fun for the whole family

Preview: Rutgers 2018 Comment Count

Brian November 9th, 2018 at 3:58 PM

Essentials

WHAT Michigan vs Rutgers wsj_gfx_v48_12.5.9.4
WHERE Homesure Lending Stadium
Piscataway, NJ
WHEN 3:30 Eastern
THE LINE Michigan –38.5
TELEVISION BTN
TICKETS exist
WEATHER sunny, around 40
15 mph wind

Overview

Rutgers is #126 in S&P+. Teams that S&P+ thinks are better than Rutgers include San Jose State, UTEP, Central Michigan, and Kansas. That latter is pretty logical since Rutgers lost to Kansas 55-14. That's the most points Kansas has put up since 2007. Kansas has since fired their coach. For only beating Rutger by 41.

[Hit THE JUMP for A HALF-ASSED PREVIEW. QUARTER-ASSED if we're being REAL]

Run Offense vs Rutgers

37121053292_c2c64d309e_k

[Eric Upchurch]

A miserably bad unit coming off a 7.2 YPC allowed day against Wisconsin—Paul "Turtle" Chryst gave Jonathan Taylor 27 carries, because of course—that has little hope of fitting all of the various gaps Michigan will test. Without bothering to adjust for sacks, Rutgers has given up 7.2 YPC to Maryland, 7.7 to Illinois(!!!), 5.1 to Buffalo(!), 8.3 to Kansas(!!!) and 5.6 to Ohio State. Only Indiana and Northwestern have failed to impose their will.

I feel like I shouldn't validate Seth's choice to spend his time breaking down Rutgers football this week but I am also loathe to spend time doing it myself, so let's quote his FFFF:

The other LB on this play, #8 WLB Tyshon Fogg, is a true sophomore but I don't care if you're a high school sophomore: when your guard pulls you don't bounce the opposite direction. I don't know what their keys are but I'm certain, after three years of this, that Rutger's linebacker coaching is the worst in the conference. …

That was a +2 on a +2/-23 day. His backup, Fogg, was +2/-10, getting a couple positives for hard run action and coming off the field whenever there was a remote possibility of a pass.

He charted a whole game? With a –21 linebacker? And then @-ed his coach? Let's talk time management, people.

Anyway, Michigan will stomp these guys flat and hopefully put nothing new on film unless it's a 20-carry Peter Bush package.

KEY MATCHUP: DON'T GET INJURED vs GETTING INJURED. Don't.

Pass Offense vs Rutgers

15228869735_d26bf6ab56_k

[Eric Upchurch]

A relative bright spot, this unit is 75th in S&P+. They don't get to the quarterback at all but they've successfully kept stuff in front of them, mostly, as they attempt to bend their way down the field without breaking. Again let's turn to Seth:

The secondary is again with out 2016 star corner Blessuan Austin but has the poor man's Marlin Jackson CB Isaiah Wharton around, though there's no reason to throw his way. When they lost all three of last year's safety rotation—one a transfer to FIU, one a behavioral dismissal, and their slot-turned-SS to the San Diego Padres—in the offseason I suggested Wharton might move to safety, but Rutgers instead moved the guy who was Austin's quite decent replacement last year, now-SS Damon Hayes. They also got back athletic (once earned a Don Brown offer) FS Saquan Hampton, who was injured last year. Hampton had two picks in this game but isn't a great help in run defense. When they go nickel they bring back that FIU transfer, SS Kiy Hester, who had to cancel his Florida plans because he hadn't graduated. Hester comes in as the safety while Hayes moves down to the slot.

Maaaan Hester must be mad at himself. He could be playing for a better football team in Florida.

This the one spot in which the opposition could provide data other than "lol rutger." They've got a couple of good DBs, they've held opposing teams relatively in check, and Shea Patterson hasn't hit the Rudock booster rockets yet. His 8-10 throws… aw hamburgers. I gave it a shot.

It'll be interesting to see how Brandon Peters has evolved since last year, at least. If he's the backup QB for the OSU game that might be relevant due to the Curse of Ryan Mallett. But please no.

 

KEY MATCHUP: NO.

Run Defense vs Rutgers

dsc_0057

This is the good part of the Rutgers offense. It features three guys averaging about 4.3 yards a carry collectively. Raheem Blackshear is a darting guy who's also a slot—think Chris Evans. Jonathan Hilliman, a BC transfer, and typo-on-his-birth-certificate-sufferer Isaih Pacheco are burlier sorts that get the short yardage stuff. Despite their differences in shape the three are near-identical statistically.

Michigan's played two opponents in the same range as Rutgers via S&P+. Northwestern and Michigan State both managed 2.5 yards per carry. MSU is about 30 spots better as a rush outfit; Northwestern is about 30 spots worse. Meanwhile Rutgers has not played anything approximating Michigan's rush defense. Ohio State is 49th now; Rutgers managed 3.6 yards a carry against them.

I set the over/under at 1.9 yards a carry.

KEY MATCHUP: TACKLING vs THE TOTAL RUTGER. Leaking first downs here and there because Blackshear or Hilliman is able to break a tackle or three may rob Rutger of its rutger destiny.

Pass Defense vs Rutgers

6522799925_0e2070803c_b

[Jannie Malm]

The Cable Subscribers have the worst pass offense in the country, full stop. Erstwhile Michigan target Artur Sitkowski chose… poorly and was immediately inserted into the starting lineup. He's averaging four yards an attempt with a 4-15 TD-INT ratio. Last year's on-and-off starter Giovanni Rescigno has chipped in two INTs of his own whenever Sitkowski just can't even anymore.

Blackshear is the top receiver as well; four star Bo Melton is another slot type. Everyone except TE Jerome Washington averages under ten yards a catch—screens and dinks are the vast majority of the Rutgers passing game.

The one thing the Cable Subscribers have managed to do acceptably is pass protect, but the nature of the offense has a ton to do with that. Instead of hanging in the pocket on passing downs Rutgers just dumps the ball out and hopes something happens. It does not.

This will be an obliteration. Michigan will eat the souls of all who dare to drop back. Great gouts of black fire will carve huge furrows in the turf. Michigan will have to watch out for screens.

KEY MATCHUP: NO.

Special Teams

I'm sure they have some.

KEY MATCHUP:  AHHHH YOU PUT IT THROUGH THE UPRIGHTS

Intangibles

0ca6e850-2a89-11e6-96dd-f563ea03981c_Screen-Shot-2016-06-04-at-3-17-03-PM.png.cf

Cheap Thrills

Worry if…

  • Someone gets injured.
  • The rules of time and space suddenly don't apply.
  • You get a rash after being in the Rutgers hot tub.

Cackle with knowing glee if…

  • A third string fullback scores.
  • The Total Rutger is in play in the fourth quarter.
  • Do we travel four fullbacks?

Fear/Paranoia Level: 0 (Baseline: 5; –1 for Everything About Rutger Football This Year, –1 for Everything About Rutger Generally, –1 for Interception Fiesta!, –1 for Literally The Worst, –1 for 55-14 Loss To A Team That Already Fired Its Coach)

Desperate need to win level: 10 (Baseline: 5; +1 for Let's Not Be The Victim Of The Greatest Upset Of All Time Again, +1 for League Game, Smoke, +1 for I Like Enjoying Things Better Than Sifting Through The Rubble Of Broken Dreams, +1 for Smug Delanyface, +1 for That Thing With The Magnets And The Teddy Bear)

Loss will cause me to… cease to exist like the rest of the universe.

Win will cause me to…  continue advocating for the Cable Subscribers' ejection from the Big Ten.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict: 

Michigan wins.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:

  • Total Rutger.
  • This is more performance art than athletic contest.
  • Michigan, 79-0

Comments

Surveillance Doe

November 9th, 2018 at 4:11 PM ^

The preview post actually caught me a little off-guard. Then there was an uneasy feeling as I realized this isn't actually a bye week. Then I realized, "Holy shit, haven't you been smoking peyote for six straight days, and couldn't some of this maybe be in your mind?"

Durham Blue

November 9th, 2018 at 4:14 PM ^

Brian thinks Michigan will cover the spread.  I had my doubts but realized today that I was totally dismissing Rutger turnovers, of which there will probably be more than two.  And Michigan likely scores on the them.  So yeah, I am changing my tune and I now think Michigan covers the 39 point spread.

Yinka Double Dare

November 9th, 2018 at 4:45 PM ^

39 is actually friendlier to Rutgers than the S&P+ spread, even including "home field advantage." Which actually might work against Rutgers keeping things closer, because Michigan has a limited travel roster instead of a phalanx of walkons to send in for the entire 4th quarter if and when it's entirely out of hand.

In 2016, even after sitting pretty much all the starters after one series in the second half, our "backups" were basically all guys who were starting the following year. Khaleke, Bush, Winovich, Gary, our entire main five secondary guys, etc. This year it's going to be guys like Uche, Dwumfour, Ambry Thomas, Hutchinson, Hawkins, etc. It's not going to get all THAT much easier against the reserves.

NittanyFan

November 9th, 2018 at 4:55 PM ^

The spread is 39 and the over/under is 47 1/2.

I've certainly never seen quite anything like that before.  That's a very tight window for any brave souls that want to parlay Michigan and the under.

Screw it --- I'll throw a few bucks on it.  It'll be a good gambling story some day if I actually win.  :-)

BuckeyeChuck

November 9th, 2018 at 10:56 PM ^

That's a projected score of about 43-4. You're right, it's amazing to see Vegas anticipate that few points for the losing team. Even in projected blowouts, the losing team is generally expected 10+ points because, you know...anything can happen. A score here, a score there...voila: the sucky team managed 10 points. But I guess anything can't happen. Only certain things can happen. Those certain things will not include the cannon being fired. s/ At least Delaney is going to get the big market TV ratings from NYC. Because, you know, NYC (just like the whole northeast) is known for it's love of college football. /s

There we go...will The rutger outscore the game's TV share in NYC?

mGrowOld

November 9th, 2018 at 4:15 PM ^

Im actually nervous for this game.  Not cause i think there's a chance in hell we'll lose but rather cause i dont want the bad thing to happen that im not even gonna type out for fear of jinxing it.

BuckeyeChuck

November 9th, 2018 at 11:01 PM ^

Are you guys talking about an injury to Shea Patterson?

Yea, sure wouldn't want to induce a jinx that made Shea Patterson get injured. Especially not an injury that lasts at least 15 days. Wouldn't want you guys to feel guilty about a Shea Patterson injury at all. So let's not even mention a Shea Patterson injury. Because that might make a Shea Patterson injury happen.

No Shea Patterson injury here. You can look somewhere else...where there is no such thing as a Shea Patterson injury.

AgonyTrain

November 9th, 2018 at 4:35 PM ^

I am irrationally afraid that this is going to be closer than expected because of the chances the team is already looking ahead to OSU and the massive flood of positive coverage from the media over the past 7 days.  I doubt that happens given the focus shown to date but there is something about this game that gives me a bad vibe.

Ali G Bomaye

November 9th, 2018 at 4:19 PM ^

Michigan still wins, easily.

Let's say that means Rutger could double-team an extra defensive lineman when they're on offense, which means there will only 2-3 guys hitting Sitkowski instead of 3-4. And on defense, Rutger will still have a super-cyan MLB going the wrong way, so maybe we don't light them up, but we'll figure out ways to get yards.

BuckeyeChuck

November 9th, 2018 at 11:15 PM ^

Michigan could play without a safety, and that shouldn't make any difference. (Heck maybe Michigan will come out with a 5-4-2 defense, if they choose to play with 11. How many DBs will they really need? Load the box with 9 guys and make Sitkowski throw HAHAHAHAHA!!!!)

Harbaugh could do without an extra TE on offense...3 TEs should be plenty. ;-)

MGlobules

November 9th, 2018 at 5:43 PM ^

Found this on the internets, and it made me think this could introduce a fun new element to mismatches of this kind. 

"Is it a penalty to have only 10 players on the field?

From my experience in playing football from pop warner to semi pro, which I currently play, the only personnel penalties are for too many men on the field. More than 11 is seen as an unfair advantage and why it is blown dead immediately after the snap of the ball to start a given play. Having less is seen as it's own punishment by not keeping track of your players and any negative play thus isn't needed."

How low can we go? Let's find out!

 

EGD

November 9th, 2018 at 4:18 PM ^

I've heard those ball pits are just disgusting repositories of filth and bacteria.  

Probably good practice with a trip to Columbus coming up.