Holes, And The Digging Out Of Them Comment Count

Brian

11/26/2016 – Michigan 32, Florida State 33 – 10-3, 6-2 Big Ten, season over

31165121944_e8368ece8f_b

[Joseph Dressler]

I can feel the hot take brigade trying to get through the door already: tweets about how much of this gets put on Drevno, the near certainty I'm going to hear something that sets my teeth on edge on WTKA this Thursday. Michigan's epic season ended with a wet fart, yes. In the aftermath I don't care to complain about it. I don't care to argue about what Michigan should or should not have done, or just... whatever.

Jim Harbaugh is an elite coach. The man has a track record. He is going to be here for a long time. His teams will be very good and often great, and sometimes they will meet other very good or great football teams, whereupon they will play a close, exciting game that will turn on one or two plays that are made or are not made. I hope they win these games. If they don't, they don't. Michigan's done all they can do and now it's time to sit back and see what happens.

That could be an extremely long period of being very good and not breaking through to satisfy the moist goatee brigade. The annals of sports are littered with excellent teams that met other excellent teams and didn't win. The difference there is razor thin and largely determined by luck.

Michigan isn't that juggernaut just yet. They were about 85% of one. The remaining 15% was why a one-point game felt lopsided for 58 minutes: the offensive line.

---------------------------------------------

FSU's defensive gameplan was simple, and weird: move one of the best defensive ends in the country to DT. The guy you saw running into the backfield virtually untouched all game was, yes, DeMarcus Walker. Michigan's inability to handle him was total. He racked up a +9.7 in PFF's grading, which is a single-game season high for Michigan or its opponents. That's a good season total for many players. Walker had ten pressure events in 45 pass rush snaps and crushed some runs besides. A quick review of the game confirms that Walker killed everything, with an assist from Derrick Nnadi on the other guard.

The two guys with tire treads on their jerseys in the aftermath are at very different points in their career, but the reason they were put in that spot is the same. Ben Bredeson is a freshman who should not be playing yet. Kyle Kalis is a senior who's played too much. Both had to be on the field because there was almost literally nobody else available.

David Dawson's apparently so far from the field that he decided to transfer before taking his shot at a starting job this spring; Juwann Bushell-Beatty's brief cameo after the Newsome injury was the impetus for inserting Bredeson in the first place. Everyone else is either Patrick Kugler, a low-rated redshirt freshman, or a true freshman. If Kugler's a miss, and it appears that way, you have no choice but to die in a fire.

That goes back to Michigan's inability to evaluate, recruit, or develop offensive linemen under Brady Hoke. Hoke could find an All Big Ten DT under a rock; he and his staff had no idea what a good player on offense looked like, and this was most true on the offensive line. Michigan's six-man 2013 OL class is down to Kugler. None of the five departures was particularly close to breaking through.

The next year Michigan took just two OL, which is always a terrible idea. One of them, Bushell-Beatty, was the guy replaced when Bredeson stepped into the starting lineup. Hoke's final class had just one guy who signed, three-star legacy Jon Runyan Jr. Newsome committed in the interregnum; Michigan added Nolan Ulizio in the late scramble.

None of these guys started getting coached well until Harbaugh arrived, and the damage could only be mitigated, not undone. Sometimes OL don't work out, and sometimes you have to keep playing the ones that don't because you don't have anyone else, and sometimes this results in an elite defensive line digesting your quarterback.

------------------------------------------

I don't know, man. I started this season's coverage off by proclaiming this to be The Year, and it more or less was. Michigan spent most of the season in the top five of the human polls and #1 in fancystats. They're about to send a dozen guys to the NFL draft. They played like an elite team for most of the season, and if you think losing in double OT in the Horseshoe with an injured quarterback and a rain of terrible calls is some sort of stain on your honor, well... I cannot help you.

The difference between an epic season and a merely good one was razor thin and largely due to the vagaries of fate. Michigan had two spots at which they absolutely could not afford any injuries. They got it in the face at both spots. Grant Newsome went out for the season, paving the way for a true freshman to start. Wilton Speight missed the Indiana game; it's unknown how much of his late slide was due to that collarbone/shoulder injury. Survey says: enough to make a difference, probably.

So they did not win all the things. That sucks. They were very good at all the things it was reasonable to be very good at, though, and that should offer some more confidence going forward. If that's a disappointment I'm with you; if it's an outrage the door is that way.

AWARDS

Known Friends And Trusted Agents Of The Week

-2535ac8789d1b499[1]you're the man now, dog

#1 Kenny Allen did the impossible: he graded out positively in all three kicking facets per PFF. His eight punts for 47 yards each, 44 yard net, nine return yards ceded, and lone touchback was worth a whopping +0.5 to Pro Football Focus Punter Batman. He hit three chip shot field goals and only had one of his kickoffs end up returnable—alas, that.

Also he terrified the FSU punt returner into a terrible muff that set Michigan up at the one.

#2 Taco Charlton kicked off his day by delivering the kind of hit to Deondre Francois that triggers the Deondre Francois Gets Obliterated Repeatedly montage that follows the poor kid around wherever he goes. He wasn't blocked on that one. On a bunch of other plays he was, usually by Roderick Johnson. Johnson, an All-ACC player who was the best player on the FSU line, ended up –2.2 to PFF and Charlton had a sack to go with four QB hits. Good luck in the NFL, sir.

#3 Ryan Glasgow had a similar day against worse competition, forcing a bunch of pressure up the middle and helping shut off Dalvin Cook, with a couple of Dalvin Cook exceptions.

Honorable mention: Maurice Hurst had another extremely productive day in limited snaps. Chris Evans had that touchdown that momentarily staked Michigan to the lead.

KFaTAotW Standings.

12: Taco Charlton(three-way T1, PSU, same vs Rutgers, #3 Maryland, #2 Iowa, #2 Indiana, #1 OSU, #2 FSU).
10: Wilton Speight (#1 UCF, #1 Illinois, #3 MSU, #1 Maryland),
9: Jabrill Peppers(T2, Hawaii; #3 UCF, #1 Colorado, #2 Rutgers, #2 MSU)
6: Ryan Glasgow(#2 UCF, #1 UW, #3 FSU)
5: Chris Wormley (three-way T1, PSU, same vs Rutgers, #1 Iowa).
4: Jourdan Lewis (#3 UW, #2 Maryland, #3 Indiana), Mike McCray(#1 Hawaii, T2 OSU), Ben Gedeon(#3 Colorado, #3 PSU, three-way T1 Rutgers, T2 OSU), Kenny Allen (#3 OSU, #1 FSU).
3.5: De'Veon Smith (four-way T2, PSU, #1 Indiana).
3: Amara Darboh(#1 MSU).
2.5: Karan Higdon(four-way T2, PSU, #2 Illinois).
2: Jake Butt(#2 Colorado), Kyle Kalis (#2 UW)
1: Delano Hill (T2, Hawaii), Chris Evans (T3, Hawaii, four-way T2, PSU),  Maurice Hurst (three-way T1, PSU),  Devin Asiasi(#3 Rutgers), Ben Braden (#3 Illinois), Channing Stribling (#3 Iowa).
0.5: Mason Cole(T3, Hawaii), Ty Isaac (four-way T2, PSU).

Who's Got It Better Than Us Of The Week

This week's best thing ever.

31888681881_8021c375bd_z

[Dressler]

We have a lead! I bet this lead lasts a long time and—aww, hamburgers.

Honorable mention: Mike McCray pick-sixes Francois. Kenny Allen uses Zoltan Mesko punt lasers to force a muff.

WGIBTUs Past.

Hawaii: Laughter-inducing Peppers punt return.
UCF: Speight opens his Rex Grossman account.
Colorado: Peppers cashes it in.
PSU: Wormley's sack establishes a theme.
UW: Darboh puts Michigan ahead for good.
Rutgers: Peppers presses "on".
Illinois: TRAIN 2.0.
MSU: lol, two points.
Maryland: very complicated bomb.
Iowa: The touchdown.
Indiana: Smith woodchips Michigan a lead.
OSU: Goat. Duck costume. Yeah.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK.

This week's worst thing ever.

Jabrill Peppers is warming up... and Jabrill Peppers is obviously not playing. Goodnight, sweet prince.

Honorable mention: all plays on which OL were asked to block Walker. The kickoff return. The 92-yard touchdown. The Cook items.

PREVIOUS EPIC DOUBLE BIRDs

Hawaii: Not Mone again.
UCF: Uh, Dymonte, you may want to either tackle or at least lightly brush that guy.
Colorado: Speight blindsided.
PSU: Clark's noncontact ACL injury.
UW: Newsome joins the ranks of the injured.
Rutgers: you can't call back the Mona Lisa of punt returns, man.
Illinois: They scored a what now? On Michigan? A touchdown?
Michigan State: a terrifying first drive momentarily makes you think you're in the mirror universe.
Maryland: Edge defense is a confirmed issue.
Iowa: Kalis hands Iowa a safety.
Indiana: A legitimate drive.
OSU: The Spot.

[After THE JUMP: let's have a real good time. An okay time?]

OFFENSE

31005110281_8a60968d85_z (1)

[Eric Upchurch]

The inverted quarterback. Wilton Speight did a lot of difficult things brilliantly and a lot of easy ones terribly. When set upon by barely-blocked hellhounds, Speight did his thing where he finds a guy you didn't even know was in a route for a first down. When given a reasonable amount of time, Speight missed throws that weren't necessarily easy but were much easier than his completions.

It's tough to render judgment when Speight was getting pressure up the middle on a majority of snaps. We've seen it all year with Hurst and Glasgow: edge rush is one thing but when a 300 pound man is running directly at your face, all your options are bad. While you probably don't want to hear me say anything about Speight's shoulder/collarbone, I did hear that it was the kind of thing that would linger for a month or two even if he was healthy enough to play. That further complicates any extrapolation from this game to next year.

A season-long view doesn't offer much more clarity. Speight was lethal, and terrible, and seemed to have little in between. He was very good for ten throws against Iowa and then fell off a cliff, and that was a microcosm of his play and the season.

The stats reflect that up and down performance, averaging it out into the #40 QB in yards per attempt and #42 in passer rating. S&P+ was far kinder, asserting that Michigan had the #14 pass offense in the country prior to the bowl game. It'll drop but not to 40th.

31165129964_1cfc9c02ab_b

[Dressler]

Not quite. Another game, another opportunity for Amara Darboh to do something hard that he doesn't quite manage. Speight left a touchdown low and behind him, but still catchable; he couldn't bring it in. He had a deep completion down the sideline; he landed on his back barely out of bounds. He's been good but something short of great, as in all three losses one more tough-ish catch from Darboh ends up changing, and probably winning, the game.

At least that's over. The great De'Veon Smith debate now ends inconclusively, because there's only so much you can do when you are getting hurled backwards by a bear. Smith was never as bad as his detractors suggested and never had the luxury of running behind a truly good offensive line when he is the kind of guy who needs a head of steam to show off his best talents.

The one thing that did disappoint this year was his pass blocking. Smith was impregnable a year ago; too many times this year he got in the way but did not actually slow down his opposite mark much. He went from a major asset in pass protection to meh. There is no explanation I can figure out, just one of those things.

Next year's running back pecking order. Seems obvious that Chris Evans is at the top right now with Higdon and Isaac trailing and vulnerable to falling out of the rotation if Kareem Walker makes good on some bowl practice hype and/or Michigan manages to flip Najee Harris. Evans isn't going to be a bell-cow feature back at his size, so there will be another committee next year.

Wide receiver pecking order. Ask again later.

DEFENSE

30907467960_925421af6b_z

[Patrick Barron]

Maybe Jabrill Peppers is good. Dalvin Cook lined up wide and Mike McCray split out over him and you could cut to any Michigan fan in the world and found the same thing: someone desperately looking for an abort button that was not there. Michigan did not abort, and Cook had a footrace against McCray. It went poorly.

Meanwhile, Cook had the single-biggest flip play of the game when he turned third and 22 into a 70 yard run and eventually a Florida State touchdown that felt like game over at the time. It was not game over, but it did set up FSU with sufficient points to make their comeback. On that play Metellus was backside help trying to flow over and limit the damage. Cook beat him to the corner and blew downfield past him. Very hard to watch that when you know damn well Peppers is getting there and setting up fourth and three or so.

Three huge plays and the rest of it was pretty much as expected. The two Dalvin Cook plays above and the 92-yard touchdown on which it looks like Dymonte Thomas busted were more than half of FSU's yards. On the rest of their snaps they totaled 171 yards; Francois completed 9 of 27 passes; Cook averaged 3.7 yards an attempt on plays other than the 71 yarder. This is why the preview was focused on keeping FSU's explosive plays to 20 yards instead of 70; Michigan did not do this.

Sigh. FSU's winning TD coming on a fade route against Jourdan Lewis is quite the twist ending. I literally cannot remember a successful fade route against Lewis in the last two years. If some odd twist of fate had given me the opportunity to call FSU's play on that down, I would have chosen "throw a fade at Lewis," because I have types "lol try that again" dozens of times on Twitter in the aftermath of teams doing just that for some damn reason.

I guess it had to happen sometime. Then was not ideal.

SPECIAL TEAMS

Aforementioned Allen performance. I've never given a specialist #1, I don't think. Quite a finish for his career. I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up on a practice squad next year.

Deadly kickoff return. Michigan's demise in this game started with the only kickoff return FSU managed, and it was a bizarre one: the returner stopped and was about to put his knee down before coming out of the endzone. Everyone anticipated the dude getting out to the 10 and then getting blasted. That did not so much happen. Jordan Glasgow missed a tackle, nobody else was there to help, and FSU started the last drive in field position.

I have no take here. That was bad and I rather wished something other than that happened.

MISCELLANEOUS

Don't even with the supposed offsides. First, that movement is just about simultaneous with the snap and is probably legal. Second, Michigan isn't winning that game anyway.

HERE

Best and worst:

Worst:  A Terrible, Exciting Game

Man, that was a weird game.  It was a “classic” in the sense it ended with a bunch of exciting, game-changing plays in the final couple of minutes, but for about 3 quarters it was pretty ugly.  FSU’s defensive line dominated UM’s offensive unit, while UM largely bottled up FSU’s offense save for a couple nice plays by Cook and a 92-yard TD throw on busted coverage by Francois.  UM had 23 yards rushing on 15 carries and 83 yards passing on 19 attempts in the first half.  FSU was a bit better, but without that 92-yard bomb they had 85 yards passing on 6/14 passing and 78 yards rushing on 19 attempts despite Cook picking up 12 and 28 yards on successive carries on that first drive.  The teams were a combined 3 for 15 on third down before halftime, and while for the game FSU only had 4 sacks and UM 2, both QBs were getting knocked around on a significant portion of their attempts.  Speight was nearly beheaded a couple of times by Walker and Sweat, while Charlton probably moved a couple of Francois’s organs on a crunching sack in the 1st quarter.

Boy it would be nice to have a great running back again:

First, for context - here are all of UM's all time leaders by YPA at 5.0+ and at least 2500 yds - Tim and Ty at the top and by large margin.  The only similar era was Butch and Jaime back ending the 80s; the time this boy fell in love with UM football.

  Ave Total
Ty Wheatley 6.1 4,178
Tim Biakabutuka 6.1 2,810
Rob Lytle 5.9 3,307
Gordon Bell 5.4 2,902
Butch Woolfolk 5.4 3,850
Jamie Morris 5.4 4,392
Harlan Huckleby 5.2 2,624
Lawrence Ricks 5.1 2,651
Mike Hart 5.0 5,040

This list is missing Michigan's all-time best YPC rusher—Denard Robinson at 6.2—but does reveal that Michigan hasn't been able to run the ball like they're "supposed to" since the mid-90s. Getting the run game up to those levels, the Stanford levels, is priority 1 for Harbaugh.

ELSEWHERE

I have not read my feed reader, I confess. For a UV.

Comments

matty blue

January 3rd, 2017 at 11:12 AM ^

it's easy to construct a scenario in which we make the playoff with literally no difference in our regular season.  would a berth in the national championship playoff qualify as a 'very good season,' regardless of how a playoff game turned out?  of course it would.

Blue and Joe

January 2nd, 2017 at 12:50 PM ^

People need to understand that 99.9999% of the time you are going to fall short. That's how sports work. When Brian predicted 12-0 he admitted it was stupid to do so. Perfect seasons don't happen very often (unless you're Alabama). If you expect perfection in sports you are going to be disapointed.

The season didn't go how we hoped. It rarely does. But that is what makes it so special when everything goes right. That day is coming.

SeattleWolverine

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:07 PM ^

Given that there are about 60 Power 5 schools and probably ~25 that have the resources to win a national championship, I am not sure that I like your 1 in a million odds of not falling short. Can we go with like 96% of the time instead? Because I really don't want to wait until 1,001,997 A.D. for another national championship. 

CalifExile

January 2nd, 2017 at 3:40 PM ^

My hope/expectation for Harbaugh is that he recruits every year like the 2016 class. If he does, in 2 or 3 years he will be competing for the NC every year. Somewhere between 15-20 players in that class are championship caliber. Keep that up and we'll be challenging Alabama even if they have a higher ranked class every year.

matty blue

January 3rd, 2017 at 11:32 AM ^

yes, we should be able to pull in a top-five recruiting class most years, and i expect we will...

the challenge is that we will be competing on the field and in recruiting against schools (cough, ohio state, cough) that are...oh, how should i say this...not against throwing a car at a recruit here and there, or free tattoos.  or that might not have the same academic standards that we do.  that's an inherent competitive disadvantage that can only be made up with great coaching, and probably not on a year-in, year-out basis.  most years, sure, and when things break right we can make a true run at a national championship.  but probably not every single year.

CalifExile

January 3rd, 2017 at 12:23 PM ^

My reasoning is that you can only put 11 guys on the field at a time. If we put 11 Bredesons, Peters and DPJs on the field, followed by 11 Garys, Peppers and Longs, we can compete with Alabama and OSU, USC, ND and Oklahoma. Anybody. We have thos guys in last year's class and look to be on track for the same this year. 35 championship quality guys in 2 classes is a great foundation for a team to challenge for the NC. Match it in 2018 and 2019 and it will be even odds for the title every year.

Blue in PA

January 2nd, 2017 at 12:50 PM ^

Frustrating that our top rated defense needed a stop against Iowa, against osu, against FSU.... and couldn't prevent the final game winning (or tying) drive.

 

Yes, the future is bright, yes JH is righting the ship, but its still going to be a long 8 months to live with that 1-3 finish to the season.  

In reply to by Blue in PA

Blue2000

January 2nd, 2017 at 3:04 PM ^

Frustrating that our top rated defense needed a stop against Iowa, against osu, against FSU.... and couldn't prevent the final game winning (or tying) drive.

 

Putting the Iowa and OSU losses on the defense because of the last drives is awfully short-sighted, when they stoned both those teams throughout each game but got no help from the offense.  There were more coverage busts in the FSU game, but even then, the defense played well enough to win, and the offense was mostly impotent.  

Big Boutros

January 2nd, 2017 at 12:51 PM ^

Good summary. I have read on a few boards how this is a "peak roster year" and I just find that silly. This will probably be the worst roster Harbaugh will ever have at Michigan, not one of the best. I understand that the DL was deep and extraordinary. They are an all-time position group. The others were not.

Speight's sputtering end to the season was not entirely his fault because of the injury, but we would have loved to have Jake Rudock against Iowa, OSU, or FSU.

Mason Cole has been a stalwart since his true freshman season, but we would have loved to have Graham Glasgow against Iowa, OSU, or FSU.

Dymonte Thomas vs. Jarrod Wilson. Healthy Junior Chesson vs. Hobbled Senior Chesson. 

The record was the same, but the team did improve. The program is getting closer. The metrics would say we already made it to the promised land. All we need, IMO, is an improved offensive line and a true #1 RB. The latter might be just days away in Najee Harris. The former could take longer but there's no reason to doubt its arrival.

Cole - Bredeson - Ruiz - Onwenu - Filiaga. I would roll with that. Younger than any other OL in the B1G, probably, but immensely talented.

westwardwolverine

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:02 PM ^

Eh, dunno about that. 

This was a legitimately great defense. I doubt Harbaugh will ever have one that much better. 

Offense was probably above average but didn't have one of the four things you need to pull out close games: A great OL, a great RB, a great WR or a great QB. 

umchicago

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:30 PM ^

i agree that the offense was above average; however, talent-wise it will end up being well below average for a harbaugh team.  it's already proving to be so with the upcoming class.

the defense, though, will be hard to equal or surpass.  talented and experienced.  they gave up only 4 or 5 big plays all year.  unfortunately, a few of them came in that bowl game.

westwardwolverine

January 2nd, 2017 at 2:20 PM ^

To me it just feels like the offense lacked that one piece to be complete. 

Jake Butt is clearly a great TE, but its hard for a TE to be a centerpiece. 

If you have a star WR, Chesson/Darboh are an excellent 2/3 combo. As it was, they were good, but as Brian noted, couldn't pull off those big plays late in important games (Even Butt dropped a few catches that he normally wouldn't).

The Speight/Smith combo would have been fine if we had a great OL. The OL would have been fine if one of Speight/Smith was a star. 

If this Sam Webb projection is correct and this class ends up with DPJ and Harris...lot of problems are going to be solved very quickly. 

snarling wolverine

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:57 PM ^

Not sure if we really had above-average talent on offense.  If you're comparing them to the entire country, sure, but in comparison to the top 25, probably not.  I think the coaches got a lot out of a group that, other than Butt, didn't really have any standout players.

We did have an excellent defense, but I have a lot of confidence in Don Brown to deliver similar defenses in the future - maybe not next year given our youth, but in 2018, perhaps.

YoOoBoMoLloRoHo

January 2nd, 2017 at 2:33 PM ^

It's hard to have a defense much better than this one. However, I think future units will be better in certain aspects because they will be faster and add more playmakers. Gedeon, Thomas, Hill and even Lewis & Peppers were very good at everything but generating turnovers. Put a ball hawk like Malik Hooker on this roster and some of Barrett's or Beathard's weak passes more likely produce a pick 6 to put a dagger in them. Put a speed blitzed like Tim Williams opposite Taco on 3rd down and the pass rush would have been lethal. But the one thing that can make the D even better ... a dependable running game to rest the D for stretches and squeeze the life from opponents in the 4th quarter.

Don

January 2nd, 2017 at 2:47 PM ^

This is like concluding in January of 1971 that Schembechler would never have a better defense than his 1970 squad. He did in the very next season, and then again in '72.

The whole "welp, this is the best opportunity we'll ever have under Harbaugh and we blew it" line of thinking after just two seasons is just fucking bizarre.

westwardwolverine

January 2nd, 2017 at 6:56 PM ^

That isn't what I said. I said it would be harder to have a defense much better than this one because this one was a truly great defense. Could Don Brown have as good or a marginally better one? Sure. But its tough to top because it was right up there with the 1997 team. 

The TEAM could be much better because the offensive talent can obvious improve tremendously. Even if the defense never quite reached the level of this year's squad, the overall team could be much better. 

schreibee

January 3rd, 2017 at 1:41 AM ^

That's the line I called for next year, but with Ulizio at RT instead of Filiaga. I don't think they're rolling with 2 true Frosh on the OL.

But UMbig11 says Cole stays at C in the coaches optimum scenario. He didn't think they'd put any of the '17 recruits in at least to start.

I argued Ruiz is the man, and his ability to play C right out of the shoot frees up the abilityto move a lot of pieces around to where they can best help.

Can't wait - long 8 months ahead. Rememer when hoops helped the offseason glide by more smoothly? Way back 3-4 years ago..

Michigan Arrogance

January 2nd, 2017 at 12:52 PM ^

the OL is clearly the big stone tied to the team trying to float to the top of the football landscape. They haven't been good in almost any games against decent to good front 7s. Every M OL in the last 1o years has had at least 2 big ?s and maybe other complete "meh" players in addition. The future 1-2 years looks to be the same. The hope is Harbaugh let QB development and an influx of top level talent at the skill positions, in addition to absolutely suffocating D, will mitigate the OL issues. I have my doubts. we will likely have 2-3 losses each of the next 2 years.

I'm also not expecting Najee Harris to commit to a team with this OL. Why would he?

 

 

Brimley

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:31 PM ^

Najee could step in as The Man from the time he hits campus v. duking it out for playing time with several other great backs in Bama.  Cook showed that a talented back can still make plays with a meh Oline.  Further, I'm not as pessimistic about the future of the line as you are.  They'll be damned young, but come in with a lot of talent.

umchicago

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:35 PM ^

you may be right.  i see a step back, but we may be able to wiggle another 10-3 season like we did in 2015.

however, i disagree about 2018.  this team will be locked and loaded.  i think the D could approach 2016 level. and the offense will have, at worst, an experienced senior speight or a seasoned peters.  plus, there will be legit gamechanges at WR, TE and RB (with or w/o harris).  with a servicable OL, the 2018 offense should be much better than 2016.

6tyrone6

January 2nd, 2017 at 12:53 PM ^

that I could watch UM games with confidence we could play with teams.  Any other coach we could have possibly have had the last 2 years would have had us at about 7-8 wins, and recruiting classes around 20th. We will have a developing year next year, watching top talent progress, then be back in the conversation 2018 and 2019 for sure. Our recruiting class in 2014 was 20th and 2015 37th. Last year 6th and this year 3-4th. Pretty sure OSU and FSU have been top 10 in recruiting 4-5 years in a row. Hard to compete with that with average or bad recruiting clasees.

Ronnie Kaye

January 2nd, 2017 at 12:58 PM ^

Hoke Hoke Hoke Brandon Brandon Hoke Brandon Hoke Hoke

So tired of Brian blaming people who aren't here anymore. He's been doing that for a very long time.

 

WolverBean

January 2nd, 2017 at 2:23 PM ^

Harbaugh seems to go away from using plays that work before they stop working. I wonder if this is in part due to time spent in the NFL against better coaches (and players) who have both the practice time and the experience to catch on very quickly to what you're doing. Could Harbaugh be in the habit of giving our opponents too much credit? I read choosing not to run the fullback dive on the 1 yard line as the offensive staff figuring that with a month to prepare, FSU would have been anticipating Michigan's most obvious playcall in that situation. In fact, FSU was out on jet skis instead of in the film room, and from the replay, it looked like the dive would have worked. Seems like our staff outsmarts itself sometimes. Still, I'd much rather that than Hoke-ian "we will run this until it works" despite repeated evidence that it's not going to work.

Connecticut Wo…

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:00 PM ^

Thanks for the quality perspective, Brian.  Three coaching changes in less than a decade is a curse from which we can all attest it's difficult to recover.  We're still feeling the effects of the transitions (i.e., quality roster depth) and some poor OL recruiting evaluation and development specifically in the Hoke/Funk years. The status of our team, at "85%" of championship-caliber, is much more optimistic than that of our foes.  OSU has no excuse for not being competitive in that game.  Top three recruiting classes and favorable treatment and they put up a score that connotes something less than 85% of championship-caliber.  While it may take another year to get to the vision that Harbaugh, his staff and we all share, I prefer our trajectory over what appears to be complacency (i.e., OSU), incompetence (i.e., ND), or whatever MSU is calling their problem these days.

westwardwolverine

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:02 PM ^

Question about the OL:

Weren't they generally considered good until Iowa? I remember they had issues with Colorado, but played well against Wisconsin and Penn State. What happened? 

stephenrjking

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:56 PM ^

They were ok, not great against Wisconsin. I think the jury was still out after that game; we only scored 14 points, after all. Penn State got lit up, but they were pulling guys off of the street to play LB. 

There were real worries as early at the Colorado game about how the OL and other facets of the team would handle elite DLs. It continued to crop up throughout the season--if an intereior DL was a dangerman, Michigan would have trouble with him. Malike McDowell absolutely destroyed Mason Cole a couple of times in EL, for example.

By the conclusion of the MSU game I had concluded that our team might be good enough to make the playoff, but that an elite DL like Clemson or Bama would wreck our line. That seems to have been the case.

Although I'm pretty sure we wouldn't get shut out by Clemson.

Nolongerusingaccount

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:04 PM ^

Some of the fellow commenters are losing their shit. Get a grip. I don't always agree with Brian, but his post was spot on.

I went to undergrad during Carr's years, including the NC year, and every one of those teams had more offensive talent than this one. Coaching is not the issue at all. In fact, I'm probably more optimistic as a fan than I've ever been because I've seen how talent can be wasted (96, 99, 00, 03). This year was not that situation.

Harbaugh is the best coach I have seen at Michigan and one of the best in college football, period. Admittedly, I never watched Bo teams, but I do remember watching some Moeller coached teams. You have to be absolutely insane if you believe coaching is the issue.

Separately, Urban Meyer is an elite coach too notwithstanding the clunker of a semifinal. It's not going to be easy, but if and when, all the pieces come together and Michigan wins a NC, it will be pretty fucking glorious.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Rufus X

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:05 PM ^

Every team in the College football playoff had either a great RB or a great QB, or both. We had neither. And we really don't have one in the wings (that anyone outside of Schembechler Hall is aware of, anyway). In Harbaugh We Trust, but that needs to change in a hurry or get used to Top 10 but not Top 4 finishes.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Sopwith

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:18 PM ^

is something like a necessary precondition to having a great RB or QB. If you don't have the holes or the clean pocket, an otherwise great RB or QB will rarely ever produce like one.

Those positions are also easier to recruit in the sense you just need to hit the mark on a single one out of several recruiting years, and a QB or RB can often can step in to produce immediately.

An OL, in contrast, depends on years of competent evaluation, signing, and coaching of multiple players across several classes. They just take longer to grow as a crop, and a bad cycle or two can be devastating for years to come.

umchicago

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:41 PM ^

seriously?  at QB peters was one of the best in his class.  and speight isn't going to get worse with more experience. add mccaffery this year.  at RB walker was one of the best in his class. plus, evans has shown gamebreaking ability.  and what if harris comes?  factor in the WRs in this class too.  this team will have plenty of playmakers in a year or two.

Muttley

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:20 PM ^

Good teams, but always the bridesmaid in some form.  I'll take the chances of an improving team on the doorstep over blowing it up and starting over.

The alternative to Harbaugh is an inferior coach, and fortunately the Jed Yorks who come out to post aren't making any decisions, just noise.

Wolvie3758

January 2nd, 2017 at 1:20 PM ^

They keep LOSING the big games with late collapses...MSU last year and the 3 games this year..its a very DISTURBING trend..Always the bridesmaid and never the Bride...When we went up 30-27 with 1:57 left I KNEW we were going to lose because we always lose these types of game..It wa SO predictable