Picture Pages: Circle Routes Comment Count

Brian

Despite some post-burial kicking at the ceiling, Jake Rudock's pick six was the final nail in Michigan's coffin against Utah. It came on a route that I've called a "circle" for a bit now. The idea is that you run a slant, then abort that halfway through into an out route. Corner jumps the slant, you get some nice separation and hooray beer. Or you run an out, corner jumps the out, etc.

The general idea is that it is a horizontal double move. I've called it "circle" probably because NCAA football did back in the day; you can see that on a successful one the WR does tend to run in a little circle after his first break:

Both Utah and Michigan tried to run these routes on Thursday, with different results. Here are those plays… AT THE SAME TIME.

On the left will be a Utah throw on their first touchdown drive. It's second and six; Michigan is in the nickel they ran the whole day, showing press coverage on the outside.

On the right, Michigan attempts to convert a third and three halfway through the fourth quarter while down a touchdown.

circle-1perry-1

As far as we're concerned these plays are completely identical to start: we are looking at the slot receiver to the bottom of the screen with a corner who is locked up in man coverage three yards off the line of scrimmage.

circle-2perry-2

A couple moments after the snap both WRs have crossed the LOS; the only difference in the corners is that the Utah guy has taken a step forward, perhaps anticipating this route.

[After the JUMP: everything goes fine because HARBAUGH? Probably!]

Next, a crucial difference:

circle-3perry-3

These guys didn't start at the same exact point on that down and distance effect; Perry started at the bottom and Utah's guy was a step further inside, so this looks more different than it actually is: it's still way different. Utah's WR has taken a step and turned his body, causing Peppers to react. Probably over-react since this slant is headed right into those linebackers.

Meanwhile Perry is offering a vague hint of a slant only. The cornerback is not reacting; Perry hasn't given him anything to react to.

circle-4perry-4

By the point at which these guys stop to circle, Peppers has turned his hips to the inside; the Utah nickel has barely taken a step. Peppers has momentum he has to deal with. Perry's route has not done the same thing.

circle-5perry-5

The difference here is a step, maybe two, from both defender and wide receiver.

circle-6     perry-6circle-7     perry-7

On such steps empires rise and fall. DUN DUN DUN.

Video

Utah:

Michigan:

Fox also provided a replay of the second:

Things and stuff

Routes, man. UFR sucks at routes. I tried to branch into that last year but the primary limitation is that it's hard to see most of 'em. I ended up with a few minuses, the occasional plus, and nothing approximating a take on anyone's skills in that department that doesn't fall prey to Hitchens's Razor.

It bothers me even more since in this game we got assertions from Harbaugh that Jehu Chesson slowed up on the first deep ball that went just over his outstretched hand, and if you squint on a replay it certainly looks like he downshifts slightly once the corner bites on his out route.

I mean, probably. But probably he should do that since he's open by yards and he doesn't want to run out of real estate? I don't know; if WR and QB know what's going on with each other that is the TD is so badly wants to be.

Routes are a great hidden thing that only stick out when they are totally obvious, and about 80% of them never get tested. They are destined to be a feelingsball kind of thing.

HE STARED DOWN HIS GUY THE WHOLE TIME. Yeah. So did Travis Wilson.

circle-3

This is a route against man coverage on which no fancy robber zone is ever going to impact you. The only guys looking at the QB have no shot at defending the pass. Stare away.

HE SHOULD HAVE USED THE INFORMATION FROM STARING. This I will go with. Rudock's presnap read was correct. A circle route that catches pure man coverage is a tough cover. Often you're going to get a safety matching up against a much quicker guy. It is one of those things that makes a HSP like Peppers exciting: he can and should cover that. (I mean, eventually, right?)

So there is a natural inclination to think the throw you are making is a good idea. It should be discarded when the receiver ends up with a gentleman in his breadbasket. Polished offenses don't ask their QB to make this decision much, if at all, because the guy is open; this is an offense in Hoke rehab.

FIRE GRANT PERRY. This goes back to FIRE BRADY HOKE, man. Hoke recruited zero slot receivers after Dennis Norfleet, and barely any receivers, period, after the Darboh/Chesson class. Thus your two slots in this game were both true freshmen.

Perry looked exactly like a promising freshman in this game, which is to say he looked pretty good when not making boggling errors. I do not know why Hoke thought he could create a football team that never needed a little receiver to pick up third and medium. You'll have to tune in to SiriusXM to find out.

/shorts SiriusXM stock

CAN WE GO BACK TO PEPPERS FOR A SECOND HERE. Okay.

I THOUGHT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE CHARLES WOODSON. Life as a nickel guy is tougher than life as a boundary corner, because as a boundary corner you can just line up and—if you are as athletic as Peppers is—put them in the, you know, boundary. Having to go both directions is more difficult, and Peppers could have done better with it in game one.

Also: game one. He'll get better. Probably with rapidity. Meanwhile, can I interest you in some screens?

Comments

Maizen

September 8th, 2015 at 2:03 PM ^

Watching Rudock throw the deep ball on Thirsday was painful. If you watch the tape he's just sitting back there rifling the ball down the field. No touch and using every ounce of arm strength he has from the looks of it.

Compare that to some of Henne's deep balls where he just flicks it out there and it doesn't even look like he's trying.

I think we all just have to realize Rudock is the best we have at this point and as long as he takes care of the ball we'll be OK. But our upside is limited until we get an O'Korn or Peters in there who both have more natural ability.

Honk if Ufer M…

September 8th, 2015 at 2:33 PM ^

Well if he's throwing it as far as he can with every ounce of strength to get it as far as he threw it, then isn't there such a thing as designing deep balls that are 5, 7 or 10 yards less deep, but still deep, that maybe he'd have better control on? That way you're still stretching the defense and making everything else easier.

CoverZero

September 8th, 2015 at 3:43 PM ^

Watch the tape again.  Chesson slowed down and then when he spotted the ball in the air he tried to speed up to catch it.  Had he kept running it was a TD.  Harbaugh said the same thing in his presser yesterday.  This was a simple matter of timing.  Go look at Todd Collins vs. PSU in 1994 for a similar throw... it happens.

stephenrjking

September 8th, 2015 at 1:14 PM ^

I started the thread about this Thursday night, where my conclusion conceded a poor route (though I did not grasp how poor) but laid virtually all blame on Rudock. This post, combined with Harbaigh's comments that assign a good portion of blame to the route, is persuasive. Rudock still should have backed off, because he's watching the corner make his break; but the route is worse than I thought. Perry's juke was very halfhearted--the sort of juke one makes when one is making a Quick move, not when one wants the defender to go the wrong way. Re: the Isaac issue. We know he would have been open, but it is apparent that neither he nor Rudock nor the coaches considered him to be a serious option pre-snap. Motioning him out does change the look for the D, and my guess is that he is the fourth read (thus a fly route getting him somewhere where he can be useful to a QB who is running for his life), but nobody had any intention of checking to him. That kind of check requires serious chemistry between QB and receiver, something we know Rudock hasn't had time to gain with the primary wideouts, much less a part-time RB. Given the pre-snap read, there was no reason to change anyway. Some of these things take time.

readyourguard

September 8th, 2015 at 1:18 PM ^

Harbaugh commented on Perry's lack of route precision, and you see it in the pictures.  On an out route, you have to sell the slant and get the DB to bite.  By bite I mean turn his shoulders and/or hips.  Utah got Peppers to bite.  Perry did not.

 

End of story.

Space Coyote

September 8th, 2015 at 1:46 PM ^

Need to close the gap and "step on his toes" to force him to react inside. He does a weak fake inside with a gap between himself and the man. The man also has inside leverage because there is no LB help inside for him, so he's not going to turn unless you step on his inside toes and force him to turn inside.

The leverage is a different story between the two plays, as Brian pointed out. Peppers has two LBs inside of him, he can play with outside leverage and any slant has a LB sitting underneath the route. The Utah guy only has one LB inside and has to check the QB. He plays with inside leverage and never loses that leverage post-snap. You have to force a defender that's walling off to turn, if he can wall off then he can break outside faster than the receiver can, which is what happened here.

Ultimately though, Rudock never should have made the throw. Poor route, poorer decision to throw.

mgoblue98

September 8th, 2015 at 3:35 PM ^

It seems that there is some confusion on who or what the QB is looking at .  Many think that the QB is looking (staring down) at the receiver.  If he is, he should't be.  He should be looking at the DB.  If the QB sees the DB turn his hips, then he should throw.  If the QB doesn't see the DB's hips turn, then go to next progression.

UMForLife

September 8th, 2015 at 1:27 PM ^

Rudock never looked at anywhere but Perry. Perry ran it wrong, but Rudock should know better. The only thing I can think of is that Perry was still moving towards the sideline when Rudock is still releasing the ball. At the time Rudock releases the ball, it looks like Perry is going to be able to make that play. May be that is why Rudock threw it. Isaac would have been a better choice.

ST3

September 8th, 2015 at 1:37 PM ^

I wonder if Rudock realized his ints were going to be analyzed like the Zapruder film.

My analysis reveals that if he throws down, and to the left, that's a harmless incompletion.

 

BayWolves

September 8th, 2015 at 1:49 PM ^

This team becomes solid by game 3 or 4. I only see good things happening because they are getting the best coaching they have had in years. Corrections will be made and peppers will be Woodson 2.0 before long.!it's coming, man.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

25dodgebros

September 8th, 2015 at 3:10 PM ^

We must remember that Perry is 4 months out of high school and Peppers is essentially a freshman as well.  For anyone who discounts the freshman effect look back at the UM/MSU game in 1995 or the first half of the OSU game of that year to see a freshman Charles Woodson fail  to make plays that would become second nature later in his career.  No one makes the leap without a few bad things happening early on.   Peppers will be one of the best players in college football soon and Perry will be a very solid slot receiver for a long time.  

Mgodiscgolfer

September 8th, 2015 at 3:02 PM ^

that a QB does not want to under throw in that situation, so a good throw is long not short. Combine that with the air being thinner in Utah and him being pumped up early in the game. I am sure his eyes were as big as a saucer when he saw his reciever getting so wide open. It does not suprise me at all that both throws were over thrown. 

jmblue

September 8th, 2015 at 3:04 PM ^

I do not know why Hoke thought he could create a football team that never needed a little receiver to pick up third and medium

All the more so given that Drew Dileo was his go-to receiver on critical downs.

CoverZero

September 8th, 2015 at 3:29 PM ^

Great analysis Brian.  Thank you!

I was dismayed at the number of Michigan "fans" who piled on Rudock after the game....some calling him "garbage" etc.  I hope that he did not hear any of that to his face because he did not deserve it.   He played OK, well in some spots.  Perhaps he should not have thrown this ball....but as you mention the presnap read was there and the WR ran a poor route.  This happened 2X. 

People that understand Football...know that timing between a QB and WR is vital...along with route running.   This was a case of a guy who just arrived on campus in a new offense, throwing to a guy who had never played college football before.  It was unfortunate, but it will get better.  Rudock can make that throw all day folks. 

BTW Tom Brady threw a similar pick 6 his first throw vs. UCLA in 95.  That one was on Tom though not on the WR.

Mgodiscgolfer

September 8th, 2015 at 5:19 PM ^

had a bad game and or cost UM the game forget that football is a team sport. In my opinion, he had an ok game but missed on having an amazing game Because, lets face it, if he threw TD's instead of Int's he would be hailed a hero by these very same fans.

Sten Carlson

September 8th, 2015 at 6:26 PM ^

In regards to Rudock, Perry, the over throws, and the INT's: nothing that happened was at all surprising given the lack of cohesion between the QB and WR's.  If coach comes out and says the WR slowed down, then he slowed down -- the if's and but's in here are pretty meaningless, and I'll bet BOTh guys do it better next time.

Guys can rip on Rudock all they want, but I for one was pleased to see a QB actually throw a deep ball that wasn't a jump ball, ala Denard to Junior, and a WR get some separation.  I am not really sure what people were expecting, but lots of guys are way to hard on Rudock, IMO.  Further, and back to Perry, maybe the reason that he was targeted so often was because he was open?  Novel concept, I know. 

Personally, I'd be willing to bet that the 2015 opener versus Utah will be the WORST game Michigan ever plays while Harbaugh is coaching, and it was a few read/routes/steps from being a win.  At this point, I'll take it.

Oregon Wolverine

September 8th, 2015 at 7:41 PM ^

We're hard on Rudock because Wolverines fans eat their young, probably because we're so damn hungry for Ws.

Good thing Jake listens to Harbaugh. The Ws are on the way. If we had a warm up opener, we just might have pulled this game out against the Utes. After only one game we were much improved, much crisper overall, fewer mistakes. Deep balls were close, loved the Kerridge dive for five yards (thought Jim would keep calling that number), and special teams looked like there was purpose. On the punt O'Neal held, I held my breath hoping he'd tuck it and run -- so much room and he's plenty athletic. We have much to be optimistic about if we can get the trenches cleaned up.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Leonhall

September 8th, 2015 at 9:54 PM ^

I agree, I was happy with Rudock because he seemed poised and had control I thought. He didn't play perfect, but I'm guessing he'll be pretty decent by October. I think some people predicted 10-11 wins and that just isn't going to be easy, I expect similar responses after each loss.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

jsa

September 8th, 2015 at 10:54 PM ^

Whip route. Perry does a bad job selling the slant on the pick six. We use this in combination with our shallow and scat concepts. When that reciever runs enough shallows or spot/snag routes, the whip has a really nice effect.

BoMoLoHoH4

September 9th, 2015 at 12:20 AM ^

Maybe I missed any comments related to Rudock's ability to operate in a pocket? The first QB at UM since Henne almost a decade ago. Rudock acrually know's how to step and slide in the pocket; he is tough enough to hold the ball under pressure long enough to go through his reads and willing to take a hit to make a play while getting rid of it without taking a sack or vacating the pocket at the first sign of pressure. On 50 passing attempts he was never sacked and never vacated the pocket to turn tail and run backwards in the face of pressure. He showed toughness, leadership, poise, and experience in an environment that will be the most difficult he will play in all season. Rudock should have won UM fans over with the way he responded after the pick 6 in leading the team downfield for a score in the two minute drill. Also forgotten is the number of third down conversions he made on passes with the pocket collapsing where he found open receivers (Butt) and fit a pass into a tight window to pick up first downs. I like his mobility he is able to scramble and gain yardage in the right circumstances. There is lots to like about this kid. Lets see how he does in the game this weekend which will what ONLY HIS 6TH WEEK IN ANN ARBOR?

jrj84105

September 9th, 2015 at 7:56 PM ^

People reading lots into week one play. Some important first time performances.

Rudock (at least new to Michigan) with his INTs and overthrows.

Utah DB who got burned on the overthrows.

Perry with bad routes.

Utah receiver who turned Peppers on this Utah play.

Peppers who blew up Utah's WR screen.

Utah WR "blocking" Peppers on most plays.

 

Looking at the "what ifs?" from this game, my takeaway is that the experienced players on both teams played very well, and that the mistakes were largely concentrated in guys playing their first game of college football.  Michigan's underperformers will improve with experience and improved chemistry. Utah's underperformers may get a chance to improve next year as the projected starting DB and WR return to action.  I think both teams, if they can stay healthy, wind up with pretty strong seasons.