Notre Dame Postgame Press Conference: Jim Harbaugh Comment Count

Ethan Sears

 

[Barron]

(Thanks to David Nasternak for providing audio from South Bend)

Jim, what do you think of the team’s performance and is there a level of disappointment with how it all went today?

“Yeah, we would’ve liked to come out victorious. Congratulations to Notre Dame,thought they played a very good ballgame.”

Jim, not many explosive plays offensively, what wasn’t happening there?

“Just a few, not enough. What was happening? Yeah, we didn’t make enough explosive plays. Probably didn’t run the ball as well as we would’ve liked. Credit to Notre Dame’s defense.”

Jim, Ambry (Thomas’)  99-yarder, can you talk about what you saw in terms of maybe some key blocks and also what Ambry did on that play?

“Yeah, it was a middle return. He was able to break some arm tackles and then show some real burst when he got into the open field. Was able to finish off that, gave us a great spark.”

Jim, was there any communication issues between Shea and the offensive line. It looked like maybe with the snap counts he was hurrying, were they off-balance, were they not on the same page?

“No, I thought they were. I didn’t see any communication issues between Shea and the offensive line.”

Jim, the way your team came out, Notre Dame hit some big plays, third down, on your team right out of the box. Did you feel like your team came out slow, trying to ease its way in or something? Even on offense, with some of the playcalling, did you feel that way at all?

“No, I didn’t feel like our team was trying to ease their way into the game.”

How about the defense on third down? They hit some huge plays, defended, were they picking on you guys? Blitzes, or what do you think?

“Third down conversions were about the same for both teams. Definitely some big penalties that kept drives alive and were converted into touchdowns.”

Jim, what’s missing from your program now? You guys are not winning big games.

“You know, onward. Just good old-fashioned resolve. There’s more we can do, there’s — this can be a very good football team. We have confidence in it.”

How would you evaluate Shea tonight?

“I thought he competed well. Thought he was doing the things that we were asking him to do and, for a first time out, with his new team, I thought he did a good job.”

Coach, what are your biggest takeaways from tonight, about your team?

“I don’t really have all the biggest takeaways. I thought our guys, thought they played fast. Thought they competed hard. Yeah, there was — there’s improvements to be made. Mistakes were made, but I thought they fought hard.”

You gave up 21 points in the first half, then cut that down to three in the second half, and I think only 60-aught yards for the offense for Notre Dame. What changed for your defense? What got better, what improved?

“Really, I thought we were stopping the run well. Brandon Wimbush made some big plays throughout the game, running the ball, getting out of the pocket. Credit to him. He played a heck of a ballgame. Thought we limited that in the second half.”

Can you talk about how Dylan (McCaffrey) played when he got in there?

“Yeah, I thought Dylan played well. He showed some real moxie in there and ran the offense, made some good throws. Coming in off the bench like that, I thought he acquitted himself really well.”

Why did you make that decision to go with him over Brandon (Peters)? Was that this week that you knew he’d be second-string?

“Yeah, that was this week. Brandon in practice, on a rollout, had tweaked his knee. And he hadn’t taken any reps since Tuesday, so wasn’t 1000 percent for today. So, elevated Dylan to second-string.”

Jim, Brandon Watson, big interception and pinning the ball down, I think it was in the first quarter, on a punt. Can you just talk about Brandon’s play and what he brought tonight?

“Yeah, I thought that was a spectacular play Brandon made, and like I said, there’s good play to be pointed out throughout the team, and a lot of good things to build on. But didn’t come out the way we wanted it, but, it’s not the end, it’s the beginning for us. That’s the way we’re approaching. I was really impressed by the play Brandon made, the way he played all night.”

Jim, still had a lot of pass protection issues that were sorta similar to what we saw last year. Is that what you guys saw in camp? Is that coming along, or is that not what you expected?

“Yeah, they got us on the one inside blitz that we didn’t pick up. They were — there was good pressure that their front was bringing the entire night, some we blocked, yeah. Could be better, yes. We’ll work to improve it.”

How much has, overall, offensively, still limited on what they can do? Shea (Patterson), new quarterback, new guys, new spots, still working through all that?

“Yeah, sure, sure. The guys really, really prepared well for this ballgame. Not the outcome we anticipated or wanted, but we just gotta dig deep. Make no excuses. Give credit to Notre Dame and move onto the next week.”

Where are you in terms of finding that identity on your offense? Is it gonna — are you close? Does it take a little while in your mind to getting the identity that you want for this offense?

“Where are we at? We’re at the beginning.”

Jim, with all the excitement of a new season, does this feel like a setback for you guys?

“It was a big opening game. Did not come out the way we wanted, but we gotta dig down.”

Does it feel like a setback though?

“It’s the beginning. It’s the beginning for us. We’re not treating it like the end.”

Jim, despite everything that kinda went sideways in this game at times, you had the ball with a chance to drive and tie the game late, where you wanted it. What does it say about your team that you were in that position despite all that went wrong?

“They fought hard. We did well. There’s things to build on.”

Thoughts about Will Hart, and any update on Brad Robbins at all?

“Brad’s gonna be out for a while. He did have a back surgery.”

And how Will performed, other than the dropped snap?

“Yeah, he had the — he pinned them in. Did a great punt, down to I think like the 4, 3, 4-yard line. Had some other good punts. Things to build on there, for Will.”

Comments

Amaznbluedoc

September 2nd, 2018 at 4:37 PM ^

Why didn't the reporters have the temerity to ask why the OL still stinks and after a year of work the only difference on the field was a slightly better QB.  Better yet, they should have asked, why the team appeared un-prepared (again)?

jsquigg

September 2nd, 2018 at 4:45 PM ^

People are really overstating things.  We can attach the tired narratives if the development continues to be lax.  This game was decided by:

a) 3rd down, couldn't get off the field whether it was a penalty, being over aggressive, losing a 50/50 ball.  This was a back breaker, and I know little about football strategy, but it seemed like guys were losing contain and getting out of rush lanes far too often for who was QB.  I realize the margins are razor thin at this level and the DTs probably didn't get enough push.  I was also frustrated by how often it seemed the defense got edged and/or was unprepared for obvious option style/QB run plays.

b) For as bad as the line play was, I think people are over reacting about play calls.  The offense moved the ball halfway decently all night, they just couldn't finish.  I don't think you can underestimate how starting in a hole impacts the game, especially when ND is probably a top 10 defense.  Clock management was frustrating, but they still got the TD and the ball back with a chance to tie.  Ultimately the pass blocking cost them again, and to me more so than the play calling.

c) Little mental errors like the botched snap and ND getting a TD on a would be INT and Gentry dropping a TD all swung the game.  It felt like M got dominated in the first half, and they did statistically, but it was a lot of little things that added up.  You can say they only made it close because ND took their foot off the gas, but I thought M played noticeably harder in the second half.  They didn't give up, and all this body language, intangible, etc. narrative bullshit won't end until they start winning.  I'm going to withhold judgement until the season plays out.  I think Mayfield and Hudson seeing the field is inevitable at this point.

 

Go blue...  

Michifornia

September 2nd, 2018 at 6:45 PM ^

His quick dry answers were acceptable the first couple of years because I shared his indignation when the reporters seemed to try to push his buttons.  But now all the questions are the same as all of us are asking and he has no answers.  Which is why it's so frustrating and I finally agree that if we fail against osu and msu this year, it's time to give someone else a try.

The o line play is obviously not good enough.  But the playcalling is just killing us.  I know, nothing new but cannot believe we have to endure the same crap all over again.  Last year everyone was calling for Pep to be fired.  Then the Amazon series came out and he came off as a good guy, which I think is great.  But he cannot call plays.  Period.

I still believe we have more than enough talent to succeed this year but there has to be some change in the approach on offense.  Yes, the defense gave up some things early on, but you gotta give Wimbush some credit.  Hawkins gave a gift TD (I see why he's not a receiver any longer).  I have no problem with our defense.  Just can't make mental errors.

Been a diehard for over 40 years and was as happy as anyone when Harbaugh was hired.  But the rhetoric and hype have outlived its utility.  This is the last year or there's gotta be some major changes.

DOG500

September 2nd, 2018 at 7:14 PM ^

Fact is Michigan is 3-6 since last year's 5-1 start against cupcakes. They will go on a winning streak now against this year's cupcakes, then lose vs decent teams when it counts. Rinse and repeat..Harbaugh has made no difference 

Mongo

September 2nd, 2018 at 7:14 PM ^

Thought the game plan was DOA early and the adjustments for UM on both offense and defense were effective, but then coaches just went back to the very conservative game plan.  ND came out aggressive and it paid off.  They took the punches to the house and came out with the win.  Michigan needs to get more aggressive on offense with the better teams because we don't have an OL that can go toe-to-toe for 4 quarters with a team like ND.  We need to get points early then rely on the defense to bring it home.  Going down 18 points early against a team like ND is going to be a loss 99.9% of the time.

Footdog

September 2nd, 2018 at 8:03 PM ^

How about we have an OFFENSIVE COORDINATOR like every other program in the country. This offense has  not progressed AT ALL. Loaded with QB's and still the same. Recruiting is going to be so bad unless they run the table.

thevetdoc1

September 2nd, 2018 at 8:21 PM ^

He is getting very good at speaking in defeat. I am so disappointed in Coach. This team was no prepared, not improved, not inventive, just the same old thing we saw last year. No wonder our recruiting is nose diving. But, I probably said the same thing about Coach Beilein at one point. There is just no excuse for the offense. It is an offense that works when you have superior manpower but we are even to minus and we can't stand in the pocket for long. QB draws, short patterns, etc. And will someone explain the logic of having a tailback try to block a defensive linemen or blitzer when we have fullbacks on the roster.

Maybe Coach will prove me wrong but he is officially on the clock. 

Mongo

September 2nd, 2018 at 9:36 PM ^

Same game was watched but a season can be about progress.  If you define a season by game one, then last year vs Florida should have projected UM to greatness.  Which clearly it wasn't.  I think we have more upside this year.  ND might be a top 5 team once we get thru the season.  Fans need to take a chill pill and go with the flow for the balance of the season.  MSU and PSU looked like dog shit against nothing opponents.  Let's move on and get better.

Go Blue !!!

JJJ

September 3rd, 2018 at 8:40 AM ^

This new blog format is not an improvement over that last iteration.

Anybody know why BTN2GO doesn’t have the replay available? I’m guessing they did not get right for rebroadcast when they renegotiated with NBC/Comcast.

micheal honcho

September 3rd, 2018 at 12:01 PM ^

Offensive identity Jim. What is it? I think we should be Wisconsin with better QBs & Recievers and a more open passing game. Or.. do we want to be PSU with a spread passing attack? Or.. perhaps we want to be some hybrid that’s a shitty version of both? Whatever it is you as the head coach need to define it, then you can demand it from your players and bench those who cant execute it. 

Coach Brown, you at least have an identity on your defense. I appreciate that and it works, until it doesn’t. You need to recognize quickly when teams are using your aggression against you. Those NFL D ends are making pee wee football mistakes. We preach to 10 yr olds” heels deep and then you better have your head up looking”. Our ends were run under time & time again Don. That’s too basic of football to be excused at this level.

Bristol24

September 5th, 2018 at 3:06 PM ^

Jim Harbaugh is the answer.  Ed Warinner is not.  Offensive formation needs changed to mirror what they do at OSU.

Michigan will finish 8-4 unless play calling changes.