Kansas State 31, Michigan 14 Comment Count

Ace


Photo via

Shane Morris had a solid debut as a starting quarterback.

He also led Michigan in rushing. By 29 yards. Over Devin Funchess.

The defense, meanwhile, couldn't put together a real stop until the second half. KSU receiver Tyler Lockett's three first-half touchdown receptions were more than enough to defeat the Wolverines on their own, as the offense fared no better, failing to reach 300 yards of total offense for the 11th time under Al Borges.

The 2013 season is mercifully over. Michigan finishes at 7-6, blown out by a mediocre Big 12 team. It's 1:30 in the morning. Goodnight, and here's to a better tomorrow.

Comments

Randy Marsh

December 29th, 2013 at 10:43 AM ^

Honestly not sure why Peppers would want to join this shit. He got the guarantee that Hoke will be coach next year, but what about his sophomore season and beyond? There sure as hell is no guarantee there.

BlueInWisconsin

December 29th, 2013 at 10:45 AM ^

A lot of negativity here. One thing people should stop and think about for a moment is the number of freshman Michigan put on the field. All night long the announcers were calling out freshmen who we're making contributions for Michigan. This year sucked, but to pretend like there isn't a bright future is a little silly.

Kermits Blue Key

December 29th, 2013 at 11:16 AM ^

The amount of negativity on here is expected considering the amount of shit play on the field this year. Yes, the team is young, but you're completely glazing over the fact that this team did not improve at all during the year. As a matter of fact, they've been regressing the last two years. If these coaches aren't able to effectivley develop players or schemes, then the mere aging of our players is nowhere near a guarantee of a bright future.

The Iron Jock

December 29th, 2013 at 11:23 AM ^

You forgot the asterisk.

Actually, we aren't the winningest program in the land anymore, at least as a percentage. We handed that little record over to Notre Dame last night. At least they took care of their business by beating Rutgers in their own crappy bowl game. 

Now that the 2013 Michigan football meltdown is complete, what do we have to look forward to in 2014? Trips to South Bend, East Lansing and Columbus, and App State at home, with the outcome seriously in question. And seriously, if we lose that one, don't you just fire Hoke and his staff, and David Brandon, in the first week of September? It's a fair question.

I was full of optimism when we hired Rich Rod, and I would later see the error of my ways. My heart swelled with pride when Hoke made his remarks at his first press conference and I hunkered down for the rebuilding process that, I hoped, would raise our once-proud football program from the smoldering ruins. David Brandon was saying all the right things. The future, even though it was still distant, looked bright.  

But now what do we have, three full years out? A soft, confused mess of a football team. A big shiny stadium that no one can afford to go to. Our prestige in shambles. Sparty mocking us at every turn. 

Youth cannot -- I repeat, cannot -- explain away what happened here this year. At least, not entirely. These are talented guys, athletic guys. What happened to this team is an outrage, and the fact that the coaches haven't stepped up to the mic to admit failure on their part is very telling. Hoke is scared. Borges is clueless. Brandon is arrogant. We are screwed.

Happy fucking New Year.  


 

tybert

December 29th, 2013 at 10:58 AM ^

1. If Blake Countess put his name in for NFL draft rating, he should Google Donovan Warren and find his future. Warren had a better three seasons than Blake ever did and is unemployed.

2. Time to DROP the crap and videos around the "This is Michigan" theme - it's an insult to those Michigan teams that played real Manball. 

Orie Hopp

December 29th, 2013 at 11:55 AM ^

I dont even know where to focus my frustration with Michigan anymore.  Can someone explain whats wrong with this team?  I used to just have a problem with borges.  And then after three weeks of preperation for kstate they allow 3 td's on the first 3 possesions.  I used to love mattison for what he did for this defense the past couple of years, but now not so much. And then you have Hoke who only still has some of my favor because of the recruiting.  I feel like the recruiting is the only thing still holding my patience with this regime.  They got next year and then im done, they better beat 2 outta the three rivals and atleast finish second in their division. 

 

Mgo-Bo

December 29th, 2013 at 12:44 PM ^

The offense began the game looking interesting. Morris looked good for a freshmen. The Defense?! I watch a lot of football and I'm struggling to remember any game where every pass was to a guy who was ALL ALONE on the tv screen. Kstate receivers could have crawled to 1st down markers after catch. So confusing.

Gr1mlock

December 29th, 2013 at 1:06 PM ^

Alright, we sucked, in basically every facet of the game.  There is no denying that, and I think all the manners in which we sucked have been covered, as have the obligatory "fire everything and everyone" responses.  Let's look at that game and see what we can take positively from it:

  • Morris was strong armed as billed, more accurate than expected, showed poise in the pocket, and seemed to make good decisions.  Whether he's playing next year due to Gardner injury or in two years, I feel good about our future at QB.
  • Justice Hayes, the forgotten man in our RB corp, played heavily and looked ok, particularly on a couple blitz pickups. 
  • While still failing to open holes for the running game, the O Line at least gave Morris a pretty clean pocket most of the game.
  • Fitz finished his career with a touchdown.

That's all I got.  I don't have any foolish belief that that was a good or positive game, but all told, it could have been (slightly) worse.  Thankfully, 2013 football is behind us, and hopefully 2014 will be a step back in the right direction and show this season to be an abberation of youth and bad luck. 

 

 

bighouse22

December 29th, 2013 at 9:31 PM ^

Gardner was the offense this year.  Yes he made a lot of mistakes, but he was at his worst when they tried to reign him in.  In the games against MSU, Nebraska, Iowa and Northwestern he played relatively mistake free, but he didn't create much either in those games and the result was 1-3.  

I prefer allowing Gardner to be himself.  Take the good with the bad and let him learn from his mistakes this year.  He will be a better version of himself next year.  You can't ignore over 3000 yards total offense and 31 tds (21 passing and 11 rushing).  He is incredibly dynamic and needs to play.

Shane can get spot duty to further his experience for his Junior and Senior years.

Lester B Simple

January 1st, 2014 at 11:01 AM ^

Gee whiz Mgo-Bo I like your name (wish Bo would come back).

2014 will be different and we are moving to a weaker schedule so we have no old rivals and only a weak schedule.  Brilliant, Genius, this football game is simple - all you have to do is find teams with worse coaching than we have and get them on the schedule.

What a wonderful idea.  Next I think we should propose not keeping score and letting every team play in a bowl game (well we are getting there anyway).   The only games that are not dumpster fires are the last 6 or 8 and those football teams play at a whole other level (they are in the stratosphere compared to the UM program which used to play with them).

I wonder if the big house will be setting attendance records when Pioneer High School beats the UM team?

You Only Live Twice

December 29th, 2013 at 1:08 PM ^

With a team of so many underclassmen I'm still inclined to be on the side that "makes excuses" for the coaching staff.  In a way, that's the only credible position for me to take; not knowing enough about football or coaching to criticize things like playcalling, etc. 

I do believe that major staff changes would have a detrimental effect and not be a magic bullet of any kind.  Not giving RR a 4th year was a colossal mistake and repeating that mistake will do the program lasting damage, partly because it would ensure more tense "rebuilding" years and partly because I can't see any good coaches choosing to come here for any amount of money if they are not supported.  I could be wrong there, but if Brandon fires the guy that he hired only 3 years later.... would you want that person to be your boss?  And speaking of DB, he has to take a good look at his own leadership style.  Leaders do bear responsibility for developing the people below them.  If Hoke, who is not ignorant about football, isn't improving as a HC, then his leader is tasked with figuring out how best to help him accomplish that.   Looking forward in hopes of a better 2014 for this program.

bighouse22

December 29th, 2013 at 9:38 PM ^

Continuity does matter and Hoke should be back, but he has a lot of work in the offseason.  I do believe they will be at least 9-3.  What I will really be looking for is a win over MSU or OSU.  That is the sign things are headed where they need to go as long as they take care of business in their other games.  There should be no excuse for losing to anyone other than MSU or OSU.  

The expectation should be 10 wins with a key win over OSU or MSU.  Hard decisions should be in play with anything less.  You can't have another year of losing red letter games or an inability to beat a team with a winning record on the road.  That statistic is as bad as the red letter game issue.

Lester B Simple

January 1st, 2014 at 10:34 AM ^

Every football team in the country has more freshmen and sophomores on their teams than juniors and seniors - it is a simple fact of football attrition.  Just check it out.

Most teams find freshsmen who are good enough to start and red shirt the rest.

We start the freshmen too but they usually do not develop rapidly or at all in our current system.

Sorry young players is what makes college football so exciting, not a big problem.

Lester B Simple reporting the facts

mal

December 29th, 2013 at 1:24 PM ^

Damn it! We looked absolutely horrible...wait....the team, the team, the team, Bo, Fritz, all- time winningest program, largest crowd to watch a football game in America today, piped in music, tradition, Hoke is a great guy, we are killing it in recruiting right now, the tailgate on the golf course was fabulous, legacy jerseys, Michigan Men, We travel so well to bowl games, the '69 osu game, pre-game flyovers, honoring something or someone at every break in the action, highlights of anthony carter's catch vs Indiana on the big board, next year we are going to get pressure on the qb rushing 4, and jake butt will be an all-american.....all better

west2

December 29th, 2013 at 1:27 PM ^

actually the 2014 schedule is really weak.  Michigan realisitically should go 9-3 and if they beat one rival team will have a 10 win season.   App State is a shadow of its former self, unlike when they won the third of 3 straight D2/FCS national titles including beating Michigan, this years team went 4-8 so Mich shoud roll in that one.  Other than ND, Sparty and Bucky, they have to play PSU with a new coach and NW that might cause some difficulty.  Other than that they play Utah (a 5-7 team), Miami of Ohio, Minny, Rutgers, Maryland & Indiana, all winnable games.   Achieving improvement in 2014 should be easy due to the schedule.  If M goes 10-2 beating bucky but not going to the Bgtn title game we all know it will be enough to keep the coaching staff around.  Then in 2015 when many of todays kids are juniors the schedule doesnt look much more daunting as ND will be gone replaced by Utah, BYU, Oregon State and UNLV.  So sports fans because of or in spite of the schedule we are looking at the current coaching staff remaining for the foreseable future....so there, negatators, take that!

erald01

December 29th, 2013 at 1:48 PM ^

If this team doesnt show up with a chip on their shoulder next year and are hungry to knock sparty, osu and evryone else on their asses..then will become like detroit lions, constantly coaching turnover and always hoping for "next year"

Huttybubba1

December 29th, 2013 at 1:53 PM ^

I've been a Michigan fan for 42 years and I've never felt so unattached to Michigan football as I have been feel for the past few years. Like many of I alway just couldn't wait for the season to start, I felt a mile high when they won and had a lump in my stomach when they lost. Unfortunately the day Bo died,  the Michigan football program that we knew died with him, 50-41 since his death. This program has become a program with no leadership or direction, the coaching staff doesn't interact with the players on the sidelines but more importantly I haven't seen any in your face coaching when they screw up and this is the main reason this team is SOFT. Brady need to have a complete overhaul of his coaching staff or it will be more of the same next year and the year after that of the same crap we've had the past 7 years.

Lester B Simple

January 1st, 2014 at 10:19 AM ^

Dearest Hutty,

You are starting to make some sense.  However I believe the problem goes much higher than who are coaches are, what they know about football etc.

We have very poor coaches and most agree there is no hope for improvement there.  Why do we have poor coaches?  Is it the coaches fault they can't find their ass with both hands? No. no. no.

I hope we are are smart enough not to hire one more bad coach before giving our current AD and whoever hired him the boot!  They have this once great UM football program FUBARed so to speak.

What worries me is the Big House will empty out before it sinks in to the Board of Regents and many of the faithful that we need to fix the goose that lays the golden eggs at UM.  Patience and calm in this circumstance are the work of fool's not geniuses.

Lester B Simple

 

 

Don

December 29th, 2013 at 1:56 PM ^

I'm the head coach of a football team in a BCS conference. The coach that preceded me had seven straight winning seasons, won 9 games in his final year, and took his team to three bowl games. He was the winningest coach in my school's history as of when I was hired. So I did not take over a losing program, much less a tire fire.

My first two years were 2-9 and 3-8, a huge disappointment to my school's fans, especially considering the established success of my predecessor. I appeared to be over the hump in my third year at 6-4-1, but my fourth year was barely over .500 at 6-5. My fifth year was a big disappointment at 5-6, and my sixth year was a disaster, going 2-8-1. By then, many fans at my school had concluded that I wasn't going to get the job done and demanded that the Athletic Director fire me. For whatever reason, he kept me on, and after 13 seasons of double-digit wins and an appearance in a national title game, I'm now considered by most college football observers to be one of the most successful coaches in college football over the last two decades

Who am I?

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

December 29th, 2013 at 2:42 PM ^

He probably qualifies as an exception since Va Tech alums had lower expectations - the 5th and 6th year were reaching a breaking point with his losing record. Meanwhile coaches get only a 3-4 year stint to deliver at a traditional powerhouse. The win-loss records are the ultimate gauge, but the momentum/culture of a program is the element that gives coaches any reprieve from the axe. Kiffin was axed because the team flat out quit at ASU. Muschamp will get another year to see if he can clean up the culture and win. Mack's program had become coddled & soft. Chizik was axed when Auburn fell into disrepair. Fickell took a back seat when the OSU culture softened in just 1 season. Once hope evaporates for a ready return to the top, major programs sharpen the axe. Good or bad, it's the nature of impatient Regents and Donors forcing the hand of ADs.

Don

December 29th, 2013 at 4:40 PM ^

I can't believe that Brandon isn't getting an earful from major donors and other influential UM bigwigs today. These embarrassing performances were supposed to be a thing of the recent past, not a continuing problem.

bighouse22

December 29th, 2013 at 9:51 PM ^

Although I think Frank Beamer has done a good job with VaTech, I don't think Frank Beamer is the goal for the Michigan program.  Maybe I am unrealistic, but I think the expectation should be Alabama, USC, OSU when they were competing and winning NCs. Of course you leave out any questionable ethical issues, but consistently competing at the highest level is the goal.

Waves

December 29th, 2013 at 2:17 PM ^

I was naughty and I lost my 100 point balance.

I prepared for my posts well but apparently just didn't execute. Most likely this is because I am a rather young poster and was trying a new system. But no worries, I have some 5-star memes prepared and am recovering from my boo-boos.

ccarna

December 29th, 2013 at 2:43 PM ^

Seemed as if they didn't care......Where is the passion? They need a "Bo type" or "Barwis type" to get them fired up with that "killer instinct"! Along with changing the OC, O Line Coach, perhaps others, and getting a good QB coach of course!....... And, I still question S&C coach given O and D line play and toughness.

1of12MattDamons

December 29th, 2013 at 4:23 PM ^

Instead, there will no longer be 60-something of 85 scholarship players in their first or second year. They will also have a lot more valuable experience under their belts and will have progressed not through magic, but through hard work.

Actually maybe, just maybe the football fairies will fill them with magic dust and whenever you see a big hit being made from the magical defensive entities floating around on the field, a small cloud of this dust will appear.

bighouse22

December 29th, 2013 at 9:54 PM ^

I really hope this is really about youth and success is right around the corner.  I was looking for signs all year and thought maybe, just maybe the OSU game was it, but the lackluster effort against KSU was a sour note.

Here's to next year!

Ernis

December 29th, 2013 at 3:27 PM ^

Gotta put this one squarely on the D. Borges had a solid gameplan that played to Morris's strengths under neutral circumstances. Once we were down 2-3 scores, that was no longer tenable. C'est la vie.

 

Fuck it, Dude. Let's go bowling.

Maizenblueball

December 29th, 2013 at 3:53 PM ^

I didn't expect much from the Offense, but I expected the Defense wouldn't be so bad.  That D was a dumpster fire.  We made a mediocre K State look like an NFL Offense.  I know I'm just re-stating the obvious, but damn, that was a painful game to watch.

I'm more pissed off about our D than I am the Offense at this point, and that's saying something.