Michigan Hockey 2018-19, Game #20: Michigan 4, Notre Dame 2
OFFENSE
Corsi |
House |
Possession % |
|
First Period |
18 | 7 | 42% |
Second Period |
22 | 3 | 54% |
Third Period |
14 | 1 | 52% |
Overtime |
n/a | n/a | n/a |
TOTAL |
54 | 11 | 49% |
Analysis: Michigan was gifted a bit toward their offensive output tonight. Joe Cecconi dumped a puck on net from inside his own blue line that CALE Morris could not have seen, and it snuck under his arm and inside the post. The most ridiculous goal I’ve maybe ever seen. Nolan Moyle also had a sharp-angle shot that I cannot tell if he got his eyes around to see exactly where he was shooting it, but it hit the bar and dropped into the net. Morris also looked like he never saw that one, either. Both goals were fortunate. Will Lockwood also broke out of the neutral zone and got around a defender, getting a shot inside the short-side post and behind Morris. That was a legit play from Lockwood. Aside from that, Michigan had a few chances but was mostly pushed towards the edges of the zone. The Wolverines generated a nice volume and tested Morris (who bounced back after the first period to make a number a game-saving stops) a number of times. Starting up 3-0 rather early, Michigan took a more defensive approach and did not put themselves in dangerous spots trying to score when the opportunities were not present.
[Bill Rapai]
DEFENSE
Corsi |
House |
Possession % |
|
First Period |
25 | 10 | 58% |
Second Period |
19 | 3 | 46% |
Third Period |
13 | 2 | 48% |
Overtime |
n/a | n/a | n/a |
TOTAL |
57 | 15 | 51% |
Analysis: Michigan’s defense played one of its better games of the season (again, aside from a few glitches early on). Anthony and I were talking about how the game was very similar to Michigan’s win against Notre Dame two months ago. After getting an early lead, the defense settled in and locked the Irish down. They only surrendered five shots on frame from the House in the last two periods combined, which is phenomenal. Nick Blankenburg especially stood out on defense (as a lot of Michigan Hockey Twitter echoed this) both as a defender and a puck-mover/offensive threat. His maturation will be one of the talking points as the second half progresses.
Overall, this is how Michigan must play in order to win games. Without elite NHL weapons up and down their forward lines, the Wolverines must be tight defensively and help Lavigne by limiting attempts by location and sweeping up anything in passing lanes. They’ve shown multiple times that they’re capable now, even without Quinn Hughes.
SPECIAL TEAMS
PP For |
PP Against |
PP Corsi For |
PP Corsi Against |
PP Shots/Min For |
PP Shots/Min Against |
|
First Period |
0/1 | 0/1 | 4 | 1 | 1(1/1) | n/a |
Second Period |
n/a | 1/2 | n/a | 4 | n/a | 1(3/3) |
Third Period |
0/1 | 0/1 | 8 | 4 | 2.5(5/2) | 1(2/2) |
Overtime |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
TOTAL |
0/2 | 1/4 | 12 | 9 | 2(6/3) | 1(5/5) |
Analysis: Michigan didn’t get many power plays (1.5), but they sure did look good when they had a chance. Six shots in three minutes is great. All of their looks were clean and a couple could have easily gone into the net. Alas, Cale Morris. Michigan didn’t generate enough dangerous offense to force too many penalties. With Norris and Hughes gone, that’s to be expected.
On the flip side, Michigan took four penalties. That’s about the ceiling for what you want to give the Irish, who have lived on the power play against the Wolverines over the last couple of years. Notre Dame had one scary chance from the slot that Lavigne saved and then had the goal off of a leg deflection after a shot from the point. Those happen. I don’t think the Irish ‘should’ have had more. They created enough to get a nice bounce, but that’s all.
[James Coller]
GOALTENDING
Shots Faced |
Shots from House Faced |
|
First Period |
11 | 3 |
Second Period |
11 | 1 |
Third Period |
10 | 0 |
Overtime |
n/a | n/a |
TOTAL |
32 | 4 |
Analysis: Hayden Lavigne started in net and looked very good. First, he did not have to deal with the poor sun angles and therefore give up one of the most bonkers goals in all of college hockey. He also didn’t have to face a whole lot of shots from dangerous areas thanks to a brilliant defensive night from the Wolverine blueliners. Lavigne deflected pucks well; he held his position. This is something we’ve seen from Lavigne off and on over the last two and a half seasons. His ceiling is a very good college goalie. When he plays at this level and his defense is contoured to him, these are the results.
ODD-MAN RUSHES
Defense |
Rushes |
Advs |
Escape% |
Offense |
Rushes |
Advs |
Scoring% |
1st Period |
|||||||
2nd Period |
|||||||
3rd Period |
|||||||
OT |
|||||||
Total |
Analysis: I was watching from home, so I did not chart these. However, from what I can remember Michigan gave up maybe one 2v1 and got two or three 3v2s. Not much came of any OMRs.
FINAL CORSI NUMBERS
I had: Notre Dame 57, Michigan 54
www.collegehockeynews.com had: Notre Dame 57, Michigan 56
January 6th, 2019 at 8:22 AM ^
Go Blue! Let's play ND in enough sports so we beat them at something!!! Hockey School!!!
/s
January 6th, 2019 at 8:04 PM ^
You mean like, two sports? Because I think we'd take them down in basketball.
January 6th, 2019 at 9:13 AM ^
How many people were in the Big House for Michigan's outdoor game(s)? That great was a bit painful to watch on TV. No one anywhere close to the ice aside from staff, 75% empty stadium, strange lighting, delayed start due to good weather in South Bend. Did not seem enjoyable for anyone.
Go Blue, make the tourny!
January 6th, 2019 at 9:25 AM ^
...but a most enjoyable outcome.
January 6th, 2019 at 9:49 AM ^
TBH, the bloom is off the rose for most outdoor games. In most situations, it's awful sightlines and poor ice. In this case, ND seemed to slap this thing together so that it was basically just the stadium and the ice, and that was that. Apparently no bands, students aren't on campus yet down there, etc.
Seems to me this fad should be over.
January 7th, 2019 at 3:53 PM ^
I agree that Notre Dame just threw this together, but I think that’s because the NHL came in with the winter classic and Notre Dame said hey, we already have the ice on the football field, let’s do something else while it’s there. If you want the outdoor games to be successful, they have to be an EVENT the AD is committed to promoting, not just an afterthought.
January 6th, 2019 at 9:58 AM ^
I was at the game versus Sparty at Michigam Stadium. It was close to full, and from what I could see, a lot of booze made its way in as well. Sight lines were not great, more of a party atmosphere. I would do it again.
January 6th, 2019 at 10:07 AM ^
The Big Chill had 104,173 certified (113,411 announced) in 2010. UM also played in Camp Randall earlier in 2010 before 55k in the Culver Cup. The Cold War in E. Lansing was played before 74k.
My daughter sat in the student section at The Big Chill and said it was similar to a UM football game except they played the Blues Brothers song for about 10 minutes straight between the second and third periods.
For all you Brandon and fireworks haters they had postgame fireworks that I viewed from my front porch that were cool on some random Dec. Saturday over the Westside A2 skyline.
My coldest day in the Big House was for the Winter Classic on Jan. 1, 2014. Seventeen and snowing when we opened the gates. After five hours and viewing many beer slushies this is what I looked like.
January 6th, 2019 at 11:04 PM ^
We were at the Cold War in Lansing, the Big Chill in AA and the Culver Cup in Madison. All were great experiences. Yes, the sight lines aren't great, but you can see well enough to tell what's going on. All were very well attended so the atmosphere was fantastic.
January 7th, 2019 at 8:30 AM ^
Don't forget the Frozen Diamond Faceoff in Cleveland in 2012. We beat Ohio 4-0. I was at that game, the original Cold War and the Big Chill. All fun events, but, yes, I think it has now officially played out. Only if Michigan wins the Natty should they do it again at the Big House the following year.
January 6th, 2019 at 10:25 AM ^
Saw the highlights only. What puck luck for the guys in blue or was it white! Looked like the Romulan cloaking device was working with the white unis. The luck of the Irish just wasn't working for ND.
January 6th, 2019 at 11:09 AM ^
I was at the game. Sightlines on the 10 yard line (Section 7), mid-lower bowl, were horrible. Sat on the East side of the Stadium and the sun was in our eyes until about 5pm. After the first period we went over to the nearly empty North endzone above the tunnel and had a much better view.
A group of Michigan students made the trip and we were near them before we moved. The Notre Dame fans around us actually enjoyed the chants and the experience they provided. Seemed like 1/3rd of the people in attendance were Michigan fans.
Way too much cliche stadium music, even after the puck was put into play. 23k people in the stadium that size (77k Capacity) was comical. Poor gameday experience.
Comments