SMU 82, Michigan 58 Comment Count

Ace


mood: whiskey

The excuses don't quite cut it.

Yes, Michigan didn't have their starting point guard, Yes, they went on the road against a good SMU squad, and couldn't fly to Dallas until this morning. Yes, they're young and inexperienced. Yes, Caris LeVert had an uncharacteristically awful game.

The Mustangs managed to weather the loss of one of their key players, though, flourishing despite the departure of Markus Kennedy in the opening minute. The issues that have plagued Michigan's defense all season came to the fore tonight; SMU got dunk after dunk after dunk created by all-too-easy dribble penetration; the Mustangs didn't miss often, but when they did, they were more likely than not to grab the rebound; they rained in 8-of-15 threes on more open looks created by shoddy perimeter defense.

Walton's absence doesn't explain all of that. Youth only goes so far. Same for weather-impacted travel plans.

LeVert went 1-for-13 tonight. Without him carrying the load, only Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman and Duncan Robinson could crack double-digit points. Even with the extenuating circumstances taken into account, Michigan remains too reliant on one player to carry the load on one end, and they're entirely too lost on the other to make up for it.

Michigan's next four opponents, each ranked worse than 250th on KenPom, all come to Crisler. That's welcome news for a team that needs to do quite a bit of tuning up before they're ready to take on the Big Ten.

Comments

CommodityTrader

December 9th, 2015 at 12:19 AM ^

1) Let's give Beilein credit as an offensive genuis - he needs to hire a DEFENSIVE genius for the staff, even if defense is just about effort, more than scheme, somebody to focus on it in specific

2) Zak Irvin looks TERRIBLE - yes he's coming back from injury, but his shot motion is a train wreck - he hit the side of the backboard on an open three tonight

3) MASSIVE regression of Aubrey Dawkins - he's disappeared, why?

That seems like enough to work through - thoughts?

 

ijohnb

December 9th, 2015 at 6:04 AM ^

Thoughts. 1) There was no evidence of anybody on our staff being an offensive genius tonight. Right now, JBs offense looks to be about 2 variations of the "chuck it up" system. 2) It looks as though every known quantity on our roster has regressed. 3) Caris is lost early in games and it puts us behind the eight ball in every game. 4) Our entire team lacks basic defensive fundamentals. 5) Outside of Duncan Robinson and Zac Irvin, effort appears to be an ongoing issue. 6) The rotation is out of control and has no rhyme or reasons, and both players and fans appear confused. 7) As it currently stands, this is a bottom tier BIG team with what was thought to he a POY candidate. Here is the sum total - The performance of the Trey and Sauce teams bought JB a good deal of time, but this appears to be a poorly coached team. It is time for Beilien to bring this together a little bit, or I think it may be time to start, just to start, asking a question or two about where exactly this is going.

Padog

December 9th, 2015 at 9:07 AM ^

1. Shut up. John Beilein is one of the best offensive coaches in basketball. The offense was fine tonight. If Caris goes makes 4 more shots, 2 of them threes, and Irvin kits more shots then it's a closer game. Coaches can put their players in the best position possible to win, and the players didn't do it, on offense.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

lilpenny1316

December 9th, 2015 at 10:01 AM ^

Beilein's UM teams have been criticized for having long scoring droughts where offensive flow and creating easier scoring opportunities are a problem.  It's not as if these questions have manifest themselves in the past month.  The offense will be better by conference season, but these scoring droughts have dogged all of Beilein's teams except for two.

991GT3

December 9th, 2015 at 1:27 PM ^

have recruiting issues. I agree with you that as of today they are clueless as to how to fix the situation assuming it is fixable.

The good news is they play inferior opponents the next four games.

Drbogue

December 8th, 2015 at 11:04 PM ^

This team is pretty awful to watch right now. I don't recall seeing a more clueless defensive performance in the last 30 years of Michigan basketball against anyone with a pulse. Pathetic when you understand that defense is more about effort than scheme.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

trueblueintexas

December 8th, 2015 at 11:08 PM ^

The defensive problems tonight were not from effort but athelticism. Michigan's guards got beat off the dribble one-on-one almost every time down court tonight. Provening it wasn't effort, they also could not generate one-on-one penetration on the offensive end. Can't play good D when everyone is out of position trying to cover penetration. It's also why SMU's big had 11 dunks on 13 shot attempts. It's also why no one was boxing out to get defensive rebounds.

trueblueintexas

December 8th, 2015 at 11:56 PM ^

Interesting question. Beilein & Bacari have proven they can develop JMo, McGary and Horford to something better than they started out. Beilein uses the pick and roll as much or more than any coach in college basketball. That should be something which translates well to the NBA. And yet, for some reason, Beilein is having problems attracting bigs. Interesting to see what Teske does when he arrives next year. I think that will be the true test of what Beilein & Bacari can do with a big. 

gbdub

December 9th, 2015 at 8:44 AM ^

And Horford left when he had the chance. Beilein doesn't feature bigs, and I think it's time to start asking why not? We were so much better when we had McGary able to bring that big inside presence. It's a whole extra dimension when the long shots aren't falling, and the effort and athleticism on the defensive end and glass are a major plus.

If it takes a bit of tweaking to the offense to make Michigan more attractive to elite big man recruits, I think we need to do it. Trying to be a finesse team with no defense just isn't going to lead to consistent success, especially in the big ten.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

trueblueintexas

December 9th, 2015 at 11:53 AM ^

I'm curious why you say that. Walton is the only person I would say consistently can blow by his defender in a half-court set. LeVert's struggles have come against athletes he can not consistently take off of the dribble. Last night was a classic example. Even the times he got to the hoop his own defender was still affecting his shot. Irvin is very similar. He is fast enough to get even but not past many defenders. MAAR has shown times when he is able to blow past his defender and make a defense react but not consistenly enough to run the team. Fans have not seen enough of Wilson against good competition to even know. Despite Dawkins exploits on a few dunks which is more about leaping vs, speed and agility, I have not seen him consistently be able to beat a defender off of the dribble. 

On the opposite end of the court, please tell me, who was able to prevent Nic Moore from getting anywhere he wanted on the floor? He scored 15 points and had 7 assists. Most of them on easy passes in the lane for dunks. It's not like SMU was running a fast break all night getting assists and points in transition. SMU put up 82 points on 57.4% shooting playing primarily half court offense. 

 

CTSgoblue

December 8th, 2015 at 11:05 PM ^

This team will grow but the one thing they unfortunately can't do is add a big to the roster mid-season. It'll continue to be a high variance team that wins when it's shot is on and gets run off the floor when it's not.

funkywolve

December 9th, 2015 at 12:37 AM ^

was glaring.  In all aspects of the game - offense, defense and reboudning.  So when they aren't hitting from the outside, they get almost no easy baskets.  Easy is maybe the wrong word, but I watched most of the second half and almost all our their shots in the half court offense were at least 10, if not 15, feet from the basket.

B-Nut-GoBlue

December 8th, 2015 at 11:08 PM ^

We are going to get destroyed in Big Ten play.  Sparty, Purdue, Iowa, and hell Wisconsin and Indiana, and even Ohio State has the athletes to go get rebounds that we have no clue how to get.  Fucking two people around the rim and both go to the side directly under the hoop and leave the front of the rim open for a trailer to dunk/lay the offensive board back in.  Good God those are awful fundamentals.

los barcos

December 8th, 2015 at 11:11 PM ^

Burn through some of that depth we heard about and just go full court press all game. Teams are scoring anyways in our half court defense, might as well try to play for turnovers.

cp4three2

December 8th, 2015 at 11:18 PM ^

But with Trey Burke making a miracle three in the tournament. 

 

We're a football school. I'm ok with it. If we want to be a dual sport school we need to give Brad Stevens Jim Harbaugh money when JB retires. 

 

I love Beilein, but he is what he is at a school that is focused on football. He's made us relevant again and it's fun, but it's clear that we're not going to be a power. This team is filled with semiors and juniors with contributing sophomores. 

cp4three2

December 8th, 2015 at 11:39 PM ^

And I'm ok with that and when he gets in the Dance you never know. I think Stevens probably looks back to college in about 4 years, when about the time on Stevens is running out. The NBA is going to be the Warriors vs againg Durant and Lebron for about the next 5 years. 

milo16

December 8th, 2015 at 11:14 PM ^

live by the three die by the three is the motto for this team. Against quality oppenents like SMU, Uconn, and Xavier with physical guards and big men, this strategy wont work.

 

taistreetsmyhero

December 8th, 2015 at 11:20 PM ^

Lack of fundamentals on defense. Nobody on our team has shown an ability to play perimeter defense. Guys get blown past with the simplest moves. No instinct to box out, just watch the ball go in or miss into the other team's hands. Worst defensive team under beilein by far. He gets an F- for big man recruiting. His seat is warm.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

lbpeley

December 9th, 2015 at 7:54 AM ^

his seat is probably not even a little warm. At the risk of saying anything but smoke blowing praise about him and angering the mgoblogerati, there's been excuses every year but 2 or 3.

"We just need this player or that player". "Wait till next year when this guy gets some experience".Yet this player or that player either never seem to sign or never seem to explode. This has to be on coaching.

At some point we need to either just be happy not being what we were under Amaker or realize Belein is not as elite of a coach as we all desperately want him to be and go get one that is. I'm kind of fine either way but it was a fuck ton more fun with teams capable of deep tourney runs instead of getting our balls handed to us by any team with a pulse.

Huma

December 9th, 2015 at 8:48 AM ^

You guys are crazy. In no way is or should Beilein be on the hot seat. We were in the championship game 3 years ago and were one ridiculous three by Kentucky away from the final four 2 years ago. Yes, last year was bad but our top 3 players were hurt most of the year, not to mention that McGary unexpectedly left for the NBA after the bullshit pot issue. This year is disappointing so far, but all is not yet lost.

Padog

December 9th, 2015 at 9:02 AM ^

This is kind of an arrogant comment, the bottom line is that we are not a Top 15 basketball school. We are never going to compete consistently with Kentucky, Duke, Kansas, MSU, UNC, Villanova, Louisville, UCLA. The fact that you think we can just "hire" somebody better is extremely ignorant.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

hfhmilkman

December 9th, 2015 at 9:36 AM ^

Recruiting in college basketball is dirtier than a toilet in the student slums. If you want the big guys what are you willing to do?  Are you willing to have a hoard of boosters take care of players?  Are you willing to have assistants bring in strippers?  Are you willing to treate your college basketball players like pseudo professionals?  Are you willing for your staff to lie, cheat, steal and for an AD apartment to do everything necessary to keep players who have no interest in college eligible?  Are you willing to sell your soul to a AAU power broker and keep him happy?  There are a couple exceptions of coaches doing it the right way.  But those are a very few.  Beilein appears to do things above the board.  More often than not our team is in the tournament and doing damage.  I'm not going to judge this team until March.  I would rather have an outside chance of winning than cheat and be a contender every year.  If you want to win every year no matter what the cost, be a UK fan.

Pumafb

December 9th, 2015 at 6:06 PM ^

I agree with that. What I don't understand is why are many content with what Beilein is? Yes, he brought us back from obscurity, but that shouldn't mean he gets a free pass. Michigan absolutely should be on the same level as MSU in basketball. If we aren't, we are doing something wrong.

alum96

December 8th, 2015 at 11:28 PM ^

SMU beat Yale by 2.  At home. With their best big man playing.

Kenpom has Yale in the 80s.

That is all.

(we look like a mid major in terms of athleticism and we are going to make a ton of "nobodies" look like superstars in games in the Big 10)