 at 10:32 PM ^

The essays were really good. I was trying to point out that it is much harder to get in than it was even ten years ago, and thought I could illustrate that using an anonymous real life example. Didn't take into account internet idiot wanting to tear the kid down without knowing him.

BlueSpiceIn SEC.hell

November 13th, 2014 at 10:10 AM ^

you didn't anticipate an internet idiot wanting to tear people down on this Blog.

It is extremely hard to find anything written here that is not dripping with a negative, snarky bias.

I mean under Hoke we have the highest APR ever and people still want to knock him.

As a parent of a graduating college senior and a high school senior - both with excellent grades and scores, I know how nebulous the process is and how difficult it is to get into good schools.

I appreciated your post because you were providing excellent insight for those who really wanted to know .  

Unfortunately most questions asked of coach Hoke seem driven by a need to bring him down, and regardless of his answer he is still bashed.

Wendyk5

November 12th, 2014 at 10:09 PM ^

I got waitlisted out of high school, and ended up transferring in as a sophomore with a 4.0 my freshman year somewhere else. But i had zero extracuricular activities in high school, terrible SAT's, ok ACT, and around a 3.5 GPA from a small rigorous private school in Texas where a good 25% of my graduating class of 60 went to Ivy League schools (15% went to Harvard). I would never get in today with the same transcript. My essay kicked ass, though. Class of 1987. 

erald01

November 12th, 2014 at 6:55 PM ^

We are becoming a laughing stock of the universities..The president called Hoke to appologize? For what? I dont get it, it wasnt that big of a deal what he said, plus why is Hoke even mentioning that..god we nees a total house cleaning in the football dept..these guys are total tools for representing such an institute

MonkeyMan

November 12th, 2014 at 8:39 PM ^

It is really incredible that the level of standards for academics are so far apart for various universtities that still have to play each other in games for cash prizes- you have Hoke's 69 grads out of 69 on the one hand, and UNC on the other hand, and 'Bama oversigning JUCO's on the other hand (you can do the 3 hand thing when you are a monkey)

Where in the hell is the NCAA in all of this? Why doesn't anyone major in politics launch a real investigation of that outfit and ask why they don't even the playing field?

Right now the NCAA seems far more corrupt than the NFL or any other pro league can think of now. How comes nobody ever looks into them?

Waves

November 12th, 2014 at 9:48 PM ^

"the one thing when you talk about bye weeks a little bit is the timing. You don't want to lose that part of it"

Glad he's watching that. We sure wouldn't want the offense to lose its almost zen-like precision.

bronxblue

November 12th, 2014 at 10:10 PM ^

As others noted, that series of academic questioning was (a) pedantic, (b) unnecessary, and (c) factually irrelevant.  Yes, there are a couple of kids who have great academic credentials who don't get into UM, but I take issue with the whole "waitlisting 4.0 kids" because, yeah, with the way HS grades are inflated due to AP classes and the like, you can have a 4.0 kid on this weird 5.0 scale that, if you factored it out, is a 3.3-3.4 with meh extracurriculars.  Regardless, I'd hate a hard-and-fast rule, and good on Hoke for kinda shutting that down.  

Amaizing Blue

November 12th, 2014 at 10:41 PM ^

If a HS uses a weighted grading system and awards an extra point for AP classes, it doesn't matter to UM. They actually create a new transcript with unweighted grades, then factor in the rigor of the curriculum along with many other criteria. So you get consideration from them for taking lots of AP classes, but your GPA won't be higher than a 4.0.