Michigan 70, Maryland 67 Comment Count

Ace


Bryan Fuller/MGoBlog

I'm trying and failing to process this game in the immediate aftermath.

Despite playing at home, Michigan seemingly had no business hanging with the third-ranked team in the country, not with their best player wearing sweats on the bench. Even the most cock-eyed optimist had to feel the other shoe looming overhead as Maryland whittled into what once stood as a 13-point Michigan lead. That feeling held as Mark Donnal missed the back end of a one-and-one, giving Rasheed Sulaimon an opportunity to send the game to overtime in a most devastating fashion.

Sulaimon weaved back and forth at the top of the arc, but Donnal shadowed him step for step, and while Sulaimon's heave cleared Donnal's fingertips, it didn't hit home. With that, Michigan had a signature win in hand.

Recounting how the two teams reached that point requires a play-by-play worthy of a boxing match. Donnal hit the first significant blow at the end of the first half, blocking consecutive Maryland shots before tipping in a Zak Irvin miss at the buzzer to give the Wolverines an eight-point halftime margin.

Michigan extended that lead behind jumpers from Duncan Robinson, Zak Irvin, and Derrick Walton—in Walton's case, a four-point play after holding his form with center Diamond Stone barrelling through him—but the combination of Stone and Jake Layman countered in a big way. Stone bullied Maryland back into striking distance; Layman tied it up with a smooth midrange stroke; Stone gave the Terps a one-point lead at the 6:33 mark with an and-one.


Fuller

On the ropes, Michigan fought back, retaking the lead with an and-one of their own from Donnal. Robinson hit a spectacular lefty reverse. Walton drilled a step-back from the elbow. Irvin connected from long range. The lead stood at eight with three minutes remaining.

Sulaimon, who'd been off all night, knocked consecutive three-pointers through, leading to a furious finish as Michigan couldn't put the Terps away at the line. When Sulaimon's final attempt bounced to the corner and the clock hit zero, the Crisler Center crowd unleashed 40 minutes of pent-up nerves.

Irvin finished with 22 points on 17 shot equivalents, Robinson made 5/9 three-pointers on his way to 17, and Walton posted a 12-10-4 line while contributing to a season-worst performance from star Terps guard Melo Trimble, who mustered only two points. Donnal cemented himself as the team's top center with eight points, nine boards, and two blocks; his rebound of a Walton miss with 17 seconds left gained Michigan a critical point while burning a few seconds off the clock.

After little went right against Purdue, everything came together for a Michigan squad missing Caris LeVert, and the schedule eases up considerably after Sunday's trip to Iowa. This may well be the victory that pushes Michigan to the right side of the tourney bubble when all is said and done; it took a true team effort to obtain it.

Comments

alum96

January 12th, 2016 at 11:49 PM ^

I am here to confess I have no idea who this Mark Donnal guy suddenly is, and that I was totally wrong about Mark Donnal being a guy who has no business being in a major conference. 

Now I wonder if that redshirt year that was taken away a few months ago will be given back this offseason as uhhh.... we could use an extra year of Mark Donnal.

Just crazy-ness.

Tater

January 13th, 2016 at 12:55 AM ^

My "pet peeve" for football and basketball has been people here and in other forums mentioning specific players by name as likely to become "attrition" at the end of the season.  I mentioned Donnal as an example of why we shouldn't do this after his first "big game" this season.  

You never know when the "light is going to go on" for young players.  Big guys tend to develop more slowly except for the few who arrive "ready" as freshmen.  And most of "those" freshmen are taking the money to play elsewhere.  

Donnal is quickly becoming an example of another kind: the "Beilein Leap."

ijohnb

January 13th, 2016 at 7:30 AM ^

don't see any issue with it. Speculating about a possible transfer is not the same as wishing for one. A lot of times posters mention it with regard to the player's best interest though it may not always be the case.

Mr. Yost

January 13th, 2016 at 11:13 AM ^

He is THE lesson for writing guys off too early.

Alum will need to get in line behind me. I just didn't see it, I can't tell you how bad it was - at least to me. He looked like a walk-on scrub minutes only player, maybe.

He's a legitimate B1G role player and his development and confidence is unreal.

Beilein could take WolverineDevotee and make him into a serviceable player - I'm only half kidding.

I don't know one guy who has played multiple years at Michigan and didn't get better. I know multiple guys who've played multiple years that got literally twice as good. It's unreal.

ijohnb

January 13th, 2016 at 8:26 AM ^

this vein, sometimes I feel like JB engages in all or nothing thinking regarding players. I think both cam and Doyle could contribute something if just given 8 - 10 minutes to get in the flow of the game.

In reply to by ijohnb

93Grad

January 13th, 2016 at 10:52 AM ^

I just don't see Cam ever being a fit in this system.  I was wrong about Donnal of course, so I could be again, but I dont see it happening with Cam.  Doyle for sure has some tools that could help us.  He just needs to get his mojo back and some stickum for the hands.

Mr Miggle

January 13th, 2016 at 7:51 PM ^

Nor would that even be possible. Beilein said at the time, the change in his class designation came after a talk with Donnal about his future and that coming back here for his 5th year was still a possibility. The obvious implication was that Donnal shouldn't count on it. Maybe that was just what he needed to give him a sense of urgency.

Maizerage11

January 12th, 2016 at 11:54 PM ^

I had a lot of fun at this game, but I was dissapointed about the attedance.  Why is michigan having trouble filling seats for a top 5 match up?  I picked up tickets for $10 and had pretty decents seats so I dont think that it is cost.  

 

Hopefully this win gets people excited again and it will be sold out for MSU.   

 

Good win!

robpollard

January 13th, 2016 at 7:53 AM ^

I've always been perplexed by the lack of StubHub / TicketCity seats for U of M basketball games. Except for the top two rows of the arena, there usually isn't a good selection and I have no idea why. For example, the mid/late December games probably only had 5-6,000 actual people there, but if you go to StubHub, there aren't a ton of seats on there (e.g., only a couple hundred).

Do people sell them elsewhere (e.g., the couple times I tried in-person scalpers, they were overpriced, but maybe I've hit up the wrong guys)? Are there rules preventing resale? What gives?

I don't have this problem for UM football. I know there are literally 9x as many seats in that stadium, but still, when a UM baseball game has thousands of empty seats, you'd figure people would want to sell their tickets instead of eating them.

AcheBlue

January 13th, 2016 at 8:03 AM ^

Let's be honest. If you have the priority points and can afford the season tickets for the lower bowl, you don't need the $10-$20 you can get from reselling the tickets. The tickets are more valuable as a potential gift to a friend/client.

Also, many people are likely undecided until the last minute for a 9pm weeknight possible loss. The weather (and how many glasses of wine/beer they have at dinner) likely makes up their mind for them.

It seems to me that the upper bowl is frequently more full than the lower bowl. I think it would be cool if the Athletic Department used the ticket scan data and reselling habits of season ticket holders to reward (better seating) those who consistently arrive on time and use don't resell their tickets.

robpollard

January 13th, 2016 at 10:57 AM ^

I can understand the weather and time for tonight...but not in a big way. This was against the #3 team in the nation, not against Penn State. I would hope more people would have been able to figure it out. I think you are right about the possible loss -- our fan base seems pretty down after last year and the shaky start this year.

But aside from last night, there are many other games, mostly in the non-conference, where there are literally thousands of empty seats. I understand not wanting to bother listing your tickets on StubHub for just one game, but this is multiple. I have no idea about the upper bowl; I'm going based on what I see on TV, and the upper bowl isn't typically shown.

And I don't think you want to penalize people who resell their tickets; I think you want to penalize those who don't use their tickets. UM needs butts in the seats -- a larger crowd is a better atmosphere, and plus more money spent on parking, snacks, etc. UM needs to work with their season ticket holders to figure this out and make sure those tickets get used.

ijohnb

January 13th, 2016 at 12:09 PM ^

did not regularly sell out for Fab Five non-conference games.  I mean, they would sell out the Duke game but there was regularly lots of open space in games against Southwest Nobody State.  This is not a new thing with Michigan basketball attendance, it has always been shaky.

robpollard

January 13th, 2016 at 12:41 PM ^

In 1992, you didn't have StubHub apps or TicketCity websites. The re-sale market is much different.

I'm talking about seats that have (very likely) been sold, but thouands of people are not using them. It's 2016. U of M needs to use technology and marketing to work with their season ticket holders to get those seats in use.

I would have gone to a couple games this year, but I'm not paying $75 for two so-so tickets to see a game against Bryant. But I would pay about half that -- but there is litte inventory publically available, even though there are thousands of unused seats.

AcheBlue

January 13th, 2016 at 2:09 PM ^

We are in agreement that there should be some incentive to not let your tickets go unused. My point is about rewarding your best fans. In general, the upper bowl sections (at least along the sidelines) are as full as the lower bowl, if not more so. Around where I sit, and presumably in most sections, there is a core group that almost always shows up or gives their tickets to a friend. These are the people you want closest to the court to maximize the home court advantage.

Chronic resellers don't have the same effect. A significant number of seats around me are sold on stub-hub almost every game (you can see the printed tickets when the fans arrive). I have no idea who actually owns the seats. Those seats are disproportionately used by visiting fans.

I presume no-shows in the lower bowl are because the owners of those seats use them for business or personal gifts with the exception of high profile games. If they don't have someone to give them to, the resell value and effort is not enough incentive to sell the tickets. I don't know a good way to get them filled without penalizing the owners for no-shows.

Maizerage11

January 12th, 2016 at 11:54 PM ^

I had a lot of fun at this game, but I was dissapointed about the attedance.  Why is michigan having trouble filling seats for a top 5 match up?  I picked up tickets for $10 and had pretty decents seats so I dont think that it is cost.  

 

Hopefully this win gets people excited again and it will be sold out for MSU.   

 

Good win!

blue90

January 12th, 2016 at 11:54 PM ^

all complaining like crazy after Purdue and then we go and beat Maryland without Caris!! There was too much that stood out for me in this game and they were all positive.  Our D is improving. Donnal still gave up a lot of points but he played hard and got 9 rebounds which is incredible. Another positive thing is that when this team is on, they are on.  We can hang with anyone if we're knocking down our shots and Walton is running the offense the way he should. This may be our downfall but the great thing about it is anyone can go off at any moment and knock down a couple straight threes, not many other teams can say this.

There isn't anything bad to say, other than, Walton had 10 rebounds and Irvin only had 2 but maybe that is a good thing.  Irvin's D was great.  Duncan is just absurd, he hits everything, even an under the basket, left hander.  I personally think this Maryland team is a bit overrated but nevertheless, we beat a great team tonight and we're showing great improvments.  Go Beilien, go team.

Yo_Blue

January 13th, 2016 at 7:55 AM ^

While the scorers scored (as they should), Walton was the player of the game for me.  He hit the boards... hard.  He controlled the tempo pretty well with only one section where Michigan couldn't get a look at the basket.  To top it off, he and MAAR held an All-American to 2 freaking points.  Their job was so complete Trimble wasn't even an option for the potential tying shot.