Hello: Luke Schoonmaker Comment Count

Ace

Michigan picked up a commitment out of left field—or, more accurately, the right coast—this evening when Hamden (CT) Hamden Hall tight end Luke Schoonmaker announced he'll be a Wolverine.

He's flown almost entirely under the radar; two of the four recruiting sites don't have profiles for him, and the other two have one article and zero scouting reports between them. He's apparently held his Michigan offer since participating in last month's Sacred Heart satellite camp.

Schoonmaker is the 11th commit in the 2018 class and the first at tight end, a position of significant need.

GURU RATINGS

Scout Rivals ESPN 247 247 Comp
3*, #78 TE,
#1748 Ovr
NR TE NR TE 3*, 86, #32 TE,
#762 Ovr
NR TE

At the time of this writing, Schoonmaker doesn't even have a Rivals or ESPN profile. I'm assuming 247 and Scout have given his film a once-over since there are no in-person game or camp reports; the former has him as a middle-of-the-pack three-star, the latter essentially left him unranked.

Schoonmaker apparently doesn't lack for size. Both 247 and Scout list him at 6'6", 225.

[Hit THE JUMP for scouting, video, and more.]

SCOUTING

Since we don't have scouting reports, let's take a look at Schoonmaker's film. The first catch: he mostly plays quarterback for his high school team. The other catch: he's way, way better than the Connecticut small-school competition. Here are his midseason junior highlights:

And here is a single-game reel from the NEPSAC Mike Atkins Bowl (Class C championship), in which Schoonmaker capped Hamden Hall's 11-0 season with 203 yards and two scores passing and an additional 102 yards and two TDs on just five carries. The first play of the reel is Hamden Hall's first offensive snap; Schoonmaker runs in a QB sneak... from 87 yards out:

Most of the clips are of Schoonmaker at quarterback, so I jotted down some notes on the plays he lined up at tight end (timestamps from the first video):

1:00 — Good burst off the line, finds space up the seam, goes up for ball but not the cleanest high-point

1:19 — Gets pancake but only after losing initial block; poor initial pop then stops feet on contact; runner forced to bounce into likely TFL

2:55 — Wide open on short crossing route, underthrow takes him to ground on catch

3:05 — Better job of getting pop and moving feet on block, doesn’t sustain it

7:20 — Wide open again on deep crossing route, clean catch on high throw

7:36 — Good initial contact, stops his feet, loses defender for what appears to be a TFL (play cuts away early)

7:46 — Not a clean route (rounded off at break) but nice snag in some traffic

He looks to have good straight-line speed, and while he doesn't have a lot of wiggle, he's got yards-after-catch potential in that rumbling Jake Butt-like fashion—he can juke just enough to keep from getting hit square, at which point he can run through tackles from smaller defenders. I was impressed with his feel for the game; he makes good reads as both a thrower and runner, and while he won't make those same reads as a tight end, that football IQ will help him out. He also shows good vision as a runner.

He's certainly got the requisite size for the position. There's far too small a sample to get a feel for his hands, but on most of his catches he does a solid job of high-pointing and plucking the ball away from his body. He'll have a lot of work to do from a technical aspect, both as a receiver and blocker. He rounds off his routes; those cuts need to be a lot sharper to gain separation against better defenses. When blocking he shows a habit of stopping his feet upon initial contact, which causes him to lose a couple blocks that doom edge runs.

Schoonmaker is a developmental prospect, both because of his current level of competition and his relative lack of experience at the position he'll play in college. It's still easy to see why the coaches like him; he's got an intriguing combination of size, athleticism, and feel for the game. He's got the all-around athleticism this staff covets; in addition to being a pretty solid quarterback, he's a pitcher/1B on the baseball team.

OFFERS

Schoonmaker holds offers from Indiana, Rutgers, Temple, UConn, ECU, UMass, Miami (NTM), and Toledo, according to 247

HIGH SCHOOL

According to the Rivals database, Schoonmaker would be Hamden Hall's only FBS signee since at least 2002. Michigan has only had 13 players from Connecticut in program history, most notably early Bo fullback Fritz Seyferth; the only to hail from Hamden was guard John E. Maturo, who suited up from 1946-48.

STATS

According to MaxPreps, Schoonmaker caught five passes for 111 yards and two touchdowns as a junior. He also went 55-for-92 for 878 yards (9.5 YPA) with five TDs and five INTs while adding 623 yards and 13 TDs on 53 rushes (11.7 YPC).

FAKE 40 TIME

Schoonover's Hudl page lists an unsourced 40 time of 4.58 seconds, which gets four FAKEs out of five. That time would've been good for sixth among tight ends at this year's NFL Combine. While Schoonover looks fast for a tight end, that would be an elite electronic time.

VIDEO

More single-game reels can be found on his Hudl page.

PREDICTION BASED ON FLIMSY EVIDENCE

Other than a probable redshirt, it's hard to predict how Schoonmaker's career will go given the limited available video (and the competition level). With his size and athleticism, he's got plenty of upside as a tight end; he'll also need a lot of development, especially as a blocker. He'll likely end up on a similar track as Sean McKeon, another tight end from an East Coast state not known for its high school football.

Ian Bunting, TJ Wheatley, Nick Eubanks, and McKeon (plus Zach Gentry) are slated to be on the roster when Schoonmaker arrives, so there shouldn't be any need for him to see the field right away. He'll work on refining his game and bulking up for a couple of years before vying for playing time, likely as a flex TE in the mold of Butt and Bunting; if he can't block well enough to play at all in-line, he could also try going the Gentry route and making it as an oversized receiver.

UPSHOT FOR THE REST OF THE CLASS

This won't end Michigan's pursuit of tight ends. Texas four-star Mustapha Muhammad remains a solid bet to end up in the class, and Illinois four-star Luke Ford took a campus visit last weekend that reportedly vaulted the Wolverines towards the top of his list. After Devin Asiasi's early departure and Gentry's move to wideout, the coaches will want a second true TE in the class, possibly even a third if Muhammad and Ford both want in and they have the room.

Here's the class as it currently stands:

Comments

Wee-Bey Brice

July 26th, 2017 at 8:25 AM ^

But if that's apparent to you, what makes you think it never occurred to Harbaugh or any of his staff? They don't prioritize based on rankings.

When I watched Ford's tape I thought his movements were pretty stiff. I read the scouting reports, etc, and then my eyes told me something different. Harbaugh probably does the same thing and prioritizes based on his eyes. He saw this kid in person and thought he was good enough to take with Ford still on the board. Thats good enough for me.

Mr Miggle

July 26th, 2017 at 8:25 AM ^

I was thinking of Jay Riemersma, but they were both recruited as QBs and switched after a few years. Riemersma switched to TE as a redhirt junior after a rotator cuff injury and played 9 seasons in the NFL. 

brianntb

July 25th, 2017 at 10:45 PM ^

Michigan coaches can coach up. But damn, wish they'd start pulling in 5 stars, not barely 3 stars. This is Michigan fergodsakes. That said, I hope for the best. 

FatGuyTouchdown

July 25th, 2017 at 10:47 PM ^

is doing. I think at this point we have enough evidence to suggest that Harbaugh is targeting guys from the New England area as an area of opportunity. Connecticutt and Massachusetts have sent 10 guys to the NFL over the last 5 NFL drafts, most of them underscouted and under recruited. It'll never be a football factory, but if you can basically lock down the occasional top end talent, mix that with New Jersey, in state, and Georgia, and oh boy. 

CommandoInKhakis

July 26th, 2017 at 6:19 AM ^

that might help you understand your poor logic:
 
It’s caveman times, and we’re traveling to our caves.  The caves are to the north, and the way we get there is we look for mossy trees.  Since moss grows on the north side of trees, we generally get back to the caves.
 
Sometimes, though, moss grows on the east side of trees.  We sometimes follow one of these misleading trees and get lost.
 
Then one day some genius comes along and he invents the compass.  Since everything is a competition for this dude, he doesn’t tell everyone he has a compass.  The observant people start to notice, though, that the guy never gets lost.  When they see him diverge from the group, they don’t question it because they understand he knows what he’s doing.
 
The unobservant people—they are another story.  They get upset.  "Hey!  Look at that guy. WTF, doesn’t he know it's a proven fact that the mossy side of trees is correlated with north and therefore he should follow the moss?!!”  
 
The end.
 
Symbolism in this story:
 
Guy with compass: Jim Harbaugh
WTF guy: Gucci Mane

newtopos

July 26th, 2017 at 6:52 AM ^

The problem with your "analogy" is that Harbaugh's "compass," as well as the compasses of Nick Saban, Urban Meyer, Jimbo Fischer, David Shaw, Mark Richt, Bobby Petrino, Mark Dantonio, Brian Kelly, Paul Chryst, David Cutliffe, Kirby Smart, and James Franklin all said that the moss belonged with Jeremy Ruckert, a top-50 player overall (top-11 to 247Sports), who has just committed to Ohio State.  

I do think Harbaugh has a great eye for talent.  I think it is safe to say that Luke Schoonmaker, who only received an offered in the past two months, was not at the top of Harbaugh's board.  I hope he is a huge success, and it looks like he has a lot of raw potential (which means it will take time and development to him to flourish).  

Better analogy: Harbaugh has a very good ability to scout talent and find diamonds in the rough.  But it's nice to be able to walk into Tiffany's and simply get the best, most exclusive diamond, which does not need to be cut, polished, etc.  Michigan needs its share of the Jabrill Peppers and Rashan Garys of the world, and cannot rely solely on diamonds in the rough if it wants to beat Ohio State or Alabama.

WolvinLA2

July 26th, 2017 at 10:16 AM ^

But we already missed on Ruckert, so that's a moot point now. Harbaugh wanted him too. And we aren't relying solely on diamonds in the rough. But no one liked Metellus a couple cycles ago and he'll be a starter this fall, looked good in the bowl as a true frosh. There are other examples like this. It's not like Harbaugh is ignoring the top talent for these under the radar guys. He's still getting plenty of top ranked guys. But when he sees a guy he likes, he offers. And some of the time those guys beat out lots of guys ranked ahead of them.

newtopos

July 26th, 2017 at 10:50 AM ^

The poster was suggesting that other top coaches were led astray by following the mere rules of thumb of rankings (moss), whereas Harbaugh has a compass that always shows him true north.  The suggestion that others were led astray in targeting Ruckert seems silly, given that he was also a higher priority for Harbaugh.  Also, even if Harbaugh has a perfect eye for talent, that doesn't mean he is always able to land the recruits he thinks would be most valuable to the team.  I'm not complaining about his approach or Michigan's recruiting, but the reality is that our primary rival is in our division, is now recruiting at Alabama levels, and currently holds an advantage over us when it comes to recruiting elite recruits (e.g., 10 players in the top 60 in 2016 for OSU, versus 2 for us).  It is okay to be disappointed about losing out in recruiting battles versus OSU, and fairy tales about magical compasses do not actually create a world in which everything that happens in recruiting is always the best of all possible outcomes for Michigan. 

dragonchild

July 26th, 2017 at 6:31 AM ^

If you're a 3-star in Texas, it's because 100 scouts have dropped by to watch your team and you haven't stood out.

A 3-star from New England means no one knows anything about you other than you're the best player on the best team in the state not known for football.

Not to say this guy's going to be a stud but this is a case where the ranking has no bearing on his upside.  Also, it's not just Harbaugh. . . Don Brown knows this area well.

reddogrjw

July 26th, 2017 at 8:27 AM ^

Benjamin St. Juste was low rated, went to camps, bumped up

 

Someone like Paea would have had a higher rating had he gone to camps

 

we have 11 commits - 8 are 4-stars

the 9th is #435 (he's been climbing) and a 4-star on at least one site

this is our 10th rated and he's #601 and the #1 player in Connecticut - with only one service rating him - he will probably bump up but if not no biggie

 

while you cannot take an entire class of guys like this, getting a couple each year that Michigan identified before others is a great way to recruit - so many players blow up once Michigan offers - look at Shough as an example

 

people going crazy over his rating are silly - if the class averages around .9 in the composite we'll be fine

Khaleke The Freak

July 26th, 2017 at 10:24 AM ^

Reminds me of Steuber, who wasn't highly regarded nationally but the coaching staff was very high on him. I think he was the #1 player in Connecticut last year and he'll probably be a part of the two deep as a true FR. Not saying Schoonmaker will contribute as a FR but I like how the staff is plucking the No.1 players in their respective states from the NE area.

Mr Mxyzptlk

July 26th, 2017 at 8:36 AM ^

I somewhat agree with you.  Five stars and high four stars are generally going to prove to be great prospects.  But as we all know, Harbaugh sees the world differently.  His board is different than than those at Scout, Rivals etc.  Look at his track record at Stanford and how many two and three star kids he put in the NFL.

BlueCube

July 26th, 2017 at 10:14 PM ^

an understatement.

You're juding a commit from a small state that is ignored for the most part by recruiting services based on star ranking over a coach who has proven he knows talent.

Your take is really old.

I hope to hell his friends and family don't read this. Welcome to Michigan where most the board shits on you on the way in. This is an embarrassment. At least start a different thread to treat him like shit.

 

Blue Sharpie

July 25th, 2017 at 11:06 PM ^

Sounds like a very good athlete in multiple sports- a Harbaugh guy. You know they like him a lot with so few spots left in 2018. Probably just needs to put on some muscle. Deserves a shot on name alone "schoonmaker"! "Schoooooon" like "Dooooom"

ak47

July 25th, 2017 at 11:07 PM ^

Anyone who isn't disappointed going from hopefully ruckert to this guy is lying to themselves. Strange to de this kid as a take this early in a small class, hard to believe the staff couldn't have reeled him in later after seeing more how the class shapes up. This current recruiting cycle is pretty underwhelming relative to what other top recruiting schools do with small classes.

BoFlex

July 26th, 2017 at 12:41 AM ^

That's not a bad average rating in the grand scheme of things, but it doesn't help that the main rival is raking in another outrageous class with an average rating of 95.70.

To put that into perspective if Ohio State's average class rating was a recruit, it would be the #93 overall recruit in the nation on 247Composite. Michigan's 90.91 would be the #263 overall recruit.

Pepto Bismol

July 26th, 2017 at 10:19 AM ^

What's the difference between 90.91 and 95.70?  I can tell you, definitively, that it's 4.79.  That's almost 5. 

OSU recruits have an extra 5.  Honestly, how can we expect to compete?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goggles Paisano

July 26th, 2017 at 8:33 PM ^

The difference in #93 and #263 is a very fine line.  And even moreso a finer line given that these kids haven't even played their senior seasons yet.  Our success is coming and it isn't based on the final grade of the 4 major recruiting sites.  

HL2VCTRS

July 26th, 2017 at 7:42 AM ^

Why do we have to be disappointed to go from Ruckert to this guy? Why can't we be disappointed that we missed out on a top flight prospect like Ruckert and then he intrigued by picking up a guy who seems to have all the tools (undeveloped) and could potentially be a solid TE in a few years. Being excited about one doesn't mean we aren't dissapointed about the other. Let's look at each recruit for what they bring instead of shitting on them because they aren't somebody else. It's not lying to ourselves.

Mr Miggle

July 26th, 2017 at 8:49 AM ^

It does not seem fair to compare this kid to him. Let's accept the staff likes Schoonmaker a lot more than his recruiting profile. They could have pushed for some higher ranked recruits instead after Ruckert went off the board. We know laziness isn't the reason they didn't. Nor is it desperation at this date.  

I wouldn't assume we can just have our pick of lower ranked recruits late in the cycle. That's a risk too, especially with an out of region player.