Preview: Illinois 2010 Comment Count

Brian

illini-logoEssentials  

WHAT Michigan vs Illinois
WHERE Michigan Stadium, Ann Arbor, MI
WHEN Noon Eastern, November 6th 2010
THE LINE Michigan –3(?!?!?)
TELEVISION National on ESPN
WEATHER Clear, around 40

Negligible wind

Run Offense vs Illinois

Illinois appears to have a for-real defense this year after bringing in Vic Koenning, an established collegiate defensive coordinator with a recent history of success at Clemson and Kansas State. The three years before his hire, Koenning's Ds were 9th, 18th, and 39th in total defense, with that last stop a one-off year at Kansas State where he took the Wildcat D up from 117th. Ahem.

martez-wilson Illinois has been shutting down guys on the strength of a good defensive line (one that features MGoSouldongmate Corey Liuget) and the emergence of Martez Wilson (right) into something resembling the uber-hyped recruit he was. Wilson's by far Illinois's leading tackler with 68; he's second to Liuget in TFLs and sacks. Against the Big Ten:

Opponent Carries Yards TDs YPC
OSU 39 230 1 5.9
PSU 24 83 0 3.5
MSU 30 100 1 3.3
Indiana 33 114 0 3.5
Purdue 33 160 0 4.8

That is pretty impressive, with the MSU game standing out as intimidating. The saving grace for Michigan are the numbers against Purdue and OSU, both teams that feature running quarterbacks. (Purdue actually featured two—they started off with fingerless Rob Henry until it was obvious he couldn't throw, then brought in Sean Robinson, using Henry as a tailback in their version of the inverted veer. It was freaky.) Pryor broke off a 66-yard run en route to 121 yards on just eight carries, but blew up his quad in the third quarter and did little but hand off when he returned, or Ohio State may have gotten some distance from the Illini. Unfortunately, Purdue's respectable YPC was on the back of a single 57-yard run from Al-Terek McBurse; the Purdue quarterbacks combined for 31 yards. Dan Dierking did average 5 YPC on 10 carries, FWIW.

Neither OSU, which tends to regard the spread option as a backup plan and had a Navarre-level statue for most of the second half, or an injury-decimated Purdue team is a particularly good comparison for Michigan. Neither are the rushing games of MSU and PSU (pro style) or Indiana (both injury ravaged and pistol-based). So we don't know much about this specific matchup.

Illinois has proven throughout the year that they'll be tough sledding, though, with Liuget a constant threat to penetrate and Wilson capable of running down Denard wherever he ends up. Getting a good release on him and chopping him to the ground will be important.

Key Matchup: Denard's Reads versus His Desire To Not Be Shattered. I'm pretty sure at this point that Michigan's read option plays are really just handoffs that attempt to get the opponent to respect the idea of a pull. Denard's already running so much that he invariably hands off even when it seems like he's got the edge like whoah. In a critical, critical (yes, another) game I'd like to see him take advantage of those opportunities.

091810_SPT_Umich vs UMass_MRM Pass Offense vs Illinois

Michigan had an off week against Penn State, with Denard making a number of poor throws and/or poor decisions. When the receivers had an opportunity to rectify some of those mistakes they did not take them, and Robinson had his worst completion percentage of the year by a healthy margin. Penn State got no pressure, at least, and Denard's one-man play action continued to be very effective.

Meanwhile, Illinois is 25th in pass efficiency defense. They intercepted Ben Chappell three times, held him to just over 50% completions, and generally blew him up. Kirk Cousins was just over 50% himself but put up a good YPA thanks to some deep balls to BJ Cunningham; Illinois destroyed Robert Bolden. They got a pass against OSU since the wind and Pryor's injury limited the Buckeyes to 18 attempts, two of which were from the backup. They've got a good track record.

They've done this despite losing Terry Hawthorne to a stress fracture and Supo Sanni to something or other. Illinois moved a cornerback to safety and dropped two new starters in at corner, one of them a converted tailback. The difference between Justin Green and the guys Michigan is rolling out is one of experience—he's a sophomore—and talent, as he was a top 100 recruit who made a strange switch from Ohio State to Illinois. Still, he's a position switch starter and the team isn't suffering from it. A dollar to that position coach. Hawthorne's working his way back to health, which means that Illinois has three more competent cornerbacks than Michigan and now this is just getting depressive.

Anyway: Michigan should have success in the same vein they did against Penn State, where the threat of the run opens up passing plays that eat up big chunks of yards but third and long is almost futile. Michigan's success here will be dependent on Denard's accuracy and the situation Michigan finds themselves in.

Key Matchup: Denard and His Receivers MAKE PLAYS. Illinois, having seen Michigan's jagged passing success, will probably play it cool, giving Denard some opportunities to hit guys and those guys opportunities to bring balls in.

Run Defense vs Illinois

Last week's bold prediction was stupid indeed—encouraged by a not-awful performance against Iowa and anticipating that Penn State's offensive line would be a far less serious challenge, I suggested Michigan would hold Penn State under four yards a carry. Close! Except not close: PSU averaged 4.7 as Michigan switched from a four-man front to a debacle of a 3-3-5. Like the 2008 Purdue game, rumors are flying that Michigan is scrapping their bye week spectacular for something else, and with Craig Roh seemingly ready to put his lost year behind him and get his hand on the ground that will be more of a conventional 4-3 look, I'm guessing.

If the Iowa game is any evidence, that could be not awful against a conventional rushing attack even minus Mike Martin. Unfortunately for Michigan, their array of freshmen, position converts, freshman position converts, and LSD-tripping ferrets is going up against a shotgun triple option attack. Michigan doesn't even know where they're supposed to be on an inside zone. Illinois has used the option, a healthy dose of zone reads of all varieties, and some Nathan Scheelhaase scrambling to do this against relevant opponents:

Opponent Carries Yards TDs YPC
OSU 34 136 1 4.0
PSU 54 282 0 5.2
MSU 38 137 0 3.6
Indiana 31 173 1 5.6
Purdue 45 203 2 4.5

Unfortunately, the "relevant" bit of the Big Ten numbers is definitely more Indiana-Purdue-PSU than OSU-MSU.

As mentioned in the scouting post from the bye week, expect to see a lot of this:

option2

Illinois runs a lot of triple option. Against Purdue they were content to run basic zone reads since the backside DE was crashing down all day, but Michigan's guys should be experienced at dealing with that. The triple option not so much. With Martin on the injury list he figures to be limited, leaving Mouton, Demens, Spur Of The Week, and Kovacs to play the proverbial assignment football and tackle in space. Kovacs seems suited for this, and Demens may be—still too early to tell—but I'm worried about Mouton and the other guy, whoever it is. Also I'm worried about…

Key matchup: Freshman cornerbacks and safeties [Ed-M: and ferrets] tackling on the edge on the option. The option puts a lot of pressure on your safeties to come up and fill ably, which apparently means we're going to have the privilege of watching Ray Vinopal try to tackle guys fifty pounds heavier than him.

Pass Defense vs Illinois

Two weeks ago I would have said this will be a sidelight on third and long and Scheelhaase will do well not to turn it over, but then Michigan played Penn State and Scheelhaase averaged 9.7 YPA with 4 TDs against Purdue. His long was again a pass to his tailback and no receiver brought in anything longer than 17 yards, but even if Illinois's passing game is an all-dink affair Scheelhaase is getting comfortable with it. He was 16 of 20 against Purdue, 13 of 21 against Indiana, and 15 of 19 against Penn State, all in grindingly effective games for the Illinois offense. His only bad day in the past moth was against Michigan State. That was a very bad day (3 INTs), but we can't expect something like that to recur, especially against this secondary.

I'm not sure Courtney Avery could have been worse than JT Floyd against Penn State but "secondary just as good as it was against Penn State" is a recipe for disaster. Moving the safeties around worked about as well as it did last year, and the year before. James Rogers was out for most of the PSU game in favor of Talbott so we may see our long-held dream finally come to fruition: a secondary made up of nothing but true freshmen without a fourth star to any of their names.

Guh.

Key matchup: Demens and Mouton getting their zone responsibilities right. I mentioned this in passing but to reiterate: I now think it was Demens screwing up against Iowa since in the PSU game the guy lined up over the slot receiver carried him all the way several times, leaving the linebackers to deal with problems underneath. Illinois gets a large chunk of their passing yards after the catch, so dealing with mesh and whatnot will be important against a passing attack that looks short almost without exception.

Special Teams

For the first time in a while it looks like the opponent's return game is about as bad as Michigan's. The Illini are 118th(!) in punt return average at just over two yards a pop and have had a Michigan 2008-level epidemic of muffed punts. Two of those gave Penn State its (sigh) only points outside of an eighty-yard touchdown strike. Kick returns aren't much better at 89th.

Illinois has the usual massive advantage at kicker (15 of 17 on the year). Their punting has also been outstanding; they're sixth nationally.

Key Matchup: STOP KICKING THE DAMN BALL

Intangibles

Cat-CatGreyLyingInGrassLooking02

Cheap Thrills

Worry if...

  • Martin's ankle prevents him from doing anything useful.
  • Michigan doesn't look like they know what they're doing against the option.
  • The secondary.

Cackle with knowing glee if...

  • We get some sort of bizarre Minnesota-2008-like turnaround as the coaches finally realize they should be doing something basic with all these noobs.
  • Denard's hitting his passes more accurately and Illinois can't deal.
  • Pryor's success running presages success.

Fear/Paranoia Level: 8 (Baseline 5; +1 for What The Hell Was That?, +1 for If James Rogers Really Got Beat Out By Talbott Last Week The Secondary Is Literally Three True Freshmen and Kovacs, +1 for And Then We're Throwing a Freshman Spur Out There Against The Option, +1 for Assuming That Martin Is Not Useful Until He Is Again, –1 for Denard, –1 for Denard Plus Bonus Ninja Tricks, +1 for FFFFFFUUUUUU.)

Desperate need to win level: 10 (Baseline 5; +1 for God, A Win, Any Win, +1 for Rich Rodriguez Job Reclamation Project, +1 for Denard Career Flight Path Maintenance, +1 for Seriously That A Win, Any Win Bit, +1 for A Brief Respite From The Enduring Misery Of Life Is Needed In These Dark Times, Oh Lord, I Beseech Thee, Hear My Call And Respond To Your Good And Faithful Servant, Or At Least, You Know, Your Middling And Somewhat Forgetful Guy Who Resents The Idea Of Servitude, Oh Lord, Lord.)

Loss will cause me to... drink.

Win will cause me to... open one eye and look around in case the falling building didn't actually hit me.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict:

WTF, Vegas? Michigan being favored here seems insane after last week on both ends. I foresee Illinois's offense tearing through Michigan's like it's almost not there on both air and ground, with some rough spots from Scheelhaase ending a drive here and there and Michigan's return to a somewhat sane defense making the going slightly tougher this week. The Illini won't score on 7 of 9 drives. More like 5 of 9.

Michigan's offense, meanwhile, will have the same promising-but-not-quite-there style they've had since the Big Ten sledding got tough, exploding for a couple of long touchdowns and putting together a number of long drives that get Michigan into the high twenties but sputter out in missed fourth downs, missed field goals, and penalties.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid Sunday:

  • Michigan goes back to a 4-3 under look and it seems like an improvement.
  • Mike Martin does not play effectively.
  • Courtney Avery has a less bad day than JT Floyd did against Penn State.
  • Illinois, 37-30.

Comments

TrppWlbrnID

November 5th, 2010 at 4:52 PM ^

but i couldn't type through the tears.  here are the chunks of that post:

looking at the standings, UM is currently in 9th place in conference with 1 win, behind PU, PSU, and NW with 2 conf wins.  there are currently 8 big ten bowl tie-ins.

PU has Wisc, UM, MSU and Ind and is currently 4-4.  they can't beat Wisc or MSU, that gets them to 4-6.  they are even against UM and Indy, this might get them to 6-6.

, PsU has NW, OSU, Indy and MSU.  NW has PSU, Iowa, ILL and Wisc.

MGoShoe

November 5th, 2010 at 5:07 PM ^

...is doing the color commentary and:

zingermans Will be on Brian Griese's "Grieseboard" segment--UM/Illi game/ESPN. He'll break down a sandwich on air. Great time w ESPN film crew today!

So we've got that going for us.

diamondjack

November 5th, 2010 at 9:11 PM ^

I was five years old when I attended my first Michigan game.  Nov. 7th 1981.  Michigan and Illinois were tied 21-21 at halftime.  Michigan went on to win 70-21.  I slapped hands with AC and Butch Woolfolk on their way out of the stadium.

Tomorrow I am taking my own five year old to his frist Michigan game.  I am hoping for some serious deja-vu, kharma, luck, etc. so he can have a similar memory to mine.  Unfortunately the 21-21 at the half may be optimistic.  I will choose to cling to my optimism and hope to have a great day at the Big House!

vegasjeff

November 5th, 2010 at 9:02 PM ^

+1 for A Brief Respite From The Enduring Misery Of Life Is Needed In These Dark Times, Oh Lord, I Beseech Thee, Hear My Call And Respond To Your Good And Faithful Servant, Or At Least, You Know, Your Middling And Somewhat Forgetful Guy Who Resents The Idea Of Servitude, Oh Lord, Lord.

That was hilarious. Very well done.

BLUEFBFAN

November 5th, 2010 at 9:27 PM ^

Operation for Saturday is just to win the game. Defense needs to do whatever it takes to make a stop or force turnover to get off the field. Offense needs not to go three and out,or turn the ball over,or settle for three point field goals. When they get the ball they need to score TOUCHDOWNS on each and every possession and put up at least fitty. Come on offense you can do it!

M-Wolverine

November 5th, 2010 at 10:26 PM ^

Brian has given us the key to winning the game. Muffed Punts!! If they can just muff 3 times as many punts as we do, we have a fighting chance. There's the break we were looking for...

snoopblue

November 6th, 2010 at 12:06 AM ^

If this game goes south, at least there's brian griese on the commentating crew so we can get some insight from a former national championship winning and Rose Bowl MVP Michigan quarterback about the direction the program is going in.

I don't think the game will go south though. Scheelhaase (spelling?) isn't tall the DL and LB's need to get their hands up, jump and swat at the ball when he's in the pocket making throws and hopefully (HOPEFULLY) we can get turnover(S!!!) off the tips. People may not like this, but Martez Wilson is a beast and a way to confuse would be to switch in Denard and Tate throughout the game. Coach, I think we're ready to see your kitchen sink plays now.

Mannix

November 6th, 2010 at 12:59 AM ^

I'm feeling if there are enough MGoSingingTheBlues predicting DOOM, then something, er, spectacular may happen for Blue. But I doubt it.

Therefore, in advance of all talk of raising the points to post and how bad the defense is and how UNACCEPTABLE just about everything is with GERG, Michigan loses by two TD's. I don't know where those scores will come, but based on the Big 10 trend, LATE and with flurry and mayhem.*

 

*As much despair as I can think of for college football and my favorite team in order to shift the paradigm

CaptainBlue

November 6th, 2010 at 1:38 AM ^

It's pitiful just how predictable these final scores are. We know that the defense will be picked apart, giving up 35-45 points, and the offense will find a way to stay in the game, keeping within 10 points week after week, for the most part.

Was watching highlights from the UM defense a few years back...it's saddening.

DHerrick

November 6th, 2010 at 11:18 AM ^

***James Rogers was out for most of the PSU game in favor of Talbott so we may see our long-held dream finally come to fruition: a secondary made up of nothing but true freshmen without a fourth star to any of their names.***

This is truly scary.