Preview: Iowa Comment Count

Brian November 4th, 2011 at 1:45 PM

iowa-cornPreviously here: There is a mini program for anyone making the trek. ACE FFFF.

Other stuff: Who Are You and Why Do We Care(?)from Holdin' The Rope. Know Your Foe from MZone. Meinke on Floyd.

Previews: M&GB, BWS, MGoFootball, MNBN.


WHAT Michigan vs Iowa
WHERE Kinnick Stadium, Iowa City, IA
WHEN Noon Eastern, November 5th 2011
THE LINE Michigan -4
WEATHER mid-40s at kickoff rising to almost 60; sunny, windy

Run Offense vs. Iowa


this team averaged 4.8 YPC.

Now that this site has a post dedicated to opponent scouting that I don't write it's always interesting to see whether my impressions from the opponent's game are the same as Ace's. This week they were in one critical respect: wow, Iowa has problems at DT.

Minnesota's late surge was a bunch of downhill runs from the pistol aimed at one Steve Bigach, who is a walk-on, national merit scholar, and Academic All Big Ten. He played like it. He's actually the second-string walk-on; Thomas "Not That Nard Dog" Nardo is the preferred starter but he was out with injury. He's touch and go this week in the same way Kovacs is. This is the difference between Michigan starting Heininger (not ideal but you can get away with it) and Brink (time to be nervous).

The rest of the Iowa front seven has not been great. Iowa is languishing at 69th in rush defense. Results against teams other than Tennessee Tech and Louisiana-Monroe:

Opponent Att Yds YPC TD Nat'l Rk
Iowa State 51 197 3.9 2 43rd
Pitt 33 157 4.8 0 67th
PSU 44 234 5.3 0 56th
NW 37 175 4.7 1 33rd
Indiana 46 225 4.9 2 54th
Minnesota 38 181 4.8 2 72nd

That's remarkably consistent. Any opponent other than Iowa State averages just under five yards a carry despite not being that good at running the ball. The last couple weeks mobile quarterbacks Tre Roberson and MarQueis Gray have combined for 156 yards at 5.9 a pop. Mac Morehouse just describe the Hawkeyes as "awful" against mobile QBs.


no reason. via Midnight Maize

Michigan is good at running the ball when they bother to do it. After Finding Themselves against Purdue Michigan moved from a horrible 12th to a fantastic 8th nationally. They're actually beating last year's 5.5 YPC at about 5.8, albeit with most of the toughest defenses on the schedule yet to come.

Last week it was finally the Fitzgerald Toussaint show. Toussaint was the first Michigan tailback to get 20 carries in a game since Eastern Michigan in 2009; he turned those into 170 yards and won the starting job in the process. Denard Robinson enjoyed a relatively light workload thanks to that, and everyone hopes that will continue.

As to what Michigan does… at this point your guess is as good as Norm Parker's. Michigan bludgeoned the outside of the Purdue defense, brought out a power-based variant of the inverted veer (or "dash"), and is liable to do something completely different next week. Hell, if Iowa's interior line is as iffy as it looks they could line up in the I and run power. They might even succeed at it.

The only sure thing is that Michigan will do a bunch of different stuff and it will average around 5 yards a carry, if not more.

Key Matchup: Iowa LBs versus Toussaint/Robinson. The Iowa guys don't find the ball that well and could be optioned off to spectacular effect—or just run by. A big play or two could be in the offing.

Pass Offense vs. Iowa

If the run defense is a problem this is a… very large problem. That's the ticket. You have seen the Steele Jantz comparison from Fire Jerry Kill, but here is the Steele Jantz comparison:


The issues in Iowa's pass defense are not limited to funny but trigger-happy Gopher fans, either. Local beatwriter Mark Morehouse picked up on the same post I did before last week's Hawkeye Armageddon event:

FireJerry, who put some work into the post, computed that Iowa’s opposing FBS quarterbacks have pass-efficiency ratings that are 27 points higher against the Hawkeyes than against the rest of their competition.

But the site draws the same conclusion you (at least you should) and I do about the Gophers’ chances of springing an upset at TCF Bank Stadium Saturday:

If only Iowa’s offense was as bad as their defense then we might be on to something.

It’s still the Minnesota defense that allows 308.7 rushing yards per game in Big Ten play.

Herf nerf hurf hurf.

So. The Iowa secondary is atrocious, 91st(!) in pass efficiency defense despite having maybe one decent QB on the schedule I mean, seriously people:

  • Steele Jantz
  • Tino Sunseri
  • Matt McGloin (wsg Rob Bolden)
  • Dan Persa
  • Tre Roberson
  • MarQuies Gray

I've spent the year fretting about the level of competition facing Michigan's defense; Iowa has faced worse (No ND, no MSU even in a trash tornado) and is in the same ballpark as the GERGfence's pass efficiency D.

This is inexplicable.If you were asking people to name the best starting cornerback combo in the Big Ten before the season started, I'm guessing most people would have gone right to Iowa's Prater/Hyde combo. I would have, certainly. Even if Prater has been a disappointment that's probably not it.

Candidate reasons include a complete lack of corner depth (MGoFootball's interview with Planned Sick Days hopefully mentions the return of a nickel corner that might foretell a nickel package), a complete lack of pass rush (83rd wsg 99th in TFL implying a further lack of penetration), and walk-on safeties of the not-Sash variety (


via FFFF


For Iowa's defense to be so bad against such a motely collection of opponents the answer has to be "all of the above." Nothing is working.

The good news for Iowa is that Michigan's performance here has an opponent-invariant quality. You might shoot a guy wide open but if he's not the one farthest downfield you just might get away with it, because both of Michigan's quarterbacks have Rex Grossman disease*. Robinson has been incredibly frustrating this year and Gardner's best pass was a beautiful touchdown that was just a bit over the line.

That fretted about, against defenses of Iowa's caliber Denard has been acceptable. He was 9 of 14 against Purdue with a YPA well over 12 (26th in pass efficiency D), put up 337 yard on Northwestern, and bombed Minnesota as everyone except Iowa does. Struggles against iffy teams stopped when the nonconference schedule did.

Terrible interceptions did not. You might as well rack one or two up right now. This will slow Michigan's offense down; it doesn't seem like Iowa is going to.

*[The secret weapon in Michigan's turnover margin is that half of Michigan's function as punts.]

Key Matchup: Denard vs Accuracy. Forever and ever this key matchup until Denard's missing at a rate that forces defenses to fear him in the air. Is this possible? Absolutely—a lot of spread QBs have light-on moments. Until it happens it hasn't happened.

This section is unchanged from the last two weeks. Until this part.

Run Defense vs. Iowa

Andrew Sweat Marcus Coker Ohio State v Iowa scjV6AJG4Jcl[1]

"I call them Lithuania and Estonia. Latvia? That's for a special someone."

After weeks and weeks wherein opponents went after Michigan's flimsy edges, this will be a stiff test for the interior of the defense. Marcus Coker is a tank with legs, if you can call the meaty appendages below his torso "legs" instead of "Baltic states." Think Beanie Wells with less breakaway speed and even more cinderblock to his fists. I be like dang about one of his long runs against Minnesota:

There is a 75% chance Hoke kidnaps him after the game and puts him out in Cavanaugh's number at the Tuesday practice availability. I fully support this course of action.

Iowa does the fullbacks and TE and MANBALL thing except their main play is zone—they haven't pulled linemen much since Ferentz arrived and they're not going to start now. The Iowa line is veteran and quality; there's some dodginess in the pass protection but that's another section.

So what's the deal with the rankings? Iowa is square in the middle in rushing yardage, 60th at just under 160 a game. That's after running through the tissue-soft Northwestern-Indiana-Minnesota anti-gauntlet. The numbers:

Opponent Att Yds YPC TD Nat'l Rk
ISU 42 162 3.9 2 108
Pitt 29 104 3.6 1 31
PSU 25 124 5.0 0 24
NW 27 158 5.9 2 95
Indiana 38 234 6.2 2 117
Minnesota 39 295 7.6 2 103

I'm not sure what to make of that Penn State number since it includes 49 yards from Vandenberg—surely scrambles—and hacks out 39 sack yards. Coker managed 74 yards on 18 carries, 4.1 per. Make of that what you will.

I make this of it: punt. I don't think you can tell much from the last three games. The Penn State number looks a little daunting, Pitt not so much. It's clear from the numbers that the issue with the Iowa run game is not quality so much as quantity. As BHGP put it earlier in the week, Coker's backup has been Marcus Coker. In games that are serious they can't put it all on the run game because the run game will break and then they'll be screwed.

Michigan's run defense is also sort of an enigma. They're obviously a lot better than last year. They also got gashed for big yards by the two teams with serious rushing attacks they played (Notre Dame and MSU), and neither of those teams actually has a serious rushing attack. They just have quality backs. If that's the secret to beating the Michigan defense—outrun and out-thump Michigan's young, iffy linebackers—er… the above run is not so much with the confidence building. 

Is Mike Martin the guy who almost singlehandedly crushed the Purdue ground game or the one who got blown out of the middle by MSU's rickety offensive line? Well, it's kind of both:

"Purdue decided to block him one-on-one and zone me? Good luck to the guard that’s gotta block him," Van Bergen said this week. "I’m confident there’s not one guy in the Big Ten who can block Mike Martin one-on-one, run-blocking or pass-blocking. He’s too strong, too quick, got too many tools."

That was odd. If Iowa does the same thing they will be dumb, so they probably won't.

Meanwhile, will Jordan Kovacs be around to provide the security blanket that made Michigan one of the last teams in the country to give up a play longer than 40 yards? Let's find out.

Key Matchup: Heininger and Martin—mostly Martin—against the interior Iowa OL. The best way to stop Coker is to slow him in the backfield and tackle him before he can get up a head of steam. Martin's variable performance and the lingering possibility that Heininger just gets blown up are this matchup's largest X-factors.

Pass Defense vs. Iowa


Vandenberg; McNutt

Problems also loom here. Michigan's list of quarterbacks conquered isn't much more imposing than Iowa's. Purdue and Minnesota are bad (and Gray didn't even play); Cousins is iffy and was playing in the trash tornado; Ryan Lindley is currently 75th in passer efficiency. Tommy Rees went for 315 yards, Dan Persa 331. Michigan's main asset has been that lack of big plays conceded: Rees needed 39 attempts for his yards, Persa 44. That keeps Michigan's YPA in a reasonable range. It does make you wonder what happens if someone like Tommy Rees minus the three mindblowing turnovers comes along.


RK Passer Cmp% Yards YPA TD INT RTG
13 Jarrett Lee, LSU 63.2 1250 8.1 13 1 157.4
14 E.J. Manuel, Florida St. 66.0 1776 9.0 13 8 155.4
15 James Vandenberg, Iowa 62.2 1918 8.5 17 4 155.2
16 Tajh Boyd, Clemson 61.3 2674 8.4 25 5 154.8
17 Brandon Weeden, Oklahoma St. 71.3 2710 7.9 22 7 154.3
18 Matt Barkley, Southern California 67.3 2290 7.6 22 5 151.5

[Ed: thanks for nothing, official NCAA stats site and your decision to freak me out by spelling it "Vanderberg."]

Looks like it's time to find out. Vandenberg's performance does come with some schedule strength caveats similar to those you can apply to Coker. The secondaries of Indiana, Northwestern, and Minnesota are liable to make even Ohio State's quarterback situation look good. Vandenberg struggled against Penn State (50% completions, YPA under 5, two INT) and hasn't really played anyone else with a good pass D. Iowa St and Pitt are decent, I guess. The three already-mentioned dwarves are tire fires. Saturday's game looks like a proving ground for both units.

Iowa has a couple weapons before a steep dropoff. Marvin McNutt is a notch below Michael Floyd but only a notch; Keenan Davis is a quality second banana. Things do get a little thin after the top two: freshman Kevonte Martin-Manley* is the third most prominent target. While he's looking like a keeper he remains a dread freshman. Coker gets his share of dumpoffs and then it's bupkis. They'll hit some tight ends for short gains from time to time, but there's no Clark/Moeaki this year.

The offensive line could be an issue. Watching first-round-hype-recipient Reilly Reiff get blasted back into Vandenberg so badly that a Minnesota DE sacked him with his but is an eye-opening experience. Iowa's below average in sacks allowed (73rd) and the Iowa internets believe Vandenberg freaks out at blitzes. This could be a game in which the Mattison blitz packages play a major factor.

Michigan's pass defense is the most wonderfully mediocre thing that's ever existed. Never in the realm of simulated conflict have so many been so happy for something so middling. Michigan's 41st in pass efficiency D. This statement has sent a half-dozen readers into rapturous seizures. Their man strength is not being completely awful. They get behind opponents but rake the ball out. They usually tackle on the catch. Every once in a while a ball will get batted to them. The safeties haven't let anything behind them all year. This is a tiny unicorn being shepherded into adulthood by an entire community.

The main issue will be the health of Jordan Kovacs. Kovacs missed last week's game against Purdue with some sort of knee injury; he has reportedly been practicing and Brady Hoke says he will go. These things will be believed when seen.

Extra bonus weird factor: there's going to be some wind. Not MSU-level wind, but potentially meaningful.

Key Matchup: Floyd and Countess vs their counterparts. I'm expecting the first deep balls since MSU (sort of), these run by quality receivers in an environment more conducive to completions. Each ball that Vandenberg hangs up there will be a huge swing opportunity for Iowa. May the corners get in chests all game long.

*[Iowa has replaced their Inexplicably Great White Wide Receiver with the Elaborately Named Great Wide Receiver of late. Call it a push.]

Special Teams

Iowa's kicker was amongst the most reliable in the league before he missed a chip-shot and a 30-some yarder in the Minnesota loss. He's still 12 of 16 on the year and was 14 of 17 last year. The misses against Minnesota are a fluke.

Brendan Gibbons added 22 and 37 yard field goals to his collection of uninspiring makes that we'll take all day after last year. He's now 6 of 8 on the year. None of those are from outside 40 and two are glorified extra points. This is still massive improvement.

Iowa has a huge advantage in punting (Michigan is 111th, Iowa 12th net) but Michigan's is based on an extremely small sample size dominated by pooch punts from Michigan State's half of the field. Nobody's returning anything much, though Iowa has a slight advantage on kickoffs.

Key Matchup: Gibbons you put it through the uprights?



Cheap Thrills

Worry if...

  • Martin is getting blown up like he was at MSU.
  • Denard and Devin do not make the Iowa secondary pay for its inexplicable badness.
  • Michigan's road issues rear their heads again with more snap count goofs.

Cackle with knowing glee if...

  • Iowa fans' predictions that mobile quarterbacks will tear them to ribbons bears out. 
  • Bigach is playing and Michigan can manball him and the rest of that DL.
  • Mattison blitz packages send Vandenberg into UPDATE: the fetal position.

Fear/Paranoia Level: 5 (Baseline 5; +1 for Road Disaster Reprise?, +1 for Coker Plus Freshman Linebackers Equals Like Dang, +1 for Where Is The Kovacs Binky?, –1 for GERG-Level Pass D Against Basically A Season-Long McGloin, –1 for Minnesota Comparative Scores For Real, +1 for Vandenberg Is Not TerBush, –1 for Roberson/Gray == Luck Plus Legs, –1 for They Would Take Heininger In A Hot Second.)

Desperate need to win level: 8 (Baseline 5; +1 for This Is Not The Last Two Years, Please, Part II, +1 for Division Goals: We Has Them, +1 for I Like NINE WINS, –1 for It's Not Like This Would Be Totally Incomprehensible, +1 for Hell Yes It Would After The Minnesota Game.)

Loss will cause me to... collapse to my knees, rend my garments, and prepare for the literally Red Sea that is the rest of the schedule to cave in. Okay, so some of it is orange. But orange is almost red.

Win will cause me to... tattoo B-R-A-D-Y G-E-T-S-IT across my knuckles.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

Man, this creeps me out. In the aftermath of the Minnesota game Michigan is a solid road favorite that the public is piling in on and Vegas is like "fine by us." Heebie jeebies right there.

Still, they did lose to Minnesota and when Graham Watson made the Hawkeyes her upset special on Doctor Saturday one of her arguments was "Iowa outgained Minnesota by 75 yards." That is the worst argument in the history of arguments. Total yardage in Minnesota-Michigan: 580-177. I know football is weird but it ain't that weird. It's hard to comprehend but it does look like this Iowa team is the kind of team that can lose to Minnesota if they get a few bad breaks, which basically makes them Purdue.

But it is on the road and Michigan is capable of throwing six interceptions at any moment against any opponent and confidence is not roaringly high over here. Still… man. Losing to ISU, scraping by Pitt, hardly threatening to score against PSU, losing to Minnesota… these are not events that make me think this is a team that should beat Michigan.

Meanwhile, what happens if Iowa gets a fourth and two at the Michigan 38? Do they send Marcus Coker at Will Heininger? No, they punt. What happens if the inverse happens? Adamantium claws burst from Hoke's forehead and he says "go for it." Given the defenses in this matchup, advantage M.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:

  • Denard has a Heisman-ish day, cracking 100 yards on the ground and completing 65% of his passes. Yes, terrible INT.
  • Coker grinds out 120 yards at around 4 per, and this seems acceptable.
  • Power works in this game. For real.
  • Michigan, 33-28



November 4th, 2011 at 4:14 PM ^

I was ready to be pissed after MSU, but the bounce back against Purdue proved it wasn't the sig line. (Though my old one WAS with THAT).

I think it might be more of a curse concerning to all things referring to the line in the real world...Nickelback gets the Thanksgiving game...and lots of grief...Biebs is dropping love children everywhere...............I wouldn't feel too comfortable if I was a princess somewhere out there right now.


November 4th, 2011 at 2:24 PM ^

Seriously, does anyone else just feel like we're playing a bad-mediocre team.  I thought the line about them being Purdue was spot on. The only thing that scares me is our play on the road.


November 4th, 2011 at 2:43 PM ^

question in my mind that Iowa is better than Purdue. 

Whether this game is a close Iowa victory or a Michigan blowout will be determined in the first ten minutes of the game.  If Michigan jumps out big, it will confirm what Iowa is starting to suspect about itself and M will cruise.

If Iowa is given life early in this game, grab a bottle of something.

Tha Quiet Storm

November 4th, 2011 at 2:49 PM ^

I kinda feel the same for this game that I did about NW - below average defense, good QB and some weapons on offense. The only thing that they have over NW is a better home field advantage, but I'm hoping the 11 AM start will make it a little less hostile place to play (at least compared to what it would be like at night like in 09).


November 4th, 2011 at 3:32 PM ^

I would be somewhat surprised if Iowa played as badly as they did last week/like Purdue played for most of the season, but this is one of those Iowa teams we saw before 2009 - 7-8 wins but only one gear.  They play well, but that running game is hanging on by a single ACL, and who knows what will happen when Iowa tries to pass. 


November 4th, 2011 at 2:41 PM ^

Question:  What would the line look like if Michigan was playing this game in Ann Arbor, given that the line is currently -4 on the road?  Would it be at least a touchdown spread for a home game?

MI Expat NY

November 4th, 2011 at 3:14 PM ^

I've always wondered if the adage "home field is worth three points" meant that home field is worth three points as opposed to a neutral site, of if it refers to a shift from one team's home field to the opponents home field is worth three points.  Clearly, you think it's the former.


November 4th, 2011 at 2:47 PM ^

This seems like a Michigan blowout if you just look at stats but I think Iowa home>>>>>>Iowa away and Michigan away<<<Michigan home.

Just win baby. Go Blue!

And for those worried about how we will come to this score, I think Brian is just giving a general feeling for around where the score will end up because he realizes its a ridiculous exercise to try to predict exact scores. Despite his worry, he has us beating the spread, which is nice.



November 4th, 2011 at 2:56 PM ^

This is what we have become I guess. 

Everything in the world points to us kicking the living shit out of these losers, but we're afraid because they might be mad because they lost to Minnesota?  Fuck these clowns.  I thought they would suck this year and they have actually exceeded my expectations because Vandenhoofenbrawsteingkuler has turned into a pretty good qb.  Iowa is a cyclical team that depends on player development and seniors.  When I saw they were losing Claybourn and most of their front 7 along with their starting qb I had them down for 6 wins and they are right on pace.

Could we lose to these guys? Sure, but I'm not wasting anytime worrying about it.  If it happens it happens until them I'm enjoying my Friday figuring out if Denard can get to 500yds of offense this week.   I think these safties are ready for about 2 QB oh noes.  We haven't busted that out in a few weeks.



November 4th, 2011 at 3:15 PM ^

a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma.  (Thanks, WC)  They look like your classic spaz team.  All over the place.  But, they always play Michigan tough in Iowa City.  If we play well and keep things under control, it'sa Meeechigan victory, but probably a close one still.


November 4th, 2011 at 3:27 PM ^

I am amused that after losing to Minnesota an Iowa fan would put game video on the internet for any reason other than utter self hatred--let alone chest thumping.

If the roles were reversed, I would be replacing all game video on my hard drive with malware because it would hurt me less.


November 4th, 2011 at 3:41 PM ^

This feels like one of those games where UM is always up, but never by more than 7-10 points.  Iowa will float around, and I'm sure McNutt will score a nice long catch or two.  Mattison, though, should knocn Vandenberg into next week with a blitz or two, and some Reese-ing is a possibility.  I actually think the 33 is a little pessimistic - Iowa's defense is no better than NWs, and that game probably shouldn't have even been as close as it was.  My guess is that Coker will get over 100 yards but in the way Hillman got his yards, as Iowa will try to keep pace with Denard and Co. and abandon the run as the game goes on.  Fitz will run roughshod over this line especially if Nardo is out, and none of Iowa's LBs ans Safeties seem gritty enough to catch him in the secondary. 

I also expect Denard to be better passing because Borges will focus on the short stuff.  I'm sure they'll arm-punt a couple of passes, but the QBs should have been taught more and more to look for the short stuff, and the running lanes will also be open because my guess is that Iowa will go Nickel. 

Man, I want to say that this is an easyish win for UM, but man it's Iowa and I still have memories of Brad Banks destroying UM at homecoming and, ugh.  This is not 2 years ago, this is not 2 years ago.  UM will win this game comfortably, and then take down the Zookers for win number 9. 


November 4th, 2011 at 4:35 PM ^

I don't see how the Michigan offense will not score a lot of points against this defense. UM is slow on the road, so I expect a close game during the first half.  But I see UM scoring over 30 points.

I doubt IA offense will be able to keep up with the scoring in the end. I'm thinking Michigan's DL will be giving IA offense fits!  We'll see.  I could see a 14-10 game at  halftime with Michigan winning 31-17 after halftime adjustments.

El Jeffe

November 4th, 2011 at 4:37 PM ^

Am I the only one who doesn't understand the "three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday" bit? They are:

  • Denard has a Heisman-ish day, cracking 100 yards on the ground and completing 65% of his passes. Yes, terrible INT.
  • Coker grinds out 120 yards at around 4 per, and this seems acceptable.
  • Power works in this game. For real.

Those all seem rather reasonable and more or less predicted by the game preview. So why would they make Brian look stupid?


November 4th, 2011 at 5:28 PM ^

I'm seriously confused, Brian.

You lay out a very convincing case as to why these guys are TERRIBLE yet you have them scoring 28 on us? The only teams to score over 20 on us are NW (who couldn't sniff the end zone in the second half), ND (who has serious talent at QB and WR), and MSU who had 1 score off of a pick 6. 

I don't know....

I see 21-0 before I see 33-28.

Furthermore....they scored 21 on are they going to score more against us? How? 

This is not the same as the last 2 years.  have a little faith.


November 5th, 2011 at 9:03 AM ^

I think Brian laid out the argument that their defense is terrible not their offense.

You say ND has talent on offense, well so does Iowa. He said McNutt is a notch below Floyd and they have a quality 2nd receiver. Combine that with a running back who is better or equal to ND's and that's why he has them scoring 28 points.