A Moment Of Stillness Amongst Chaos

Submitted by Brian on November 18th, 2013 at 12:49 PM

11/16/2013 – Michigan 27, Northwestern 19 (3OT) – 7-3, 3-3 Big Ten

10894805656_a461351752_b[1]

Bryan Fuller

In the long history of clock-running fire-drill field goal attempts there has been only pain and misery. When the game's about to end and you're trying to fling six guys on the field and take six off and align your kicker such that he can calmly take two steps and boot, you're gonna die.

Everyone knows this. Pac-12 refs know it so well that they don't even bother with last second field goals anymore as long as the defense squats on the ball like a hobo over a purloined chicken. Northwestern's student section knew it and was counting the clock down to their first Big Ten victory.

That's something I missed live and had to pick up on replay because I was dumbly staring at a horde of people exiting, a horde of people entering, focused on a line that I knew for a fact would not be set. So I also missed Drew Dileo sliding into his holder spot and recovering an instant before Glanda snapped it to him, possibly tipped off to exactly when he needed to get the ball off, set or not, by the numbers ringing out from the students.

Michigan's not set, in all probability, but there's no flag and Dileo's recovered from his sprawl and Gibbons ceases moving backwards, which oh by the way he is at the snap. Moving backwards. This is just an indicator of the doom to come—catch, placement, kick, overtime, whereupon it was ordained by fate that Michigan would pull this game out of their butt. Like it was nothing. Like it was always going to happen like that.

Because This Is Michigan, and That Is Northwestern.

-------------------------------------

The time for turning up your nose at any win, no matter how alarming, is past. Michigan could beat Akron on a triple reverse Hail Mary that Akron intercepts and fumbles out of their own endzone for a safety and it would be time to wave the flag and say hurrah.

So let us duly wave the flag. It is good to see the team happy. In the aftermath, various players tweeted out "Go team," each instance more delightful than the last, and then Taylor Lewan got piled on for following the crowd. Kyle Bosch did this.

And this time, Gardner destroyed the jumbled heap of pointy bits and gristle he calls a rib cage for a purpose. That purpose is looking an awful lot like not being in Detroit for a bowl game—SORRY, right, waving the flag.

While unit X's shocking incompetence is a callback to the Rodriguez days, so is feeling good for the put-upon players after a narrow win against a bad team. Even if I am in a emotion deprivation chamber for the rest of the year for my safety and that of people around me, the way you get out of those is by having good things happen, and that was a good thing.

So, good.

It was also an obvious thing. My game previews have always been made in a spirit that says predicting things is dumb (thus the weird scores), but damn if this wasn't easy to call:

Michigan wins! On some bulllllllllshit that causes Northwestern fans to self-immolate.

Or eat the saddest cup of pudding in the world.

large[1]

Sippin' On Purple's Rodger Sherman has questionable taste in hats

This is what Northwestern does. Sometimes it's in the service of preventing a Big Ten championship game appearance, like it was last year; sometimes it's keeping you winless in that Big Ten. Either way, you could feel both sides of that stadium preparing to lose as Michigan embarked on the dread two minute drill. This one ended in chaos and fiasco, as they all do, but at the end Michigan managed to pull itself together and execute. Northwestern's bad mojo still trumps all.

That's not going to lead anywhere important—this season ends with an abattoir named Braxton Miller. In a landscape as bleak as the weather on Saturday, though, any ray of light is a welcome one. Let us forget about our worries and stare blankly into the butt of next week, ignoring what that hammering sound ahead might mean. It's probably meant for some other cow. Yeah. Otherwise I would not be so calm and tranquil.

Go team!

Awards

brady-hoke-epic-double-point_thumb_31[2]Brady Hoke Epic Double Point Of The Week. This is a tough one because while the defense held Northwestern to nine points in regulation, nobody really stood out as the single best guy on that unit. I think we will go with James Ross, though; Ross had an important sack and nine solo tackles amongst 13 total; his speed and ability to get to the right place was a major factor in Michigan suppressing Northwestern's option game.

Honorable mention: Jeremy Gallon had ten catches. Brendan Gibbons was perfect on the day. (Matt Wile missed the 51-yarder.) Wile dropped punt after punt inside the 20 and had a 50-yarder. Collectively, Derrick Green and De'Veon Smith had a stat line that looked like an actual running back: 27 carries for 120 yards.

Epic Double Point Standings.

2.0: Jeremy Gallon (ND, Indiana)
1.0: Devin Gardner (ND), Desmond Morgan(UConn), Devin Funchess(Minnesota), Frank Clark(PSU), Matt Wile (Nebraska), James Ross (Northwestern)
0.5: Cam Gordon (CMU), Brennen Beyer (CMU)

Brady Hoke Epic Double Fist-Pump Of The Week. Michigan executes the first and only successful clock-running end of game field goal fire drill in the history of football. Go team!

Honorable mention: Jibreel Black sacks Siemian to put Northwestern in a deep hole in the third OT, Jake Butt's one-hand stab gives Michigan a torchclown, Joe Reynolds flags down a punt at the one, subsequent Northwestern punt goes out at the ten, Derrick Green runs through a guy for a 20-yarder, Gardner leads with his ribs into the endzone.

Epic Double Fist-Pumps Past.

8/31/2013: Dymonte Thomas introduces himself by blocking a punt.
9/7/2013: Jeremy Gallon spins through four Notre Dame defenders for a 61-yard touchdown.
9/14/2013: Michigan does not lose to Akron. Thanks, Thomas Gordon.
9/21/2013: Desmond Morgan's leaping one-handed spear INT saves Michigan's bacon against UConn.
10/5/2013: Fitzgerald Toussaint runs for ten yards, gets touchdown rather easily.
10/12/2013: Devin Funchess shoots up the middle of the field to catch a 40 yard touchdown, staking Michigan to a ten-point lead they wouldn't relinquish. (Right?)
10/19/2013: Thomas Gordon picks off an Indiana pass to end the Hoosiers' last drive that could have taken the lead.
11/2/2013: Clock expires.
11/9/2013: Nebraska muffs a punt through no action of Michigan's.
11/16/2013: Michigan executes a clock-running last-second field goal to get the game to OT.

[AFTER THE JUMP: decisions, waggles, I hate Illinois rollouts, a brilliant GIF, and physics.]

Offense

10897789175_deb781dd5d_z[1]

this was the dropped one, IIRC [Fuller]

How about that. Borges bounced up from recent nadirs by implementing a run-plus-constraint package that got Derrick Green some nice runs up the middle and successfully tested the edge with three bubble screens for thirteen, four (on second and five in the redzone), and zero yards. The unsuccessful one was a dropped ball that would have been a success, and the four-yarder (in OT, Funchess fumbled it at the end) probably should have been more but Funchess went inside instead of out. It gave the linebackers a crappy decision to make and Gardner a read and it just made sense even as you were watching it.

This helped Michigan go forward on the ground.

They're on to you. There were a couple points at which I did want to throw my nonexistent hat to the ground and stomp on it, though.

#1 was the fourth and two play late. Michigan comes out in a pistol package, and there is a timeout. They then come out in a goal line package with Taylor Lewan as a wing TE. They run the Gardner boot, and get crushed. Oh, the reasons this made me want to flee to a monastery and disclaim all knowledge of feet and balls:

  1. Michigan still hasn't learned that moving Taylor Lewan around is a massive HI I AM RUNNING HERE flag.
  2. They've been running that boot since Gardner ascended to the starting QB job and it usually has Funchess out there, because Funchess can go downfield. Removing eligible receivers had better damn work, because if it doesn't (and it never does) it just looks like you're playing 10 on 11. Also, massive HI I AM RUNNING HERE FLAG
  3. Northwestern had already stuffed this exact same play on an earlier third and two. With Lewan as a wing TE and everything.
  4. NORTHWESTERN LOST ON A GARDNER BOOT LAST YEAR.

image

If there was ever a team that was going to blow that up it was going to be Northwestern, and every team is going to blow it up since we've seen the last couple weeks that everyone is gameplanning for that play on short yardage. To run it there was incredible malpractice. It's over.

This continues a theme with Borges: he sticks with his cute stuff way too long. Remember that thing he did where he'd line the fullback up about a foot from the QB and then give him the ball on a quick dive over the top? Yeah, that lasted about three games too many and then was finally ditched.

If Michigan was intent on having Gardner run it, anything else would have been preferable. Literally anything.

#2 was the end of Michigan's first drive. They'd thrown and run effectively and unpredictably from various formations down to the Northwestern seven, whereupon they ran a stretch for a loss of two yards—cumong man—and then went with a waggle on second and goal from the nine.

That's alarming to me. Why on earth would Northwestern bite on that action when they just beat up the base play and you are in an obvious passing down? They did not; they put a guy in Gardner's face and blew the play up. To run that there is to assume Northwestern's staff is composed of morons who will fall for the world's most obvious feint.

There's a variety of poker player who is good but exploitable because he thinks he's smarter than everyone in the room. Sometimes I get overly aggressive and then show something dumb and then that guy is after you because he thinks you're a sap. Borges reminds me of those guys. He has a tendency to do the most obvious counter-move to anything he's just done. Supporting evidence: #1 above. He doesn't seem to anticipate that teams will adjust to things on film and pre-emptively insert the counter. That was a major cause of Gardner's near-INTs: Michigan was running the same things they always do and Northwestern was in the huddle on them. Linebacker undercuts on plays that otherwise look open, and that's a tough adjust for Gardner.

Gardner throwing it at people. Which people? Any people. While the near INT thing has been overplayed a bit by the BTN asserting that any fingertip-deflected pass should have been a turnover, hoo man did Gardner put a couple right in Wildcat breadbaskets.

I'll have to check, but on a couple it looked like Northwestern had specific robber zones designed to look like player X was open and then bait Gardner; these worked well save for the catching the ball thing. On Michigan's last drive Northwestern undercut a Dileo in route, which was Michigan's go-to play on fourth down last week (Dileo dropped it) and has been their go-to play for a long time on third and medium. Another was the pop pass which seems to be about 50% of their pistol snaps and hasn't actually seen a run from that formation for a long time.

Obviously, Gardner shouldn't be making these throws but with Northwestern jumping his primary reads and a line that's pretty leaky he's probably just reading presnap and going with that sometimes. This deep into the season I don't know if that's fixable. Guy has lost faith in his line with good reason and is making bad decisions.

ROLLOUT CITY. I hate rollouts. They are occasionally good for short conversions; run with any frequency and they become option-halving, time-limiting invitations for your quarterback to make a crappy throw without his feet set. In compensation you get some shorter throws that your quarterback is going to be less accurate on and you run away from certain rushers.

Michigan seemed to be using them to mitigate pass protection issues, but the 13 yard sack on the two minute drill was another damn rollout on which everyone was covered and the unblocked end—the intentionally unblocked end roared in to sack. Another sack was a rollout on which the end got outside of Schofield and Gardner tried to go around; no dice, another huge sack.

We talked about this some during the Denard era: paradoxically, rolling the pocket removes your QBs legs as a threat, as he can't threaten to break the pocket and go vertical.  The pass protection benefits it's providing are dubious. Death to rollouts.

Goodbye, Toussaint? Zero snaps for Toussaint, who was dressed and on the sideline, as Green, De'Veon Smith, and Justice Hayes got all the tailback snaps; Kerridge also moonlighted as a pass protector. Afterwards, Michigan muttered something about injury. I generally hear things about guys who aren't likely to play and heard nothing about Toussaint; that seems like saving face to me.

In his absence, Green and Smith looked okay. Green had one nice cut in the hole to dodge a tackler, ran through a lineman on a 23-yard stretch…

10898357416_131833c10e_z[1]

WHAT HAPPENS NOW [Fuller]

… and fell forward all day.  Nothing Smith did was amazing but he averaged five yards a carry, which is a lot more than none.

And seriously. I must have had a bad angle on the Gallon endzone fade, which I thought was close and turned out to not be particularly so.

10898462395_85f30c9245_z[1]

Fuller

Nevertheless, I still maintain that Michigan's insistence on not throwing the ball at their 6'5" leaping stretched-out guy in the endzone—like, ever—is nuts. This team should probably chuck him a deep ball about every fifth play just to see what happens, and yet I can't remember even one aimless chuck in his direction.

This should be Junior Hemingway redux here: receiver with size and ball skills bails out floundering offense time and again. It doesn't even take that long to throw a fade.

Butt. Nice catch, man.

10894843606_dcfe6c041b_z[1]

Fuller

I am glad you are not 5'8" in this instance.

Defense

I am the golfer they based par off of. Save for getting bombed by Indiana's tempo, this defense has a knack for hewing particularly close to expectations no matter the personnel shifts underlying the greater whole. Thomas Gordon came back in this game (with some authority); Jarrod Wilson ate bench for reasons inexplicable; Black continued being a seemingly exploitable nose tackle without actually being exploited; Michigan held an opponent offense down to numbers that would have been met with rapture if the offense had scored, like, points.

What happened here in eleven regulation drives plus three overtimes:

  • Three and outs: 5, including the second OT drive (six yards, FG) and third OT drive (-13 yards, prayer). One of those was field-position driven after the Reynolds punt catch.
  • First down and outs: 2, drives of 16 and 21 yards.
  • FG drives: three, of 49 yards, 56 yards, and 77 yards.
  • Northwestern's last regulation drive had two first downs and gained 32 yards.
  • They had one OT TD drive.

Northwestern's not what we thought they might be at the beginning of the season, especially without Venric Mark. They've rarely been that inept this year, even when they haven't had Colter at their disposal. That's quality output, especially when you look at the YPC: 5.3 passing, 2.9 rushing.

Gordon back, Wilson not so much. Thomas Gordon returned to his starting spot and seemed to play really well aside from a couple of missed tackles in space, which will happen against a guy like Colter. On the other side of the ledger, Gordon blew Colter up (albeit after he got the first down) on one play and made quite a few of those open field tackles.

He played next to Avery, and while Avery didn't do anything that made you question that choice, it did seem pretty strange to have him out there instead of Wilson, who is much better equipped to tackle folks.

On the edge, it seems like Stribling has re-taken the third corner spot from Lewis, at least until he does something where he phases out again, whereupon Lewis will retake the spot until someone puts a 40-yard pass in the six inches of space he's ceding, whereupon… yeah. Just call it the Mobius back.

Henry, Clark. This seemed like the third straight game in which both Clark and Henry playd well, better than they did earlier in the season. Heininger Certainty Principle is engaged. People aren't getting to the quarterback much, yeah. That's just something we have to live with this year.

Option stuff. Michigan held down the option so well in this one that more than once I was privately irritated that Michigan had given up five yards only to find out that they'd given up close to zero. They made two adjustments that I picked up live: the DE was far more committed to take the pitch man and on certain plays they went with two high safeties, which allowed the playside one to charge down to take the pitch. The results were very good: a couple of Colter runs on which he managed to slice through the blocking at the line and not much else. Good to see the week-to-week improvement there.

I am kind of out of things to say here. They did a nice job slightly better than expected and nothing terribly long or damaging transpired. They are who they are.

Miscellaneous

Punt cover explanation. I was right on the goal line where Joe Reynolds grabbed that punt that the side judge called a touchback that was eventually put on the one, and thought they'd screwed up the call in Michigan's favor. I've poked at the rules and this is what I've discovered: once a player has possession of the ball, the play is dead. So when Reynolds caught the ball, that was where the ball was despite his momentum clearly carrying him into the endzone*. That's why they put it at the one instead of the two, where Michigan eventually caught the Reynolds fling out of the endzone.

*[Note since it seems everyone who I talk to is unclear on this: in college the only thing that matters is the location of the ball. You can be standing with two feet in the endzone and grab the ball and as long as the ball stays out, it's at the one.]

I take back everything nice I've ever said about Under Armour. Good lord, these things.

10897226195_d35bbb1225_c[1]

Fuller

Half-measures. Full measures:

  • pants say DON'T TREAD ON ME on butt
  • players have names of all 50 states and assorted territories on them, including Canadian provinces with asterisks next to them
  • one player gets a jersey that starts with an asterisk and reads SOON
  • pads get those sensors they put in Christmas cards; sensors play "Stars and Stripes Forever" whenever someone gets hit

Decision recap. I was vaguely in favor of going for it on the late fourth and two. My thinking was admittedly influenced by my desire to see the game end in regulation. In a strictly statistical world of average NFL defense versus average NFL offense, Advanced NFL Stats's calculator says that decision shades towards going but it's close enough to 50/50 that game context easily overwhelms that.

Add in the game context and… it doesn't get much clearer. There are six minutes left. Michigan is down three and their offense is terrible; Northwestern hasn't been much better. You're neither particularly likely to get the first down or particularly likely to get another chance to score a touchdown. I thought it was the right move because I'm in favor of aggression and I'd rather be the team with the ball last, which was more likely if Northwestern was trying a four minute drill in six minutes instead of trying to go down the field to win.

With Northwestern sputtering on the ground and Michigan having a first down-or-two buffer they were likely to get the ball back with good field position if they biffed, and that is in fact what happened. So… yeah, right move, but if Michigan kicked I wouldn't have thrown a fit. The Mathlete's college numbers are strongly in favor of going for it. The break-even point was a 30% chance of getting it:

Michigan has had its troubles on offense but a 30% break even point is a low bar. 3rd or 4th and 1’s from inside the 5 are converted at 57% historically. So even if Michigan was half as likely as an average team to convert it still would have been an even decision with kicking the field goal.

He also brings up the point about the four minute drill in a clear fashion:

A failed fourth down would have left Northwestern with the ball and the lead late. Coaching history as taught us that this is a recipe for most coaches to curl up into a ball and try and ground out the clock and if they’re lucky get a first down or two. Because of this often failed mentality, giving the other team back the ball with a lead can be more valuable than giving them back the ball with a tie where there is some pressure to push forward.

Michigan had two other fourth down decisions on which they chose the conservative option:

  • On fourth and four from the Northwestern 46, Michigan punted. Wile put it on the 12, Michigan got a three and out, and Michigan resumed at the Northwestern 48 (whereupon they also went three and out.)
  • On fourth and three from the Northwestern 34, Michigan had Matt Wile try a 51 yard field goal.

I did not like the punt, but like the fourth and two decision it was a close thing that could be argued either way.

The field goal was terrible, especially given the unpredictable winds. It made me morose. It made me hate this offense that has taken Brady Hoke's big swinging jibblies and turned them into Bette Midler albums. This is probably a reason I was in favor of going for it late. Yes, this thinking results in Breaking Bad. Whateva. I think what I want.

This has been decision recap.

10897179775_07aa01b359_z[1]

Now more than ever, Pat White's critical commentary on growling sounds [Fuller]

I remember. I remember when I went to Ryan Field and came away with a smug sense of superiority about how much better Michigan Stadium's grandeur was. Now that only happens during the Discover commercials they put on the scoreboard.

There's little difference now other than the quality of the scoreboard, and about half the time Northwestern provides a camera angle that lets you figure out what the hell you just watched, so even that's a push. What good is your enormous scoreboard if you're never going to show the offensive line on replays? I ASK YOU THIS SIR.

Let's check in with the wife. Reminder: wife has enormous surplus of empathy and starts rooting for the opposition once Michigan goes up by many points. While that hasn't been relevant for a bit, she remembers the way this game ended last year and BTN slathered the Nebraska Hail Mary all over the broadcast. Result:

I wanted Michigan to win, and then they did
and I felt shitty
I was like "what is this shit?"

-MGoWife

Her relationship with fandom is bizarre. In a different way than mine is.

Here

Genius gif from Drkboarder:

XoRVL6L[1]

(Yes, please put these in the diaries.)

Do recommend the Mathlete's post if you want the fourth and two decision from every angle.

Inside The Box Score is… whoah.

The Heisenborges Uncertainty Principle pits the Newtonian Mechanics school of thought (MOAR MANBALL!) against Quantum Mechanics (QUANTA SCREENS!) and the wave-particle duality of spread and shred concepts. Applied to Heisenborges, the traditionalists see a wave of defenders crashing through the inexperienced line, gathering TFLs by the bushels. The new school sees individual quanta of defenders beating blocks, one block at a time. The probability distribution function of each and every block working is directly related to the number of blocks that must be executed properly.

I think we have discovered that ST3 is a physicist. Also:

A week after NOT getting a single rushing first down, we had 10 against NU. This is primarily attributable to the running of Derrick Green and an adjustment Heisenborges made (the whole, pass to set up the run concept, i.e., DRAW PLAYS!) Green ran 19 times for 79 yards. It's been so long since we've seen positive rushing yards, I was expecting Green to be over 200 yards in the boxscore. If that's what positive 79 yards looks like, I'll take it.

Best and Worst:

Best:  Northwestern: The ‘Eat Your Vegetables, There are Starving Kids in X’ of College Football

It’s a bit cliche, but I remember my mom whipping out the tired “eat your food, there are kids with far less around the world” argument when I wouldn’t finish my broccoli.  Of course, little did she know that broccoli is the most deadly of the vegetables.  Regardless, the point was to remind me that there were people out there with it worse off, and not to take for granted the bountiful opportunities before me.

Well, for UM fans those starving children are Northwestern.  After a 4-0 start, NW has lost 6 straight, including one game on a last-second Hail Mary from Cereal Empire Progeny Ron Kellogg III and another after being Gibbons’ed with about a second left.  Unless they somehow pull off an epic upset against MSU, they will finish with a losing record before they match up against Illinois, and a season that began with talk of a Rose Bowl bid will, at best, end with them playing in some god-forsaken shanty-town (or Detroit) in a late-December bowl game named after a Dave Brandon’s Mortal Enemyor the state in which it is held.  So the next time you complain about being “only” 7-3, remember that there are a bunch of future hedge fund associates and medical school colleagues being bummed out for a couple more weeks.

reshp1 breaks down the results on third down, which were implausibly grim all day. Comes out thinking things are about equally distributed between Gardner, Borges, blocking, and Northwestern's defense doing a good job.

Elsewhere

Out of time. Later, gentlemen.

Comments

champswest

November 18th, 2013 at 1:59 PM ^

what if Michigan had been flagged for a penalty (illegal motion, too many men on the field, etc.)?  Would they have been penalized and had to kick over (with no game clock running)?

MI Expat NY

November 18th, 2013 at 2:03 PM ^

No, the game would end on the penalty.  Either because the clock expired if they called an illegal shift, or because there would be a 10 second runoff on a false start penalty.  The scenario you describe resulted in a game winning or tying field goal a couple bowl seasons ago, leading to the new 10 second runoff rule.  

MI Expat NY

November 18th, 2013 at 2:11 PM ^

I'm not sure if this is exactly the rule, but I think if the penalty results in the play being whistled dead, there's a 10 second runoff.  Otherwise, the penalty would not have been enforced until after the play ended, with no time left on the clock, resulting in the end of the game.  Either way, if the penalty was called, the game is over.  I'm really surprised NW folks aren't more upset about this.  

M-Wolverine

November 18th, 2013 at 2:48 PM ^

It's what the guru of WCO, Bill Walsh, did.  And no, it's not locked into any situation, but you try and get back to it.

Why did Walsh do it?

 

Here’s my understanding. He started with fewer than 25, maybe as few as 15. He definitely then scripted 20 and may have gone up to 25. He would go over these plays in the offensive meeting the night before games. One coach who never had seen this before told me this was fascinating. Of course, if unexpected things happened, Walsh would abandon the strict order of the scripted plays but he tried to come back to them when he could.

Why did Walsh script his plays? He once explained this to me and gave me an example. It was Stanford’ 1992 season. Bill took me into the coaches’ conference room — long oblong table. He shut the lights and put on a tape of the USC game they had played earlier that season. He showed me one scripted play after another — I can’t remember the plays, wish I could. He said each play he called would give him information. If, for example, he ran a particular pass pattern how would the Trojans respond? And so forth.

http://cohn.blogs.pressdemocrat.com/12936/bill-walsh-scripted-plays/

reshp1

November 18th, 2013 at 2:03 PM ^

I agree completely with this post game write-up and it feels strange and unsettling.

 

And those uni's, great googly moogly where they bad. The helmets and tops were just run of mill tacky in this day and age, but the pants.... holy, well, pants were they ugly. Those hamstring stripes were downright offensive.

ann.arbor.lover

November 18th, 2013 at 2:04 PM ^

One win over the next three opponents (Iowa, Columbus Community College, random SEC / Big 12 team) is all we need to match last year's record, which should not be that hard to do. Sure, 8-5 once again is somewhat disappointing, but it's not that shabby either.

Ron Utah

November 18th, 2013 at 2:32 PM ^

Last year's losses:

  • 'Bama
  • ND
  • Nebraska
  • Ohio
  • South Carolina

That's the two undefeated teams that played for the NC, a Nebraska game that severely distorted by the loss of our best player, the undefeated Buckeyes, and one of the most underrated and best-coached teams in college football that probably would have won the B1G.

This year, we lost to a below-average PSU team and and average Nebraska at HOME.  While I believe MSU compares to any of the above teams save 'Bama, the PSU and Nebraska losses are inexcusable.

Only beating Ohio or a decent bowl opponent could make this year's record as pleasing or moreso than last year's, and that assumes we beat Iowa--which I think is a VERY dangerous bet.

BlueFordSoftTop

November 18th, 2013 at 2:08 PM ^

More of "Hoke's Guys" played and they demonstrated improvement.  My hopes for next season are somewhat elevated.

I watched The Kick through a viewfinder unfortunately and only realized what had happened when my N'western hosts groaned and swore.  The pic snapped is grainy due to the rain but I will be happy to upload it on request.

Needless to say, my N'western friends are absolutely crushed.  Certain expressions directed at Borges pale in comparison with what I heard said about Fitzgerald on Saturday.  They love their 'Cats and literally cried a bit through the expletive streams.

When you are feeling down, think about the starving, uncared-for masses in developing nations.  Saturday was like that for me.

Ron Utah

November 18th, 2013 at 2:26 PM ^

I was not in favor of going for the fourth and two.  I usually am, but this game's circumstances made that choice pretty unattractive to me.  But I was far more disappointed when I saw the formation and play-call.

Borges did some things really well in this game, and deserves credit for those: the bubble-type screens, the draw plays, and his OT play-calling in general.

But man, some of those calls.  The fourth and two was the worst, but I agree that we are generally over-using waggle and naked rollouts.  I don't mind moving the pocket, but I'm not sure the play action pocket moves are paying dividends.

As for the first-and-goal on our first drive, Gardner checked into that running play.  Probably from the naked bootleg--which I wouldn't have liked either--but that was not AB's call.

What I don't get is that we finally find some success with a formation (I-form twins with Funchess uncovered) and then we don't use it on critical downs.

I REALLY wish we'd add the Wisconsin jet sweep into our I-form package; using Norfleet as the jet/decoy.  This accomplishes exactly what the bubble-type play to Funchess does, but also gets another play-maker on the field and gives another look the defense needs to prepare for.

BlueMan80

November 18th, 2013 at 2:30 PM ^

was truly epic.  I was in the stands when Anthony Thomas fumbled on his way to the end zone for the cliching touchdown allowing NU to come back to win 54-51.  This was payback in Evanston.  Watching it live was an out of body experience.  The refs actually hustled to spot the ball.  The local sports writers are grumbling about that.  Dileo slides in to the spot Gibbons is at.  Gibbons steps back quckly and boom...field goal.  I don't think anyone was focused on what the line was doing and maybe Dileo's slide helped with that.  I'm trying to process the whole thing and figure out if anyone in the history of football has ever successfully pulled that off.  An NU fan next to me kept insisting that "the ref" under the cross bar signaled it was no good.  He was on that rant through the end of the game.  Came home and watched the replay.  It was some NU guy in a white shirt under the cross bar signaling no good.  He doesn't count.

Given all this, I would suggest that Hoke and Ferrigno should get an epic double pump.  Something they do in practice actually worked as planned with 12 seconds left and they got it done in 11.  Bravo!

Amutnal

November 18th, 2013 at 9:40 PM ^

Hoke has worked with Borges for so many years and has not realized how god awful he is as an OC. This really makes me question Hoke's ability to be a top tier head coach. Hoke could have had his pick upon his hiring by Michigan, yet he chose his boy. Urban Meyer went out and picked up and coming talent. I fear we will be slightly below mediocre with this current staff, unfortunately.

The FannMan

November 18th, 2013 at 2:32 PM ^

Sam Webb claimed this morning that there was abolutely an injury to Toussaint in practice last week. 

Don't know that it matters.  Green's production is hard to argue with.

 

mgoblue98

November 18th, 2013 at 3:02 PM ^

The pass pro was better from Green.  Keep in mind that to accomplish being better, all they had to do was actually succeed one time in having a running back, any running back block anyone.  I am pretty sure that I saw Justice Hayes whiff twice.  I will be interested to see if UFER confirms that.

Ron Utah

November 18th, 2013 at 3:11 PM ^

Just two days ago he was willing to commit to Fitz as the guy.  I'm not saying Fitz will find himself the #4 option, but it's clear the staff was pleased with Green and Smith.  Even if he starts, Fitz will be sharing more carries and will have to produce.

The key from the game, IMO, was the pass pro.  Green looked capable, and that's more than we've gotten from Fitz in a few weeks.

imafreak1

November 18th, 2013 at 2:44 PM ^

For a team that is so terrible and awful and the worst at 2 minute drives, Michigan certainly seems to have some good fortune in this situations. Must be luck.

UMaD

November 18th, 2013 at 2:51 PM ^

Gallon and Black still playing great, but we have to keep hearing about how small they are.  Whatever.

Whiteman can't jump.  Call the short one a slot!  Have you tasted the quinoa at this midwestern Mexican restaurant?  Devin Gardner sure looks like a WR to me.  etc.

Bodogblog

November 18th, 2013 at 2:58 PM ^

Black at nose and Beyer at SDE were blown deep off the ball on a 3rd and 1.  Must have been caught on the field and couldn't get the heavy guys in.

Gordon whiffed on Trumpy when he should have been dead 7 yards deep in the backfield.  That was a great play on the come, reversed to a confidence-building big play for NW. 

Ron Utah

November 18th, 2013 at 3:14 PM ^

I was disappointed in Gardner's day.  Northwestern could have had a couple of easy picks, he missed reads, locked onto receivers...

I understand that he is dealing with the very real possibility that he could get hit at any moment.  I understand that the weather was bad.  I understand that there were some bad play-calls.  But he's got to do better for us to be successful.  

He wasted some good protection in this game and missed some easy reads; we were fortunate to win.  YAY NORTHWESTERN!